Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance Analysis of UAV Routing Protocol Based on Mobility Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends in Communication and Intelligent Systems (ICRTCIS 2023)

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

The communication between the flying birds or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) a.k.a Flying Adhoc Network (FANET), is the most challenging task in an extremly vibrant environment. To overcome the problem of data dissemination in changed topology, many routing protocols are investigated and modified. The stable path and congestion avoidance are the evolving area in FANET. This paper investigates preliminary UAV routing protocol with different mobility models to examine the factors such as latency, average end-to-end (E2E) delay, packet delivery ratio (PDR), etc. in dynamic environment with numerous node count and node speed variations. The simulation results presented here show that increasing the node count from 0 to 49 keeping constant velocity of 20 m/sec reflects that throughput of Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) is 1.7 kbps using Gauss Markov (GM) mobility model (MM), which is higher than throughput using Random Way-point (RWP) MM. For the same simulation condition, a lower average E2E delay of 0.44 ms for OLSR is achieved using GM MM. However, by increasing the node speed in the range of 20 m/sec to 100 m/sec for 50 nodes, the average throughput for Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol increased to 28 kbps at 75 m/sec, which is higher than OLSR using RWP MM. The simulation achieves an end-to-end delay of 600 ms and 790 ms at 50 m/sec for AODV protocol using RWP MM and GM MM, respectively. Thus, the experiment demonstrates that GM MM with variable nodes and node speed performs better than RWP MM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arafat MY, Moh S (2019) Routing protocols for unmanned aerial vehicle networks: a survey. IEEE Access 7:99694–99720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lansky J, Ali S, Rahmani AM, Yousefpoor MS, Yousefpoor E, Khan F, Hosseinzadeh M (2022) Reinforcement learning-based routing protocols in flying ad hoc networks (FANET): a review. Mathematics 10(16):3017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lansky J, Rahmani AM, Malik MH, Yousefpoor E, Yousefpoor MS, Khan MU, Hosseinzadeh M (2023) An energy-aware routing method using firefly algorithm for flying ad hoc networks. Sci Rep 13(1):1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, Qiu H (2023) Delay-aware and link-quality-aware geographical routing protocol for UANET via dueling deep Q-network. Sensors 23(6):3024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horyna J, Baca T, Walter V, Albani D, Hert D, Ferrante E, Saska M (2023) Decentralized swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles for search and rescue operations without explicit communication. Auton Robot 47(1):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar S, Raw RS, Bansal A, Mohammed MA, Khuwuthyakorn P, Thinnukool O (2021) 3D location oriented routing in flying ad-hoc networks for information dissemination. IEEE Access 9:137083–137098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nawaz H, Ali HM, Laghari AA (2021) UAV communication networks issues: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28(3):1349–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oubbati OS, Atiquzzaman M, Lorenz P, Tareque MH, Hossain MS (2019) Routing in flying ad hoc networks: survey, constraints, and future challenge perspectives. IEEE Access 7:81057–81105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Y, Zhao N, Ding Z, Alouini MS (2018) Multiple UAVs as relays: multi-hop single link versus multiple dual-hop links. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 17(9):6348–6359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bae JH, Kim YS, Hur N, Kim HM (2018) Study on air-to-ground multipath channel and mobility influences in UAV based broadcasting. In: 2018 International conference on information and communication technology convergence (ICTC). IEEE, pp 1534–1538

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khan S, Khan MZ, Khan P, Mehmood G, Khan A, Fayaz M (2022) An ant-hocnet routing protocol based on optimized fuzzy logic for swarm of UAVs in FANET. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cumino P, Lobato Junior W, Tavares T, Santos H, Rosário D, Cerqueira E, Gerla M et al (2018) Cooperative UAV scheme for enhancing video transmission and global network energy efficiency. Sensors 18(12):4155

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srivastava A, Prakash J (2021) Future FANET with application and enabling techniques: anatomization and sustainability issues. Comput Sci Rev 39:100359

