Abstract
Purpose
In order to study the effect of shear modulus and saturation of topsoil on the dynamic response in two typical layered foundations (the upper stiff-layer and lower soft-layer ground/the upper soft-layer and lower stiff-layer ground).
Methods
First, based on the mixed theory of three-phase porous media, a double-layered unsaturated soil foundation model is established and the dynamic governing equations of unsaturated soils are established by using the Fourier transform and Helmholtz vector decomposition. Then, the dynamic response solution of double-layered unsaturated foundations in the transformed domain is obtained using the transfer matrix method and combining with the boundary conditions and continuity conditions of adjacent layers. The numerical solutions of displacement, stress, and pore pressure are obtained by using numerical inverse Fourier transformation. Finally, the influence of shear modulus and saturation of topsoil on the dynamic response of double-layered ground is addressed.
Results
With the increase of topsoil shear modulus, the vertical displacement, pore water pressure and pore air pressure in the upper soft-layer and lower stiff-layer ground and the upper stiff-layer and lower soft-layer ground decrease. With the increase of topsoil saturation, the vertical displacement and pore air pressure in the upper soft-layer and lower stiff-layer ground and the upper stiff-layer and lower soft-layer ground increase but the pore water pressure decreases significantly.
Conclusions
The results show that the shear modulus and saturation of topsoil have a significant effect on the vertical displacement, pore air pressure and pore water pressure of double-layered ground. The results will provide theoretical basis and guiding significance for foundation design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hung HH, Yang YB (2001) Elastic waves in visco-elastic half-space generated by various vehicle loads. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21(1):1–17
Zhou HF, Jiang JQ (2007) Dynamic response of viscoelastic half-space under moving loads. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 39(4):545–553
Yan KZ, Wu LC, Zhu XP (2011) Dynamic response of elastic half-space soil under moving loads. J Archit Civ Eng 28(04):30–34
Heider Y, Avci O, Markert B, Ehlers W (2014) The dynamic response of fluid-saturated porous materials with application to seismically induced soil liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 63(8):120–137
Cai YQ, Chen Y, Cao ZG, Sun HL, Guo J (2015) Dynamic responses of a saturated poroelastic half-space generated by a moving truck on the uneven pavement. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:172–181
Chen WY, Mou YM, Xu LY, Wang Zh, Luo Jh (2020) Frequency-dependent dynamic behavior of a poroviscoelastic soil layer under cyclic loading. Int J Numer Anal Met 44(9):1336–1349
Chen WY, Chen GX, Xia TD, Chen W (2014) Energy flux characteristics of seismic waves at the interface between soil layers with different saturations. Sci Chn 57(10):2062–2069
Zhang M, Shang W, Zhou ZC, Guo C (2014) Propagation characteristics of Rayleigh waves in double-layer unsaturated soils. Rock Soil Mech 38(10):2931–2938
Liu HB, Zhou FX, Yue GD, Hao LC (2020) Propagation characteristics of thermoelastic wave in unsaturated soil. Rock Soil Mech 41(05):1613–1624
Nadarajah R, Shada HK, Ariful HB, Eleanor LH (2016) Simplified finite-element model for site response analysis of unsaturated soil profiles. Int J Geomech 16(1):04015036
Lu Z, Fang R, Yao HL, Dong C, Xian SH (2018) Dynamic responses of unsaturated half-space soil to a moving harmonic rectangular load. Int J Numer Anal Met 42(9):1057–1077
Ai ZY, Ye Z (2021) Extended precise integration solution to layered transversely isotropic unsaturated poroelastic media under harmonically dynamic loads. Eng Anal Bound Elem 122:21–34
Shi LW, Ma Q, Ma YX (2021) Dynamic responses of unsaturated half-space soils to a strip load at different boundary conditions. Arab J Geosci 14:947
Pan E (2019) Green’s functions for geophysics: a review. Rep Prog Phys 82:106801
Lu Z, Hu Z, Yao HL, Liu J, Zhan YX (2016) An analytical method for evaluating highway embankment responses with consideration of dynamic wheel-pavement interactions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 83:135–147
Ba ZN, Liang JW, Vincent WL (2016) Wave propagation of buried spherical SH-, P1-, P2- and SV-waves in a layered poroelastic half-space. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 88:237–255
Feng SJ, Ding XH, Zheng QT, Chen ZL, Zhang DM (2020) Extended stiffness matrix method for horizontal vibration of a rigid disk embedded in stratified soils. Appl Math Model 77:663–689
