Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of body sway measured by a markerless low-cost motion sensor and by a force plate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Research on Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The measurement of body sway is the standard method in the assessment of postural balance. Although the usual technique involves the record of center of pressure (CoP), it may also be done by the measurement of center of mass (CoM). This study compared the CoM estimated from joint positions reported by the Microsoft Kinect v2 (CoMk) to the CoP tracked with a force plate and CoM obtained from CoP (CoMp).

Methods

The signals of CoP and CoM of forty-six subjects in medial–lateral and anterior–posterior direction were acquired during quiet standing with eyes open or closed, on stable (floor) or unstable (foam pad) surface. Stabilometric parameters (sway area, velocity, range, RMS value, and the frequency band which contain 80% of the signal energy) based on CoP and CoM were calculated to evaluate the performance among conditions. The Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) between parameters based on all measurements was also computed.

Results

Five parameters of CoP were able to distinguish differences among all four conditions, four parameters of CoMp, and three of CoMk. Sway area, range, and RMS values from CoP and CoMk presented high correlation (rs > 0.7), velocity showed high or moderate correlation (0.3 < rs < 0.9), and frequency parameters presented moderate or low correlation (rs < 0.7). CoMk and CoMp parameters showed high correlation, except velocity which presented moderate correlation.

Conclusion

Although the CoM measurements via Kinect v2 have limitations as compared to traditional force plate measurement, these results support the use of the Kinect device for research and clinical assessment of body balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the Brazilian state agencies Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederico Caetano Jandre.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 34.7 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 30.2 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonzalez, D.R.G., Imbiriba, L.A. & Jandre, F.C. Comparison of body sway measured by a markerless low-cost motion sensor and by a force plate. Res. Biomed. Eng. 37, 507–517 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-021-00161-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-021-00161-4

Keywords

Navigation