Abstract
The protectorate of Saint Katherine considers one of the biggest protected areas in Egypt characterized by a unique location and environment. It supports a high number of rare and endangered species. Cleome droserifolia (Rorida droserifolia) is an endangered plant found in Saint Katherine, Sinai, Egypt. It has been known for its medicinal uses so it becomes rare due to over-grazing and over-collection for use in traditional medicine, research and trade home use. DNA barcoding analysis and in vitro culture tools were conducted for saving the plant. This research supports the goal number 15 of the United Nations Sustainable Development (SDGs); aimed at preserving, restore and reinstate sustainable usage of terrestrial ecosystems and halting biodiversity deterioration. Two pairs primers of three DNA markers: [ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL), maturase K (matK) and trnH-psbA] were used for PCR amplification and sequencing. BLAST results and phylogenetic analysis proved a correct authentication of Cleome droserifolia on both; species and genus levels and confirms the involvement of Cleome droserifolia in Cleome genus. For in vitro propagation, cotyledonary node explants of germinated seedlings were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium fortified with 0.27 µM α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and 2.32 µM of kinetin (Kin). The highest mean number of axillary shoots was 8.16 shoots/explant. 85% of multiple shoots were successfully rooted on ¼ MS medium fortified with 7.42 µM indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). The successfully rooted plants were transferred to a mixture of sand, soil, and peat moss (1: 1: 1) and efficiently acclimatized in the greenhouse.
Article highlights
-
Two ex situ conservation approaches for the medicinal endangered Cleome droserifolia plant were successfully conducted for saving the plant from extinction.
-
DNA barcoding was successfully used to identify the plant at the genus and species levels.
-
Cotyledonary node explants of germinated seedlings were used for in vitro propagation of the plant with eighty one induction percentage.
-
This research contributes to one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (goal number 15) by promoting the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Medicinal plants play a vital role in enhancing human health, serving as key sources for herbal therapies, anti-infective treatments, therapeutic medications, and dietary supplements [1]. Particularly in developing nations, these plants are fundamental for disease treatment and healthcare [2]. However, in Egypt, numerous medicinal plant species face endangerment due to factors like over-grazing, excessive harvesting for fuel and medicines through cutting and uprooting, tourism, and urbanization [3].
Cleome droserifolia (Forssk.) Delile Descr. (Syn. Roridula droserifolia Forssk. or Rorida droserifolia (Forssk.) Thulin & Roalson), is a wild aromatic shrub. It is found in Arabian countries like Syria, Palestine, Libya and Sinai in Egypt [4,5,6,7,8]. It belongs to the Cleomaceae family, it is called “spider flower” and “mountain bee plant” [3, 9]. In Egypt, it is known as Afein, Samwah, or Reeh El-Bard [3, 6]. This species is endangered due to ecological challenges, over-collection for various uses, and over-grazing in the Saint Katherine Protectorate. So, it is classified as endangered plant [3, 10].
Cleome genus exhibits anticancer, hepatoprotective [6, 11, 12], antiparasitic, antimicrobial [6], antioxidant, and robust antidiabetic properties [1, 13]. Various studies on Cleome droserifolia highlight the presence of phytochemicals like tannins, alkaloids, coumarins, amino acids, and terpenoids [3, 14,15,16,17]. The plant extract has bioactive compounds including terpenoids, flavonoids, glycosides, carbohydrates, sterols, and sesquiterpenes like daucosterol, teucladiol, and buchariol, contributing to its anticancer and antibacterial effects [16, 18,19,20]. It has anti-hyperglycemic properties, making it used by herbalists and Bedouins in Sinai for diabetes treatment [21]. Additionally, the plant is employed in treating various ailments such as liver diseases, skin issues, inflammation, scabies, and abdominal pain [22]. Rare and endangered species require conservation through in situ or ex situ methods to prevent their extinction. conservation involves safeguarding species within their natural habitats, while ex situ conservation entails preserving genetic resources outside their original environments. This is often crucial when species are on the brink of extinction. Ex situ strategies encompass techniques like seed banking, field gene banks, living collections, cryopreservation, DNA barcoding and in vitro propagation. [23, 24].
DNA barcoding is an innovative and valuable tool for the ex situ conservation of medicinal and rare species. By utilizing short DNA sequences, or barcodes, this method compares individual samples with a reference library to identify species and address taxonomic and ecological issues. It aids in species discovery, phylogenetic diversity assessment, and traditional medicine identification. Moreover, it effectively differentiates species, resolves uncertainties, and contributes to the protection of endangered species. [3, 25,26,27,28]. El-Atroush et al. [29] utilized DNA barcoding (ITS and rbcL) for Cleome droserifolia identification, highlighting the need for updated primers and protocols to enhance plant identification efficiency.
In vitro propagation is a pivotal technology for conserving endangered or medicinally significant species. Plant tissue culture, employing vegetative explants, yields numerous plants quickly and in limited space [30]. Even a small sample generates hundreds of genetically identical plants regardless of seasons. It’s crucial for non-seed-forming or seed-trouble species [31], and those challenging conventional propagation methods [32]. Micropropagation of Cleome species is scarcely documented. Hassan [33] found that 30 mg/l adenine sulphate with 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) in Murashige and Skoog (MS) [34] medium resulted in the highest axillary shoots/plantlet count of 3.22 in Cleome droserifolia. Another protocol for in vitro organogenesis of Cleome viscosa utilized leaf explants, yielding 95% callusing and 7.6 shoots using 2 mg/l BAP in MS medium [35].
This research aimed to conserve the Cleome droserifolia plant by adding more barcodes to the universal plant databases to enhance species and landrace differentiation, boosting accurate identification for biodiversity conservation. Also, it aimed to develop a protocol to improve the in vitro propagation of the plant for germplasm conservation using different kinds of growth regulators to increase the number of multiplied shoots.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Samples collection
Cleome droserifolia leaf specimens and mature seeds were harvested from shrubs grown in Wadi Zaghra, Saint Katherine, Southern Sinai (N: 28.63501, E: 34.13972) as shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Plant identification was carried out by Dr. Ibrahim Abdelrafee El Gamal, Nature Conservation Sector, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency, Southern Sinai, Egypt. Specimens were placed in the Herbarium of Faculty of Science, Cairo University with the voucher number 35.120.335.
2.2 DNA barcoding
2.2.1 DNA Extraction and Purification
Leaf samples from Cleome droserifolia plant were gathered and turned into a fine powder using liquid nitrogen, a mortar and pestle. The DNA within the samples was then extracted and cleaned using the DNeasy Plant Kit from Qiagen, Germany. The ND-1000 System spectrophotometer (Nano-Drop Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) gauged extracted DNA’s quantity and purity. A 1% agarose gel, with a DNA size marker (Lambda DNA Hind III digest Phi X 174/HaeIII digest), estimated purified DNA’s concentration and quality.
2.2.2 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing
The reaction of PCR was done as mentioned by Ibrahim et al. [36] in a net volume of 50 µl master mix containing: 1x buffer (Promega, USA), 15mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs (Promega, USA), 20 pcoml of each primer (Invitrogen), 1 u of Tag DNA polymerase (GoTaq, Promega, USA), 40 ng DNA and pure water to the final volume. Three chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) genes; ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL), maturase K (matK) and trnH-psbA were used for DNA barcoding analysis. The sequences of the primers are listed in Table 1.
The PCR amplification of the three genes started with an initial step at 94 °C for 5 min. This was followed by 40 cycles, each consisting of three phases. First, the DNA was denatured at 94 °C for 30 s. Then, it was annealed at 45 °C for 30 s. Lastly, elongation occurred at 72 °C for 30 s. The final cycle included a longer 7-minute extension at 72 °C. The Perkin-Elmer/Gen-eAmp PCR System 9700, provided by PE Applied Biosystems in the USA, was used for these PCR processes.
The PCR products were separated using a 1.5% w/v agarose gel that was stained with ethidium bromide (EtBr) at a concentration of 0.5 ug/ml. The gel was run in 1X TBE buffer at a voltage of 95 volts. To determine the sizes of the DNA fragments, a 100 bp DNA ladder from Promega in the USA was used as a reference standard. UV transilluminator aided visualization, and images were captured. To recover the PCR-amplified fragments from the agarose gel, the Q1A Quik PCR Purification Kit from Qiagen Inc. in Venlo, The Netherlands, with Catalog Number 28,106, was employed. The recovery process followed the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Purified PCR amplicons underwent DNA sequencing using ABIPRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) as per the supplied protocol.
2.2.3 Data analysis and assigning of species
The terminal noisy regions on the 3′ and 5′ ends of Cleome droserifolia’s rbcL, matK, and trnH-psbA barcode sequences were excised. These purified sequences were then deposited in the GeneBank, each acquiring an accession number. Alignment occurred against previously published sequences utilizing the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) on the National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Online tool Clust Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) facilitated the creation of phylogenetic trees.
2.3 In vitro propagation experiments
2.3.1 Seeds sterilization
Mature seeds of Cleome droserifolia were cleaned by washing under continuous running tap water. They were subsequently treated with tween twenty solution for 10 min, followed by immersion in a 15% commercial bleach solution containing 5.25% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min. The treated seeds were then rinsed four times with distilled water. The sterilization procedure was conducted within a laminar airflow hood (Hoten LaminAir HVR 2448, USA).
2.3.2 Seeds germination
For germinating Cleome droserifolia seeds, a half-strength MS medium (Duchefa, Haarlem, the Netherlands) foritified with 3% sucrose (wv−1) was employed. The medium’s pH was tuned to 5.7 ± 0.1, and it was solidified using 0.3% phytagel (Duchefa, Haarlem, the Netherlands) before undergoing autoclaving at 121 °C and 1.06 kg cm−2 for 15 min. Then, 7–8 seeds were placed in each aseptic glass jar (375 ml) containing the medium. After that, the jars were incubated in a dark and humid environment for 7 days to stimulate germination, followed by a transfer to a light environment. Seedlings emerged within two weeks and were used as explants for subsequent in vitro propagation.
2.3.3 Shoot initiation and multiplication
Cotyledonary node explants, obtained from 15-day-old seedlings, were placed in 375 ml jars containing 50 ml of MS medium. The medium was supplemented with 0.27 µM α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) along with various concentrations of cytokinins (Sigma Cell Culture, min 90%, St. Louis, USA). Specifically, Kinetin (Kin) was used at concentrations of 1.16, 2.32, 4.60, and 9.30 µM, N6-2- isopentenyl adinine (2iP) at concentrations of 1.23, 2.46, 4.90, and 9.80 µM, and thidiazuron (TDZ) at concentrations of 1.14, 2.27, 4.55, and 9.10 µM, individually. As a control, plant growth regulators (PGRs) free MS medium was utilized. The cultured jars were maintained under controlled conditions of 25 ± 1 °C and a 16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod using cool white fluorescent lamps providing 2500–3000 lx. After a culture period of 30 days, assessments were conducted for survival and growth percentages, as well as the average number and length (cm) of shoots per explant.
2.3.4 Roots induction and hardening
Shoots measuring 5–6 cm in length were introduced to diverse root induction media. Different strengths of MS media (full, ½, and ¼ MS medium) were enriched with 2.46 to 9.80 µM of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA; Sigma Cell Culture, min. 90%, St. Louis, USA) or 2.69 to 10.74 µM of NAA to initiate rooting. A control group utilizing free MS medium was included. Following the adjustment and autoclaving of the medium pH, the cultures were incubated. After a four-week cultivation period on the rooting media, parameters such as shoot length, average number of roots, and root length were documented. Once the plantlets had successfully rooted, they were gently cleansed with distilled water to eliminate any nutrient medium residues. Subsequently, the plantlets were transplanted into plastic pots containing a mixture of autoclaved sand, soil, and peat moss (1:1:1 ratio, Peat moss, PROMIX®). To ensure plant stability, the pots were irrigated and enveloped with polyethylene bags. These bags were gradually removed to reduce humidity after a six-week span. The plants were then allowed to grow under open conditions.
2.3.5 Experimental design and statistical analysis
The experiments were meticulously organized using a completely randomized desigened, encompassing a minimum of ten replicates for each treatment. These experiments were repeated thrice. Statistical evaluation involved Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) alongside Duncan’s multiple range test [40], as modified by Snedecor and Cochran [41], were used to evaluate the obtained data. Significance was attributed to means sharing a common letter when P ≤ 0.05, indicating no significant differences.
3 Results
3.1 Molecular identification of Cleome droserifolia by DNA barcoding
The classification and identification of the endangered Cleome droserifolia (Rorida droserifolia) plant was carried out using three DNA barcodes; [ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL), maturase K (matK) and trnH-psbA] to conserve this endangered plant. The forward and the reverse primer pairs of the three used barcodes produced expected amplicon sizes of approximately 700, 950 and 500 bp for rbcL, matK and trnH-psbA, respectively. Sequences were submitted to the GenBank database after removing the peripheral noisy parts and were given the following accession numbers OM863545, OM863546 and OM863547 for the nucleotide sequences. BLASTn tool of the National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was used to identify the obtained sequences by comparing the newly generated sequences of the three barcodes; rbcL, matK and trnH-psbA of Cleome droserifolia (Rorida droserifolia) with the library of the previously submitted GenBank accessions. The species of the highest identity percentages of the BLAST matching results and their phylogenetic trees analysis are presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4; Figs. 3, 4 and 5. The alignments of the three barcode sequences against GenBank accessions produced a query coverage between 74 and 100% for rbcL (Table 2) and 100% for each of matK (Table 3) and trnH-psbA (Table 4).
Phylogenetic trees and BLAST result for the three partial gene sequences clear that the plant under study is closely related to previously published Cleome species. BLAST results with the rbcL gene revealed that the highest identity percentage between Cleome droserifolia and the other published sequences of the species in the same genus showed 99.56% identity with Cleome amblyocarpa, 99.42 with Cleome violacea, 98.83 with Cleome arabica and the identity percentage with the same species of Cleome droserifolia (Rorida droserifolia) of the previously published accessions were 98.68 (accession # KU739619.1), 98.93 (accession # KR998500.1) and 99.04 (accession # OM112196.1) with query coverage of 100, 82 and 75%, respectively (Table 2).
For matK gene; the BLAST results revealed 99.71, 97.83, 96.15, 96.68, 96.01 and 96.24% identity percentages with Cleome droserifolia, Cleome breyeri, Cleome ornithopodioides, Cleome monochroma, Cleome turkmena and Cleome chilensis, respectively (Table 3).
It is clear from Table 4 that, Cleome anomala and Cleome moritziana showed the highest similarity percentages with Cleome droserifolia for the trnH-psbA gene which was 96.59 and 95.28%, respectively. Also, the phylogenetic trees for the three used genes show that, the closely related species were grouped in one cluster and the relatively distantly related species were scattered in different groups (Figs. 3, 4 and 5).
3.2 In vitro propagation of Cleome droserifolia
3.2.1 In vitro shoot induction and multiplication
In this study, Cleome droserifolia seeds were successfully germinated on ½ MS medium after 7 days of dark incubation, achieving a germination rate of approximately 60% (Fig. 6a). Cotyledonary node explants from 15-day-old seedlings were cultured on MS medium fortified with 0.27 µM NAA and different concentrations of cytokinins, namely Kin, 2iP, and TDZ, to induce shoot formation (Table 5).