Hu AF, Li YJ, Jia YS, Sun B, Xie KH (2016) Dynamic response of a layered saturated ground subjected to a buried moving load. Eng Mech 33(12):44–51
Hu AF, Li YJ, Deng YB, Xie KH (2020) Vibration of layered saturated ground with a tunnel subjected to an underground moving load. Comput Geotech 119:103342
Liang JW, Wu MT, Ba ZN, Sang QZ (2021) A reflection-transmission matrix method for time-history response analysis of a layered TI saturated site under obliquely incident seismic waves. Appl Math Model 97:206–225
Ma Q, Zhou FX (2018) Dynamic response of graded non-homogeneous soil under a moving load. J Nat Disaster 27(06):59–65
Ma Q, Zhou FX, Zhang WY (2019) Vibration isolation of saturated foundations by functionally graded wave impeding block under a moving load. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41(2):108
Ye Z, Ai ZY (2021) Poroelastodynamic response of layered unsaturated media in the vicinity of a moving harmonic load. Comput Geotech 138:104358
Ye Z, Ai ZY (2021) Dynamic response analysis of multilayered unsaturated poroelastic medium subjected to a vertical time-harmonic load. Appl Math Model 90:394–412
Li XB, Zhang ZQ, Pan E (2020) Wave-induced dynamic response in a transversely isotropic an. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 139:106365
Zhang ZQ, Pan E (2020) Time-harmonic response of transversely isotropic and layered poroelastic half-spaces under general buried loads. Appl Math Model 80:426–453
Thomson WT (1950) Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified soil medium. J Appl Phys 21(2):89–93
Kausel E, Roësset JM (1981) Stiffness matrices for layered soils. GeoScienceWorld 71(6):1743–1761
Anil KV, Poonam K (2003) Waves in stratified anisotropic poroelastic media: a transfer matrix approach. J Sound Vib 277(1–2):239–275
Lu Z, Yao HL, Luo XW, Hu ML (2009) 3D dynamic responses of layered ground under vehicle loads. Rock Soil Mech 30(10):2965–2970
Xu MJ, Wei DM, He CB (2011) Axisymmetric steady state dynamic response of layered unsaturated soils. Rock Soil Mech 32(04):1113–1118
Liang JW, Wu MT, Ba ZN, Vincent WL (2020) Transfer matrix solution to free-field response of a multi-layered transversely isotropic poroelastic half-plane. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 134:106168
Bolzon G, Schrefler BA, Zienkiewicz OC (1996) Elastoplastic soil constitutive laws generalized to partially saturated states. Géotechnique 46(2):279–289
Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. John Wiley & Sons Inc
Van Genuchten MTh (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Aa J 44(5):892–898
Xu MJ, Wei DM (2011) 3D non-axisymmetrical dynamic response of unsaturated soils. Eng Mech 28(3):78–85
Zhou FX, Lai YM (2013) Dynamic response analysis of graded fluid-saturated soil under strip load. Rock Soil Mech 34(6):1723–1730
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the Chinese Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 52168053) and the Qinghai Province Science and Technology Department Project (No. 2021-ZJ-943Q). The authors are appreciating the helpful suggestions and comments of the reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
\(N_{n} = 2\mu S_{n} i\xi \lambda_{n} (n = 1,2,3)\),\(X = \frac{{i\mu \lambda_{0}^{2} }}{\xi } + i\mu \xi (n = 1,2,3)\),\(L_{n} = \frac{{\omega^{2} \rho_{w} S_{n} \lambda_{n} - f_{wn} \lambda_{n} }}{{b^{w} \rho_{w} }}(n = 1,2,3)\),\(K_{n} = \frac{{\omega^{2} \rho_{a} S_{n} \lambda_{n} - f_{an} \lambda_{n} }}{{b^{a} \rho_{a} }}(n = 1,2,3)\), \(M_{n} = 2\mu S_{n} \lambda_{n}^{2} + \lambda - a\chi f_{wn} - a(1 - \chi )f_{an} (n = 1,2,3)\).
The elements in matrix \(\left[ S \right]\) are
\(S_{11} = S_{15} = 2\mu \lambda_{0}\),\(S_{12} = S_{16} = M_{1}\), \(S_{13} = S_{17} = M_{2}\), \(S_{14} = S_{18} = M_{3}\), \(S_{21} = - S_{25} = X\), \(S_{22} = - S_{26} = N_{1}\), \(S_{23} = - S_{27} = N_{2}\), \(S_{24} = - S_{28} = N_{3}\), \(S_{31} = S_{35} = 0\), \(S_{32} = S_{36} = f_{w1}\), \(S_{33} = S_{37} = f_{w2}\), \(S_{34} = S_{38} = f_{w3}\), \(S_{41} = S_{45} = 0\), \(S_{42} = S_{46} = f_{a1}\), \(S_{43} = S_{47} = f_{a2}\), \(S_{44} = S_{48} = f_{a3}\), \(S_{51} = S_{55} = \frac{{i\lambda_{0} }}{\xi }\), \(S_{52} = S_{56} = S_{1} i\xi\), \(S_{53} = S_{57} = S_{2} i\xi\), \(S_{54} = S_{58} = S_{3} i\xi\), \(S_{61} = - S_{65} = 1\), \(S_{62} = - S_{66} = S_{1} \lambda_{1}\), \(S_{63} = - S_{67} = S_{2} \lambda_{2}\), \(S_{64} = - S_{68} = S_{3} \lambda_{3}\), \(S_{71} = - S_{75} = \frac{{\omega^{2} }}{{b^{w} }}\), \(S_{72} = - S_{76} = L_{1}\), \(S_{73} = - S_{77} = L_{2}\), \(S_{74} = - S_{78} = L_{3}\), \(S_{81} = - S_{85} = \frac{{\omega^{2} }}{{b^{a} }}\), \(S_{82} = - S_{86} = K_{1}\), \(S_{83} = - S_{87} = K_{2}\),\(S_{84} = - S_{88} = K_{3}\).
