Abstract
Purpose
The measurement of body sway is the standard method in the assessment of postural balance. Although the usual technique involves the record of center of pressure (CoP), it may also be done by the measurement of center of mass (CoM). This study compared the CoM estimated from joint positions reported by the Microsoft Kinect v2 (CoMk) to the CoP tracked with a force plate and CoM obtained from CoP (CoMp).
Methods
The signals of CoP and CoM of forty-six subjects in medial–lateral and anterior–posterior direction were acquired during quiet standing with eyes open or closed, on stable (floor) or unstable (foam pad) surface. Stabilometric parameters (sway area, velocity, range, RMS value, and the frequency band which contain 80% of the signal energy) based on CoP and CoM were calculated to evaluate the performance among conditions. The Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) between parameters based on all measurements was also computed.
Results
Five parameters of CoP were able to distinguish differences among all four conditions, four parameters of CoMp, and three of CoMk. Sway area, range, and RMS values from CoP and CoMk presented high correlation (rs > 0.7), velocity showed high or moderate correlation (0.3 < rs < 0.9), and frequency parameters presented moderate or low correlation (rs < 0.7). CoMk and CoMp parameters showed high correlation, except velocity which presented moderate correlation.
Conclusion
Although the CoM measurements via Kinect v2 have limitations as compared to traditional force plate measurement, these results support the use of the Kinect device for research and clinical assessment of body balance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baratto L, Morasso PG, Re C, Spada G. A new look at posturographic analysis in the clinical context: sway-density versus other parameterization techniques. Motor Control. 2002;6:246–70. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.6.3.246.
Bonnechère B, Jansen B, Salvia P, Bouzahouene H, Omelina L, Moiseev F, Sholukha V, Cornelis J, Rooze M, Van Sint Jan S. Validity and reliability of the Kinect within functional assessment activities: comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry. Gait Posture. 2014;39:593–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.018.
Browne J, O’Hare N, O’Hare G, Finn A, Colin J. Clinical assessment of the quantitative posturography system. Physiotherapy. 2002;88:217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60413-0.
Butkiewicz T. Low-cost coastal mapping using Kinect v2 time-of-flight cameras. 2014 Oceans - St. John’s, 2014, p. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2014.7003084
Caron O, Gelat T, Rougier P, Blanchi JP. A comparative analysis of the center of gravity and center of pressure trajectory path lengths in standing posture: an estimation of active stiffness. J Appl Biomech. 2000;16:234–47. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.16.3.234.
Clark RA, Bower KJ, Mentiplay BF, Paterson K, Pua Y-H. Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables. J Biomech. 2013;46:2722–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.011.
Clark RA, Mentiplay BF, Hough E, Pua YH. Three-dimensional cameras and skeleton pose tracking for physical function assessment: a review of uses, validity, current developments and Kinect alternatives. Gait Posture. 2019;68:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.029.
Clark RA, Pua Y-H, Fortin K, Ritchie C, Webster KE, Denehy L, Bryant AL. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait Posture. 2012;36:372–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033.
Clark RA, Pua Y-H, Oliveira CC, Bower KJ, Thilarajah S, McGaw R, Hasanki K, Mentiplay BF. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control. Gait Posture. 2015;42:210–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.005.
Clark RA, Vernon S, Mentiplay BF, Miller KJ, McGinley JL, Pua YH, Paterson K, Bower KJ. Instrumenting gait assessment using the Kinect in people living with stroke: reliability and association with balance tests. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0006-8.
Diaz MG, Tombari F, Rodriguez-Gonzalvez P, Gonzalez-Aguilera D. Analysis and evaluation between the first and the second generation of RGB-D sensors. IEEE Sens J. 2015;15:6507–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2459139.
Duarte M, Freitas SMSF. Revision of posturography based on force plate for balance evaluation. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14:183–92.
Dutta T. Evaluation of the KinectTM sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace. Appl Ergon. 2012;43:645–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.011.
