Skip to main content
Log in

Hem-o-lok clip versus hand-made loop in base closure during laparoscopic appendectomy in children

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hem-o-lok clip in base closure during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in children and compare its outcomes with hand-made loop.

Methods

A prospective study was performed that included all patients who underwent LA at our hospital from January 2017 to March 2018. The cases were randomly divided into two groups according to the method used for base closure; in the first group double hem-o-lok clips were used, while double hand-made loops were adopted in the second group. Data were collected and compared between groups by t and Chi-square tests including clinical data, operative time, complications, hospital stay and cost of supplies.

Results

The study included 44 patients, hem-o-lok clip group and hand-made loop group consisted of 21 and 23 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between both groups concerning patients’ demographics, complications or hospital stay. Mean operative time was 29.95 ± 8.33 min in hem-o-lok clip group (range 18–47), whereas it was 38.78 ± 4.91 min in hand-made loop group (range 31–52) reaching statistical significance (p = 0.001). In terms of costs, a cartridge of hem-o-lok clips to be used per each case costs approximately 14 USD in our country, while a single package of Vicryl ligature 2-0 for forming hand-made loops costs 4 USD.

Conclusions

Hem-o-lok clip is effective and safe in securing the base of appendix during LA in children. Although it is slightly more expensive than hand-made loop, it offers a significantly shorter operative time as the principal advantage when compared to hand-made loop which is superior because of its economic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adwan H, Weerasuriya CK, Endleman P, Barnes A, Stewart L, Justin T (2014) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children: a UK District General Hospital experience. J Pediatr Surg 49(2):277–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ure BM, Spangenberger W, Hebebrand D, Eypasch EP, Troidl H (1992) Laparoscopic surgery in children and adolescents with suspected appendicitis: results of medical technology assessment. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2(6):336–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Soll C, Wyss P, Gelpke H, Raptis DA, Breitenstein S (2016) Appendiceal stump closure using polymeric clips reduces intra-abdominal abscesses. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(5):661–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parikh PP, Tashiro J, Wagenaar AE, Curbelo M, Perez EA, Neville HL et al (2018) Looped suture versus stapler device in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparative outcomes and intraoperative cost analysis. J Pediatr Surg 53(4):616–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponsky TA, Rothenberg SS (2009) Division of the mesoappendix with electrocautery in children is safe, effective, and cost-efficient. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(Suppl 1):S11–S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayir B, Ensari CO, Bilecik T, Aslaner A, Oruc MT (2015) Methods for closure of appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy procedure. Ulus Cerrahi Derg 31(4):229–231

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayir B, Bilecik T, Ensari CO, Oruc MT (2014) Laparoscopic appendectomy with hand-made loop. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 9(2):152–156

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebeid AME, Hassan HS, Almetaher HA, Elhalaby EA (2016) Low-cost laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients. Ann Ped Surg 12(3):100–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yildiz F, Terzi A, Coban S, Zeybek N, Uzunkoy A (2009) The handmade endoloop technique. A simple and cheap technique for laparoscopic appendectomy. Saudi Med J 30(2):224–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanssen A, Plotnikov S, Dubois R (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. JSLS 11(1):59–62

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajid MS, Rimple J, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Use of endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(1):11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rickert A, Kruger CM, Runkel N, Kuthe A, Koninger J, Jansen-Winkeln B et al (2015) The TICAP-Study (titanium clips for appendicular stump closure): a prospective multicentre observational study on appendicular stump closure with an innovative titanium clip. BMC Surg 15:85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Safavi A, Langer M, Skarsgard ED (2012) Endoloop versus endostapler closure of the appendiceal stump in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg 55(1):37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rakic M, Jukic M, Pogorelic Z, Mrklic I, Klicek R, Druzijanic N et al (2014) Analysis of endoloops and endostaples for closing the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Today 44(9):1716–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Escolino M, Becmeur F, Saxena A, Till H, Holcomb GW 3rd, Esposito C (2018) Endoloop versus endostapler: what is the best option for appendiceal stump closure in children with complicated appendicitis? Results of a multicentric international survey. Surg Endosc 32(8):3570–3575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hage JJ (2008) On the origin and evolution of the Roeder knot and loop–a geometrical review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tobias-Machado M, Forseto P Jr, Medina JA, Watanabe M, Juliano RV, Wroclawski ER (2004) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal access with duplication of the open technique. Int Braz J Urol 30(3):221–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bansal P, Kumar A, Shrivastava A, Kumar D, Mandhani A, Bhandari M (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: our initial experience. Indian J Urol 20(2):154–159

    Google Scholar 

  19. Delibegovic S, Matovic E (2009) Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 23(12):2851–2854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Colak E, Kement M, Ozlem N, Mutlu T, Yildirim K, Gurer A et al (2013) A comparison of nonabsorbable polymeric clips and endoloop ligatures for the closure of the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(3):255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pogorelic Z, Kostovski B, Jeroncic A, Susnjar T, Mrklic I, Jukic M et al (2017) A comparison of endoloop ligatures and nonabsorbable polymeric clips for the closure of the appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(6):645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lucchi A, Berti P, Grassia M, Siani LM, Gabbianelli C, Garulli G (2017) Laparoscopic appendectomy: hem-o-lok versus endoloop in stump closure. Updates Surg 69(1):61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Partecke LI, Kessler W, von Bernstorff W, Diedrich S, Heidecke CD, Patrzyk M (2010) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(8):1077–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hue CS, Kim JS, Kim KH, Nam SH, Kim KW (2013) The usefulness and safety of Hem-o-lok clips for the closure of appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. J Korean Surg Soc 84(1):27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Golebiewski A, Anzelewicz S, Wiejek A, Lubacka D, Czauderna P (2019) A Prospective randomized controlled trial of single-port and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29(5):703–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ali R, Anwar M, Akhtar J (2018) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial from a developing country. J Pediatr Surg 53(2):247–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khirallah MG, Eldesouki NI, Elzanaty AA, Ismail KA, Arafa M (2017) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children with complicated appendicitis. Ann Ped Surg 13:17–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohajerzadeh L, Rouzrokh M, Khaleghnejad Tabari A, Mirshemirani A, Atqiaee K, Dara N (2014) Laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis in children. Ann Colorectal Res 2(1):e16599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Naiditch J, Lautz T, Chin A, Browne M, Rowell E (2015) Endoloop as the first line tool for appendiceal stump closure in children with appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 25(2):155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miyano G, Urao M, Lane G, Kato Y, Okazaki T, Yamataka A (2011) Appendiceal stump closure in children with complicated appendicitis: a prospective analysis of endoloops versus endostaples. Asian J Endosc Surg 4(3):116–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Elgendy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elgendy, A., Khirallah, M.G. Hem-o-lok clip versus hand-made loop in base closure during laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J Ped Endosc Surg 1, 127–132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-019-00018-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-019-00018-9

Keywords

Navigation