Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of DEWMA-Based Hello Packet for AODV to Improve the Performance of FANET with 3D-GMM

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flying ad hoc network (FANET) is a new sub-domain of MANET (mobile ad hoc network) with moving nodes known as automated flying vehicles (AFV) carrying various loads such as cameras and sensors to work in a limited geographical area. AFV are wirelessly communicated in a peer-to-peer fashion through hello packets; this periodic hello packet transmission consumes lots of energy. In this paper, a novel deep exponentially weighted moving average (DEWMA) technique is proposed to schedule hello packets using the relative velocity concept in the three-dimensional Gauss–Markov mobility model, which is implemented in the AODV routing protocol. The novel technique uses velocity to schedule hello intermissions in such a way that it not only optimizes power consumption but also considers non-breakage communication. Research involving simulation is currently underway using NS3.27, underscoring the importance of the innovative proposed study in terms of achieving energy savings of 3–26% in high-density and low-density scenarios, respectively. Besides, it outperforms in terms of throughput, PDR, and end-to-end delay network performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Arafat MY, Moh S. A survey on cluster-based routing protocols for unmanned aerial vehicle networks. IEEE Access. 2019;7:498–516. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guillen-Perez, Cano M-D. Flying ad hoc networks: a new domain for network communications. Sensors. 2018;18(10):3571.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan MA, Qureshi IM, Khanzada F. A hybrid communication scheme for efficient and low-cost deployment of future flying ad-hoc network (FANET). Drones. 2019;3(1):16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li X, Zhang T, Li J. A particle swarm mobility model for flying ad hoc networks. In: GLOBECOM 2017—2017 IEEE global communications conference, Singapore; 2017. pp. 1–6.

  5. Broyles D, Jabbar A, Sterbenz PG. Design and analysis of a 3-D Gauss Markov mobility model for highly dynamic airborne networks. In: Proceedings of the international telemetering conference (ITC 2010), International Foundation for Telemetering, Town and Country Resort & Convention Center, San Diego, NV; 2010. pp. 1–10.

  6. Biomo DMM, Kunz T, St-Hilaire M. An enhanced Gauss–Markov mobility model for simulation of unmanned aerial ad hoc networks. In: Proceeding of 7th IFIP wireless and mobile networking conference (WMNC). IEEE, Vilamoura, Portugal; 2014. pp. 1–8.

  7. Hodgkinson D, Johnston R. Aviation law and drones: unmanned aircraft and the future of aviation. New York: Routledge; 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351332323.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Azevedo IMB, Coutinho C, Martins Toda E, Costa Carvalho T, Jailton J. Wireless communications challenges to flying ad hoc networks (FANET). In: Mobile computing. IntechOpen; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86544

  9. Hameed S, Minhas Q-A, Ahmad S, Ullah F, Khan A, Khan A, Uddin MI, Hua Q. Connectivity of drones in FANETs using biologically inspired dragonfly algorithm (DA) through machine learning. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2022;2022:Article ID 5432023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5432023.

  10. Khan MA, Khan IU, Safi A, Quershi IM. Dynamic routing in flying ad-hoc networks using topology-based routing protocols. Drones. 2018;2(3):27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Camp T, Boleng J, Davies V. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2002;2(5):483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayat S, Bettstetter C, Yanmaz E, Brown TX. Multi-objective drone path planning for search and rescue with quality-of-service requirements. Auton Robot. 2020;44:1183–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-020-09926-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amponis G, Lagkas T, Argyriou V, Moscholios I, Zevgara M, Ouzounidis S, Sarigiannidis P. Anchored self-similar 3D Gauss–Markov mobility model for ad hoc routing scenarios. IET Netw. 2023;12(5):250–9. https://doi.org/10.1049/ntw2.12089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shirani R, St-Hilaire M, Kunz T, Zhou Y, Li J, Lamont L. On the delay of reactive-greedy-reactive routing in unmanned aeronautical ad-hoc networks. Procedia Comput Sci. 2012;10:535–42. ISSN:1877-0509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.06.068.