All tested treatments exhibited 100% survival of explants. Among the three cytokinins investigated, the highest shoot induction response, mean number of shoots, and shoot length were observed on MS medium fortified with Kin compared to 2iP or TDZ (Table 5) (Fig. 6).
In media containing 2iP or TDZ, the initiation of shoot bud formation was delayed compared to the medium with Kin. Notably, the medium fortified with 2.32 µM Kin + 0.27 µM NAA demonstrated the most favorable outcomes for shoot induction, achieving an 81% success rate (Table 5) (Fig. 6b). Additionally, this concentration of Kin resulted in the highest mean number of shoots (8.16) and the longest shoot length (4.5 cm).
Higher concentrations of Kin showed a decreasing trend in shoot induction percentage, as well as the mean number and length of shoots per explant. Similar trends were observed with 2iP, where increased concentrations led to reduced shoot induction and mean number of shoots. Compared to Kin or 2iP, the use of TDZ resulted in the lowest percentage of shoot induction, following the pattern observed in the control medium.
Employing elevated concentrations of the cytokinins tested in this experiment resulted in the vitrification of plants, as shown in Fig. 6c. Among the various combinations, MS medium fortified with 0.27 µM NAA + 2.32 µM Kin yielded the most healthy and normal shoot growth.
3.2.2 In vitro rooting and acclimatization of plantlets
The in vitro propagated shoots were transferred to various media for root induction. Full, half, and quarter-strength MS media were tested along with different concentrations of IBA (2.46, 4.96, 7.42, and 9.80 µM) or NAA (2.69, 5.37, 8.10, and 10.74 µM). Full and half MS media didn’t stimulate rooting after 4 weeks of culture. Also, IBA was more effective than NAA in stimulating root formation.
Among the tested conditions, quarter-strength MS medium supplemented with varying IBA concentrations successfully induced root development after 4 weeks. The summarized impact of IBA and NAA on root induction is presented in Table 6. Shoots cultured on the control medium (¼ MS without IBA) showed no response to root stimulation. The highest root induction percentage (85%) was observed with shoots cultured on ¼ MS medium fortified with 7.42 µM IBA. This same medium yielded an average of 11.6 roots per shoot, with roots measuring around 9.17 cm and shoots reaching 5.6 cm in length (Fig. 6d). The medium containing 9.80 µM IBA produced the second-highest rooting percentage (75%), along with 13.3 mean roots per shoot and 8.75 cm root length.
Rooting percentage gradually increased with rising IBA and NAA levels, reaching a peak at 7.42 and 8.10 µM NAA, after which it decreased upon using 9.80 µM IBA or 10.74 µM NAA. The differences in the mean number and length of roots and shoot length between the highest tested IBA concentrations (4.96, 7.42, and 9.80 µM) were not statistically significant. However, the concentration of 7.42 µM IBA resulted in the highest rooting percentage at 85%. Following root induction, plantlets were gradually transferred to greenhouse conditions, exhibiting a survival rate of about 65% (Fig. 6e).
4 Discussion
4.1 Molecular identification of Cleome droserifolia by DNA barcoding
DNA barcoding analysis of plant species is playing a pivotal role in designing biodiversity conservation strategies and enhancing species identification and classification [27]. Compared to RNA and protein macromolecules, DNA markers are more reliable for species identification due to DNA’s stability [42]. DNA barcoding utilizes specific regions of nuclei, plastids, or mitochondria to create an accurate tool for species taxonomy and precise authentication of unknown species [43]. It relies on short DNA sequences, which are then matched to existing barcode sequences in comprehensive databases of known species [44]. Unlike morphological identification methods, DNA barcoding is not restricted by morphological traits and doesn’t necessitate specialized training. It aligns seamlessly with standard databases [27, 45].
In this study, utilizing phylogenetic tree analysis and BLAST matching of the three barcode markers (rbcL, matK, and trnH-psbA), Cleome droserifolia was conclusively identified within the Cleome genus, achieving a 100% certainty level. Prior research indicates that a DNA barcoding attempt is successful when BLAST results show an identity percentage of 95% or higher and correspond to a single genus on the generic level. At the species level, success is achieved when the identity percentage is also above 95%, and a single species is matched [46].
In our study, the highest identity percentages between Cleome droserifolia and other published Cleome species ranged between 96.59% and 99.71%. Specifically, the matK sequence displayed 99.71% identity with Cleome droserifolia, and the rbcL sequence showed identity percentages of 99.04% (accession # OM112196.1), 98.93% (accession # KR998500.1), and 98.68% (accession # KU739619.1) with the same species, Rorida droserifolia. Regarding the trnH-psbA marker, successful identification was achieved only on the genus level. Notably, this study introduced a new barcode sequence for the trnH-psbA marker into the GenBank database.
Therefore, based on the obtained data, the authentication of Cleome droserifolia proved successful at both the species and genus levels using the rbcL and matK markers, while the trnH-psbA marker achieved genus-level identification. The phylogenetic trees constructed using the three markers (rbcL, matK, and trnH-psbA) consistently positioned Cleome droserifolia within the Cleome genus.
Hence, this study effectively authenticated Cleome droserifolia on both species and genus levels. Here, DNA barcoding was employed as a swift and cost-effective molecular method, augmenting morphological identification for precise Cleome droserifolia authentication. It underscores DNA barcoding’s potential to contribute to building comprehensive barcoding libraries for endangered species, aiding species classification [47].
4.2 In vitro propagation of Cleome droserifolia
Conserving natural plant resources often involves utilizing seedling materials for in vitro cultures due to their rich genetic diversity [48]. This approach can significantly boost the propagation rate of native species [49]. Seedling explants from the Cleomaceae family have garnered significant attention for micropropagation due to their ability for prolific shoot multiplication, as seen in species like Cleome viscosa [35]; Cleome spinosa [50] and Cleome dendroides [51]. In this study, cotyledonary node explants from 15-day-old Cleome droserifolia seedlings were employed for shoot induction and multiplication. These explants were effectively cultured on a medium containing NAA at 0.27 µM along with varying concentrations of cytokinins such as Kin, 2iP, and TDZ. The significance of auxins and cytokinins in promoting cell division and organ induction is well established [52]. Auxins, a crucial class of plant hormones, play a pivotal role in the formation of in vivo organs. The movement of auxins from apical shoots to basal plant tissues is essential for growth and various developmental processes [53]. Atta et al. [54] reported that, the addition of auxin in the tissue culture medium triggers the regulation of cell division, from which founder cells appears. Notably, In this work, the addition of lower concentrations of NAA (0.27 µM) promoted the regeneration of shoot buds by participating in meristem formation.
Similarly, cytokinins consider essential group of plant growth regulators (PGRs), influence growth by stimulating direct shoot initiation, cell division, and multiplication [55]. The type and amount of cytokinin significantly affect shoot multiplication. In this experiment, the highest mean number of shoots was noticed with kin followed by 2iP and TDZ. Elevated concentrations of cytokinins adversely impacted shoot multiplication and growth. Several researchers, including Ashraf et al. [56] and Karolak et al. [57], have observed that lower cytokinin concentrations are more suitable for stimulating shoot bud development, while higher concentrations can inhibit the number and frequency of shoot induction. This observation is consistent with the findings of Koroch et al. [58], who noted that higher concentrations of BA hindered shoot growth and multiplication in Echinacea purpurea. Similar trends have been identified in other medicinal plants such as Aspilia africana [59], Prunella vulgaris [60], and Elephantopus scaber [61]. Additionally, in this study, higher concentrations of cytokinins were linked to plant vitrification. Thus, the combination of low auxin and cytokinin concentrations appears to be most effective for stimulating meristem growth and facilitating the emergence of new shoots in Cleome droserifolia. For many medicinal plants, optimal cytokinin concentrations enhance shoot numbers, but the introduction of low levels of both auxin and cytokinin promotes a higher proportion of shoot proliferation [62,63,64,65]. This synergistic effect likely supports meristematic growth as apical meristems naturally produce endogenous auxins, and adding exogenous auxin in low quantities aids this meristematic growth [57].
In conclusion, the best medium for shoot induction and multiplication of Cleome droserifolia through in vitro propagation seems to be MS medium fortified with 2.32 µM Kin and 0.27 µM NAA.
In the realm of plant propagation, in vitro root induction stands as a critical bottleneck. It’s widely acknowledged that auxins are essential for root development and growth [66]. In this study, roots successfully emerged after four weeks of cultivation. Several factors influence root development, encompassing plant species and the type and concentration of auxins. In the case of Cleome droserifolia, IBA and NAA were employed to encourage root formation on a quarter strength MS medium. Interestingly, IBA proved to be more effective than NAA in this regard. IBA, being a natural auxin with heightened stability and low oxidative propensity, showcases notable root-inducing properties [67]. Among the tested media, the most effective one for prompting root formation in in vitro multiplied shoots of Cleome droserifolia was found to be ¼ MS medium fortified with 7.42 µM IBA. This particular medium exhibited an impressive 85% rooting rate along with the highest average number and length of roots per explant, as well as the mean length of axillary shoots. This outcome aligns with the findings of Hassan [33], who achieved a 93.3% rooting rate for Cleome droserifolia shoots with 7.42 µM IBA, albeit using full-strength MS medium. Following successful rooting, the established plantlets were transitioned to a greenhouse setting for further cultivation.
5 Conclusions
The Cleome droserifolia plant faces a multitude of challenges, including ecological disasters, over-collection, over-grazing, and difficulties in obtaining its seeds. These issues have collectively placed this plant species in a vulnerable position, leading to its decline and potential disappearance from its natural habitat. In response, we have undertaken two distinct ex-situ plant conservation strategies. Firstly, we employed DNA barcode analysis using three specific DNA barcodes, including a novel barcode that has been introduced for the first time in the GenBank database. This approach provides a robust method for accurately identifying the Cleome droserifolia plant. Secondly, we successfully established an efficient in vitro propagation protocol for Cleome droserifolia through this study. These endeavors mark crucial initial steps in the broader context of plant conservation, facilitating both research initiatives and public awareness efforts. It’s important to note that further investigations involving additional nuclear markers will be necessary to comprehensively authenticate the plant’s identity. This study is aligned with one of the central goals of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — namely, the preservation and safeguarding of threatened species. By contributing to the conservation of Cleome droserifolia, we are actively participating in the broader mission to protect and prevent the extinction of endangered plant species.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- BA:
-
6-Benzyl adenine
- BLAST:
-
Basic local alignment tool
- CBOL:
-
Consortium for the barcode of life
- cpDNA:
-
Chloroplast DNA
- IBA:
-
Iindole-3-butyric acid
- 2iP:
-
N6-(2-isopentenyl) adenine
- IUCN:
-
International Union for Conservation of Nature
- Kin:
-
Kinetin
- matK :
-
Maturase K
- MS:
-
Murashige and Skoog
- NAA:
-
α-- Naphthaleneacetic acid
- NCBI:
-
National Center of Biotechnology Information
- ncDNA:
-
Nuclear DNA
- PGRs:
-
Plant growth regulators
- rbcL :
-
Ribulose-1,5- bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit
- TDZ:
-
Thidiazuron
References
Hashem NM, Shehata MG (2021) Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Cleome droserifolia (Forssk) Del and its biological effects on redox status, immunity, and gut microflora. Animals 11(7):1929.
Muhaidat R, Al-Qudah MA, Samir O, Jacob JH, Hussein E, Al-Tarawneh IN, Bsoul E, Abu Orabi ST (2015) Phytochemical investigation and in vitro antibacterial activity of essential oils from Cleome droserifolia (Forssk.) Delile and C. trinervia Fresen. (Cleomaceae). S Afr J Bot 99:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.03.184
Moustafa A, Sarah R, Qiqa S, Mansour S, Alotaibi M (2019) Cleome droserifolia: an Egyptian natural heritage facing extinction. Asian J Plant Sci Res 9:14–21
Yang SS, Mabry TJ, El-Fishawy AM, El-Kashoury EA, Abdel-Kawy MA, Soliman FM (1990) Flavonoids of Cleome Droserifolia. Egypt J Pharm Sci 31(1–4):443–451
Boulos L (1999) Flora of Egypt; Azollaceae oxalidaceae. Cairo Al-Hadara 1:170
Ezzat SM, Abdel Motaal A (2012) Isolation of new cytotoxic metabolites from Cleome droserifolia growing in Egypt. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung C 67(5–6):266–274. https://doi.org/10.5560/ZNC.2012.67c0266
Kamel WM, Abd El-Ghani MM, El-Bous MM (2010) Cleomaceae as a distinct family in the flora of Egypt. The Afr J Plant Sci Biotechnol 4:11–16
Helal EGE, Abou Aouf N, Abdallah IZA, Khattab AM (2015) Hypoglycemic and antioxidant effects of Cleome Droserifolia (Samwah) in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Egypt J Hosp Med 58:39–47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0009359
Panicker NG, Balhamar SOMS, Akhlaq S, Qureshi MM, Rehman NU, Al-Harrasi A, Hussain J, Mustafa F (2020) Organic extracts from Cleome droserifolia exhibit effective caspase-dependent anticancer activity. BMC Complement Med Ther Complement Med Ther 20:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-2858-0
Abd El-Wahab RH, Zaghloul MS, Moustafa AA (2004) Conservation of medicinal plants in St. Katherine protectorate, South Sinai I. evaluation of ecological status and human impact. Proceedings of first international conference on strategy of Egyptian herbaria
Abdel-Kader M, Alqasoumi S, Al-Taweel A (2009) Hepatoprotective constituents from Cleome Droserifolia. Chem Pharm Bull 57(6):620–624. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.57.620
Abdel Maksoud H, Abozaid O, Elharrif MG, Abdelhamid O, Alaa E (2020) Selenium Cleome droserifolia nanoparticles (Se-CNPs) and it’s ameliorative effects in experimentally induced Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Nutr ESPEN 40:383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.07.016
Abdel Motaal A, Ezzat SM, El-Askary H (2014) Antihyperglycemic activity and standardization of the bioactive extract of Cleome Droserifolia growing in Egypt. Pharmacognosy J 6(5):15–21. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2014.5.4
Diab LI (1992) Pharmacognostical study of certain Cleome species growing in Egypt. MS Thesis, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys) Al-Azhar University: Cairo, Egypt
Hussein NS, Ahmed AA, Darwish FM (1994) Sesquiterpenes from Cleome Droserifolia. Pharmazie 49:76–77
El-Askary H (2005) Terpenoids from Cleome Droserifolia. (Forssk) Del Molecules 10(8):971–977. https://doi.org/10.3390/10080971
