Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Bioavailability, Efficacy and Safety of MICROCORE NESC® with Calcium Carbonate and Calcium Citrate Malate in Osteopenic and Osteoporotic Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease characterized by loss of bone mass, reduced bone strength and increased bone fragility predisposing to fractures. This study was planned to evaluate the efficacy, safety and relative bioavailability of Microcore NESC® (Natural Egg Shell Calcium) in osteopenia and osteoporotic patients.

Methods

This was a randomized, open label, parallel group interventional clinical trial which included 60 study participants with osteopenia and osteoporosis who were randomized into three groups (20 each). Group 1—Microcore NESC®, Group 2—Shelcal and Group 3—CCM with 12 weeks treatment period. The participants were evaluated for relative oral bioavailability, bone mineral density (BMD), serum osteocalcin, change in VAS pain scale and quality of life—Questionnaires.

Results

There was significant improvement in the BMD T scores—post-treatment with MICROCORE NESC® and Shelcal. Higher percentage of improvement in calcium absorption as depicted by an increase in serum calcium levels (10.23%) in the MICROCORE NESC®-treated group when compared to Shelcal (7.7%) and CCM (7.2%). The relative bioavailability of MICROCORE NESC® with respect to Shelcal was 93%.

Discussion

MICROCORE NESC®, has shown a better oral relative bio availability of calcium (93%), better improvement of BMD T score compared to Shelcal and CCM. The general health status has improved to very good/excellent in 83% of patients in MICROCORE NESC®-treated group. Thus, MICROCORE NESC® can be considered a better and safe calcium supplement, as there are very few side effects observed without any clinically significant abnormalities in lab parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study will be available on request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention. (2001). diagnosis, and therapy, march 7–29 2000: Highlights of the conference. Southern Medical Journal, 94, 569–573.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles, P. (1992). Calcium absorption and calcium bioavailability. Journal of Internal Medicine, 231, 161–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reginster, J. Y., Denis, D., Bartsch, V., Deroisy, R., Zegels, B., Franchimont, P., et al. (1993). Acute biochemical variations induced by four different calcium salts in healthy male participants. Osteoporosis International, 3, 271–275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wood, R. J., & Martini, L. (2003). Reply to R. P. Heaney. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78, 493–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levenson, D. I., & Bockman, R. S. (1994). A review of calcium preparations. Nutrition Reviews, 52, 221–232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Porter, C. (2003). Vitamin and mineral supplements: Part 1. Rx Consultant., 12, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sakhaee, K., Bhuket, T., Adams-Huet, B., & Rao, D. S. (1999). Meta-analysis of calcium bioavailability: A comparison of calcium citrate with calcium carbonate. American Journal of Therapeutics, 6, 313–321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heller, H. J., Stewart, A., Haynes, S., & Pak, C. Y. (1999). Pharmacokinetics of calcium absorption from two commercial calcium supplements. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 39, 1151–1154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heaney, R. P. (2001). Factors influencing the measurement of bioavailability, taking calcium as a model. Journal of Nutrition, 131, 1334–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abrams, S.A., Copeland, K.C., Gunn, S.K., Gundberg, C.M., Klein, K.O., Ellis, K.J. (2000). Calcium absorption, bone mass accumulation, and kinetics increase during early pubertal development in girls. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 85(5):1805

  11. Shankar, K., M, S., Raizada, P., & Jain, R. (2018). A Randomized open-label clinical study comparing the efficacy, safety, and bioavailability of calcium lysinate with calcium carbonate and calcium citrate malate in osteopenia participants. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports, 8(4), 15–19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rovenský, J., Stancíková, M., Masaryk, P., Svík, K., & Istok, R. (2003). Eggshell calcium in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research, 23(2–3), 83–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruff, K. J., Winkler, A., Jackson, R. W., DeVore, D. P., & Ritz, B. W. (2009). Eggshell membrane in the treatment of pain and stiffness from osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Clinical Rheumatology, 28(8), 907–914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Benson, K. F., Ruff, K. J., & Jensen, G. S. (2012). Effects of natural eggshell membrane (NEM) on cytokine production in cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells: Increased suppression of tumor necrosis factor-α levels after in vitro digestion. Journal of Medicinal Food, 15(4), 360–368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Laird, E., Ward, M., McSorley, E., Strain, J. J., & Wallace, J. (2010). Vitamin D and bone health: Potential mechanisms. Nutrients, 2(7), 693–724.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kołodziejska, B., Stępień, N., & Kolmas, J. (2021). The influence of strontium on bone tissue metabolism and its application in osteoporosis treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(12), 6564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Castiglioni, S., Cazzaniga, A., Albisetti, W., & Maier, J. A. (2013). Magnesium and osteoporosis: Current state of knowledge and future research directions. Nutrients, 5(8), 3022–3033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Connor, J. P., Kanjilal, D., Teitelbaum, M., Lin, S. S., & Cottrell, J. A. (2020). Zinc as a therapeutic agent in bone regeneration. Materials (Basel), 13(10), 2211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fung, E. B., Kwiatkowski, J. L., Huang, J. N., Gildengorin, G., King, J. C., & Vichinsky, E. P. (2013). Zinc supplementation improves bone density in participants with thalassemia: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98(4), 960–971.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the sponsor (Microcore) and the CRO (ki3 Pvt. Ltd).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sakthi Balan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The study was sponsored by Microcore.

Ethical Standard Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the study participants.

Limitations

Sample size was small and only relative bio availability was calculated in our study. Baseline Vitamin D 3 and PTH levels could have been monitored to rule out other factors affecting calcium metabolism.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gopal, K., Deb, B., Uma, N. et al. Comparative Evaluation of Bioavailability, Efficacy and Safety of MICROCORE NESC® with Calcium Carbonate and Calcium Citrate Malate in Osteopenic and Osteoporotic Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JOIO 58, 535–541 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01117-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01117-3

Keywords

Navigation