Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Shape Memory Alloy Actuation on Parametric Instability in Pipes Conveying Pulsating Fluid

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Vibration control of pipes conveying fluid at high pressure and pulsating velocity has been a key area of research for many engineering applications. The variation of velocity of flowing fluid with time leads to parametric instabilities in the transverse motion of the pipe. The objective of the present work is to effectively control the parametric instabilities of flexible pipes conveying pulsating fluid (sinusoidal velocity profile) by applying shape memory alloy (SMA) based actuation.

Methods

The Equivalent Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (ECTE) based SMA model has been employed to assimilate the actuator effect as part of the governing equation. Bolotin’s approach has been used to investigate the principal primary and secondary instability regions due to pulsating flow in a pipe with and without the actuator.

Results

It is observed that the extent of the instability region increases with a rise in flow velocity of the fluid, however, the inclusion of SMA wire actuator causes a significant reduction in the region of principal primaryinstability. The effect of other parameters like fluid-pipe mass ratio, and mean component of fluid velocity on both primary and secondary instabilities of the system is also addressed.

Conclusion

SMA actuators could be effectively used for the vibration control of pipes containing pulsating flows, as long as the harmonic component of the fluctuation of the flow is within a specific limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(d_a\) :

Diameter of the SMA wire actuator

e :

Offset of the actuators from the axis of the pipe

F :

Transverse force between the pipe wall and the fluid

\(f_a\) :

Force developed by the SMA wire actuator

h :

Convective heat transfer coefficient

\(i_a\) :

Input current supplied to the SMA wire actuator

\(l_p\) :

Length of the pipe

\(M_p\) :

Bending moment acting on the pipe

P :

Pressure of the fluid measured above the atmosphere

\(Q_p\) :

Transverse shear force in the pipe

\(q_p\) :

Shear stress on the internal surface of the pipe

\(R_a\) :

Resistance per unit length of SMA wire actuator

\(S_p\) :

Internal surface area of the pipe

\(T_a\) :

Temperature of SMA wire actuator

t :

Time

\(\gamma\) :

Pipe flow parameter

\(T_p\) :

Time period of periodic solution

\(U_f\) :

Axial flow velocity of the fluid

u :

Non-dimensional axial flow velocity

x :

Distance from the left support along the length of the pipe

z :

Transverse displacement of the pipe

\(A_a\) :

Cross-sectional area of SMA wire actuator

\(A_f\) :

Cross-sectional area of flow

\(C_a\) :

Specific heat of SMA wire actuator

\(E_a\) :

Elastic modulus of SMA wire actuator

\(E_pI_p\) :

Flexural rigidity of the pipe

T :

Tension force in the pipe wall

\(I_a\) :

Amplitude of input current in SMA wire actuator

\(m_a\) :

Mass per unit length of SMA wire actuator

\(m_f\) :

Mass of the fluid per unit length of pipe

\(m_p\) :

Mass of the pipe per unit length

\(S_a\) :

Surface area of the unit length of the SMA wire actuator

\(T_\circ\) :

Ambient temperature

\(u_\circ\) :

Mean component of the pulsating flow

\(\mathcal {F}\) :

Non-dimensional force developed in the SMA wire actuator

w :

Non-dimensional transverse displacement of the pipe

\(\alpha _a\) :

Effective coefficient of thermal expansion (ECTE) of SMA wire actuator

\(\beta\) :

Fluid-pipe mass ratio parameter

\(\varepsilon _a\) :

Total axial strain in SMA wire actuator

\(\theta\) :

Slope of the pipe at some point

\(\lambda\) :

Excitation parameter

\(\mu\) :

Non-dimensional distance from the left support along the length of the pipe

\(\rho _a\) :

Density of SMA wire actuator

\(\sigma _a\) :

Stress induced in SMA wire actuator

\(\tau\) :

Non-dimensional time

\(\omega\) :

Frequency of harmonic fluctuation of the fluid velocity

\(\mathrm \Omega\) :

Non-dimensional frequency of pulsating flow

References

  1. Gu Z, Bai C, Zhang H (2019) Stochastic finite-element modeling and dynamic characteristics analysis of pipe-conveying fluid. J Vib Eng Technol 7:251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00118-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdelrahman WG, Al-Garni AZ, Abdelmaksoud SI, Abdallah A (2018) Effect of piezoelectric patch size and material on active vibration control of wind turbine blades. J Vib Eng Technol 6:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0020-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chopra I, Sirohi J (2013) Smart structures theory. Cambridge Aerospace Series (Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025164

  4. Shen X, Chen Y, Wang J, Li J, Chang L, Sun Y (2019) Design, experiment and verification of resonant frequency-tunable vibration isolator based on annular metal rubbers and shape memory alloy actuators. J Vib Eng Technol 7:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00109-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jia Y, Li L, Wang C, Lu Z, Zhang R (2019) A novel shape memory alloy damping inerter for vibration mitigation. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ab3dc8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zareie S, Issa AS, Seethaler RJ, Zabihollah A (2020) Recent advances in the applications of shape memory alloys in civil infrastructures: a review. Structures 27:1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suhail R, Amato G, McCrum D (2020) Active and passive confinement of shape modified low strength concrete columns using SMA and FRP systems. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mao Z, Xu Z, Wang Q (2020) Shape memory alloy actuator with active cooling device and deflectable winglet application. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/aba9ab

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalra S, Bhattacharya B, Munjal BS (2018) Development of shape memory alloy actuator integrated flexible poly-ether-ether-ketone antenna with simultaneous beam steering and shaping ability. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 29(18):3634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X18798946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Srivastava R, Sharma AK, Hait AK, Bhattacharya B (2018) Design and development of active bimorph structure for deployable space application, in active and passive smart structures and integrated systems XII, vol. 10595, ed. by A. Erturk. Int Soc Optics Photonics (SPIE), vol. 10595, pp. 818 – 829. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2296547

  11. Fonseca LM, Savi MA (2020) Nonlinear dynamics of an autonomous robot with deformable origami wheels. Int J Nonlin Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang X, Kumar K, Jawed MK, Mohammadi Nasab A, Ye Z, Shan W, Majidi C (2019) Highly dynamic shape memory alloy actuator for fast moving soft robots. Adv Mater Technol 4(4):1800540. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meng L, Kang R, Gan D, Chen G, Chen L, Branson DT, Dai JS (2020) A mechanically intelligent crawling robot driven by shape memory alloy and compliant bistable mechanism. J Mech Robotics 12(6):061005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishii H, Ting KL (2004) SMA actuated compliant bistable mechanisms. Mechatronics 14(4):421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4158(03)00068-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mekaouche A, Chapelle F, Balandraud X (2018) A compliant mechanism with variable stiffness achieved by rotary actuators and shape-memory alloy. Meccanica 53:2555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0844-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Banerjee A, Bhattacharya B, Mallik AK (2010) Optimum discrete location of shape memory alloy wire for enhanced actuation of a compliant link. J Mech Des 132(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000643

  17. Abitha H, Kavitha V, Gomathi B, Ramachandran B (2020) A recent investigation on shape memory alloys and polymers based materials on bio artificial implants-hip and knee joint. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoeckel D, Pelton A, Duerig T (2009) Self-expanding Nitinol stents for the treatment of vascular disease, in shape memory alloys for biomedical applications. In: Yoneyama T, Miyazaki T (eds). Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 237 – 256. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845695248.2.237

  19. Bhattacharya B, Patel OP (2011) A new shape memory alloy based smart encoder for sensing of direction and angular motion. Sens Transducers 130(7):103

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jain AK, Sharma AK, Khandekar S, Bhattacharya B (2020) Shape memory alloy-based sensor for two-phase flow detection. IEEE Sens J 20(23):14209. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3008191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhaskar J, Sharma AK, Bhattacharya B, Adhikari S (2020) A review on shape memory alloy reinforced polymer composite materials and structures. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ab8836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SH, Kim SW (2020) Self-sensing-based deflection control of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP)-based shape memory alloy hybrid composite beams. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Païdoussis M, Issid N (1974) Dynamic stability of pipes conveying fluid. J Sound Vib 33(3):267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(74)80002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh K, Mallik A (1979) Parametric instabilities of a periodically supported pipe conveying fluid. J Sound Vib 62(3):379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(79)90631-X

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh K, Mallik A (1978) Use of dynamic absorbers to control parametric instabilities of a pipe. J Appl Mech 45(4):949. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3424454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mallik A, Narayanan S (1980) Control of parametric instabilities of a periodically supported pipe with dynamic absorber, In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics (University of Southampton, UK), pp. 661–676

  27. Mallik AK, Kulkarni SB, Ram KS (1984) Parametric instability of a periodically supported pipe without and with vibration absorbers. J Appl Mech 51(1):159. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3167561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yau CH, Bajaj A, Nwokah O (1995) Active control of chaotic vibration in a constrained flexible pipe conveying fluid. J Fluids Struct 9(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1995.1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin YH, Chu CL (1996) Active flutter control of a cantilever tube conveying fluid using piezoelectric actuators. J Sound Vib 196(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsai YK, Lin YH (1997) Adaptive modal vibration control of a fluid-conveying cantilever pipe. J Fluids Struct 11(5):535. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1997.0092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsai XY, Chen LW (2002) Dynamic stability of a shape memory alloy wire reinforced composite beam. Compos Struct 56(3):235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00008-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baz A, Imam K, McCoy J (1990) Active vibration control of flexible beams using shape memory actuators. J Sound Vib 140(3):437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(90)90760-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Williams K, Chu G, Bernhard R (2002) Adaptive-passive absorbers using shape-memory alloys. J Sound Vib 249(5):835. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rustighi E, Brennan MJ, Mace BR (2004) A shape memory alloy adaptive tuned vibration absorber: design and implementation. Smart Mater Struct 14(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/14/1/002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baz A, Poh S, Ro J, Gilheany J (1995) Control of the natural frequencies of nitinol-reinforced composite beams. J Sound Vib 185(1):171. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1994.0370

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Dauksher R, Patterson Z, Majidi C (2021) Characterization and analysis of a flexural shape memory alloy actuator. Actuators. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10080202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Utter B (2019) Enhancing the actuation frequency of shape memory alloy wire by vibration-enhanced cooling. J Intelligent Mate Syst Struc 30(20):3177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X19880015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shin DD, Mohanchandra KP, Carman GP (2004) High frequency actuation of thin film NiTi. Sens Actuators A: Phys 111(2):166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2003.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Song SH, Lee JY, Rodrigue H, Choi IS, Kang YJ, Ahn SH (2016) 35 Hz shape memory alloy actuator with bending-twisting mode. Sci Rep 6:21118. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21118

  40. Dana A, Vollach S, Shilo D (2021) Use the force: review of high-rate actuation of shape memory alloys, use the force: review of high-rate actuation of shape memory alloys. Actuators 10(7):140

  41. Turner TL, Patel HD (2007) Analysis of SMA hybrid composite structures in MSC Nastran and ABAQUS. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 18(5):435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06066699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bolotin VV (1964) The dynamic stability of elastic systems, the dynamic stability of elastic systems (Holden-Day). San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1972245

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Mallik AK, Bhattacharjee JK (2005) Stability problems in applied mechanics. Alpha Science International Ltd., New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  44. Turner TL (2001) Experimental validation of a thermoelastic model for SMA hybrid composites, in Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Modeling, Signal Processing, and Control in Smart Structures, vol. 4326, ed. by V.S. Rao. Int Soc Optics Photonics (SPIE). 4326: 208 – 219. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.436475

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge partial support of this research from Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)-Space Technology Cell; Sponsored project STC/ME/2017183.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bishakh Bhattacharya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The authors would like to thank the following SPIE publication for permitting the use of a figure in the manuscript. Travis L. Turner, “Experimental validation of a thermoelastic model for SMA hybrid composites,” Proc. SPIE 4326, Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Modeling, Signal Processing, and Control in Smart Structures, (21 August 2001).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (pdf 95 kb)

Appendix A Equation of Motion

Appendix A Equation of Motion

The assumptions made while deriving the governing equation are as follows:

  1. 1.

    The flow is assumed to be of plug type.

  2. 2.

    The fluid is assumed to be incompressible.

  3. 3.

    The effect of pressurization of flowing fluid is neglected.

  4. 4.

    The damping and axial tension in the pipe are neglected.

  5. 5.

    The motion of the pipe is assumed to be in one plane (X-Z).

Consider a pinned-pinned flexible pipe conveying pulsating fluid, as shown in Fig. 1 including the SMA actuators. Let \(l_p\) be the pipe length, \(E_pI_p\) is flexural rigidity, \(S_p\) is internal surface area per unit length, and \(m_f\) is mass per unit length of the pipe conveying fluid of mass per unit length \(m_p\). Let \(U_f\) be the axial flow velocity, \(A_f\) is the cross-sectional flow area, and P is the fluid gauge pressure.

Assume a small element of the pipe of length dx and the corresponding element of the enclosed fluid, as shown in Figs. 12 and  13, for deriving the governing equation of motion. Let \(q_p\) is the shear stress on the internal surface of the pipe, F is the transverse force between pipe wall and fluid, \(Q_p\) is the transverse shear force in the pipe, \(f_a\) is the force induced in the SMA actuator, which in turn induces a compressive load in the pipe and \(M_p\) is the bending moment.

For the fluid element shown in Fig. 12, force balance in X and Z directions, respectively, gives

$$\begin{aligned}&-A_f\frac{\partial P}{\partial x}-q_pS_p+F\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}-m_f\frac{\partial U_f}{\partial t}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(32)
$$\begin{aligned}&F+A_f\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\ \left( P\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right) +q_pS_p\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}+\ m_f\ {\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial t}+U_f\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\right) }^2z=0\ \end{aligned}$$
(33)
Fig. 12
figure 12

Free body diagram of fluid element

For the pipe element shown in Fig. 13, force balance in X and Z directions gives (z-component of \(f_a\) is neglected since the case is assumed to be of small vibrations)

Fig. 13
figure 13

Free body diagram of pipe element


$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}+q_p S_p-F\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(34)
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial Q_p}{\partial x}+F+\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\ \left( T\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right) +q_p S_p\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}-m_p\ \frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial t^2}=0\ \end{aligned}$$
(35)

The relation between \(Q_p\) and \(M_p\) is given by

$$\begin{aligned} Q_p=-\frac{\partial M_p}{\partial x}=-E_pI_p\frac{{\partial }^3z}{\partial x^3} \end{aligned}$$
(36)

Combining the Eqs. 33, 35 and 36, we get

$$\begin{aligned} -E_pI_p\ \frac{{\partial }^4z}{\partial x^4}+\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\ \left[ \left( T-PA_f\right) \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right] -\ m_f\ {\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial t}+U_f\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\right) }^2z-m_p\ \frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial t^2}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(37)

Adding the Eqs. 32 and 34 gives

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\ \left( T-PA_f\right) =m_f\frac{\partial U_f}{\partial t} \end{aligned}$$
(38)

Integrating Eq. 38 from x to \({l_p}\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} {\left( T-PA_f\right) }_{x=l_p}-{\left( T-PA_f\right) }_x=m_f\frac{\partial U_f}{\partial t}\ \left( l_p-x\right) \end{aligned}$$
(39)

The pressure at x = \(l_p\) is zero, since it is measured above atmosphere and the fluid discharges to atmosphere, i.e. \({(PA_f}_{x=l_p}=0\) in the above equation and \({\left( T\right) }_{x=l_p}=-f_a\) (compressive)

$$\begin{aligned} {\left( T\right) }_{x=l_p}\ -{\left( T-PA_f\right) }_x\ =\ m_f\frac{\partial U_f}{\partial t}\ \left( l_p-x\right) \end{aligned}$$
(40)

or

$$\begin{aligned} {-\left( T-PA_f\right) }_x=f_a+m_f\frac{\partial U_f}{\partial t}\ \left( l_p-x\right) \end{aligned}$$
(41)

Substituting Eq. 41 into Eq. 37, we get the equation of motion as

$$\begin{aligned}&E_pI_p\frac{{\partial }^4z}{\partial x^4}+\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left[ \left\{ f_a+m_f\frac{\partial U_f}{\partial t}\left( l_p-x\right) \right\} \frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right] +m_f\frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial t^2}+2m_f U_f\ \frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial x\partial t}\nonumber \\&\quad +m_f U_f^2\frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial x^2}+m_p\ \frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial t^2}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(42)

Simplifying the above equation further, the governing equation becomes

$$\begin{aligned}&E_pI_p\ \frac{{\partial }^4z}{\partial x^4}+\left[ m_f U_f^2+f_a+ m_f\frac{\partial U_f}{\partial t}\ \left( l_p-x\right) \right] \ \ \frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial x^2}+2m_f U_f\ \frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial x\partial t}\nonumber \\&\quad +(m_f+m_p)\ \frac{{\partial }^2z}{\partial t^2}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(43)

The equation of motion is converted to the non-dimensional form using the non-dimensional terms given in Sect. 2.1. Thus, we finally obtain

$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{{\partial }^4w}{\partial {\mu }^4}+u^2\frac{{\partial }^2w}{\partial {\mu }^2}+\left[ \beta \left( 1-\mu \right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial \tau }+{\mathcal {F}}\right] \frac{{\partial }^2w}{\partial {\mu }^2}+2\beta u\frac{{\partial }^2w}{\partial \mu \partial \tau }+\ \frac{{\partial }^2w}{\partial {\tau }^2}=0;\,\nonumber \\&\quad 0\le \ \mu \le 1 \end{aligned}$$
(44)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaik, N.H., Sharma, A.K. & Bhattacharya, B. Effect of Shape Memory Alloy Actuation on Parametric Instability in Pipes Conveying Pulsating Fluid. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 11, 3003–3016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00726-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00726-2

Keywords

Navigation