Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A survey on synthetic jets as active flow control

  • Review
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Synthetic jets (SJs) are becoming increasingly popular in aerospace engineering due to their potential applications in flow mixing enhancement, boundary layer control, and thermal load reduction. These pulsating jets involve the periodic motion of fluid in and out of a cavity through an orifice generated by a vibrating diaphragm at the cavity base. SJs are unique because they comprise working fluid and do not require an external fluid source, setting them apart from conventional flow control techniques. Although the net mass flux is zero in a complete cycle, there is a finite net momentum flux due to the imbalanced flow conditions across the orifice, and hence SJs are also known as Zero Net Mass Flux (ZNMF) jets. Numerous experimental and numerical studies have evaluated the efficacy of SJs in controlling the flow and heat transfer characteristics under various conditions, including quiescent and cross-flow situations. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the progress in synthetic jet applications in the last 40 years, specifically focusing on their potential use in flow control, heat transfer, and related applications in aerospace engineering. The strengths and limitations of SJs are discussed, and critical areas are identified for future research and development, including further optimization and refinement of these unique jets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated during the current study.

References

  1. Gad-el Hak M (1996) Modern developments in flow control. Appl Mech Rev 49(7):365 (49(7):365–379)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jahanmiri M (2010) Active flow control: a review. Technical report, Chalmers University of Technology

  3. Lauchle GC, Gurney G (1984) Laminar boundary-layer transition on a heated underwater body. J Fluid Mech 144:79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seifert A, Darabi A, Wyganski I (1996) Delay of airfoil stall by periodic excitation. J Aircr 33(4):691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crook A, Sadri AM, Wood NJ (1999) The development and implementation of synthetic jets for the control of separated flow. AIAA paper 3176:1999

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilarranz J, Rediniotis O (2001) Compact, high-power synthetic jet actuators for flow separation control. AIAA Paper 737:2001

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liepmann HW, Nosenchuck DM (1982) Active control of laminar-turbulent transition. J Fluid Mech 118:201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Menon S (2001) Fuel-air mixing enhancement by synthetic microjets. AIAA J 39(12):2308–2319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen F-J, Yao C, Beeler G, Bryant RG, Fox R (2000) Development of synthetic jet actuators for active flow control at NASA Langley. AIAA Paper 2405:2000

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xia Q, Zhong S (2013) Liquids mixing enhanced by multiple synthetic jet pairs at low Reynolds numbers. Chem Eng Sci 102:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xia Q, Zhong S (2014) Enhancement of laminar flow mixing using a pair of staggered lateral synthetic jets. Sens Actuators A 207:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilarranz JL, Traub LW, Rediniotis OK (2005) A new class of synthetic jet actuators—part ii: application to flow separation control. J Fluids Eng 127(2):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cattafesta LN, Sheplak M (2011) Actuators for active flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43(1):247–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aider J-L, Beaudoin J-F, Wesfreid JE (2010) Drag and lift reduction of a 3d bluff-body using active vortex generators. Exp Fluids 48(5):771–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Godard G, Stanislas M (2006) Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerosp Sci Technol 10(3):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Achenbach E (1971) Influence of surface roughness on the cross-flow around a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech 46(02):321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Achenbach E (1974) The effects of surface roughness and tunnel blockage on the flow past spheres. J Fluid Mech 65(01):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jana T, Thillaikumar T, Kaushik M (2020) Assessment of cavity covered with porous surface in controlling shock/boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic intake. Int J Aeronaut Sp Sci 21:924–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaushik M (2019) Experimental studies on micro-vortex generator-controlled shock/boundary-layer interactions in Mach 2.2 intake. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 20(3):584–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Glagolev AI, Zubkov AI, Panov YA (1967) Supersonic flow past a gas jet obstacle emerging from a plate. Fluid Dyn 2(3):60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Avduevskii VS, Medvedev KI, Polyanskii MN (1970), Interaction between a supersonic flow and a transverse jet injected through a circular orifice in a plate. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, No. 5, 193

