Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized, controlled trial of two tranexamic acid dosing protocols in adult spinal deformity surgery

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an anti-fibrinolytic effective in reducing blood loss in orthopedic surgery. The appropriate dosing protocol for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two TXA protocols [low dose (L): 10 mg/kg bolus, 1 mg/kg/hr infusion; high dose (H): 50 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg/hr] in complex ASD surgery.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were ASD reconstructions with minimum 10 fusion levels or planned 3-column osteotomy (3CO). Standard demographic and surgical data were collected. Intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) was calculated by suction canisters minus irrigation plus estimated blood lost in sponges, estimated to the nearest 50 mL. Serious adverse events (SAE) were defined a priori as: venothromboembolic event (VTE), cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, renal dysfunction, and seizure. All SAE were recorded. Simple t tests compared EBL between groups. Mean EBL by total blood volume (TBV), transfusion volume, complications related to TXA were secondary outcomes.

Results

Sixty-two patients were enrolled and 52 patients completed the study; 25 were randomized to H and 27 to L. Demographic and surgical variables were not different between the two groups. EBL was not different between groups (H: 1596 ± 933 cc, L: 2046 ± 1105 cc, p = 0.12, 95% CI: − 1022 to 122 cc). EBL as a percentage of TBV was lower for the high-dose group (H: 29.5 ± 14.8%, L: 42.5 ± 26.2%, p = 0.03). Intraoperative transfusion volume (H: 961 ± 505 cc, L: 1105 ± 808 cc, p = 0.5) and post-operative transfusion volume (H: 513 ± 305 cc, L: 524 ± 245 cc, p = 0.9) were not different. SAE related to TXA were not different (p = 0.7) and occurred in 2 (8%) H and 3 (11%) L. There was one seizure (H), 2 VTE, and 2 arrhythmias.

Conclusion

No differences in EBL, transfusion volume, nor SAE were observed between H and L dose TXA protocols. High dose was associated with decreased TBV loss (13%). Further prospective study, with pharmacologic analysis, is required to determine appropriate TXA dosage in ASD surgeries.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level II.

Trial registration

The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02053363) February 3, 2014.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data

Data are not available for sharing.