Appendix B
The elements in matrix \(\left[ {U^{1} } \right]\) are
\(U_{11}^{1} = U_{15}^{1} = 2\mu^{1} \lambda_{0}^{1}\), \(U_{12}^{1} = U_{16}^{1} = M_{1}^{1}\), \(U_{13}^{1} = U_{17}^{1} = M_{2}^{1}\), \(U_{14}^{1} = U_{18}^{1} = M_{3}^{1}\); \(U_{21}^{1} = - U_{25}^{1} = X^{1}\), \(U_{22}^{1} = - U_{26}^{1} = N_{1}^{1}\), \(U_{23}^{1} = - U_{27}^{1} = N_{2}^{1}\), \(U_{24}^{1} = - U_{28}^{1} = N_{3}^{1}\); \(U_{31}^{1} = U_{35}^{1} = 0\), \(U_{32}^{1} = U_{36}^{1} = f_{w1}^{1}\), \(U_{33}^{1} = U_{37}^{1} = f_{w2}^{1}\), \(U_{34}^{1} = U_{38}^{1} = f_{w3}^{1}\);
\(U_{41}^{1} = U_{45}^{1} = 0\), \(U_{42}^{1} = U_{46}^{1} = f_{a1}^{1}\), \(U_{43}^{1} = U_{47}^{1} = f_{a2}^{1}\), \(U_{44}^{1} = U_{48}^{1} = f_{a3}^{1}\).
The elements in matrix \(\left[ {U^{N} } \right]\) are
\(U_{11}^{N} = \frac{{i\lambda_{0}^{N} }}{\xi }\), \(U_{12}^{N} = S_{1}^{N}\), \(U_{13}^{N} = S_{2}^{N} i\xi\), \(U_{14}^{N} = S_{3}^{N}\), \(U_{15}^{N} = \frac{{i\lambda_{0}^{N} }}{\xi }\), \(U_{16}^{N} = S_{1}^{N} i\xi\), \(U_{17}^{N} = S_{2}^{N} i\xi\), \(U_{18}^{N} = S_{3}^{N} i\xi\);\(U_{21}^{N} = 1\),\(U_{22}^{N} = S_{1}^{N} \lambda_{1}^{N}\),\(U_{23}^{N} = S_{2}^{N} \lambda_{2}^{N}\),\(U_{24}^{N} = S_{3}^{N} \lambda_{3}^{N}\),\(U_{25}^{N} = - 1\),\(U_{26}^{N} = - S_{1}^{N} \lambda_{1}^{N}\),\(U_{27}^{N} = - S_{2}^{N} \lambda_{2}^{N}\), \(U_{28}^{N} = - S_{3}^{N} \lambda_{3}^{N}\);\(U_{31}^{N} = \frac{{\omega^{2} }}{{b^{{w^{N} }} }}\),\(U_{32}^{N} = L_{1}^{N}\), \(U_{33}^{N} = L_{2}^{N}\),\(U_{34}^{N} = L_{3}^{N}\),\(U_{35}^{N} = - \frac{{\omega^{2} }}{{b^{{w^{N} }} }}\),\(U_{36}^{N} = - L_{1}^{N}\),\(U_{37}^{N} = - L_{2}^{N}\), \(U_{38}^{N} = - L_{3}^{N}\);\(U_{41}^{N} = \frac{{\omega^{2} }}{{b^{{a^{N} }} }}\),\(U_{42}^{N} = K_{1}^{N}\), \(U_{43}^{N} = K_{2}^{N}\),\(U_{44}^{N} = K_{3}^{N}\),\(U_{45}^{N} = - \frac{{\omega^{2} }}{{b^{{a^{N} }} }}\),\(U_{46}^{N} = - K_{1}^{N}\),\(U_{47}^{N} = - K_{2}^{N}\),\(U_{48}^{N} = - K_{3}^{N}\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Q., Shi, Lw. Dynamic Response of Two-Dimensional Double-Layered Unsaturated Soil Foundations Under a Strip Load. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 10, 1221–1233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00439-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00439-6