Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection in pediatric population with vesicoureteric reflux having associated congenital anomalies: our experience and detailed review

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Successful resolution of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) via endoscopic methods has been achieved in the last two decades. After investigating multiple agents, Deflux is being used at most of the centers. We have studied the safety and efficacy of Deflux in our patients having VUR with complex urogenital anomalies and reviewed the literature.

Methods

We have retrospectively collected the data of 28 children with the diagnosis of VUR, treated endoscopically over a period of 3 years. The data were collected from the hospital records and analyzed. The data included demographics, associated anomalies, grades of reflux, number of ureters affected, treatment given, number of sittings required, initial findings of micturating cystourethrograms, follow-up cystogram findings, and details of the procedure done. The data were evaluated for overall success rates in children with associated anomalies.

Results

Among the 28 patients, 22 children with 33 affected ureter units having associated anomalies (secondary VUR) were included in the study, with 18 boys and 4 girls. Six children having primary VUR and not associated with other congenital anomalies were excluded. The reflux was unilateral in 10 (45.45%) children and bilateral in 12 (54.54%) children. Reflux was Grade II in 11 (33.33%), Grade III in 9 (27.27%), Grade IV in 2 (6.06%), and Grade V in 11 (33.33%) of the 33 ureters. After the first injection of Deflux, complete resolution was observed in 28 (84.84%) ureters and 5 (15.15%) had partial resolution of the VUR at 3-month follow-up. At 1 year of the first injection, complete resolution was achieved in 32 (96.96%) ureters and 1 (3.03%) ureter still had persistent Grade IV reflux, for which he had undergone ureteric reimplantation.

Conclusions

We have observed that by endoscopic method reflux resolution was achieved in 84.84% after 1st and 96% children after 2nd injection. So based on our experience, we recommend the Deflux procedure as the primary treatment modality for VUR even in patients with associated complex urological anomalies and bladder dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [Praveen Mathur]. The data are not publicly available due to institutional protocol and government restrictions.

References

  1. Sargent MA (2000) What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? Pediatr Radiol 30:587–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobson SH, Hansson S, Jakobsson B (1999) Vesico-ureteric reflux: occurrence and long-term risks. Acta Paediatr 88:22–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oswald J, Riccabona M, Lusuardi L, Bartsch G, Radmayr C (2002) Prospective comparison and 1-year follow-up of a single endoscopic subureteral polydimethylsiloxane versus dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Urology 60:894–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lavelle MT, Conlin MJ, Skoog SJ (2005) Subureteral injection of Deflux for correction of reflux: analysis of factors predicting success. Urology 65:564–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Puri P, Chertin B, Velayudham M, Dass L, Colhoun E (2003) Treatment of vesicoureteral reflux by endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer: preliminary results. J Urol 170:1541–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lebowitz RL, Olbing H, Parkkulainen KV et al (1985) International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Radiol 15:105–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandra M, Maddix H (2000) Urodynamic dysfunction in infants with vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr 136:754–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenbaum LA, Mesrobian HG (2006) Vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Clin 53:413–427

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang FY, Tsai TC (1995) Resolution of vesicoureteral reflux during medical management in children. Pediatr Nephrol 9:715–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McLorie GA, McKenna PH, Jumper BM et al (1990) High grade vesicoureteral reflux: analysis of observational therapy. J Urol 144:537–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cerwinka WH, Scherz HC, Kirsch AJ (2008) Dynamic hydrodistention classification of the ureter and the double hit method to correct vesicoureteral reflux. Arch Esp Urol 61:882–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hidas G, Soltani T, Watts B et al (2013) Is the appearance of the dextranomer/hyaluronic acid mound predictive of reflux resolution? J Urol 189:1882–1885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zambaiti E, Pensabene M, Montano V, Casuccio A, Sergio M, Cimador M (2016) Ultrasonographic mound height as predictor of vesicoureteral reflux resolution after endoscopic treatment in children. J Pediatr Surg 51:1366–1369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Routh JC, Inman BA, Reinberg Y (2010) Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: systematic review. Pediatrics 125:1010–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Capozza N, Lais A, Matarazzo E, Nappo S, Patricolo M, Caione P (2002) Influence of voiding dysfunction on the outcome of endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 168:1695–1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathur P, Gupta R, Gupta PK (2017) Congenital pouch colon with rectal atresia revisited. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 22:119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirsch AJ, Perez-Brayfield M, Smith EA et al (2004) The modified sting procedure to correct vesicoureteral reflux: improved results with submucosal implantation within the intramural ureter. J Urol 171:2413–2416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perez-Brayfield M, Kirsch AJ, Hensle TW, Koyle MA, Furness P, Scherz HC (2004) Endoscopic treatment with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid for complex cases of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 172:1614–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external source of funding was involved in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen Mathur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Financial disclosure

None.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was waived in view of the retrospective nature of the study. All patients were managed and treated as per standard institutional protocol.

Informed consent

Written and informed consent has been obtained from the parents of all the subjects.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prajapati, S., Mathur, V., Tanger, R.C. et al. Effectiveness of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection in pediatric population with vesicoureteric reflux having associated congenital anomalies: our experience and detailed review. J Ped Endosc Surg 6, 71–76 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-024-00225-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-024-00225-z

Keywords

Navigation