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Tuli EA, Golam M, Kim DS, Lee JM (2022) Performance enhancement of optimized link state routing protocol by parameter configuration for UANET. Drones 6(1):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahmani AM, Ali S, Yousefpoor E, Yousefpoor MS, Javaheri D, Lalbakhsh P, Lee SW (2022) OLSR+: a new routing method based on fuzzy logic in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs). Veh Commun:100489

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang J, Zan F, Liu X, Chen D (2022) Wireless communications and mobile computing UAV routing protocol based on link stability and selectivity of neighbor nodes in ETX metrics. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garg S, Ihler A, Bentley ES, Kumar S (2022) A cross-layer, mobility and congestion-aware routing protocol for UAV networks. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electr Syst

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim T, Lee S, Kim KH, Jo YI (2023) FANET routing protocol analysis for Multi-UAV-based reconnaissance mobility models. Drones 7(3):161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bekmezci I, Sahingoz OK, Temel Ş (2013) Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): a survey. Ad Hoc Netw 11(3):1254–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zafar W, Khan BM (2016) Flying ad-hoc networks: Technological and social implications. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 35(2):67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dentler J, Rosalie M, Danoy G, Bouvry P, Kannan S, Olivares-Mendez MA, Voos H (2019) Collision avoidance effects on the mobility of a UAV swarm using chaotic ant colony with model predictive control. J Intell Rob Syst 93(1):227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gangopadhyay S, Jain VK (2023) A position-based modified OLSR routing protocol for flying ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paredes WD, Kaushal H, Vakilinia I, Prodanoff Z (2023) LoRa technology in flying ad hoc networks: a survey of challenges and open issues. Sensors 23(5):2403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chriki A, Touati H, Snoussi H, Kamoun F (2019) FANET: communication, mobility models and security issues. Comput Netw 163:106877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh R, Sukapuram R, Chakraborty S (2023) A survey of mobility-aware multi-access edge computing: challenges, use cases and future directions. Ad Hoc Netw 140:103044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Tian S, Nguyen K, Sekiya H (2021) Decentralizing private blockchain-IoT network with OLSR. Future Internet 13(7):168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Varshney T, Katiyar A, Sharma P (2014) Performance improvement of MANET under DSR protocol using swarm optimization. In: 2014 International conference on issues and challenges in intelligent computing techniques (ICICT). IEEE, pp 58–63

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khare VR, Wang FZ, Wu S, Deng Y, Thompson C (2008) Ad-hoc network of unmanned aerial vehicle swarms for search & destroy tasks. In: 2008 4th International IEEE conference intelligent systems (vol 1). IEEE, pp 6–65

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moudni H, Er-rouidi M, Mouncif H, El Hadadi B (2016) Performance analysis of AODV routing protocol in MANET under the influence of routing attacks. In: 2016 International conference on electrical and information technologies (ICEIT). IEEE, pp 536–542

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riley GF, Henderson TR (2010) The ns-3 network simulator. In: Modeling and tools for network simulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 15–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this paper are thankful to L&T Mumbai, India, for their support in this presented research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of EXTC, SVKM’s NMIMS Mukesh Patel School of Technology Management and Engineering, Mumbai, 400056, India

    Kanchan Vipul Bakade & Avinash More

Authors
  1. Kanchan Vipul Bakade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avinash More
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanchan Vipul Bakade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Arya College of Engineering & IT, Jaipur, India

    Aditya Kumar Singh Pundir

  2. National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

    Anupam Yadav

  3. Electronics & Comm Sciences Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India

    Swagatam Das

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bakade, K.V., More, A. (2023). Performance Analysis of UAV Routing Protocol Based on Mobility Models. In: Pundir, A.K.S., Yadav, A., Das, S. (eds) Recent Trends in Communication and Intelligent Systems. ICRTCIS 2023. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5792-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation