Skip to main content
Log in

Pedagogically Reclaiming Marx’s Politics in the Postdigital Age: Social Formations and Althuserrian Pedagogical Gestures

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Postdigital Science and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper builds on Marxist postdigital literature by first clarifying what a ‘mode of production’ is, what the capitalist mode of production is, and how, why, and on what technological foundations it emerged. This leads into a discussion of these technological foundations and their relationship to production, knowledge, research, and subjectivity, in other words, the ‘general intellect’. At this point, I move from discussing modes of production to social or socio-economic formations, and show why social formations are more helpful for conceptualizing the political and pedagogical struggle in the era of postdigital capitalism (and any capitalism) as well as to insist on the division between capitalism and communism, two distinct modes of production in between which socialism is posited as a transitional social formation. With the postdigital age, collaboration, networked interactions, communication, open-source platforms, and more might be elements of a future mode of production. I end by returning to the question of the marxist political project and propose a postdigital marxist pedagogical approach that might help educators shift the balance of forces in the class struggle based on Althusser’s reading of Capital that brings together two formerly opposed educational forms: counterinterpellation and disinterpellation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I do not capitalize ‘marxist’ in order to emphasize that marxism has less to do with Marx himself and more to do with the struggles of workers and the oppressed.

  2. This is distinguished from the ‘absolute law’ of capitalist accumulation, which is the production of surplus value (Marx 1867/1967: 580). Further, it is ‘like all other laws… modified in its working by many circumstances’ (603, emphasis added).

  3. It’s worth emphasizing that Marx noted that workers’ lives are made ‘the more precarious’ as a result of proletarianization, so the figure of the ‘precariat’ is nothing new (1867/1967: 603)!

  4. The methodology takes a wide view of the knowledge economy, which is organized around four pillars that include ‘an educated and skilled labor force, a dense and modern information infrastructure, an effective innovation system, and an institutional regime that offers incentives for the efficient creation, dissemination, and use of existing knowledge’ (The World Bank Institute 2007: 23).

  5. What might be less well known is that one of Althusser’s purposes in developing the theory of interpellation is to agitate against anti-socialist theories or ‘“anticipatory" works depicting “totalitarian” socialist society as a society in which every individual will be doubled by his personal “monitor”’ (2014: 177).One cannot help but think Althusser’s target here is the anti-communist and CIA-collaborator, George Orwell.

  6. These are not the only elements at play in the Backer-Lewis debate.

References

  • Agamben, G. (2005/2007). Profanations. Trans. J. Fort. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

  • Althusser, L. (2001). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. Trans B. Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press.

  • Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism. Ed. J. Bidet. Trans. B. Brewster and G. M. Goshgarian. New York: Verso.

  • Althusser, L. (1965/2015). From Capital to Marx’s philosophy. In L. Althusser, É. Balibar, R. Establet, P. Macherey, & J. Rancière Reading Capital (pp. 9–72). Trans. B. Brewster and D. Fernbach. New York: Verso.

  • Althusser, L. (2017). Philosophy for non-philosophers. Trans. and Ed. G. M. Goshgarian. London: Bloomsbury.

  • Althusser, L. (2020). History and imperialism. Trans. and Ed. G. M. Goshgarian. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Backer, D. I. (2018). Interpellation, counterinterpellation, and education. Critical Education, 9(15), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v9i12.186408.

  • Backer, D. I. (2019). The gold and the dross: Althusser for educators. Boston, MA: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi, F. B. (2012). The uprising: On poetry and finance. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).

  • Berardi, F. B. (2018). Breathing: Chaos and poetry. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).

  • Caffentzis, G. (2013). From the Grundrisse to Capital and beyond: Then and now. In R. Bellofiore, G. Starosta, & P. D. Thomas (Eds.), In Marx’s laboratory: Critical interpretations of the Grundrisse (pp. 265–281). Rotterdam: Brill.

  • De Lissovoy, N., & Armonda, A. J. (2020). Critical pedagogy beyond the multitude: Decolonizing Hardt and Negri. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1803835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2016). Crowds and party. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer-Witheford, N. (2015). Cyber proletariat: Global labour in the digital vortex. London: Pluto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R. (2017). Education and the production of space: Political pedagogy, geography, and urban revolution. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R. (2020a). A communist theory of writing: Virno, Lyotard, and a rewriting of the general intellect. In M.A. Peters, T. Besley, P. Jandrić, & X. Zhu (Eds.), Knowledge socialism: The rise of peer production: Collegiality, collaboration, and collective intelligence (pp. 99–113). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8126-3_6.

  • Ford, D. R. (2020b). The aesthetics of exodus: Virno and Lyotard on art, timbre, and the general intellect. Cultural Politic, 16(2), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-8233434. 

  • Ford, D. R. (2021). Marxism, pedagogy, and the general intellect: Beyond the knowledge economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R., & Jandrić, P. (2021). Postdigital marxism and education. Educational Philosophy and Theoryhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1930530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. R., & Sasaki, M. (2020). The multitude beyond measure: Building a common stupor. Educational Philosophy and Theoryhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1803832. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2019). Rereading Marx in the age of digital capitalism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshgarian, G. M. (2019). The void of the forms of historicity as such. Rethinking Marxism, 31(3), 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2019.1623541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital knowledge socialism. In M.A. Peters, T. Besley, P. Jandrić, and X. Zhu (Eds.), Knowledge socialism: The rise of peer production: Collegiality, collaboration, and collective intelligence (pp. 81–98). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8126-3_5.

  • Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. E. (2012). Exopedagogy: On pirates, shorelines, and the educational commonwealth. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(8), 845-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00759.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. E. (2017). A Marxist Education of the Encounter: Althusser, Interpellation, and the Seminar. Rethinking Marxism, 29(2), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2017.1358498

  • Malott, C. (2019). Capitalism, crisis, and educational struggle in the postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00057-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malott, C. (2021). A history of education for the many: From colonization and slavery to the decline of US imperialism. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcy, S. (2009). High tech, low pay: A marxist analysis of the changing character of the working class. New York: World View Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, A. J. (2018). Learning to save the future: Rethinking education and work in an era of digital capitalism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1867/1967). Capital: A critique of political economy (vol 1): The process of capitalist production. Trans. S. Moore and E. Aveling. New York: International Publishers.

  • Marx, K. (1885/1978). Capital: A critique of political economy (vol. 2): The process of circulation of capital. Trans. D Fernbach. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Marx, K. (1939/1993). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft). Trans. M. Nicolaus. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Marx, K. (1983). Marx to Joseph Weydemeyer. In Marx-Engels collected works (vol. 39): Letters 1852–1855 (pp. 60–66). New York: International Publishers.

  • Merrifield, A. (2020). Marx dead and alive: Reading Capital in precarious times. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2774–2792. 10.1177%2F1461444815604328.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Social and emotional skills: Well-being, connectedness and success. France: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/social-emotional-skills-study/. Accessed 1 June 2021. 

  • Pasquinelli, M. (2019). On the origins of Marx’s general intellect. Radical Philosophy, 2(6), 43-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2020). Digital socialism or knowledge capitalism? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1593033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2021). Biodigital philosophy, technological convergence, and postdigital knowledge ecologies. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00211-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikowski, G., & Ford, D. R. (2019). Marxist Education across the generations: A dialogue on education, time, and transhumanism. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0028-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starosta, G. (2013). The system of machinery and determinations of revolutionary subjectivity in the Grundrisse and Capital. In R. Bellofiore, G. Starosta, & P. D. Thomas (Eds.), In Marx’s laboratory: Critical interpretations of the Grundrisse (pp. 232–263). Rotterdam: Brill.

  • The World Bank Institute (2007). Knowledge Economy Index (World Bank). https://datasource.kapsarc.org/explore/dataset/knowledge-economy-index-world-bank-2012/information/?disjunctive.location_name&disjunctive.indicator_name&disjunctive.measure_name. Acessed 1 June 2021.

  • Toscano, A. (2014). Materialism without matter: abstraction, absence and social form. Textual Practice, 28(7), 1221-1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2014.965901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercellone, C. (2007). From formal subsumption to the general intellect: Elements for a marxist reading of the thesis of cognitive capitalism. Historical Materialism, 15(1), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920607X171681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: For analysis of contemporary forms of life. Trans. I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito, & A. Casson. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek R. Ford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ford, D.R. Pedagogically Reclaiming Marx’s Politics in the Postdigital Age: Social Formations and Althuserrian Pedagogical Gestures. Postdigit Sci Educ 3, 851–869 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00238-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00238-4

Keywords

Navigation