Abstract
Maintaining the health of strategic infrastructures and bridges is crucial for effective maintenance operations. However, traditional periodical monitoring using elevating platforms is expensive and complex, leading to a search for more efficient and flexible methods. In recent years, there has been a growing adoption of noninvasive approaches such as the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with optical sensors and LiDAR technologies for rapid mapping of the territory. This study presents two methodologies for bridge inspection. The first approach integrates traditional topographic and GNSS techniques with TLS and photogrammetry using cameras mounted on UAVs. The second approach involves using a DJI Matrice 300 equipped with a LiDAR DJI Zenmuse L1 sensor for both manual and automatic flights. While the first approach resulted in a centimeter-accurate but time-consuming model, the UAV-LiDAR point cloud’s georeferencing accuracy was less accurate in the case of manual flight under the bridge due to GNSS signal obstruction. However, a photogrammetric model reconstruction phase using ground control points and photos taken by the L1-embedded camera improved the overall accuracy of the workflow. This workflow can be used for flexible, low-cost mapping of bridges when medium-level accuracy (5–10 cm) is acceptable. Finally, the article presents a solution for integrating the final 3D products interactively into a Bridge Monitoring System environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adhikari RS, Moselhi O, Bagchi A (2014) Image-based retrieval of concrete crack properties for bridge inspection. Autom Constr 39:180–194
Agisoft (2021) Agisoft Metashape user manual - professional edition, Version 1.7. https://www.agisoft.com/pdf/metashape-pro_1_7_en.pdf
Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2002) ITRF2000: A new release of the international terrestrial reference frame for earth science applications. J Geophys Res 107(B10):2214. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000561
Belcore E, Pietra VD, Grasso N, Piras M, Tondolo F, Savino P, Osello A (2021) Towards a FOSS automatic classification of defects for bridges structural health monitoring. In Italian conference on geomatics and geospatial technologies, Springer, Cham, pp 298–312
Dorafshan S, Thomas RJ, Maguire M (2019) Benchmarking image processing algorithms for unmanned aerial system- assisted crack detection in concrete structures. Infrastructures 4(2):19
Fagandini R, Federici B, Ferrando I, Gagliolo S, Pagliari D, Passoni D, Pinto L, Rossi L, Sguerso D (2017) Evaluation of the laser response of Leica Nova MultiStation MS60 for 3D modelling and structural monitoring. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017, 93– 104
Feroz S, Abu Dabous S (2021) UAV-based remote sensing applications for bridge condition assessment. Remote Sens 13(9):1809
Hudson SW, Carmichael III RF, Moser LO, Hudson WR, Wilkes WJ (1987) Bridge management systems. NCHRP Report (300)
Jaakkola A, Hyyppä J, Kukko A, Yu X, Kaartinen H, Lehtomäki M, Lin Y (2010) A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65(6):514–522
Kim H, Ahn E, Cho S, Shin M, Sim SH (2017) Comparative analysis of image binarization methods for crack identification in concrete structures. Cem Concr Res 99:53–61
Lague D, Brodu N, Leroux J (2013) Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: application to the Rangitikei canyon (NZ). ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 82:10–26
Lemmetti J, Sorri N, Kallioniemi I, Melanen P, Uusimaa P (2021) Long-range all-solid-state flash LiDAR sensor for autonomous driving. In High-power diode laser technology XIX. Int Soc Opt Photon 11668:116680P
Liu YF, Cho S, Spencer BF Jr, Fan JS (2016) Concrete crack assessment using digital image processing and 3D scene reconstruction. J Comput Civ Eng 30(1):04014124
Nex F, Armenakis C, Cramer M, Cucci DA, Gerke M, Honkavaara E, Skaloud J (2022) UAV in the advent of the twenties: where we stand and what is next. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 184:215–242
Pinto L, Bianchini F, Nova V, Passoni D (2020) Low-cost UAS photogrammetry for road infrastructures’inspection. Int Arch Photogramm. Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XLIII-B2- 2020:1145–1150
Štroner M, Rudolf U, Lenka L (2021) A new method for UAV LiDAR precision testing used for the evaluation of an affordable DJI ZENMUSE L1 scanner. Remote Sens 13(23):4811
UgCS (2022) UgCS desktop user manual. https://wiki.ugcs.com/UgCS_desktop_User_Manual
Wallace L, Lucieer A, Watson C, Turner D (2012) Development of a UAV-LiDAR system with application to forest inventory. Remote Sens 4(6):1519–1543
Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM (2012) ‘Structure-from-motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179:300–314
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Biswajeet Pradhan
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Abdel-Maksoud, H. Combining UAV-LiDAR and UAV-photogrammetry for bridge assessment and infrastructure monitoring. Arab J Geosci 17, 144 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11897-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11897-5