Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Influence Factors on AC Breakdown Characteristics of Rod-Barrier Gap and Electric Field Simulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The insulation performance of air gap can be improved by inserting insulation barriers into the high voltage box with limited space. The influence of the barrier dimension, barrier thickness, barrier position and surface state of epoxy resin barrier on the AC breakdown characteristics of the “rod electrode-insulation barrier-ground electrode” system are discussed in the work. An equal-size model of the insulation system is established to analyze the influence of the insulation barrier on electric field and the discharge mechanism. The experimental results indicate that the breakdown voltage is improved significantly by enlarging the barrier dimension, up to twice as much. In contrast, the barrier thickness has little effect on the breakdown voltage because the discharge is mainly along the barrier surface. Besides, the breakdown voltage can be increased by reducing the distance between insulation barrier and rod electrode, this is because of the blocking effect of insulation barrier on the corona layer around the electrode, which can hinder the development of charges to the ground electrode, thus delaying the discharge process. The breakdown voltage increases with the barrier surface roughness because of the prolongation of discharge path and the distortion of local electric field. The breakdown voltage decreases with the rise of temperature, it decreases to 37.5 kV when temperature rose to 60 °C. Due to the increase of free charges mobility, the corresponding surface resistivity decreases from 16.2 × 1014 Ω at 20 °C to 3.14 × 1014 Ω at 60 °C. This work can provide support for the reasonable design of insulation barriers in engineering application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig.6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gao L, Xiang B, Luo J et al (2020) Barrier effect on the DC breakdown characteristics of cryogenic nitrogen gas evaporated from liquid nitrogen. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 30(6):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao L et al (2019) Barrier effect on the DC breakdown characteristics of cryogenic nitrogen gas for the designing of the superconducting fault current limiter. In: International conference on electric power equipment-switching technology, pp 382–386

  3. Nakane R, Hayakawa N (2021) Time and space transition of DC electric field distribution based on emerging field by accumulated charge. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 28(2):440–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu KL, Liao RJ, Zhao XT (2015) Numerical simulation of the characteristics of electrons in bar-plate DC negative corona discharge based on a plasma chemical model. J Electr Eng Technol 10(4):1805–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Seok BY, Choi W (2020) Lightning impulse breakdown path and characteristics with dielectric BMC barrier inserted sphere-plane electrode. J Electr Eng Technol 14(8):872–876

    Google Scholar 

  6. Panich I, Artit Y, Phadungsak R (2017) Corona discharge characteristics and particle losses in a unipolar corona-needle charger obtained through numerical and experimental studies. J Electr Eng Technol 12(5):2021–2030

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rezinkina M, Rezinkin O, D’Alessandro F (2016) Influence of corona on strike probability of grounded electrodes by high voltage discharges. J Electrostat 22:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berendt A, Budnarowska M, Mizeraczyk J (2018) DC negative corona discharge characteristics in air flowing transversely and longitudinally through a needle-plate electrode gap. J Electrostat 92:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rezinkina M, Rezinkin O, D’Alessandro F et al (2017) Experimental and modelling study of the dependence of corona discharge on electrode geometry and ambient electric field. J Electrostat 87:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo Z, Wu Z, Wang HR et al (2019) Experimental and numerical study on formation of interface separation and interfacial dielectric strength of GIL insulator. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 26(6):1738–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boudissa R, Merabet S, Iouknane S (2013) Effect of isolation mode and surface condition of an insulating barrier on the performance of a non-uniform field electrode system under positive DC voltage. IEEE Trans Appl Superconduct 20(5):1523–1529

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh S, Serdyuk YV (2019) Simulations of non-thermal electrical discharges in air over solid insulating barrier. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 47(1):729–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kara A et al (2018) The effect of insulating barriers on AC breakdown voltage in inhomogeneous field. In: Electro-technical conference. IEEE, pp 1206–1208

  14. Ding YJ, Ge X et al (2019) Impulse test and simulation analysis of 2m rod-plane long air gap. In: 2019 IEEE 3rd international electrical and energy conference, pp 1912–1917

  15. Jorstad JS (2012) Effect of barriers in air insulated rod-plane gaps. Ph.D. dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

  16. Mauseth F, Jorstad JS, Pedersen A (2012) Streamer inception and propagation for air insulated rod-plane gaps with barriers. IEEE Electr Insul Dielectr Phenomena, pp 739–732

  17. Guo HF, Wang YY, Xu YF et al (2019) Comparative study on diffuse dielectric barrier discharges excited by unipolar positive versus bipolar pulses in atmospheric air. J Appl Phys 4:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng YS, Chen Y, Zhong XY et al (2018) Effects of barrier dimensions on AC withstand characteristics of air insulated rod-plane gaps. High Volt Eng 44(01):195–200

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kang H, Na JB (2011) Experimental study on the barrier effects in gaseous helium for the insulation design of a high voltage SFCL. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 21(3):1328–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng YS, Li Q, Chen Y et al (2019) Breakdown path and condition of air- insulated rod-plane gap with polymeric barrier inserted under alternating voltages. AIP Adv 9:105207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh S, Serdyuk YV, Summer R (2015) Streamer propagation in hybrid gas-solid insulation. In: Electrical insulation & dielectric phenomena. IEEE, pp 387–390

  22. Li GC, Wang JX, Wei YH (2019) Effect of insulation barrier on AC breakdown voltage of rod-plane gaps and analysis of surface residential charge property. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 30(10):9513–9519

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma WL (2019) Study on structure design and properties of epoxy resin based micro-nano composite insulation materials with high thermal conductivity. Ph.D. dissertation, Beijing Jiaotong University

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51907095).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guochang Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, K., Li, G., Gu, Z. et al. Analysis of Influence Factors on AC Breakdown Characteristics of Rod-Barrier Gap and Electric Field Simulation. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 18, 2189–2197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01259-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01259-0

Keywords

Navigation