Skip to main content
Log in

Pyrolytic gas analysis and evaluation from thermal plasma pyrolysis of simulated oil-based drill cuttings

  • Article
  • Published:
Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oil-based drill cuttings (OBDCs) are hazardous wastes generated during shale gas exploration, and the rapid, efficient and safe disposal methods for OBDCs have attracted the attention of many researchers. Plasma pyrolysis technology is widely used in solid waste treatment due to its extremely high temperature and reaction activity. A laboratory-scale thermal plasma pyrolysis system was built to investigate the plasma pyrolysis mechanism of simulated OBDCs. The thermal decomposition characteristics of OBDCs were studied by thermogravimetric-derivative thermo gravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DTG-DSC) analysis in the range of 50–1300 °C. The thermal decomposition process of OBDCs was divided into the following four stages: evaporation of water and light oil, evaporation and decomposition of heavy oil, carbonate decomposition, and phase change reaction from solid to liquid. The effects of the oil ratio, water content, and water/oil (W/O) ratio of OBDCs on the composition and gas selectivity of pyrolytic gas were investigated. The results show that thermal plasma can crack the mineral oil in the OBDCs into clean gases such as H2, CO and C2H2, while water can promote the decomposition of the heavy oil molecules and enhance the H2 production. The energy consumption model calculation for the pyrolysis and melting of OBDCs shows that the highest energy utilization and the lowest molar energy consumption of H2 were achieved at a W/O ratio of 1:4. Based on the thermal plasma pyrolysis system used in this study, the commercial application prospects and economic benefits of the plasma pyrolysis of OBDCs were discussed.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. 2020. Directory of National Hazardous Wastes (Version 2021). Available at: https://www.mee.gov.cn/gzk/gz/202112/t20211213_963867.shtml. Accessed 1 Jan 2021.

  2. Murtaza, M., Alarifi, S.A., and Abozuhairah, A. 2021. Optimum selection of H2S scavenger in light-weight and heavy-weight water-based drilling fluids. ACS Omega 6: 24919–24930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Z., Tong, K., He, C., et al. 2021. High quality oil recovery from oil-based drill cuttings via catalytic upgrading in presence of near-/supercritical water and different industrial wastes. Journal of Cleaner Production 321: 129061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao, F., Li, Y., Liu, Z., et al. 2020. Flow and heat transfer characteristics of oil-based drilling cuttings in a screw-driving spiral heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering 181: 115881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pereira, L.B., Sad, C.M.S., Castro, E.V.R., et al. 2022. Environmental impacts related to drilling fluid waste and treatment methods: A critical review. Fuel 310: 122301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, H., Cai, J., Sun, J., et al. 2021. Treatment of oil-based drilling cuttings using the demulsification separation-Fenton oxidation method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28: 64307–64321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, H., Diao, H., Zhang, Y., et al. 2022. Treatment and novel resource-utilization methods for shale gas oil based drill cuttings—A review. Journal of Environmental Management 317: 115462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, H., Li, J., Zhao, M., et al. 2019. Remediation of oil-based drill cuttings using low-temperature thermal desorption: performance and kinetics modeling. Chemosphere 235: 1081–1088.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, G., Liu, H., Rana, A., et al. 2021. Life cycle assessment of low-temperature thermal desorption-based technologies for drill cuttings treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials 401: 123865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, X., Li, K., and Yao, A. 2022. Thermal desorption process simulation and effect prediction of oil-based cuttings. ACS Omega 7: 21675–21683.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lv, Q., Wang, L., Jiang, J., et al. 2022. Catalytic pyrolysis of oil-based drill cuttings over metal oxides: The product properties and environmental risk assessment of heavy metals in char. Process Safety and Environment Protection 159: 354–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia, Z., Yang, H., Sun, J., et al. 2021. Co-pyrolysis of waste polyvinyl chloride and oil-based drilling cuttings: Pyrolysis process and product characteristics analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 318: 128521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, H., Liu, Y., Bai, G., et al. 2022. Study on the co-pyrolysis characteristics of oil-based drill cuttings and lees. Biomass and Bioenergy 160: 106436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. State Administration for Market Regulation. 2018. Control Standards of Pollutants in Sludge for Agricultural Use. Available at: https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=B40A49F7734797DF61D90FE1F6BA5442. Accessed 1 June 2019.

