Abstract
The current study aims to deepen the understanding of the patterns of women’ self-silencing. Thus, we examined whether women's endorsement of conservative ideology is associated with their tendency to self-silence to sexism and whether women’s objectification by other women mediates this link. In addition, this study examines whether religiosity exerts intense pressure on women’s self-silencing to sexism and whether women’s objectification by other women mediates this link. The present cross-sectional research was conducted from September 2 to November 30, 2021. The study used a convenience (non-probabilistic) sample of 204 participants through Google forms. The self-silencing to sexism scale and the sexual objectification subscale were used as suitable devices. A between-subject, correlational design was used. Bivariate correlation was utilized to examine the relationships between variables of interest. Subsequently, a bootstrapping analysis for simple mediation models was applied. This study’s findings report that the concept of women’s objectification fully mediates the relationship between conservatism, in political or religious terms, and women’s self-silencing to sexism. Understanding what contributes to women’s self-silencing to sexism and being less prone to stand up against everyday sexism is most important for social justice and women’s quality of life.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Publicly accessible data in a repository that publishes datasets. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21893109.v1
References
Aguinis, H., Edwards, J. R., & Bradley, K. J. (2017). Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115627498
Akarsu, A. S., & Sakallı, N. (2021). The associations among self-silencing, ambivalent sexism, and perceived devaluation of women in Turkey. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02353-8
Andrade, C. (2021). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
Araújo, V., & Gatto, M. A. C. (2022). Can conservatism make women more vulnerable to violence? Comparative Political Studies, 55(1), 122–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024313
Baeza, M. J., De Santis, J. P., & Cianelli, R. (2022). A concept analysis of self-silencing. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 43(8), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2022.2053009
Baldissarri, C., Andrighetto, L., Gabbiadini, A., Valtorta, R. R., Sacino, A., & Volpato, C. (2019). Do self-objectified women believe themselves to be free? Sexual objectification and belief in personal free will. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01867
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Blofield, M., Ewig, C., & Piscopo, J. M. (2017). The reactive left: Gender equality and the Latin American pink tide. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 24(4), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxx016
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389–444). Allyn and Bacon.
Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574
Calogero, R. M. (2017). Political consciousness and gender collective action: A case and place for self-objectification. In A. L. Bos & M. C. Schneider (Eds.), The Political Psychology of Women in U.S. Politics (pp. 93–110). Routledge.
Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920
De Vries, E. E., Van der Pol, L. D., Toshkov, D. D., Groeneveld, M. G., & Mesman, J. (2022). Fathers, faith, and family gender messages: Are religiosity and gender talk related to children’s gender attitudes and preferences? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 59, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.10.002
Fincham, F. D., Cui, M., Braithwaite, S., & Pasley, K. (2008a). Attitudes toward intimate partner violence in dating relationships. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.260
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Gervais, S. J., Davidson, M. M., Styck, K., Canivez, G., DiLillo, D. (2018). The development and psychometric properties of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale—perpetration version. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000148
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x
Gothreau, M. C. (2021). Sex objects: How self-objectification undermines political efficacy and engagement. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 42(4), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1941630
Grigoropoulos, I., & Kordoutis, P. (2015). Social factors affecting antitransgender sentiment in a sample of Greek undergraduate students. International Journal of Sexual Health, 27(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2014.974792
Grigoropoulos, I. (2019). Attitudes toward same-sex marriage in a Greek sample. Sexuality & Culture, 23, 415–424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9565-8
Grigoropoulos, I. (2020). Subtle forms of prejudice in Greek day-care centres. Early childhood educators’ attitudes towards same-sex marriage and children’s adjustment in same-sex families. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(5), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1835636
Grigoropoulos, I. (2022a). Towards a greater integration of ‘spicier’ sexuality into mainstream society? Social-psychological and socio-cultural predictors of attitudes towards BDSM. Sexuality and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09996-0
Grigoropoulos, I. (2022b). Greek high school teachers’ homonegative attitudes towards same-sex parent families. Sexuality and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09935-5
Grigoropoulos, I. (2022c). Gay fatherhood Experiences and challenges through the lens of minority stress theory. Journal of Homosexuality, 1–23. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2022.2043131
Grigoropoulos, I. (2023a). Examining the social tabooisation of asexuality: The underpinnings of anti-asexual bias. Sexuality Research & Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00884-2
Grigoropoulos, I. (2023b). Through the lens of the attributional theory of stigma: Attitudes toward adoption by same-sex couples and children’s adjustment in same-sex parent families. Trends in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00295-7
Grigoropoulos, I. (2023c). Laypeople’s perceptions of sexuality education with young children insights from a convenient sample of the Greek Orthodox Community. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2023.2225790
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed., Pearson, New York.
Harsey, J. S., & Zurbriggen, L. E. (2020). Men and women’s self-objectification, objectification of women, and sexist beliefs. Self and Identity. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1784263
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Statistical power and tests of mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
Hyers, L. L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti-black racism, antisemitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9142-8
Inglehart, R., & Pippa, N. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
Jack, D. C. (1991). Silencing the self: Women and depression. Harvard University Press.
Jack, D. C., & Ali, A. (Eds.). (2010). Silencing the self across cultures: Depression and gender in the social world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398090.001.0001
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B. A., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, J. (2014). Belief in a just God (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033220
Jost, J. T., Langer, M., Badaan, V., Azevedo, F., Etchezahar, E., Ungaretti, J., & Hennes, E. P. (2017). Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), e1–e26. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000127
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893
Kemp, S. (2020). The relationship between religiosity and attitudes toward women at a conservative christian college. Modern Psychological Studies, 25(2), 8 Available at: https://scholar.utc.edu/mps/vol25/iss2/8
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford.
