Abstract
Postural sway typically has high intrinsic variability. Due to high intrinsic variability, the reliability of its clinical application is limited. This study proposed the modified stability coefficient considering the intrinsic variability of postural sway for reducing its high level of variability, and calculated the contribution of major sensory systems (somatosensory, visual and vestibular) for its possible clinical application. The subjects of this study were composed of 25 healthy young (HY) adults in their 20 s and 33 healthy older (HO) adults over 65 years of age. Each subject maintained four standing conditions (eyes open and eyes closed on a firm surface, and a foam surface) for 1 min each, and postural sway was measured using the inertial sensor that was attached to their waist. Postural sway was calculated using seven variables that reflect the changes in spatial movements (Mean distance, Root mean square, Path length, Range of acceleration, Mean velocity, Mean frequency, 95% confidence ellipse area). The stability coefficient proposed in this study was calculated using the variables that showed significant difference between groups, and sensory contributions were calculated. The indices on the statistics (p value) and practical significance (effect size: Cohen’s d) between the groups, and the coefficient of variation (CV) within each group were calculated by the calculated sensory contribution. By introducing the stability coefficient, the average CV was reduced to 28.13% in HY and 27.20% in HO with a high level of variation, compared to 36.67% in HY and 39.30% in HO with a very high level of variation. The average CV of sensory ratios was 12.79% in HY and 12.92% in HO with a medium level of variation. As the sensory ratios utilizing stability coefficient show statistical and practical differences of age-related changes in balance and the average CVs with a medium level of variation, these results indicate the possibility of clinical use about the sensory ratios.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- HY:
-
Healthy young
- HO:
-
Healthy older
- CV:
-
Coefficient of variation
- EO:
-
Eyes open, firm surface
- EC:
-
Eyes closed, firm surface
- EO-foam:
-
Eyes open, foam surface
- EC-foam:
-
Eyes closed, foam surface
- DIST:
-
Mean distance
- RMS:
-
Root mean square
- PATH:
-
Path length
- RANGE:
-
Range of acceleration
- MV:
-
Mean velocity
- MF:
-
Mean frequency
- AREA:
-
95% confidence ellipse area
References
Pollock, A. S., Durward, B. R., Rowe, P. J., & Paul, J. P. (2000). What is balance? Clinical Rehabilitation, 14, 402–406.
Mancini, M., & Horak, F. B. (2010). The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(2), 239–248.
Kim, J. W., Chung, H. Y., Kim, C. S., Eom, K. M., et al. (2012). Relationship between body factors and postural sway during natural standing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(6), 963–968.
Melzer, I., Benjuya, N., & Kaplanski, J. (2004). Postural stability in the elderly: A comparison between fallers and non-fallers. Age and Ageing, 33(6), 602–607.
Nguyen, U. S., Kiel, D. P., Li, W., Galica, A. M., Kang, H. G., Casey, V. A., et al. (2012). Correlations of clinical and laboratory measures of balance in older men and women. Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken), 64(12), 1895–1902.
Takeshima, N., Islam, M. M., Rogers, M. E., et al. (2014). Pattern of age-associated decline of static and dynamic balance in community-dwelling older women. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 14, 556–560.
Horak, F. B. (2006). Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing, 35, ii7–ii11.
Contarino, D., Bertora, G. O., & Bergmann, J. M. (2003). Balance platform: mathematical modeling for clinical evaluation. The International Tinnitus Journal, 9(1), 23–25.
Di Berardino, F., Filipponi, E., Barozzi, S., Giordano, G., Alpini, D., & Cesarani, A. (2009). The use of rubber foam pads and “sensory ratios” to reduce variability in static posturography assessment. Gait & Posture, 29(1), 158–160.
Baloh, R. W., Jacobson, K. M., & Beykirch, K. (1998). Static and dynamic posturography in patients with vestibular and cerebellar lesions. Archives of Neurology, 55, 649–654.
Visser, J. E., Carpenter, M. G., van der Kooij, H., & Bloem, B. R. (2008). The clinical utility of posturography. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(11), 2424–2436.
Shah, V. P., Midha, K. K., & Dighe, S. (1991). Analytical methods evaluation: bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 16, 249–255.
Egerton, T., Brauer, S. G., & Cresswell, A. G. (2009). Fatigue after physical activity in healthy and balance-impaired elderly. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 17, 89–105.
Moe-Nilssen, R., & Helbostad, J. L. (2002). Trunk accelerometry as a measure of balance control during quiet standing. Gait & Posture, 16, 60–68.
Greene, B. R., McGrath, D., Walsh, L., Doheny, E. P., McKeown, D., Garattini, C., et al. (2012). Quantitative falls risk estimation through multi-sensor assessment of standing balance. Physiological Measurement, 33(12), 2049–2063.
Mancini, M., Salarian, A., Carlson-Kuhta, P., et al. (2012). ISway: A sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 9, 59.
Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2015). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: appli-cations, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241–286.
Gomes, F. P. (2009). Curso de estatística experimental (15th ed., p. 477). Piracicaba: Esalq.
Laufer, Y., Barak, Y., & Chemel, I. (2006). Age-related differences in the effect of a perceived threat to stability on postural control. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 61(5), 500–504.
Gill, J., Allum, J. H., Carpenter, M. G., Held-Ziolkowska, M., Adkin, A. L., Honegger, F., et al. (2001). Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of age. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(7), 438–447.
Błaszczyk, J. W., Orawiec, R., Duda-Kłodowska, D., & Opala, G. (2007). Assessment of postural instability in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 183(1), 107–114.
McGrath, D., Greene, B. R., Sheehan, K., Walsh, L., Kenny, R. A., & Caulfield, B. (2015). Stability of daily home-based measures of postural control over an 8-week period in highly functioning older adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 115(2), 437–449.
Fujimoto, C., Murofushi, T., Chihara, Y., Ushio, M., Sugasawa, K., Yamaguchi, T., et al. (2009). Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of foam posturography for peripheral vestibular disorders: analysis of parameters related to visual and somatosensory dependence. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(7), 1408–1414.
O’Sullivan, M., Blake, C., Cunningham, C., Boyle, G., & Finucane, C. (2009). Correlation of accelerometry with clinical balance tests in older fallers and non-fallers. Age and Ageing, 38(3), 308–313.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2013R1A2A2A03014511 and 2016R1D1A3B03930135).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, D., Seo, J., Kim, J. et al. Application of the Stability Coefficient for Considering Intrinsic Variability of Postural Sway. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 20, 443–449 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00024-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00024-0