  15. Andooz, A., Eqbalpour, M., Kowsari, E., et al. 2022. A comprehensive review on pyrolysis of e-waste and its sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 333: 130191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatt, K.P., Patel, S., Upadhyay, D.S., et al. 2022. A critical review on solid waste treatment using plasma pyrolysis technology. Chemical Engineering and Processing 177: 108989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sasujit, K., and Tippayawong, N. 2022. Removal of biomass tar model compound using reverse vortex flow gliding arc discharge. Energy Sources, Part A433A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects A465 44: 1045–1059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, M., Xue, W., Su, B., et al. 2017. Conversion of glycerol into syngas by rotating DC arc plasma. Energy 123: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao, H., Harding, J., Lei, S., et al. 2022. Hydrogen and aromatics recovery through plasma-catalytic pyrolysis of waste polypropylene. Journal of Cleaner Production 350: 131467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karimi, H., Khani, M.R., Gharibi, M., et al. 2020. Plasma pyrolysis feasibility study of spent petrochemical catalyst wastes to hydrogen production. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 22: 2059–2070.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, Y., Ding, L., Zhang, C., et al. 2022. Experimental study on the treatment of oil-based drill cutting by pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma at atmospheric pressure. Journal of Cleaner Production 339: 130757.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cai, X., Wei, X., and Du, C. 2020. Thermal plasma treatment and co-processing of sludge for utilization of energy and material. Energy & Fuels 34: 7775–7805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. State Administration for Market Regulation. 2008. Proximate analysis of coal. Available at: https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=F2D44028D8FE0FD0DC62997A1763B183. Accessed 1 Apr 2009.

