Abstract
The detrimental effects of sexism on women’s professional lives are well known. However, what is still under-investigated is whether women would all be affected to the same extent by exposure to sexist manifestations in the workplace, or individual variables, such as ideological standpoints, moderate women’s reactions to such events. We conducted two experimental vignette studies aimed to analyze the relations between sexism and women’s psychological distress. In Study 1, performed with 179 Italian adult women (Mage = 24.17, SD = 9.45), exposure to a hostile sexist message and to a benevolent sexist message fostered participants’ anxiety and depression. The effects of hostile sexist message were significantly stronger than the effects of benevolent sexist message. In Study 2, performed with 514 Italian adult women (Mage = 24.80, SD = 7.30), we confirmed the links above. Moreover, we showed that the individual level of sexism (that had negative associations with the dependent variables) partially buffered them: The effects on anxiety and depression of exposure to a hostile sexist message were stronger among participants with low versus individual levels of hostile sexism. Analogously, the effects of exposure to a benevolent sexist message were stronger among participants with low versus individual levels of benevolent sexism. Strengths, limitations, and possible developments of this research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material (Data Transparency)
Electronic copies of the anonymized raw data, related coding information, and all materials used to collect data will be made available upon request.
References
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111.
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005a). The perils of political correctness: Men’s and women’s responses to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800106.
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005b). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270.
Beaton, A. M., Tougas, F., & Joly, S. (1996). Neosexism Among Male Managers: Is It a Matter of Numbers?1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(24), 2189–2203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01795.x.
Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022615.
Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2003). A sticky floors model of promotion, pay, and gender. European Economic Review, 47(2), 295–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00197-0.
Borrell, C., Artazcoz, L., Gil-González, D., Pérez, G., Rohlfs, I., & Pérez, K. (2010). Perceived sexism as a health determinant in Spain. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(4), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1594.
Chan, D. K. S., Lam, C. B., Chow, S. Y., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x.
Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From Agents to Objects: Sexist Attitudes and Neural Responses to Sexualized Targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(3), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21497.
Combs, G. M., & Milosevic, I. (2016). Workplace discrimination and the wellbeing of minority women: Overview prospects and implications. In M. L. Connerley & J. Wu (Eds.), Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 17–31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Connelly, K., & Heesacker, M. (2012). Why is benevolent sexism appealing? Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312456369.
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764.
Dumont, M., Sarlet, M., & Dardenne, B. (2010). Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts selfconstrual and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles, 62, 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9582-4.
Eliezer, D., Townsend, S. S., Sawyer, P. J., Major, B., & Mendes, W. B. (2011). System-justifying beliefs moderate the relationship between perceived discrimination and resting blood pressure. Social Cognition, 29, 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.303.
Elliott, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (2004). Race, Gender, and Workplace Power. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900303.
Equal Measures 30 (2019). Harnessing the power of data for gender equality: Introducing the 2019 EM2030 SDG Gender Index. Retrieved from: https://data.em2030.org/2019-global-report/
European Institute for Gender Equality (2019). Gender Equality Index 2019 Work-life balance. Retrieved from: https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equality-index-2019-work-life-balance
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763.
Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068.
Grilli, S., Pacilli, M. G., & Roccato, M. (2020). Exposure to sexism impairs women’s writing skills even before their evaluation. Sexuality & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09722-8.
Hammond, M. D., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Why are benevolent sexists happier? Sex Roles, 65(5–6), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0017-2.
Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x.
Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00120.x.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.
Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex roles, 39(5–6), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018814924402.
Lavine, H., Lodge, M., Polichak, J., & Taber, C. (2002). Explicating the black box through experimentations: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.4.343.
Levine, C. S., Basu, D., & Chen, E. (2017). Just world beliefs are associated with lower levels of metabolic risk and inflammation and better sleep after an unfair event. Journal of Personality, 85, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12236.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Manuel, S. K., Howansky, K., Chaney, K. E., & Sanchez, D. T. (2017). No rest for the stigmatized: A model of organizational health and workplace sexism (OHWS). Sex Roles, 77(9–10), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.046.
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2017). The economic and career effects of sexual harassment on working women. Gender & Society, 31(3), 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217704631.
Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990359.
Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2010). The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 62, 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9712-7.
Pacilli, M. G., Spaccatini, F., Giovannelli, I., Centrone, D., & Roccato, M. (2019). System Justification moderates the relation between hostile (but not benevolent) sexism in the workplace and state anxiety: An experimental study. Journal of Social Psychology, 159, 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1503993.
Pedrabissi, L., & Santinello, M. (1989). Nuova versione italiana dello S.T.A.I – Forma Y [New Italian version of the S.T.A.I., Form Y]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Penone, G., & Spaccatini, F. (2019). Attribution of blame to gender violence victims: A literature review of antecedents, consequences and measures of victim blame. Psicologia sociale, 14(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1482/94264.
Pierfederici, A., Fava, G. A., Munari, F., Rossi, N., Baldaro, B., Pasquali Evangelisti, L., et al. (1982). Validazione italiana del CES-D per la misurazione della depressione [Italian validation of the CES-D measure of depression]. In R. Canestrari (Ed.), Nuovi metodi in psicometria [New methods in psychometry] (pp. 95–103). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.
Roccato, M., & Russo, S. (2017). Right-wing authoritarianism, societal threat to safety, and psychological distress. European Journal of Social Psychology¸47, 600–610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2236
Rollero, C., Glick, P., & Tartaglia, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. Testing, Psychometry & Methogology, 21, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.2.3.
Rubin, M., Paolini, S., Subašić, E., & Giacomini, A. (2019). A confirmatory study of the relations between workplace sexism, sense of belonging, mental health, and job satisfaction among women in male-dominated industries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(5), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12577.
Salomon, K., Burgess, K. D., & Bosson, J. K. (2015). Flash fire and slow burn: Women’s cardiovascular reactivity and recovery following hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 144, 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000061.
Schneider, K. T., Tomaka, J., & Palacios, R. (2001). Women’s cognitive, affective, and physiological reactions to a male coworker’s sexist behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1995–2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00161.x.
Sojo, V. E., Wood, R. E., & Genat, A. E. (2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 10–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315599346.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of personality and social psychology, 68(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & St-Pierre, L. (1999). Neosexism among women: The role of personally experienced social mobility attempts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(12), 1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992510005.
Vargas-Salfate, S. (2017). The palliative function of hostile sexism among high and low-status Chilean students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01733.
Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01887.x.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global Gender Gap Report 2020. Retrieved from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf
Funding
This work was not supported by any Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in these studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The present research protocol was approved by the University of Torino Ethic Committee [Protocol Number: 441505].
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spaccatini, F., Roccato, M. The Palliative Function of Sexism: Individual Sexism Buffers the Relationship Between Exposure to Workplace Sexism and Psychological Distress. Sexuality & Culture 25, 767–785 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09793-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09793-7