Eltoukhy M, Kuenze C, Oh J, Signorile J. Validation of static and dynamic balance assessment using Microsoft Kinect for young and elderly populations. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2017.2686330.
Gage WH, Winter DA, Frank JS, Adkin AL. Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing. Gait Posture. 2004;19:124–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00037-7.
Gholami F, Trojan DA, Kövecses J, Haddad WM, Gholami B. A Microsoft Kinect-based point-of-care gait assessment framework for multiple sclerosis patients. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017;21:1376–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2016.2593692.
González A, Hayashibe M, Bonnet V, Fraisse P. Whole body center of mass estimation with portable sensors: using the statically equivalent serial chain and a Kinect. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14:16955–71. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140916955.
Hasan SS, Robin DW, Szurkus DC, Ashmead DH, Peterson SW, Shiavi RG. Simultaneous measurement of body center of pressure and center of gravity during upright stance. Part II: amplitude and frequency data. Gait Posture. 1996;4:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(95)01031-9.
Jun H, Bailenson J. Temporal RVL: a depth stream compression method. 2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces abstracts and workshops (VRW), 2020, p. 665–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00183.
Lachat E, Macher H, Mittet M-A, Landes T, Grussenmeyer P. First experiences with Kinect v2 sensor for close range 3D modelling. ISPRS - Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2015;5:93–100. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W4-93-2015.
Lafond D, Duarte M, Prince F. Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment. J Biomech. 2004;37:1421–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00251-3.
Laurijssen D, Truijen S, Saeys W, Daems W, Steckel J. An ultrasonic six degrees-of-freedom pose estimation sensor. IEEE Sens J. 2017;17:151–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2618399.
Ledebt A, Brenière Y. Dynamical implication of anatomical and mechanical parameters in gait initiation process in children. Hum Mov Sci. 1994;13:801–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(94)90019-1.
Leightley D, Yap MH, McPhee J. Automated analysis and quantification of human mobility using a depth sensor. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2016.2558540.
Liao Y, Vakanski A, Xian M, Paul D, Baker R. A review of computational approaches for evaluation of rehabilitation exercises. Comput Biol Med. 2020;119:103687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103687.
Lim D, Kim C, Jung H, Jung D, Chun KJ. Use of the Microsoft Kinect system to characterize balance ability during balance training. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1077–83. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S85299.
Lin D, Seol H, Nussbaum MA, Madigan ML. Reliability of COP-based postural sway measures and age-related differences. Gait Posture. 2008;28:337–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.005.
Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46:239–48.
Masani K, Vette AH, Abe MO, Nakazawa K. Center of pressure velocity reflects body acceleration rather than body velocity during quiet standing. Gait Posture. 2014;39:946–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.008.
Maurer C, Peterka RJ. A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00221.2004.
Mayagoitia RE, Lötters JC, Veltink PH, Hermens H. Standing balance evaluation using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture. 2002;16:55–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00199-0.
Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Pua Y-H, McGaw R, Heywood S, Clark RA. Gait assessment using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: concurrent validity and inter-day reliability of spatiotemporal and kinematic variables. J Biomech. 2015;48:2166–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.021.
Moghadam M, Ashayeri H, Salavati M, Sarafzadeh J, Taghipoor KD, Saeedi A, Salehi R. Reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability in healthy older adults: effects of postural task difficulty and cognitive load. Gait Posture. 2011;33:651–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.016.
Oliveira LF, Simpson DM, Nadal J. Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis. Physiol Meas. 1996;17:305–12.
Otte K, Kayser B, Mansow-Model S, Verrel J, Paul F, Brandt AU, Schmitz-Hübsch T. Accuracy and reliability of the Kinect version 2 for clinical measurement of motor function. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166532.
Pagliari D, Pinto L. Calibration of Kinect for Xbox One and comparison between the two generations of Microsoft sensors. Sensors (Basel). 2015;15:27569–89. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151127569.
