Skip to main content
Log in

Application of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Crack Measurement Using Image Calibration Supported by Laser Projectors

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Multiscale Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional bridge inspection methods mostly rely on the experience and expertise of inspectors in visual detection of cracks. Such visual inspection methods are not only time consuming but also could be affected by subjective judgment of inspectors and lack a unified inspection standard. To overcome the shortcomings of visual inspection, this study investigates the feasibilities of using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) combined with laser projectors to measure surface cracks. All related parameters of the laser projectors that are fixed on the UAV are calibrated first in the laboratory. Then, the UAV with the laser projectors is used to capture images of surface cracks. The images from the UAV can be transformed to orthoimages using the laser projectors’ parameters and the image processing technology. Next, surface cracks in the orthoimages are automatically identified by a crack identification algorithm. Finally, the characteristics of surface cracks are evaluated by the image-based measurement technologies. To verify the accuracy of the proposed image-based measurement system (UAV with laser projectors), seven artificial cracks with different widths are measured using the proposed measurement system and the point cloud method (UAV with the global navigation satellite system) under different measurement distances. The test results demonstrate that while the distance between the UAV and the artificial crack is within 150 cm, the proposed image-based measurement system is able to measure crack widths more accurately than the GNSS point cloud method. In addition, the proposed image-based measurement system can automatically identify surface cracks and measure crack widths from UAV-captured images without manual measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The supplementary information is available by request to Prof. Chang-Wei Huang.

Code availability

The code of the proposed method is available by request to Prof. Chang-Wei Huang.

References

  1. M. Tirassa, M.F. Ruiz, A. Muttoni, Influence of cracking and rough surface properties on the transfer of forces in cracked concrete. Eng. Struct. 225, 111138 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Gimenes, E.A. Rodrigues, M.A. Maedo, L.A. Bitencourt, O.L. Manzoli, 2D crack propagation in high-strength concrete using multiscale modeling. Multiscale Sci. Eng. 2(2), 169–188 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42493-020-00049-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Chen, T.C. Hutchinson, Image-based framework for concrete surface crack monitoring and quantification. Adv. Civil Eng. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/215295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H.G. Sohn, Y.M. Lim, K.H. Yun, G.H. Kim, Monitoring crack changes in concrete structures. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 20(1), 52–61 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00376.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Park, S. Ahmad, C.B. Yun, Y. Roh, Multiple crack detection of concrete structures using impedance-based structural health monitoring techniques. Exp. Mech. 46(5), 609–618 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-006-8734-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Zhou, B. Zhang, K. Xia, X. Li, G. Yan, K. Zhang, Smart film for crack monitoring of concrete bridges. Struct. Health Monit. 10(3), 275–289 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710373288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Dorafshan, M. Maguire, Bridge inspection: human performance, unmanned aerial systems and automation. J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit. 8(3), 443–476 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0285-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Nakao, E. Hasegawa, T. Kudo, N. Sawasaki, Development of a Bridge Inspection Support Robot System Using Two-Wheeled Multicopters. J. Robot. Mechatron. 31(6), 837–844 (2019). https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2019.p0837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Metni, T. Hamel, A UAV for bridge inspection: visual servoing control law with orientation limits. Autom. Constr. 17(1), 3–10 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorafshan, S., Maguire, M., Hoffer, N. V., & Coopmans, C. (2017, June). Challenges in bridge inspection using small unmanned aerial systems: Results and lessons learned. In 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) (pp. 1722–1730). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2017.7991459.

  11. N. Metni, J.M. Pflimlin, T. Hamel, P. Soueres, Attitude and gyro bias estimation for a VTOL UAV. Control. Eng. Pract. 14(12), 1511–1520 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.R. Azinheira, A. Moutinho, Hover control of an UAV with backstepping design including input saturations. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 16(3), 517–526 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2007.908209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.D. Phung, C.H. Quach, T.H. Dinh, Q. Ha, Enhanced discrete particle swarm optimization path planning for UAV vision-based surface inspection. Autom. Constr. 81, 25–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kim, J. Lee, E. Ahn, S. Cho, M. Shin, S.H. Sim, Concrete crack identification using a UAV incorporating hybrid image processing. Sensors 17(9), 2052 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. I.H. Kim, H. Jeon, S.C. Baek, W.H. Hong, H.J. Jung, Application of crack identification techniques for an aging concrete bridge inspection using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Sensors 18(6), 1881 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Lei, N. Wang, P. Xu, G. Song, New crack detection method for bridge inspection using UAV incorporating image processing. J. Aerosp. Eng. 31(5), 04018058 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Duque, J. Seo, J. Wacker, Bridge deterioration quantification protocol using UAV. J. Bridg. Eng. 23(10), 04018080 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Reagan, A. Sabato, C. Niezrecki, Feasibility of using digital image correlation for unmanned aerial vehicle structural health monitoring of bridges. Struct. Health Monit. 17(5), 1056–1072 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717735326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Khaloo, D. Lattanzi, K. Cunningham, R. Dell’Andrea, M. Riley, Unmanned aerial vehicle inspection of the Placer River Trail Bridge through image-based 3D modelling. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14(1), 124–136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1330891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Jung, D. Choi, S. Song, H. Myung, Bridge inspection using unmanned aerial vehicle based on HG-SLAM: hierarchical graph-based SLAM. Remote Sensing 12(18), 3022 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Lin, W.Y. Chang, L.C. Lee, H.T. Hsiao, W.F. Tsai, Remote Crack measuring system and device. J. Chin. Inst. Civil Hydraul. Eng. 26(2), 165–180 (2014). ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.K. Sinha, P.W. Fieguth, Automated detection of cracks in buried concrete pipe images. Autom. Constr. 15(1), 58–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Litorowicz, Identification and quantification of cracks in concrete by optical fluorescent microscopy. Cem. Concr. Res. 36(8), 1508–1515 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Yamaguchi, S. Hashimoto, Fast crack detection method for large-size concrete surface images using percolation-based image processing. Mach. Vis. Appl. 21(5), 797–809 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-009-0189-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Yamaguchi, S. Hashimoto, Practical image measurement of crack width for real concrete structure. Electron. Commun. Jpn. 92(10), 1–12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecj.10151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pix4D SA, (2017). Pix4Dmapper 4.1 User Manual.

  27. Lidar360 (2018). Lidar360 User Guide V5.0. GreenValley Int., California.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [109-2221-E-033-001] and the Chung Yuan Christian University [109-CYCU-RG-12 and 110-CYCU-RG-07].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KWC and CWH drafted the manuscript. LGH and KH performed experiments and analyzed related data. CWH and WCL supervised the research. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results and preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Wei Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chou, KW., He, LG., Hsu, K. et al. Application of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Crack Measurement Using Image Calibration Supported by Laser Projectors. Multiscale Sci. Eng. 3, 225–235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42493-021-00072-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42493-021-00072-7

Keywords

Navigation