  24. Huang, Z., Xu, Z., Quan, Y., et al. 2018. Effect evaluation of hammer–milling thermal desorption technology on oil-based drilling fluid cuttings. Natural Gas Industry 38 (8): 8 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guo, W., Meng, X., Xiao, C., et al. 2018. Experimental study on the oil-based Drill cuttings treatment by thermal desorption. Environ Prot Oil Gas Fields 28 (04): 38–41, 62 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang, C., Li, T., Xu, T., et al. 2018. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of oil-based drilling cuttings in shale gas developing. AIP Conference Proceedings 1944: 020058-1–020058-9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. O’Bryan, P.L., Bourgoyne, A.T., Jr., Monger, T.G., et al. 1988. An experimental study of gas solubility in oil-based drilling fluids. SPE Drilling Engineering 3 (01): 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas, D.C., Lea, J.F., Jr., and Turek, E.A. 1984. Gas solubility in oil-based drilling fluids: Effects on kick detection. Journal of Petroleum Technology 36 (06): 959–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, Z., Zhou, J., Chen, Z., et al. 2018. A laboratory evaluation of superheated steam extraction process for decontamination of oil-based drill cuttings. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 6: 6691–6699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, X., Jin, B., Xu, B., et al. 2017. Melting characteristics during the vitrification of MSW incinerator fly ash by swirling melting treatment. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 19: 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pei, S.L., Chen, T.L., Pan, S.Y., et al. 2020. Addressing environmental sustainability of plasma vitrification technology for stabilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials 398: 122959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Xie, Q., Liang, D., He, L., et al. 2017. Measurement of coal pyrolysis reaction heat by TG-DSC. Journal of China Coal Society 42 (2): 538–546.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gaunt, L.F., Beggs, C.B., and Georghiou, G.E. 2006. Bactericidal action of the reactive species produced by gas-discharge nonthermal plasma at atmospheric pressure: A review. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 34: 1257–1269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dimitrakellis, P., Delikonstantis, E., Stefanidis, G.D., et al. 2022. Plasma technology for lignocellulosic biomass conversion toward an electrified biorefinery. Green Chemistry 24: 2680–2721.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yayalik, I., Koyun, A., and Akgün, M. 2020. Gasification of municipal solid wastes in plasma arc medium. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 40: 1401–1416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cai, X., Wei, X., Wu, J., et al. 2020. Plasma pyrolysis and gasification of carambola leaves using non-thermal arc plasma. Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy 2: 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, W., Ma, Y., Chen, G., et al. 2022. Enhanced hydrogen production using a tandem biomass pyrolysis and plasma reforming process. Fuel Processing Technology 234: 107333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, S., Mei, D., Wang, Y., et al. 2019. Plasma reforming of toluene as a model tar compound from biomass gasification: Effect of CO2 and steam. Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy 1: 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, B., Lü, Y., Zhang, X., et al. 2011. Hydrogen generation from steam reforming of ethanol in dielectric barrier discharge. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry 20: 151–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Qiu, Z., Wei, X., Mo, J., et al. 2020. Green hydrogen from bio-ethanol reforming using micro plasma. Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy 2: 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hou, Y., Qi, S., You, H., et al. 2018. The study on pyrolysis of oil-based drilling cuttings by microwave and electric heating. Journal of Environmental Management 228: 312–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, Z., Guo, Q., Liu, X., et al. 2007. Low temperature pyrolysis characteristics of oil sludge under various heating conditions. Energy & Fuels 21: 957–962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Xie, Q., Kong, S., Liu, Y., et al. 2012. Syngas production by two-stage method of biomass catalytic pyrolysis and gasification. Bioresource Technology 110: 603–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ali, A.M., Hassan, M.A.A., Ibrahim, R.R.K., et al. 2019. Analysis of solid residue and flue gas from thermal plasma treatment of petroleum sludge. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7: 103207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang, Q., Cai, X., Mallah, M.M.A., et al. 2014. Thermal plasma vitrification of MSWI fly ash mixed with different biomass ashes. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 42: 3549–3554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Li, M., Li, S., Sun, D., et al. 2016. Preliminary study of thermal treatment of coke wastewater sludge using plasma torch. Plasma Science and Technology 18: 1020–1026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Muvhiiwa, R.F., Sempuga, B., Hildebrandt, D., et al. 2018. Study of the effects of temperature on syngas composition from pyrolysis of wood pellets using a nitrogen plasma torch reactor. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 130: 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Li, J., Liu, K., Yan, S., et al. 2016. Application of thermal plasma technology for the treatment of solid wastes in China: An overview. Waste Management 58: 260–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ruj, B., and Ghosh, S. 2014. Technological aspects for thermal plasma treatment of municipal solid waste—A review. Fuel Processing Technology 126: 298–308.

  50. Cai, X., and Du, C. 2020. Thermal Plasma Treatment of Medical Waste. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 41: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Du, C. 2017. Plasma Treatment Technology of Solid Waste, 1st ed., 7–18. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhou, J., Zhai, Z., Wu, J., et al. 2023. Thermal plasma vitrification treatment of oil-based drill cuttings: Product characterization and harmless transformation. Journal of Environmental Management 331: 117285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Contract No. 51976186) and the Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province (CN) (Contract No. 2020YFS0018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZZ: original draft. JZ: conceptualization, methodology, project administration. JW: review and editing. JL: review and editing. WY: review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junhu Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, Z., Zhou, J., Wu, J. et al. Pyrolytic gas analysis and evaluation from thermal plasma pyrolysis of simulated oil-based drill cuttings. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 5, 367–382 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-023-00153-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-023-00153-3

Keywords

Navigation