Abdel Motaal A, Ezzat SM, Haddad PS (2011) Determination of bioactive markers in Cleome droserifolia using cell-based bioassays for antidiabetic activity and isolation of two novel active compounds. Phytomedicine 19(1):38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2011.07.003
Hussain J, Khan H, Ali L, Khan AL, Rehman NU, Jahangir S et al (2015) New indole alkaloid from Cleome Droserifolia. Helv Chim Acta 98:719–723
Abdullah W, Elsayed WM, Abdelshafeek KA, Nazif NM, Singab ANB (2016) Chemical constituents and biological activities of Cleome Genus: a brief review. IJPR 8(5):777–787
Singh H, Mishra A, Mishra AK (2018) The chemistry and pharmacology of Cleome Genus: a review. Biomed Pharmacother 101:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.053
Abdel-Hady NM (1998) Pharmacognostical investigation and biological verification of some recipes and preparations of natural origin for the treatment of diabetes. Msc Thesis Fac of Pharmacy (Girls), Al-Azhar Univ, Cairo, Egypt
Gupta NK, Dixit VK (2009) Evaluation of hepatoprotective activity of Cleome viscose Linn. Extract. Indian J Pharmacol 41(1):36–40. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.48892
Cruz CAC, Arnao MTG, Engelmann F (2013) Biotechnology and conservation of plant biodiversity. Resources 2:73–95. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources2020073
Kovacs Z, Csergo AM, Csontos P, Hohn M (2021) Ex situ conservation in botanical gardens—challenges and scientific potential preserving plant biodiversity. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 49(2):12334. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha49212334
Pires AC, Marinoni L (2010) DNA barcoding and traditional taxonomy unified through integrative taxonomy: a view that challenges the debate questioning both methodologies. Biota Neotrop 10(2):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000200035
Mir AH, Tyub S, Kamili AN (2020) Ecology, distribution mapping and conservation implications of four critically endangered endemic plants of Kashmir Himalaya. Saudi J Biol Sci 27:2380–2389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.05.006
Farooq Q, Shakir M, Ejaz F, Zafar T, Durrani K, Ullah A (2020) Role of DNA barcoding in Plant Biodiversity Conservation. Scholars Int J Biochem 3(3):48–52
Hashim AM, Alatawi A, Altaf FM, Qari SH, Elhady ME, Osman GH, Abouseadaa HH (2021) Phylogenetic relationships and DNA barcoding of nine endangered medicinal plant species endemic to Saint Katherine Protectorate. Saudi J Biol Sci 28(3):1919–1930
El-Atroush H, Magdy M, Werner O (2015) DNA barcoding of two endangered medicinal plants from Abou Galoom protectorate. Life Sci J 12(9):101–109
Sharma G, Jagetiya S, Dashora R (2015) General techniques of plant tissue culture. Lulu Press Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, p 28
Mathur S (2013) Conservation of biodiversity through tissue culture. Res Reviews: J Microbiol Biotechnol 2(3):1–6
Gashi B, Abdullai K, Sota V, Kongjika E (2015) Micropropagation and in vitro conservation of the rare and threatened plants Ramonda serbica and Ramonda nathaliae. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 21(1):123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-014-0261-3
Hassan HMS (2014) Developing an efficient protocol for micropropagation of an endangered medicinal plant, Cleome droserifolia (Forssk.) Del. Middle East J Agric Res 3(4):1163–1168
Murashige T, Skoog FA (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with Tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Anburaj J, Singh CR, Sundarraj S, Kannan S (2011) In vitro regeneration of Cleome viscosa – an important medicinal herb. J Cell Mol Biol 9:37–44
Ibrahim SD, Adawy SS, Atia MAM, Alsamman AM, Mokhtar MM (2016) Genetic diversity, variety identification and gene detection in some Egyptian grape varieties by SSR and SCoT markers. Plant Omics 9(5):311–318
Bao W, Dawei L, Xinwei L (2018) DNA barcoding of Actinidia (Actinidiaceae) using internal transcribed spacer, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA, and its taxonomic implication. N. Z. J Bot 56(4):360–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2018.1491009
Jing YU, Jian-Hua XUE, Shi-Liang ZHOU (2011) New universal matK primers for DNA barcoding angiosperms. J Syst Evol 49(3):176–181
Burak M, Hasancebi S (2022) Identification of Lens Cultivars in Market by Molecular Tools: DNA Barcoding and SSRs. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1202399/v1
Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
CW Snedecor, WG Cochran (1990). Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa
Mishra P, Kumar A, Nagireddy A, Mani DN, Shukla AK, Tiwari R et al (2016) DNA barcoding: an efficient tool to overcome authentication challenges in the herbal market. Plant Biotechnol J 14:8–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12419
Gao Z, Liu Y, Wang X, Wei X, Han J (2019) DNA mini-barcoding: a derived barcoding method for herbal molecular identification. Front Plant. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00987
Amin S, Ghosh S, Biswas B, Arifuzzaman Md AKA, Md Siddiki AZ (2020) Molecular identification of four medicinal plants using DNA barcoding approach from Chittagong, Bangladesh. J Adv Biotechnol Exp Ther 3(3):268–272.