Paillard T, Noé F. Techniques and methods for testing the postural function in healthy and pathological subjects. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:891390. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/891390.
Panzer VP, Bandinelli S, Hallett M. Biomechanical assessment of quiet standing and changes associated with aging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80024-7.
Peterka RJ. Chapter 2 - sensory integration for human balance control. In: Day BL, Lord SR, editors. Handbook of clinical neurology, vol. 159, Elsevier; 2018, p. 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63916-5.00002-1.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2009.
Prieto TE, Myklebust JB, Hoffmann RG, Lovett EG, Myklebust BM. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996;43:956–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.532130.
Raymakers JA, Samson MM, Verhaar HJJ. The assessment of body sway and the choice of the stability parameter(s). Gait Posture. 2005;21:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.11.006.
Romano F, Colagiorgio P, Buizza A, Sardi F, Ramat S. Extraction of traditional COP-based features from COM sway in postural stability evaluation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:3715–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319200.
Rougier P, Burdet C, Farenc I, Berger L. Backward and forward leaning postures modelled by an fBm framework. Neurosci Res. 2001;41:41–50.
Sarbolandi H, Lefloch D, Kolb A. Kinect range sensing: structured-light versus time-of-flight Kinect. Comput vis Image Underst. 2015;139:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2015.05.006.
da Silva PJG, Nadal J, Infantosi AFC. Investigating the center of pressure velocity Romberg’s quotient for assessing the visual role on the body sway. Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Biomédica. 2012;28:319–26. https://doi.org/10.4322/rbeb.2012.039.
Stone EE, Skubic M. Unobtrusive, Continuous, in-home gait measurement using the Microsoft Kinect. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60:2925–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2266341.
Stone EE, Skubic M. Fall detection in homes of older adults using the Microsoft Kinect. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015;19:290–301. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2014.2312180.
Takeda Y, Matsuda A, Rekimoto J. 3D Human reconstruction from an image for mobile telepresence systems. 2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces abstracts and workshops (VRW), 2020, p. 773–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00237.
Vieira TMM, Oliveira LF, Nadal J. Estimation procedures affect the center of pressure frequency analysis. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2009;42:665–73.
Visser JE, Carpenter MG, van der Kooij H, Bloem BR. The clinical utility of posturography. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:2424–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.220.
Wang Q, Kurillo G, Ofli F, Bajcsy R. Evaluation of pose tracking accuracy in the first and second generations of Microsoft Kinect. Int Conf Healthc Inform. 2015;2015:380–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2015.54.
Wasenmüller O, Stricker D. Comparison of Kinect V1 and V2 depth images in terms of accuracy and precision. Computer vision – ACCV 2016 workshops, Springer, Cham; 2016, p. 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54427-4_3
Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of movement. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak K. Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:1211–21.
Winter D. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture. 1995;3:193–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9.
Yang L, Zhang L, Dong H, Alelaiwi A, Saddik AE. Evaluating and improving the depth accuracy of Kinect for Windows v2. IEEE Sens J. 2015;15:4275–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2416651.
Yang Y, Pu F, Li Y, Li S, Fan Y, Li D. Reliability and validity of Kinect RGB-D sensor for assessing standing balance. IEEE Sens J. 2014;14:1633–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2296509.
Yeung LF, Cheng KC, Fong CH, Lee WCC, Tong K-Y. Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway. Gait Posture. 2014;40:532–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.012.
Zennaro S, Munaro M, Milani S, Zanuttigh P, Bernardi A, Ghidoni S, Menegatti E. Performance evaluation of the 1st and 2nd generation Kinect for multimedia applications. IEEE Int Conf Multimed Expo (ICME). 2015;2015:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2015.7177380.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by the Brazilian state agencies Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonzalez, D.R.G., Imbiriba, L.A. & Jandre, F.C. Comparison of body sway measured by a markerless low-cost motion sensor and by a force plate. Res. Biomed. Eng. 37, 507–517 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-021-00161-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-021-00161-4