Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Direct energy rebound effect for road transportation in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Engineering Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enhancement of energy efficiency stands as the principal avenue for attaining energy conservation and emissions reduction objectives within the realm of road transportation. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that these objectives may, in part or in entirety, be offset by the phenomenon known as the energy rebound effect (ERE). To quantify the long-term EREs and short-term EREs specific to China’s road transportation, this study employed panel cointegration and panel error correction models, accounting for asymmetric price effects. The findings reveal the following: The long-term EREs observed in road passenger transportation and road freight transportation range from 13% to 25% and 14% to 48%, respectively; in contrast, the short-term EREs in road passenger transportation and road freight transportation span from 36% to 41% and 3.9% to 32%, respectively. It is noteworthy that the EREs associated with road passenger transportation and road freight transportation represent a partial rebound effect, falling short of reaching the magnitude of a counterproductive backfire effect. This leads to the inference that the upsurge in energy consumption within the road transportation sector cannot be solely attributed to advancements in energy efficiency. Instead, various factors, including income levels, the scale of commodity trade, and industrial structure, exert more substantial facilitating influences. Furthermore, the escalation of fuel prices fails to dampen the demand for energy services, whether in the domain of road passenger transportation or road freight transportation. In light of these conclusions, recommendations are proffered for the formulation of energy efficiency policies pertinent to road transportation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barla P, Lamonde B, Miranda-Moreno L F, Boucher N (2009). Traveled distance, stock and fuel efficiency of private vehicles in Canada: Price elasticities and rebound effect. Transportation, 36(4): 389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout P H G, Muskens J C, Velthuijsen J W (2000). Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6/7): 425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Rivers N (2021). The energy efficiency rebound effect in general equilibrium. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 109: 102508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai J, Yang Y, Wang S, Lai K K (2016). Fuel efficiency and emission in China’s road transport sector: Induced effect and rebound effect. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112: 188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudry M, Jayasuriya L, Blainey S, Lovric M, Hall J W, Russell T, Jenkins N, Wu J (2022). The implications of ambitious decarbonisation of heat and road transport for Britain’s net zero carbon energy systems. Applied Energy, 305: 117905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Zha D L, Salman M (2022a). The influence of carbon tax on CO2 rebound effect and welfare in Chinese households. Energy Policy, 168: 113103 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Zha D L, Wang L J, Yang G L (2022b). The direct CO2 rebound effect in households: Evidence from China’s provinces. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 155: 111888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z N, Du H B, Li J L, Southworth F, Ma S F (2019). Achieving low-carbon urban passenger transport in China: Insights from the heterogeneous rebound effect. Energy Economics, 81: 1029–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borger B, Mulalic I (2012). The determinants of fuel use in the trucking industry: Volume, fleet characteristics and the rebound effect. Transport Policy, 24: 284–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon H S, Saphores J D, Boarnet M G (2015). The impact of urban form and gasoline prices on vehicle usage: Evidence from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Research in Transportation Economics, 52(SI): 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitropoulos A, Oueslati W, Sintek C (2018). The rebound effect in road transport: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Energy Economics, 75: 163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng R, Fang X K (2022). China’s pathways to synchronize the emission reductions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases: Pros and cons. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184: 106392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frondel M, Peters J, Vance C (2008). Identifying the rebound: Evidence from a German household panel. Energy Journal, 29(4): 145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frondel M, Schmidt C M (2005). Evaluating environmental programs: The perspective of modern evaluation research. Ecological Economics, 55(4): 515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gately D (1993). The imperfect price-reversibility of world oil demand. Energy Journal, 14(4): 163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham K (2014). Identifying the elasticity of driving: Evidence from a gasoline price shock in California. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 47(SI): 13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham K T, Rapson D S, Wagner G (2016). The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1): 68–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening L A, Greene D L, Difiglio C (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption: The rebound effect, a survey. Energy Policy, 28(6/7): 389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia J X, Ma G R, Qin C, Wang L Y (2020). Place-based policies, stateled industrialisation, and regional development: Evidence from China’s Great Western Development Programme. European Economic Review, 123: 103398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z J, Lin B Q (2013). China’s energy demand and its characteristics in the industrialization and urbanization process: A reply. Energy Policy, 60: 583–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazzoom J D (1980). Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy Journal, 1(4): 21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J L, Li A J, Xie X (2018). Rebound effect of transportation considering additional capital costs and input-output relationships: The role of subsistence consumption and unmet demand. Energy Economics, 74: 441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Yan Y X, Zhang X L (2021). Carbon-abatement policies, investment preferences, and directed technological change: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172: 121015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S J, Liu Y Y, Purevjav A O, Yang L (2019). Does subway expansion improve air quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96: 213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Zhang Y J (2021). Has carbon emissions trading system promoted non-fossil energy development in China? Applied Energy, 302: 117613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmaeus M, Hasselstrom L, Mellin A, Nyblom A, Akerman J (2023). Addressing rebound effects in transport policy: Insights from exploring five case studies. Transport Policy, 131: 45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos F J F, Silva F J F (2011). The rebound effect on road freight transport: Empirical evidence from Portugal. Energy Policy, 39(5): 2833–2841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizobuchi K (2008). An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs. Energy Economics, 30(5): 2486–2516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeck J, Johansen K (2016). Elasticities of fuel and traffic demand and the direct rebound effects: An econometric estimation in the case of Norway. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 83: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng T D, Yuan Z Y, Ou X M, Wang G H (2017). Analysis of future vehicle fuel demand and direct CO2 emissions in China. Energy Procedia, 142: 2767–2772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rottoli M, Dirnaichner A, Pietzcker R, Schreyer F, Luderer G (2021). Alternative electrification pathways for light-duty vehicles in the European transport sector. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 99: 103005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safarzynska K, van den Bergh J C J M (2018). A higher rebound effect under bounded rationality: Interactions between car mobility and electricity generation. Energy Economics, 74: 179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small K A, van Dender K (2007). Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect. Energy Journal, 28(1): 25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song P, Mao X Q, Li Z Y, Tan Z X (2023). Study on the optimal policy options for improving energy efficiency and co-controlling carbon emission and local air pollutants in China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 175: 113167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J (2008). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65(3): 636–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J, Sommerville M (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37(4): 1356–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S, Stapleton L (2018). Rebound effects in UK road freight transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63: 156–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton L, Sorrell S, Schwanen T (2016). Estimating direct rebound effects for personal automotive travel in Great Britain. Energy Economics, 54: 313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamannaei M, Zarei H, Rasti-Barzoki M (2021). A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road-rail systems with government intervention. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 153: 272–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A Q, Yuan Z B, Liu X H, Wang M L, Yang J, Sha Q E, Zheng J Y (2022). Measurement-based intermediate volatility organic compound emission inventory from on-road vehicle exhaust in China. Environmental Pollution, 310: 119887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Han J Y, Su M, Wan S L, Zhang Z C (2021). The relationship between freight transport and economic development: A case study of China. Research in Transportation Economics, 85: 100885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhou P, Zhou D Q (2012). An empirical study of direct rebound effect for passenger transport in urban China. Energy Economics, 34(2): 452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z H, Lu M L (2014). An empirical study of direct rebound effect for road freight transport in China. Applied Energy, 133: 274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winebrake J J, Green E H (2017). Environmental policy, decision making, and rebound effects in the US trucking sector. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 23: 54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia D, Zhang L (2022). Coupling coordination degree between coal production reduction and CO2 emission reduction in coal industry. Energy, 258: 124902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha D L, Chen Q, Wang L J (2022). Exploring carbon rebound effects in Chinese households’ consumption: A simulation analysis based on a multi-regional input-output framework. Applied Energy, 313: 118847 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S S, Lin B Q (2018). Investigating the rebound effect in road transport system: Empirical evidence from China. Energy Policy, 112: 129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y J, Liu Z, Qin C X, Tan T D (2017). The direct and indirect CO2 rebound effect for private cars in China. Energy Policy, 100: 149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y J, Peng H R, Liu Z, Tan W (2015). Direct energy rebound effect for road passenger transport in China: A dynamic panel quantile regression approach. Energy Policy, 87(SI): 303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y J, Xu H C, Jia R N (2022). Endogenous energy efficiency and rebound effect in the transportation sector: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335: 130310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211106, China

    Donglan Zha, Pansong Jiang & Xue Zhang

  2. Research Centre for Soft Energy Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211106, China

    Donglan Zha, Pansong Jiang & Xue Zhang

Authors
  1. Donglan Zha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pansong Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donglan Zha.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72074111).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zha, D., Jiang, P. & Zhang, X. Direct energy rebound effect for road transportation in China. Front. Eng. Manag. 10, 597–611 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0276-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0276-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation