Abstract
This paper builds on Marxist postdigital literature by first clarifying what a ‘mode of production’ is, what the capitalist mode of production is, and how, why, and on what technological foundations it emerged. This leads into a discussion of these technological foundations and their relationship to production, knowledge, research, and subjectivity, in other words, the ‘general intellect’. At this point, I move from discussing modes of production to social or socio-economic formations, and show why social formations are more helpful for conceptualizing the political and pedagogical struggle in the era of postdigital capitalism (and any capitalism) as well as to insist on the division between capitalism and communism, two distinct modes of production in between which socialism is posited as a transitional social formation. With the postdigital age, collaboration, networked interactions, communication, open-source platforms, and more might be elements of a future mode of production. I end by returning to the question of the marxist political project and propose a postdigital marxist pedagogical approach that might help educators shift the balance of forces in the class struggle based on Althusser’s reading of Capital that brings together two formerly opposed educational forms: counterinterpellation and disinterpellation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I do not capitalize ‘marxist’ in order to emphasize that marxism has less to do with Marx himself and more to do with the struggles of workers and the oppressed.
The methodology takes a wide view of the knowledge economy, which is organized around four pillars that include ‘an educated and skilled labor force, a dense and modern information infrastructure, an effective innovation system, and an institutional regime that offers incentives for the efficient creation, dissemination, and use of existing knowledge’ (The World Bank Institute 2007: 23).
What might be less well known is that one of Althusser’s purposes in developing the theory of interpellation is to agitate against anti-socialist theories or ‘“anticipatory" works depicting “totalitarian” socialist society as a society in which every individual will be doubled by his personal “monitor”’ (2014: 177).One cannot help but think Althusser’s target here is the anti-communist and CIA-collaborator, George Orwell.
These are not the only elements at play in the Backer-Lewis debate.
References
Agamben, G. (2005/2007). Profanations. Trans. J. Fort. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
Althusser, L. (2001). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. Trans B. Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism. Ed. J. Bidet. Trans. B. Brewster and G. M. Goshgarian. New York: Verso.
Althusser, L. (1965/2015). From Capital to Marx’s philosophy. In L. Althusser, É. Balibar, R. Establet, P. Macherey, & J. Rancière Reading Capital (pp. 9–72). Trans. B. Brewster and D. Fernbach. New York: Verso.
Althusser, L. (2017). Philosophy for non-philosophers. Trans. and Ed. G. M. Goshgarian. London: Bloomsbury.
Althusser, L. (2020). History and imperialism. Trans. and Ed. G. M. Goshgarian. Cambridge: Polity.
Backer, D. I. (2018). Interpellation, counterinterpellation, and education. Critical Education, 9(15), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v9i12.186408.
Backer, D. I. (2019). The gold and the dross: Althusser for educators. Boston, MA: Brill.
Berardi, F. B. (2012). The uprising: On poetry and finance. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).
Berardi, F. B. (2018). Breathing: Chaos and poetry. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).
Caffentzis, G. (2013). From the Grundrisse to Capital and beyond: Then and now. In R. Bellofiore, G. Starosta, & P. D. Thomas (Eds.), In Marx’s laboratory: Critical interpretations of the Grundrisse (pp. 265–281). Rotterdam: Brill.
De Lissovoy, N., & Armonda, A. J. (2020). Critical pedagogy beyond the multitude: Decolonizing Hardt and Negri. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1803835.
Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Dean, J. (2016). Crowds and party. New York: Verso.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (2015). Cyber proletariat: Global labour in the digital vortex. London: Pluto Press.
Ford, D. R. (2017). Education and the production of space: Political pedagogy, geography, and urban revolution. New York: Routledge.
Ford, D. R. (2020a). A communist theory of writing: Virno, Lyotard, and a rewriting of the general intellect. In M.A. Peters, T. Besley, P. Jandrić, & X. Zhu (Eds.), Knowledge socialism: The rise of peer production: Collegiality, collaboration, and collective intelligence (pp. 99–113). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8126-3_6.
Ford, D. R. (2020b). The aesthetics of exodus: Virno and Lyotard on art, timbre, and the general intellect. Cultural Politic, 16(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-8233434.
Ford, D. R. (2021). Marxism, pedagogy, and the general intellect: Beyond the knowledge economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ford, D. R., & Jandrić, P. (2021). Postdigital marxism and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1930530.
Ford, D. R., & Sasaki, M. (2020). The multitude beyond measure: Building a common stupor. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1803832.
Fuchs, C. (2019). Rereading Marx in the age of digital capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
Goshgarian, G. M. (2019). The void of the forms of historicity as such. Rethinking Marxism, 31(3), 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2019.1623541.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital knowledge socialism. In M.A. Peters, T. Besley, P. Jandrić, and X. Zhu (Eds.), Knowledge socialism: The rise of peer production: Collegiality, collaboration, and collective intelligence (pp. 81–98). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8126-3_5.
Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000.
Lewis, T. E. (2012). Exopedagogy: On pirates, shorelines, and the educational commonwealth. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(8), 845-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00759.x.
Lewis, T. E. (2017). A Marxist Education of the Encounter: Althusser, Interpellation, and the Seminar. Rethinking Marxism, 29(2), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2017.1358498.
Malott, C. (2019). Capitalism, crisis, and educational struggle in the postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00057-8.
Malott, C. (2021). A history of education for the many: From colonization and slavery to the decline of US imperialism. London: Bloomsbury.
Marcy, S. (2009). High tech, low pay: A marxist analysis of the changing character of the working class. New York: World View Forum.
Means, A. J. (2018). Learning to save the future: Rethinking education and work in an era of digital capitalism. New York: Routledge.
Marx, K. (1867/1967). Capital: A critique of political economy (vol 1): The process of capitalist production. Trans. S. Moore and E. Aveling. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1885/1978). Capital: A critique of political economy (vol. 2): The process of circulation of capital. Trans. D Fernbach. New York: Penguin Books.
Marx, K. (1939/1993). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft). Trans. M. Nicolaus. New York: Penguin Books.
Marx, K. (1983). Marx to Joseph Weydemeyer. In Marx-Engels collected works (vol. 39): Letters 1852–1855 (pp. 60–66). New York: International Publishers.
Merrifield, A. (2020). Marx dead and alive: Reading Capital in precarious times. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: The Guilford Press.
Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2774–2792. 10.1177%2F1461444815604328.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Social and emotional skills: Well-being, connectedness and success. France: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/social-emotional-skills-study/. Accessed 1 June 2021.
Pasquinelli, M. (2019). On the origins of Marx’s general intellect. Radical Philosophy, 2(6), 43-56.
Peters, M. A. (2020). Digital socialism or knowledge capitalism? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1593033.
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2021). Biodigital philosophy, technological convergence, and postdigital knowledge ecologies. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00211-7.
Rikowski, G., & Ford, D. R. (2019). Marxist Education across the generations: A dialogue on education, time, and transhumanism. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0028-1.
Starosta, G. (2013). The system of machinery and determinations of revolutionary subjectivity in the Grundrisse and Capital. In R. Bellofiore, G. Starosta, & P. D. Thomas (Eds.), In Marx’s laboratory: Critical interpretations of the Grundrisse (pp. 232–263). Rotterdam: Brill.
The World Bank Institute (2007). Knowledge Economy Index (World Bank). https://datasource.kapsarc.org/explore/dataset/knowledge-economy-index-world-bank-2012/information/?disjunctive.location_name&disjunctive.indicator_name&disjunctive.measure_name. Acessed 1 June 2021.
Toscano, A. (2014). Materialism without matter: abstraction, absence and social form. Textual Practice, 28(7), 1221-1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2014.965901.
Vercellone, C. (2007). From formal subsumption to the general intellect: Elements for a marxist reading of the thesis of cognitive capitalism. Historical Materialism, 15(1), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920607X171681.
Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: For analysis of contemporary forms of life. Trans. I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito, & A. Casson. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ford, D.R. Pedagogically Reclaiming Marx’s Politics in the Postdigital Age: Social Formations and Althuserrian Pedagogical Gestures. Postdigit Sci Educ 3, 851–869 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00238-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00238-4