Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrami, P.C. (1985). Dimensions of effective college instruction. Review of Higher Education 8: 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C. (1988), SEEQ and ye shall find: A review of Marsh’s ‘‘Students’ evaluation of university teaching.’’ Instructional Evaluation 9: 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C. (1989a). How should we use student ratings to evaluate teaching? Research in Higher Education 30: 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C. (1989b). SEEQing the truth about student ratings of instruction. Educational Researcher 43: 43–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C., Cohen, P.A., and d’Apollonia, S. (1988). Implementation problems in meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 58: 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C., and d’Apollonia, S. (1990). The dimensionality of ratings and their use in personnel decisions. In M. Theall and J. Franklin (eds.), Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice (New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C., and d’Apollonia, S. (1991). Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness—generalizability of ‘‘N=1’’ research: Comments on Marsh. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C., d’Apollonia, S., and Rosenfield, S. (1993). The Dimensionality of Student Ratings of Instruction: Introductory Remarks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C., d’Apollonia, S., and Rosenfield, S. (1996). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In J.C. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 11). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrami, P.C., Leventhal, L., and Perry R.P. (1982). Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research 52: 446–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. (1987). Student rating myths versus research facts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 1: 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrecht, J.D. (1981). Reliability, validity and generalizability of student ratings of instruction. (IDEA Paper No. 6). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 213 296)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M.B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students’ Intellectual Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, S.E., and Scott, O. (1976). A Comparison of the Criterion Validity of Two Types of Student Response Inventories for Appraising Instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, B., Bonge, D., and Marr, J. (1979). Ratings of instruction, examination performance, and subsequent enrollment in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology 6: 82–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1977). Investment in Learning: The Individual and Social Value of American Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L.A., Brandenburg, D.C., and Ory, J.C. (1984). Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: A Practical Guide. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L.A., Caulley, D., and Costin, F. (1979). Student ratings and instructor self-ratings and their relationship to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 16: 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp, L.A., and Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T.E., Tarver, D.A., Kelley, H.P., Liberty, P.G., Jr., and Dickerson, A.D. (1971). Dimensions underlying student ratings of courses and instructors at the University of Texas at Austin: Instructor Evaluation Form 2. (Research Bulletin RB-71-4). Austin, Texas: University of Texas at Austin, Measurement and Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, R. (1974). Teacher evaluations and student learning: A reexamination. Journal of Educational Research 68: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E. (1988). Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of the Research. (IDEA Paper No. 20). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. In M. Theall and J. Franklin (eds.), Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice (New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E. (1995). Student Ratings of Teaching: The Research Revisited. (IDEA Paper No. 32). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E., and Clegg, V.L. (1987). Are Student Ratings of Different Academic Fields Different? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 286 935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E., and Downey, R.G. (1992). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E., Downey, R.G., and Sixbury, G.R. (1994). Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives: Reply to Marsh. Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 649–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E., and Sixbury, G.R. (1993). Comparative Data by Academic Field. (IDEA Technical Report No. 8). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J.A. (1975). Colleagues as raters of classroom instruction. Journal of Higher Education 46: 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J.A. (1977). Student ratings of instruction and their relationship to student learning. American Educational Research Journal 14: 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J.A. (1979). Determining Faculty Effectiveness: Assessing Teaching, Research, and Service for Personnel Decisions and Improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J.A. (1989). Faculty evaluation and faculty development in higher education. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 5). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, C.I., and Keene, J.M., Jr. (1979). Validity of student ratings of faculty. (Indiana Studies in Higher Education No. 40). Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University, Bureau of Evaluation Studies and Testing, Division of Research and Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 169 870).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A.W., and Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity (2nd edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, E.B. (1956). Construction of a Forced-choice University Instructor Rating Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P.A. (1980a). A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P.A. (1980b). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education 13: 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P.A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement. Review of Educational Research 51: 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P.A. (1987). A Critical Analysis and Reanalysis of the Multisection Validity Meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 283 876)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.H., and Berger, W.G. (1970). Dimensions of students’ ratings of college instructors underlying subsequent achievement on course examinations. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 5: 605–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F. (1978). Do student ratings of college teachers predict student achievement? Teaching of Psychology 5: 86–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F., Greenough, W.T., and Menges, R. J. (1971). Student ratings of college teaching: Reliability, validity and usefulness. Review of Educational Research 41: 511–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, K.S., and Norr, J.L. (1973). Student values and teacher evaluation: A problem in person perception. Sociometry 36: 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Apollonia, S., and Abrami, P.C. (1987). An Empirical Critique of Metaanalysis: The Literature on Student Ratings of Instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Apollonia, S., and Abrami, P.C. (1988). The Literature on Student Ratings of Instruction: Yet Another Meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Apollonia, S., Abrami, P.C., and Rosenfield, S. (1993). The Dimensionality of Student Ratings of Instruction: A Meta-Analysis of the Factor Studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K.O., Jr. (1972). Construction and Evaluation of Scale for Rating College Instructors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K.O., Jr. (1975). Student Evaluation of Instruction. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K.O., Jr. (1983). Evaluating Teaching. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K.O., Jr., and Crichton, L.I. (1978). Student, peer, and self evaluation of college instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 70: 815–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K.O., Jr., and Whitely, S.E. (1974). Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching. American Educational Research Journal 11: 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., and Quinlan, K. (1991). The Teaching Portfolio: Capturing the Scholarship in Teaching. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D.N. (1950). Characteristics and relationship of various criteria of college and university teaching. Purdue University Studies in Higher Education 70: 5–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N.R., and Rickard, H.C. (1977). Evaluating the teaching of introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology 4: 128–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellner, C.L., and Barnes, C.P. (1983). Studies of College Teaching: Experimental Results, Theoretical Interpretations, and New Perspectives. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endo, G.T., and Della-Piana, G. (1976). A validation study of course evaluation ratings. Improving College and University Teaching 24: 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1976a). Grades and college students’ evaluation of their courses and teachers. Research in Higher Education 4: 69–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1976b). The superior college teacher from the students’ view. Research in Higher Education 5: 243–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1977). Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: A review and analysis. Research in Higher Education 6: 223–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Research in Higher Education 9: 199–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1979). The significance of circumstances for college students’ ratings of their teachers and courses. Research in Higher Education 10: 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1983). Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluation they receive from students. Research in Higher Education 18: 3–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1984). Class size and college students’ evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look. Research in Higher Education 21: 45–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education 24: 139–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education 26: 227–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students’ and faculty’s view: Matched or mismatched priorities? Research In Higher Education 28: 291–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1989a). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education 30: 137–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1989b). The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies. Research in Higher Education 30: 583–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1990a). An afterword for ‘‘The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies.’’ Research in Higher Education 31: 315–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1990b). Instructional evaluation. The Teaching Professor 4: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1992). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part I—evidence from the social laboratory and experiments. Research in Higher Education 33: 317–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II—evidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34: 151–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1994). Identifying Exemplary Teaching: Evidence from Course and Teacher Evaluations. Paper commissioned by the National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment for presentation at the Second AAHE Conference on Faculty Roles and Rewards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (forthcoming). Identifying exemplary teaching: Using data from course and teacher evaluations. In M.D. Svinicki and R.J. Menges (eds.), Honoring Exemplary Teaching (New Directions for Teaching and Learning). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A., and Newcomb, T.M. (1969). The Impact of College on Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A., and Paulsen, M.B. (eds.) (1994). Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French-Lazovik, G. (1974). Predictability of students’ evaluation of college teachers from component ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, P.W. (1973). Student ratings of teaching: Validity of several rating factors. Science 182: 83–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, P.W. (1976). Validity of student instructional ratings as a function of their timing. Journal of Higher Education 47: 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, P.W., Leonard, D.W., and Beatty, W.W. (1975). Student ratings of instruction: Validation research. American Educational Research Journal 12: 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, H., 1964. Certain Factors Underlying the Relationship between Course Grades and Student Judgments of College Teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotti, R.J., and Buchtel, F.S. (1990). Attributional bias and course evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, K.C. (1971). Similarity of Student and Instructor Attitudes and Student’s Attitudes Toward Instructors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, G.E., Hazelton, A., Smith, A.B., and Ware, W.B. (1976). A study of the validity of four types of student ratings of college teaching assessed on a criterion of student achievement gains. Research in Higher Education 5: 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grush, J.E., and Costin, F. (1975). The student as consumer of the teaching process. American Educational Research Journal 12: 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J., and Goldner, N.S. (1972). The null relationship between teaching and research. Sociology of Education 45: 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J.N., and Barker, D.G. (1970). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Improving College and University Teaching 18: 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N., and Raviv, A. (1993). Using a single score for summative teacher evaluation by students. Research in Higher Education 34: 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R.G. (1978). Variables affecting university student ratings of instructor behavior. American Educational Research Journal 15: 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D.P. (1973). Measurement of instructional effectiveness. Research in Higher Education 1: 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiobu, R.M., and Pollis, C.A. (1971). Student evaluations of courses and instructors. American Sociologist 6: 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P.M., and Kitchener, K.S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, M.A., and McKeachie, W.J. (1975). The evaluation of teachers in higher education. In F.N. Kerlinger (ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 3). Itasca, II: F.E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L. (1979). Low-inference variables of teacher clarity: Effects on student concept learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 795–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L. (1981). Actual and perceived teacher clarity: Relations to student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18: 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L., and Combs, A. (1981). Teacher Clarity, Student Instructional Ratings, and Student Performance. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L., and Combs, N. (1982). Teacher behavior and student ratings. Educational and Psychological Research 2: 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L., and Smith, L.R. (1979). The effect of low inference teacher clarity inhibitors and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education 30: 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L., and Smith, L.R. (1981). College student ratings and teacher behavior: An Experimental Study. Journal of Social Studies Research 5: 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich, W.H., and Remmers, H.H. (1992). A comparison of graphic and forced-choice ratings of teaching performance at the college and university level. Purdue Universities Studies in Higher Education 92: 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, L. (1975). Teacher rating forms: Critique and reformulation of previous validation designs. Canadian Psychological Review 16: 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson-Rose, J., and Menges, R.L. (1981). Improving college teaching: A critical review of research. Review of Educational Research 51: 403–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Hommedieu, R., Menges, R.J., and Brinko, K.T. (1988). The Effects of Student Ratings Feedback to College Teachers: A Meta-analysis and Review of Research. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Center for the Teaching Professions, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Hommedieu, R., Menges, R.J., and Brinko, K.T. (1990). Methodological explanations for the modest effects of feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, J.B., and Owen, T.R. (1973). Cornell Inventory for Student Appraisal of Teaching and Courses: Manual of Instructions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Center for Improvement of Undergraduate Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 707–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11: 253–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. (1991a). Multidimensional students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. (1991b). A multidimensional perspective on students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A reply to Abrami and d’Apollonia. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. (in press). Weighting for the right criterion in the IDEA system: Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. Journal of Educational Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., and Dunkin, M.J. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional approach. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 8). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., Fleiner, H., and Thomas, C.S. (1975). Validity and usefulness of student evaluations of instructional quality. Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 833–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., and Overall, J.U. (1980). Validity of students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: Cognitive and affective criteria. Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 468–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W.J. (1979). Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe 65: 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W.J. (1987). Instructional evaluation: Current issues and possible improvements. Journal of Higher Education 58: 344–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W.J., Lin, Y-G, and Mann, W. (1971). Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies. American Educational Research Association 8: 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.I. (1972). Evaluating Faculty Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.I. (1974). Developing Programs for Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, J.J., (1976–77). Field test and validation of a teaching evaluation instrument: The Student Opinion Survey of Teaching (A report submitted to the Senate Committee for Teaching and Learning, Faculty Senate, University of Windsor). Windsor, ON: University of Windsor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W.D., and Vasché, J.D. (1978). An Educational Production Function Approach to Teaching Effectiveness and Evaluation. Journal of Economic Education 9: 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsh, J.E., Burgess, G.G., and Smith, P.N. (1956). Student achievement as a measure of instructor effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology 47: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H.G. (1980). Evaluating University Teaching: A Review of Research. Toronto: Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H.G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors in relation to six measures of college teaching effectiveness. Proceedings of the Conference on the Evaluation and Improvement of University Teaching: The Canadian Experience (pp. 43–73). Montreal: McGill University, Centre for Teaching and Learning Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H.G. (1991). Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 7). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orpen, C. (1980). Student evaluations of lecturers as an indicator of instructional quality: A validity study. Journal of Educational Research 74: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, P.H. (1967). Some Dimensions of College Teaching: An Exploratory Study Using Critical Incidents and Factor Analyses of Student Ratings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T., and Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.P. (1991). Perceived control in college students: Implications for instruction in higher education. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 7). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, W.T., and Sawrey, J.M. (1970). Student ratings of psychology professors as teachers and the research involvement of the professors rated. The Clinical Psychologist 23: 15–16, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E.F., Jr., Greenmun, R., and Tracy, R.J. (1965). Factors related to student evaluations of a college reading course. Journal of Reading 9: 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmers, H.H. (1929). The college professor as the student sees him. Purdue University Studies in Higher Education 11: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmers, H.H., Martin, F.D., and Elliott, D.N. (1949). Are students’ ratings of instructors related to their grades? Purdue University Studies in Higher Education 66: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmers, H.H., and Weisbrodt, J.A. (1964). Manual of Instructions for Purdue Rating Scale of Instruction. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Cohen, A., and Furst, N. (1973). Correlates of student preference ratings. Journal of College Student Personnel 14: 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, J., and Mitchell, H. (1970). Feeling free, student involvement, and appreciation. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 5: 623–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagen, H.B. (1974). Student, faculty, and department chairmen ratings of instructors: Who agrees with whom? Research in Higher Education 2: 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J.A., and Wiseman, R.L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education 39: 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. (1991). The Teaching Portfolio. Boston: Anker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, B.M., and associates (1986). The Teaching Dossier: A Guide to Its Preparation and Use (Rev. Ed.). Montreal: Canadian Association of University Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.R., and Land, M.L. (1980). Student perception of teacher clarity in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 11: 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sockloff, A.L. (1973). Instruments for student evaluation of faculty: Ideal and actual. In A.L. Sockloff (ed.), Proceedings of the First Invitational Conference on Faculty Effectiveness as Evaluated by Students. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Measurement and Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D., Rosenberg, L., and Bezdek, W.E. (1964). Teacher behavior and student learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 55: 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R.E. (1967). Analysis of the Instructor Rating Form—General Engineering Department. (Research Report No. 253). Urbana, II: University of Illinois, Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, S.A., and Freedman, R.D. (1979). Expected grade covariation with student ratings of instruction: Individual versus class effects. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theall, M., Franklin, J., and Ludlow, L. (1990a). Attributions and retributions: Student ratings and the perceived causes of performance. Instructional Evaluation 11: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theall, M., Franklin, J., and Ludlow, L. (1990b). Attributions or Retributions: Student Ratings and the Perceived causes of Performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.L. (1970). Good teaching and its contexts. Phi Delta Kappan 52: 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.L., and Thompson, R.P. (1974). Relationships between College Student Ratings of Instructors and Residual Learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, C. An Analysis of the 1968 Course and Instructor Evaluation Report. (Institutional Research Bulletin No. 2–68). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Measurement and Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B.D. (1968). An Investigation of Selected Variables Relative to the Manner in which a Population of Junior College Students Evaluate their Teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston,

    Google Scholar 

  • Widlak, F.W., McDaniel, E.D., and Feldhusen, J.F. (1973). Factor Analysis of an Instructor Rating Scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H.Y., Jr. (1965). College Students’ Perceptions of the Personal Traits and Instructional Procedures of Good and Poor Teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feldman, K.A. (2007). Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings1 . In: Perry, R.P., Smart, J.C. (eds) The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics