Skip to main content
Log in

Genotype by yield*trait (GYT) biplot analysis: a novel approach for evaluating advance lines of durum wheat

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cereal Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel genotype by yield*trait (GYT) biplot approach was applied in the present study to select the superior durum wheat advanced lines based on multiple traits from the panel of 20 genotypes. Our findings suggested that genotype by trait (GT) biplot explained less total variation (42.6%) as compared to GYT biplot (85.1%). The tester vector view of GYT biplot revealed the positive strong correlation among most of the grain yield (GY) trait combinations. The which-won-where view of GYT biplot divided the polygon into six sectors, out of which only two sectors possessed the yield trait combinations. The first sector harbored three yield trait combinations, viz., GY*grain weight per spike (GWS), GY*spike length (SL) and GY*thousand grains weight (TGW), and five genotypes (DF19D7, DF19D8, DF19D9, DF19D14, and DF19D16) for which DF19D14 was the winner genotype. However, genotype DF19D13 was the polygon vortex of the other sector having GY*number of grains per spike (GS), GY*number of spikelets per spike (SPS), GY*harvest index (HI), GY*plant height (PH), GY* days to heading (DH), and GY*days to physiological maturity (DM) yield trait combinations and encompassed six contesting genotypes (DF19D4, DF19D6, DF19D13, DF19D15, DF19D18, and DF19D19). The average tester coordination (ATC) biplot categorized 12 advanced lines as better performers than the average and ranked as DF19D13 > DF19D14 > DF19D4 > DF19D16 > DF19D12 > DF19D9 > DF19D7 > DF19D19 > DF19D18 > DF19D15 > DF19D6 > DF19D8, while designated eight as inferior genotypes, performed below the average mark. Overall, these findings indicated that the genotypes (DF19D13 and DF19D14) had the right combination of traits of interest required to produce higher yield and hence are potentially valuable candidates to be tested in multi-location trials for stable performance prior to release for farmer community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernardo R (2010) Selection for multiple trait. Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Stemma Press, Minesota, USA, pp 343–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos I, Caligari P (2007) Index selection and independent culling method. In: Selection methods in plant breeding. Springer, The Netherlands

  • Boureima S, Abdoua Y (2019) Genotype by yield* trait combination biplot approach to evaluate sesame genotypes on multiple traits basis. Tur J Field Crops 24:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay K, Wilkinson G (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agri Res 14:742–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG (2013) A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Sci 53:1860–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godshalk E, Timothy D, Burns J (1988) Effectiveness of index selection for switchgrass forage yield and quality. Crop Sci 28:825–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan M, Kale H, Kardes YM, Karaman K, Kahraman K, Yılmaz MF, Temizgül R, Akar T (2020) Characterization of local sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) population grains in terms of nutritional properties and evaluation by GT biplot approach. Starch-Stärke 72:1900232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karahan T, Akgün I (2020) Selection of barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes by gyt (genotype× yield× trait) biplot technique and its comparison with GT (genotype× trait). Appl Ecol Environ Res 18:1347–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal E (2019) Comparing durum wheat cultivars by genotype× yield× trait and genotype× trait biplot method. Chilean J Agri Res 79:512–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legesse H, Dechassa N, Gebeyehu S, Bultosa G, Mekbib F (2013) Multivariate analysis as a tool for indirect selection of common bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L) for soil acidity tolerance under field conditions. Sci Tech Arts Res J 2:07–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrick LF, Glover KD, Yabwalo D, Byamukama E (2020) Use of Genotype by Yield* Trait (GYT) Analysis to select hard red spring wheat with elevated performance for agronomic and disease resistance traits. Crop Breed Genetics Genomics 2:e200009

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi R (2019) Genotype by yield* trait biplot for genotype evaluation and trait profiles in durum wheat. Cereal Res Commun 47:541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi R, Amri A (2011) Graphic analysis of trait relations and genotype evaluation in durum wheat. J Crop Imp 25:680–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oladejo AS, Akinwale R, Obisesan I (2011) Interrelationships between grain yield and other physiological traits of cowpea cultivars. African Crop Sci J 19:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramesh M, Reddy D, Priya MS, Sumathi P, Sudhakar P, Reddy K (2016) GT biplot analysis for yield and drought related traits in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Electronic J Plant Breed 7:538–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio J, Cubero J, Martin L, Suso M, Flores F (2004) Biplot analysis of trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica 135:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla G (1972) Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW, Smartt J (1999) Genetic aspects: populations and selection. In: Principles of crop improvement. Oxford Blackwell US.

  • Tidiane SA, Chiari T, Legesse W, Seid-Ahmed K, Ortiz R, Van Ginkel M, Bassi FM (2019) Durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.): Origin, cultivation and potential expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agronomy 9:263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xynias IN, Mylonas I, Korpetis EG, Ninou E, Tsaballa A, Avdikos ID, Mavromatis AG (2020) Durum wheat breeding in the Mediterranean region: current status and future prospects. Agronomy 10:432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Frégeau-Reid J (2018) Genotype by yield* trait (GYT) Biplot: a novel approach for genotype selection based on multiple traits. Sci Rep 8:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci 42:11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Hunt L, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47:643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research project was financially supported by the funds of Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Faheem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by M. A. R. Arif.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faheem, M., Arain, S.M., Sial, M.A. et al. Genotype by yield*trait (GYT) biplot analysis: a novel approach for evaluating advance lines of durum wheat. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 51, 447–456 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-022-00298-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-022-00298-7

Keywords

Navigation