Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the Stability Coefficient for Considering Intrinsic Variability of Postural Sway

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postural sway typically has high intrinsic variability. Due to high intrinsic variability, the reliability of its clinical application is limited. This study proposed the modified stability coefficient considering the intrinsic variability of postural sway for reducing its high level of variability, and calculated the contribution of major sensory systems (somatosensory, visual and vestibular) for its possible clinical application. The subjects of this study were composed of 25 healthy young (HY) adults in their 20 s and 33 healthy older (HO) adults over 65 years of age. Each subject maintained four standing conditions (eyes open and eyes closed on a firm surface, and a foam surface) for 1 min each, and postural sway was measured using the inertial sensor that was attached to their waist. Postural sway was calculated using seven variables that reflect the changes in spatial movements (Mean distance, Root mean square, Path length, Range of acceleration, Mean velocity, Mean frequency, 95% confidence ellipse area). The stability coefficient proposed in this study was calculated using the variables that showed significant difference between groups, and sensory contributions were calculated. The indices on the statistics (p value) and practical significance (effect size: Cohen’s d) between the groups, and the coefficient of variation (CV) within each group were calculated by the calculated sensory contribution. By introducing the stability coefficient, the average CV was reduced to 28.13% in HY and 27.20% in HO with a high level of variation, compared to 36.67% in HY and 39.30% in HO with a very high level of variation. The average CV of sensory ratios was 12.79% in HY and 12.92% in HO with a medium level of variation. As the sensory ratios utilizing stability coefficient show statistical and practical differences of age-related changes in balance and the average CVs with a medium level of variation, these results indicate the possibility of clinical use about the sensory ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HY:

Healthy young

HO:

Healthy older

CV:

Coefficient of variation

EO:

Eyes open, firm surface

EC:

Eyes closed, firm surface

EO-foam:

Eyes open, foam surface

EC-foam:

Eyes closed, foam surface

DIST:

Mean distance

RMS:

Root mean square

PATH:

Path length

RANGE:

Range of acceleration

MV:

Mean velocity

MF:

Mean frequency

AREA:

95% confidence ellipse area

References

  1. Pollock, A. S., Durward, B. R., Rowe, P. J., & Paul, J. P. (2000). What is balance? Clinical Rehabilitation, 14, 402–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mancini, M., & Horak, F. B. (2010). The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(2), 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J. W., Chung, H. Y., Kim, C. S., Eom, K. M., et al. (2012). Relationship between body factors and postural sway during natural standing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(6), 963–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Melzer, I., Benjuya, N., & Kaplanski, J. (2004). Postural stability in the elderly: A comparison between fallers and non-fallers. Age and Ageing, 33(6), 602–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen, U. S., Kiel, D. P., Li, W., Galica, A. M., Kang, H. G., Casey, V. A., et al. (2012). Correlations of clinical and laboratory measures of balance in older men and women. Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken), 64(12), 1895–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takeshima, N., Islam, M. M., Rogers, M. E., et al. (2014). Pattern of age-associated decline of static and dynamic balance in community-dwelling older women. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 14, 556–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horak, F. B. (2006). Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing, 35, ii7–ii11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Contarino, D., Bertora, G. O., & Bergmann, J. M. (2003). Balance platform: mathematical modeling for clinical evaluation. The International Tinnitus Journal, 9(1), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Berardino, F., Filipponi, E., Barozzi, S., Giordano, G., Alpini, D., & Cesarani, A. (2009). The use of rubber foam pads and “sensory ratios” to reduce variability in static posturography assessment. Gait & Posture, 29(1), 158–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baloh, R. W., Jacobson, K. M., & Beykirch, K. (1998). Static and dynamic posturography in patients with vestibular and cerebellar lesions. Archives of Neurology, 55, 649–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Visser, J. E., Carpenter, M. G., van der Kooij, H., & Bloem, B. R. (2008). The clinical utility of posturography. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(11), 2424–2436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah, V. P., Midha, K. K., & Dighe, S. (1991). Analytical methods evaluation: bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 16, 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Egerton, T., Brauer, S. G., & Cresswell, A. G. (2009). Fatigue after physical activity in healthy and balance-impaired elderly. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 17, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moe-Nilssen, R., & Helbostad, J. L. (2002). Trunk accelerometry as a measure of balance control during quiet standing. Gait & Posture, 16, 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greene, B. R., McGrath, D., Walsh, L., Doheny, E. P., McKeown, D., Garattini, C., et al. (2012). Quantitative falls risk estimation through multi-sensor assessment of standing balance. Physiological Measurement, 33(12), 2049–2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mancini, M., Salarian, A., Carlson-Kuhta, P., et al. (2012). ISway: A sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 9, 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2015). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: appli-cations, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomes, F. P. (2009). Curso de estatística experimental (15th ed., p. 477). Piracicaba: Esalq.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laufer, Y., Barak, Y., & Chemel, I. (2006). Age-related differences in the effect of a perceived threat to stability on postural control. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 61(5), 500–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gill, J., Allum, J. H., Carpenter, M. G., Held-Ziolkowska, M., Adkin, A. L., Honegger, F., et al. (2001). Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of age. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(7), 438–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Błaszczyk, J. W., Orawiec, R., Duda-Kłodowska, D., & Opala, G. (2007). Assessment of postural instability in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 183(1), 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McGrath, D., Greene, B. R., Sheehan, K., Walsh, L., Kenny, R. A., & Caulfield, B. (2015). Stability of daily home-based measures of postural control over an 8-week period in highly functioning older adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 115(2), 437–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujimoto, C., Murofushi, T., Chihara, Y., Ushio, M., Sugasawa, K., Yamaguchi, T., et al. (2009). Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of foam posturography for peripheral vestibular disorders: analysis of parameters related to visual and somatosensory dependence. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(7), 1408–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Sullivan, M., Blake, C., Cunningham, C., Boyle, G., & Finucane, C. (2009). Correlation of accelerometry with clinical balance tests in older fallers and non-fallers. Age and Ageing, 38(3), 308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2013R1A2A2A03014511 and 2016R1D1A3B03930135).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyerae Tack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, D., Seo, J., Kim, J. et al. Application of the Stability Coefficient for Considering Intrinsic Variability of Postural Sway. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 20, 443–449 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00024-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00024-0

Keywords

Navigation