Langton, R. (2009). Sexual solipsism: Philosophical essays on pornography and objectification. Clarendon Press.
Lott, B., Asquith, K., & Doyon, T. (2001). Relation of ethnicity and age to women’s responses to personal experiences of sexist discrimination in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600553
Maji, S., & Dixit, S. (2018). Self-silencing and women’s health: A review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 65(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764018814271
Medie, P. A., & Walsh, S. D. (2019). International organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and police implementation of domestic violence policies in Liberia and Nicaragua. Politics & Gender, 17(1), 136–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x19000515
Moon, J. W., Tratner, A. E., & McDonald, M. M. (2022). Men are less religious in more gender-equal countries. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2474
Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14716402.2008.00452.x
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(4), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
Nussbaum, M. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
Pacilli, M. G., Spaccatini, F., Giovannelli, I., Centrone, D., & Roccato, M. (2019). System justification moderates the relation between hostile (but not benevolent) sexism in the workplace and state anxiety: An experimental study. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(4), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1503993
Perales, F., & Bouma, G. (2019). Religion, religiosity and patriarchal gender beliefs: Understanding the Australian experience. Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318791755
Perry, S. L., & Hayward, G. M. (2017). Seeing is (not) believing: How viewing pornography shapes the religious lives of young Americans. Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation, 95(4), 1757–1788. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow106
Phillips, A. (2009). Religion: Ally, threat, or just religion? UNRISD background paper for UNRISD Comparative Research Project on Religion, Politics, and Gender Equality.
Poon, K. T., Lai, H. S., & Chan, R. S. W. (2023). The effect of sexual objectification on dishonesty. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(4), 1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02560-3
Roberts, T. A., Calogero, R. M., & Gervais, S. J. (2018). Objectification theory: Continuing contributions to feminist psychology. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology series. APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 249–271). American Psychological Association.
Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2017). Self-objectification and personal values. An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01055
Rousseau, A., Rodgers, R. F., & Eggermont, S. (2018). A short-term longitudinal exploration of the impact of TV exposure on objectifying attitudes toward women in early adolescent boys. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0925-5
Sáez, G., Valor-Segura, I., & Expósito, F. (2019). Interpersonal sexual objectification experiences: Psychological and social well-being consequences for women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516645813
Sakellariou, A. (2022). Investigating fundamentalist trends in the Orthodox Church of Greece: Balancing between traditionalism and fundamentalism. Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik, 7(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-022-00110-7
Sechrist, G. B., & Swim, J. K. (2008). Psychological consequences of failing to attribute negative outcomes to discrimination. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 59(1–2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9429-z
Schooler, D. (2015). The woman next to me: Pairing powerful and objectifying representations of women. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15, 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12070
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press.
Scott, J., Floyd James, K., Méndez, D. D., Johnson, R., & Davis, E. M. (2023). The wear and tear of racism: Self-silencing from the perspective of young Black women. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 3, 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100268
Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (2004). When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self-presentation and need for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.111
Seguino, S., & Lovinsky, J. (2009). The impact of religiosity on gender attitudes and outcomes.UNRISD background paper. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Spaccatini, F., & Roccato, M. (2021). The palliative function of sexism: individual sexism buffers the relationship between exposure to workplace sexism and psychological distress. Sexuality and Culture, 25(3), 767–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09793-7
Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Sechrist, G. B., DeCoster, J., VanAllen, K. L., & Ottenbreit, A. (2003). Ask, answer and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 277–311). Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 52(9-10), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
Swim, J. K., Eyssell, K. M., Murdoch, E. Q., & Ferguson, M. J. (2010). Self-silencing to sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01658.x
Tenório de Souza, F. M., Pimentel, C. E., & Pereira, C. R. (2021). From conservatism to support for gay conversion therapy: The role of prejudice and beliefs about same-sex sexuality. The Journal of social psychology, 1–18. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1955652
Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
Vardy, T., Moya, C., Placek, C. D., Apicella, C. L., Bolyanatz, A., Cohen, E., Handley, C., Kundtová Klocová, E., Lesorogol, C., Mathew, S., McNamara, S. A., Purzycki, B. G., Soler, M., Weigel, J. L., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A., Henrich, J., Lang, M., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2022). The religiosity gender gap in 14 diverse societies. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 12(1–2), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2021.2006292
Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014068031532
Ward, L. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496
Webb, P., & Childs, S. (2012). Gender politics and conservatism: The view from the British conservative party grassroots. Government and Opposition, 47(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2011.01355.x
Witte, T. H., & Sherman, M. F. (2002). Silencing the self and feminist identity development. Psychological Reports, 90(3_part_2), 1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/003329410209000304.2
Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., Schmitt, M. M., Berry, J. T., Bursley, K. H., & O’Connor, L. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory—10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00512-000
Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using webpower and R (eds). Granger, IN: ISDSA Press. https://webpower.psychstat.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordancewith the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Grigoropoulos, I. Self-Silencing Through the Lens of System Legitimizing Ideologies: Gender Discriminatory Attitudes Mediate the Link Between Conservatism and Women’s Self-Silencing to Sexism. Trends in Psychol. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00356-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00356-x