References

  1. Elgafy H, Bransford RJ, McGuire RA et al (2010) Blood loss in major spine surgery: are there effective measures to decrease massive hemorrhage in major spine fusion surgery? Spine 35:S47-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d833f6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raad M, Amin R, Jain A et al (2019) Multilevel arthrodesis for adult spinal deformity: when should we anticipate major blood loss? Spine Deform 7:141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baird EO, McAnany SJ, Lu Y et al (2015) Hemostatic agents in spine surgery: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berenholtz SM, Pham JC, Garrett-Mayer E et al (2009) Effect of epsilon aminocaproic acid on red-cell transfusion requirements in major spinal surgery. Spine 34:2096–2103. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1fab2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Elwatidy S, Jamjoom Z, Elgamal E et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of prophylactic large dose of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Spine 33:2577–2580. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318188b9c5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill JB, Chin Y, Levin A et al (2008) The use of antifibrinolytic agents in spine surgery. A meta-analysis. J bone Joint Surg Am 90:2399–2407. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neilipovitz DT (2004) Tranexamic acid for major spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 13(Suppl 1):S62-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0716-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Okubadejo GO, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Aprotinin may decrease blood loss in complex adult spinal deformity surgery, but it may also increase the risk of acute renal failure. Spine 32:2265–2271. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814ce9b0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neilipovitz DT, Murto K, Hall L et al (2001) A randomized trial of tranexamic acid to reduce blood transfusion for scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg 93:82–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sethna NF, Zurakowski D, Brustowicz RM et al (2005) Tranexamic acid reduces intraoperative blood loss in pediatric patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. Anesthesiology 102:727–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro F, Zurakowski D, Sethna NF (2007) Tranexamic acid diminishes intraoperative blood loss and transfusion in spinal fusions for duchenne muscular dystrophy scoliosis. Spine 32:2278–2283. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. (2008) Cyklokapron (tranexamic acid tablets and tranexamic acid injection). http://media.pfizer.com/products/rx/rx_product_cyklokapron.jsp. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  13. Verma K, Errico T, Diefenbach C et al (2014) The relative efficacy of antifibrinolytics in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e80. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu C, Wu A, Yue Y (2012) Which is more effective in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: batroxobin, tranexamic acid or a combination? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1390-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheriyan T, Maier SP 2nd, Bianco K et al (2015) Efficacy of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding in spine surgery: a meta-analysis. Spine J 15:752–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raman T, Varlotta C, Vasquez-Montes D et al (2019) The use of tranexamic acid in adult spinal deformity: is there an optimal dosing strategy? Spine J 19:1690–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goobie SM, Meier PM, Pereira LM et al (2011) Efficacy of tranexamic acid in pediatric craniosynostosis surgery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology 114:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318210fd8f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD (2020) Morgan and Mikhail’s clinical anesthesiology cases. McGraw Hill Lange, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nadler SB, Hidalgo JH, Bloch T (1962) Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery 51:224–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH et al (2007) The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine 32:2764–2770. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a7644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Colomina MJ, Koo M, Basora M et al (2017) Intraoperative tranexamic acid use in major spine surgery in adults: a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 118:380–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Farrokhi MR, Kazemi AP, Eftekharian HR et al (2011) Efficacy of prophylactic low dose of tranexamic acid in spinal fixation surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 23:290–296. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e31822914a1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goobie SM, Zurakowski D, Glotzbecker MP et al (2018) Tranexamic acid is efficacious at decreasing the rate of blood loss in adolescent scoliosis surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:2024–2032. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Peters A, Verma K, Slobodyanyuk K et al (2015) Antifibrinolytics reduce blood loss in adult spinal deformity surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Spine 40:E443-449. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raksakietisak M, Sathitkarnmanee B, Srisaen P et al (2015) Two doses of tranexamic acid reduce blood transfusion in complex spine surgery: a prospective randomized study. Spine 40:E1257-1263. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yagi M, Hasegawa J, Nagoshi N et al (2012) Does the intraoperative tranexamic acid decrease operative blood loss during posterior spinal fusion for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 37:E1336-1342. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318266b6e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Colomina MJ, Koo M, Basora M et al (2017) Intraoperative tranexamic acid use in major spine surgery in adults: a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trialdagger. Br J Anaesth 118:380–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan QM, Zhao ZH, Xu BS (2017) Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 26:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4899-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li ZJ, Fu X, Xing D et al (2013) Is tranexamic acid effective and safe in spinal surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J 22:1950–1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2774-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma V, Katznelson R, Jerath A et al (2014) The association between tranexamic acid and convulsive seizures after cardiac surgery: a multivariate analysis in 11 529 patients. Anaesthesia 69:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hui S, Xu D, Ren Z et al (2018) Can tranexamic acid conserve blood and save operative time in spinal surgeries? A meta-analysis. Spine J 18:1325–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goobie SM, Faraoni D (2019) Tranexamic acid and perioperative bleeding in children: what do we still need to know? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 32:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin JD, Lenke LG, Shillingford JN et al (2018) Safety of a high-dose tranexamic acid protocol in complex adult spinal deformity: analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Spine Deform 6:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Xie J, Lenke LG, Li T et al (2015) Preliminary investigation of high-dose tranexamic acid for controlling intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing spine correction surgery. Spine J 15:647–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bai J, Zhang P, Liang Y et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid usage in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:390. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2762-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lu VM, Ho YT, Nambiar M et al (2018) The perioperative efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytics in adult spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 43:E949–E958. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Luo W, Sun RX, Jiang H et al (2018) The efficacy and safety of topical administration of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 13:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0815-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yerneni K, Burke JF, Tuchman A et al (2019) Topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 61:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang F, Wang K, Li FN et al (2014) Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in spinal surgery: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:448. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang B, Li H, Wang D et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative intravenous tranexamic acid use in spinal surgery. PLoS ONE 8:e55436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kalavrouziotis D, Voisine P, Mohammadi S et al (2012) High-dose tranexamic acid is an independent predictor of early seizure after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 93:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.07.085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Manji RA, Grocott HP, Leake J et al (2012) Seizures following cardiac surgery: the impact of tranexamic acid and other risk factors. Can J Anaesth 59:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9618-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Montes FR, Pardo DF, Carreno M et al (2012) Risk factors associated with postoperative seizures in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who received tranexamic acid: a case-control study. Ann Card Anaesth 15:6–12. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.91467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Murkin JM, Falter F, Granton J et al (2010) High-dose tranexamic Acid is associated with nonischemic clinical seizures in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 110:350–353. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c92b23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Levine M, Ensom MH (2001) Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed? Pharmacotherapy 21:405–409. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Direct support was received from AO Spine North America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JCC: analyzed data, drafted initial manuscript, approved final manuscript, interpretation; MHD, RCW, EF: assisted with data collection, data analysis and interpretation, approved final manuscript; LGL: design, acquisition of data, conceived initial study, assisted with data collection, approved final manuscript; MPK: conceived initial study, collected and analyzed data, critically revised manuscript, approved final manuscript, drafting, interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Clohisy, El Dafrawy, Frazier, and Ms. Wolfe report no conflicts of interest. Dr. Kelly reports research funding support to his institution paid by the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation. Dr. Lenke reports being a consultant for Medtronic (money donated to charity); receiving royalties from Medtronic and Quality Medical Publishing; receiving reimbursement for airfare and hotels from Broadwater, the Seattle Science Foundation, Stryker Spine, the Spinal Research Foundation, AOSpine, and the Scoliosis Research Society; receiving grant support from the Scoliosis Research Society (money to his institution), EOS Imaging (money to his institution), the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation (money to his institution); and receiving grant and fellowship support from AOSpine (money to his institution).

Ethical standards

Washington University IRB # 201312010.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clohisy, J.C.F., Lenke, L.G., Dafrawy, M.H.E. et al. Randomized, controlled trial of two tranexamic acid dosing protocols in adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine Deform 10, 1399–1406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00539-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00539-z

Keywords

Navigation