  15. Bekmezci İ, Sahingoz OK, Temel Ş. Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): a survey. Ad Hoc Netw. 2013;11(3):1254–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taher Alnuami HM. Comparison between the efficient of routing protocol in flying ad-hoc networks (FANET). JQCM. 2018;10(1):9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arafat MY, Moh S. Routing protocols for unmanned aerial vehicle networks: a survey. IEEE Access. 2019;7:99694–720. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wheeb AH, Nordin R, Samah AA, Alsharif MH, Khan MA. Topology-based routing protocols and mobility models for flying ad hoc networks: a contemporary review and future research directions. Drones. 2021;6(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6010009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan I, Abdollahi A, Jamil A, Baig B, Aziz M, Subhan F. A novel design of FANET routing protocol aided 5G communication using IoT. J Mob Multimed. 2022. https://doi.org/10.13052/jmm1550-4646.1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alshaibani WT, Shayea I, Caglar R, Din J, Daradkeh YI. Mobility management of unmanned aerial vehicles in ultra-dense heterogeneous networks. Sensors. 2022;22(16):6013. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166013.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin N, Gao F, Zhao L, Al-Dubai A, Tan Z. A 3D smooth random walk mobility model for FANETs. In: 2019 IEEE 21st international conference on high performance computing and communications. pp. 460–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC/SmartCity/DSS.2019.00075.

  22. Shukla D, Singh R. Performance assessment of DSDV and AODV routing algorithms in MANET under active black hole assault. In: 2023 6th International conference on information systems and computer networks (ISCON), Mathura, India; 2023. pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCON57294.2023.10112190.

  23. Maakar S, Singh Y, Singh R. Considerations and open issues in flying ad hoc network. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2017;5(7):397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alenazi M, Sahin C, Sterbenz JP. Design improvement and implementation of 3D Gauss–Markov mobility model. DTIC Document, Technical Report. 2013.

  25. Naser MT, Wheeb AH. Implementation of RWP and Gauss Markov mobility model for multi-UAV networks in search and rescue environment. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2022;16(23):125–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahmud I, Cho Y-Z. Adaptive hello interval in FANET routing protocols for green UAVs. IEEE Access. 2019;7:63004–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2917075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anjum MN, Wang H. Mobility modeling and stochastic property analysis of airborne network. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng. 2020;7(3):1282–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2019.2921482.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Dr. Umashankar Rawat, a Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Manipal University Jaipur, as well as Dr. Arjun Singh and Dr. Gulrej Ahmed, Associate Professors in the Department of Computer and Communication Engineering at Manipal University Jaipur, for their valuable insights and comments on the manuscript. Additionally, we extend our appreciation to the anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions.

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kusumlata Jain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. We declare that the submitted paper is my original work and no part of it has been published anywhere else in the past. We take full responsibility, that if in future, the paper is found invalid according to basic rules, the last decision will be of the authorities concerned.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Disclaimer

This material or document has been generated by Hemant Kumar Saini and is meant for use only by the persons or entities to whom it is addressed who are working on the same area and finding the latest trends. This document is not for distribution of any kind and may include confidential and/or protected information. It is completely forbidden to review, retransmit, or utilize it in any other way. This document and its contents are subject to change at any time and without notice. To provide potential researchers the chance to comprehend UAV beliefs and opinions with regard to the future, forward-looking statements (if any) are included. This will allow them to use these beliefs and opinions as one aspect in assessing a network’s performance. You should not place undue reliance on these statements because they don’t guarantee future results. Such predictions of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements inherently involve known and unknowable risks and uncertainties, which could materially affect actual performance and results in future periods. Except as required by applicable securities laws, Hemant Kumar Saini and its affiliates disclaim any duty to update forward-looking statements if circumstances, estimates, or opinions change. Readers and investors are advised to exercise independent judgment before making any implementation decisions and not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

This article is part of the topical collection “Advances in Machine Vision and Augmented Intelligence” guest edited by Manish Kumar Bajpai, Ranjeet Kumar, Koushlendra Kumar Singh and George Giakos.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saini, H.K., Jain, K. Implementation of DEWMA-Based Hello Packet for AODV to Improve the Performance of FANET with 3D-GMM. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 321 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02673-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02673-z

Keywords

Navigation