  22. Zubkov AI, Lyagushin BE, Panov YuA, Tul’tsev AV (1994) Interaction of a transverse gas jet with supersonic flow in a dihedral. Fluid Dyn 29(6):872–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Glagolev AI, Zubkov AI, Panov YuA (1968) Interaction between a supersonic flow and gas issuing from a hole in a plate. Fluid Dyn 3(2):65–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vinogradov YuA, Zhilenko DYu, Zubkov AI, Panov YuA (1999) Flow pattern in the vicinity of an annular system of transverse jets in a supersonic stream. Fluid Dyn 34(1):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vinogradov YA, Zhilenko DY, Zubkov AI, Panov YA (1999) Flow pattern in the vicinity of an annular system of transverse jets in a supersonic stream. Fluid Dyn 34(1):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Glezer A, Amitay M (2002) Synthetic jets. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34:503–529

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Xia X, Mohseni K (2015) Axisymmetric synthetic jets: modeling of the far-field momentum flux. In: 53rd AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. AIAA, no. January, pp 1–14

  28. Chen Y, Liang S, Anug K, Glezer A, Jagoda J (1999) Enhanced mixing in a simulated combustor using synthetic jet actuators. In: 37th AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., no. c, p. AIAA-99–0449, 1999

  29. Amitay M, Cannelle F (2006) Evolution of finite span synthetic jets. Phys Fluids 18(5): 054101–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor K, Amitay M (2015) Dynamic stall process on a finite span model and its control via synthetic jet actuators. Phys Fluids 27:26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Narayanaswamy V, Raja LL, Clemens NT (2012) Control of unsteadiness of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction by using a pulsed-plasma-jet actuator. Phys Fluids 24(7):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Holman R, Utturkar Y, Mittal R, Smith BL, Cattafesta L (2005) Formation criterion for synthetic jets. AIAA J 43(10):2110–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Glezer A (1988) The formation of vortex rings. Phys Fluids 13:3532–3542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith BL, Glezer A (1998) The formation and evolution of synthetic jets. Phys Fluids 10(9):2281–2297

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith BL, Swift GW (2001) Synthetic jets at large reynolds number and comparison to continuous jets. In: AIAA paper, 3030:2001

  36. Utturkar Y, Holman R, Mittal R, Carroll B, Sheplak M, Cattafesta L (2003) A jet formation criterion for synthetic jet actuators. In: 41st Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., no. January, 2003

  37. Shuster JM, Smith DR (2007) Experimental study of the formation and scaling of a round synthetic jet. Phys Fluids 19:045–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wiltse JM, Glezer A (1993) Manipulation of free shear flows using piezoelectric actuators. J Fluid Mech 249:261–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jabbal M, Zhong S (2008) The near wall effect of synthetic jets in a boundary layer. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 29(1):119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jabbal M, Zhong S (2010) Particle image velocimetry measurements of the interaction of synthetic jets with a zero-pressure gradient laminar boundary layer. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 22(6): 063603–17

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang P, Wang J, Feng L (2008) Review of zero-net-mass-flux jet and its application in separation flow control. Sci China Ser E: Technol Sci 51(9):1315–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhong S, Jabbal M, Tang H, Garcillan L, Guo F, Wood N, Warsop C (2007) Towards the design of synthetic-jet actuators for full-scale flight conditions. Flow Turbul Combust 78(3–4):283–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cater JE, Soria J (2002) The evolution of round zero-net-mass-flux jets. J Fluid Mech 472:167–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jabbal M, Wu J, Zhong S (2006) The performance of round synthetic jets in quiescent flow. Aeronaut J 110(1108):385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Travnicek Z, Brouckova Z, Kordik J, Vit T (2015) Visualization of synthetic jet formation in air. J Vis 18:595–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xia Q, Zhong S (2016) An experimental study on the behaviors of circular synthetic jets at low Reynolds numbers‖. J Mech Eng Sci 226:2686–2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Crittenden TM, Glezer A (2006) A high-speed, compressible synthetic jet. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 18(1): 017107–18

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang PF, Wang JJ (2007) Novel signal wave pattern for efficient synthetic jet generation. AIAA J 45:1058–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou J (2010) Numerical investigation of the behaviour of circular synthetic jets for effective flow separation control. PhD thesis

  50. