Abstract
The assessment of liquefaction vulnerability is crucial to understanding the potential consequences of a tailings dam failure. The “Plewes method” is a relatively well-known and simple screening method to assess liquefaction potential based on results of cone penetration testing (CPT) which may be complemented with laboratory testing. The objective of the current work is to emphasise the screening nature of the method and its uncertainties when applied in tailings deposits. Specifically, the paper highlights the difficulties in assessing the intrinsic uncertainty of the method and the additional uncertainty that results from variations of the slope of the critical state line (λ10) along the depth of the CPT sounding. The results of the method are too uncertain for detailed characterisation of tailings even when a relatively low intrinsic uncertainty is assumed. However, the method characterises weaker soils with lower uncertainty (although still too high for detailed characterisation) than stronger soils. The uncertainty of the method is negatively affected by the relatively low λ10 values that are typical of nonplastic tailings. It is suggested that the results of the method should be presented in scatter plots in which the spread of the data is consistent with the uncertainty of the method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data used in the paper are in the public domain.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Roche C, Thygesen K, Baker E (eds) (2017) Mine tailings storage: safety is no accident. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environmental Programme and GRID-Arendal, Nairobi and Arendal
Santamarina JC, Torres-Cruz LA, Bachus RC (2019) Why coal ash and tailings dam disasters occur. Science 364(6440):526–528
Jefferies M, Been K (2015) Soil Liquefaction: a critical state approach. In: CRC Press, Boca Raton. USA, Fla
Plewes HD, Davies MP, Jefferies MG (1992) CPT based screening procedure for evaluating liquefaction susceptibility. In: Proceedings of the 45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference. Canada, Toronto
Robertson PK, de Melo L, Williams DJ, Wilson GW (2019) Report of the expert panel on the technical causes of the failure of Feijao Dam I. Commissioned by Vale
Been K, Jefferies MG, Crooks JHA, Rothenberg L (1987) The cone penetration test in sands: part II, general inference of state. Géotechnique 37(3):285–299
Been K, Crooks JHA, Jefferies MG (1988) Interpretation of material state from the CPT in sands and clays. Proceedings, ICE Conference on Penetration Testing in the U.K., Birmingham, U.K., pp 89–92
Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35(2):99–112
Shuttle DA, Cunning J (2008) Reply to the discussion by Robertson on “Liquefaction potential of silts from CPT”. Can Geotech J 45:142–145
Been K, Jefferies MG, Hachey JE (1991) The critical state of sands. Géotechnique 41(3):365–381
Verdugo R, Ishihara K (1996) The steady state of sandy soils. Soils Found 36(2):81–91
Been K, Jefferies MG (1992) Towards systematic CPT interpretation. Proceedings of the Wroth Memorial Symposium, Thomas Telford, London, pp 121–134
Reid D. (2015). Estimating slope of critical state line from cone penetration test–an update. Can Geotech J 52:46-57
Torres-Cruz LA, Santamarina JC (2020) The critical state line of nonplastic tailings. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0019
Wride (Fear) CE, Robertson PK et al (2000) Interpretation of in situ test results from the CANLEX sites. Can Geotech J 37:505–529
Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. University Science Books
Shuttle D, Jefferies M (1998) Dimensionless and unbiased CPT interpretation in sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 22:351–391
Jefferies MG, Jonsson L, Been K (1987) Experience with measurement of horizontal geostatic stress in sand during cone penetration test profiling. Géotechnique 37(4):483–498
Okusa S, Anma S (1980) Slope failures and tailings dam damage in the 1978 Izu-Ohshima-Kinkai earthquake. Eng Geol 16(3–4):195–224
Vermeulen NJ (2001) The composition and state of gold tailings. In: PhD Thesis. University of Pretoria, South Africa https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/23079
Naeini SA, Baziar MH (2003) Effect of fines content on steady-state strength of mixed and layered samples of a sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:181–187
Shuttle DA, Cunning J (2007) Liquefaction potential of silts from CPTu. Can Geotech J 44:1–19
Torres-Cruz LA (2019) Limit void ratios and steady-state line of non-plastic soils. Proc Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng 172(3):283–295
Reid D, Fourie A, Ayala JL et al (2020) Results of a critical state line testing round robin programme. In: Géotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P373
Bedin J, Schnaid F, da Fonseca AV, de Costa Filho LM (2012) Gold tailings liquefaction under critical state soil mechanics. Géotechnique 62(3):263–267
Li W, Coop MR, Senetakis K, Schnaid F (2018) The mechanics of a silt-sized gold tailing. Eng Geol 241:97–108
Fourie AB, Papageorgiou G (2001) Defining an appropriate steady state line for Merriespruit gold tailings. Can Geotech J 38(4):695–706
Li W, Coop MR (2019) The mechanical behaviour of Panzhihua iron tailings. Can Geotech J 56(3):420–435
Carrera A, Coop M, Lancellota R (2011) Influence of grading on the mechanical behaviour of Stava tailings. Géotechnique 61(11):935–946
Chang N, Heymann G, Clayton C (2011) The effect of fabric on the behaviour of gold tailings. Géotechnique 61(3):187–197
Acknowledgements
Generous and insightful comments from Mike Jefferies are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres-Cruz, L.A. The Plewes Method: a Word of Caution. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 1329–1338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00392-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00392-0