Chen S, Pang X, Song J, Shi L, Yao H, Han J et al (2014) A renaissance in herbal medicine identification: from morphology to DNA. Biotechnol Adv 32:1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.004
De Groot GA, During HJ, Maas JW, Schneider H et al (2011) Use of rbcL and trnL-F as a two-locus DNA barcode for identification of NW-European ferns: an ecological perspective. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16371. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016371
Hosein FN, Austin N, Maharaj S, Johnson W, Rostant L, Ramdass AC, Rampersad SN (2017) Utility of DNA barcoding to identify rare endemic vascular plant species in Trinidad. Ecol Evol 7(18):7311–7333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3220
Vlachou G, Papafotiou M, Bertsouklis KF (2019) Studies on seed germination and micropropagation of Clinopodium nepeta: a medicinal and aromatic plant. HortScience 54(9):1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13996-19
Papafotiou M, Martini AN (2016) In vitro seed and clonal propagation of the Mediterranean aromatic and medicinal plant Teucrium Capitatum. HortScience 51:403–411. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.51.4.403
Tsai YT, Chen PY, To KY (2012) Plant regeneration and stable transformation in the floricultural plant Cleome spinosa, a C3 plant closely related to the C4 plant C. Gynandra. Plant Cell Rep 31(7):1189–1198
De Castro CT, Simões-Gurgel C, Gayer CR, Pinto Coelho MG, Albarello N (2020) Micropropagation of Cleome dendroides (Cleomaceae), an endemic Brazilian species, as a source of glucosinolates. Plant Biosystems 155(2):281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2020.1739161
Kaviani B, Ahmadi HA, Tarang AR, Bohlooli ZS, Hashemabadi D, Ansari MH (2013) Effect of kinetin (kn) and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) on the micropropagation of Matthiola incana using shoot tips, and callus induction and root formation on the leaf explants. Afr J Agric Res 8(30):4134–4149. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.921
Hu W, Fagundez S, Katin-Grazzini L, Li Y, Li W, Chen Y, Wang X, Deng Z, Xie S, McAvoy RJ, Li Y (2017) Endogenous auxin and its manipulation influence in vitro shoot organogenesis of citrus epicotyl explants. Hortic Res 4:17071
Atta R, Laurens L, Boucheron-Dubuisson E et al (2009) Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. Plant J 57(4):626–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03715.x
MA Mazri (2014) Role of cytokinins and physical state of the culture medium to improve in vitro shoot multiplication, rooting and acclimatization of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Boufeggous. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 24:268–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-014-0267-5
Ashraf MF, Aziz MA, Kemat N, Ismail I (2014) Effect of cytokinin types, concentrations and their interactions on in vitro shoot regeneration of Chlorophytum Borivilianum Sant. & Fernandez Electron J Biotechnol 17:275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.08.004
Karolak IG, Konka KH, Krzemi´nska M, Olszewska MA, Owczarek A (2021) Cytokinin based tissue cultures for stable medicinal plant production: regeneration and phytochemical profiling of Salvia bulleyana shoots. Biomolecules 11(10):1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101513
Koroch A, Kapteyn J, Juliani HR, Simon JE (2002) In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) In vitro regeneration and agrobacterium transformation of Echinacea purpurea leaf explants: Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA
Okello D, Yang S, Komakech R, Chung Y, Rahmat E, Gang R, Omujal F, Lamwaka AV, Kang Y (2021) Indirect in vitro regeneration of the medicinal plant, Aspilia Africana, and histological assessment at different developmental stages. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.797721
Rasool R, Kamili AN, Ganai BA, Akbar S (2009) Effect of BAP and NAA on shoot regeneration in Prunella Vulgaris. J Nat Sci Math Qassim Univ 3(1):21–26
Abraham J, Thomas TD (2015) Plant regeneration from organogenic callus and assessment of clonal fidelity in Elephantopus scaber Linn., an ethnomedicinal herb. Physiol Mol Biology Plants 21(2):269–277
Rout GR, Samantaray S, DAS P (2000) In vitro manipulation and propagation of medicinal plants. Biotechnol Adv 18:91–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-9750(99)00026-9
Rout GR (2004) Effect of cytokinins and auxins on micropropagation of Clitoria ternatea L. Biol Lett 41(1):21–26
Ahmed MR, Anis M, Alatar AA, Faisal M (2017) In vitro clonal propagation, evaluation of genetic fidelity using RAPD and ISSR marker in micropropagated plants of Cassia alata L: a potential medicinal plant. Agroforest Syst 9:637–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9992-1
El-Shafey NM, Sayed M, Ahmed ES, Hammouda O, Khodary SEA (2019) Effect of growth regulators on micropropagation, callus induction and callus flavonoid content of Rumex Pictus Forssk. Egypt J Bot 59(2):293–302. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejbo.2019.4873.1202
Nakhooda M, Watt MP, Mycock D (2013) The choice of auxin analogue for in vitro root induction influences post-induction root development in Eucalyptus grandis. Turk J Agric for 37:258–266. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1302-110
Ghareb H, Ibrahim SD, Hegazi G (2020) In vitro propagation and DNA barcode analysis of the endangered Silene Schimperiana in Saint Katherine protectorate. J Genetic Eng Biotechnol 18:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00052u
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HG: put the plan of the in vitro propagation section, did the DNA barcoding and analysis, written the manuscript and revised it, and corresponding the publication. SSM: Did the in vitro propagation of the plant and did the analysis of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval and Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghareb, H.ES., Mustafa, S.S. Molecular identification and in vitro propagation of the endangered medicinal Cleome droserifolia plant of Saint Katherine. SN Appl. Sci. 5, 320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05531-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05531-4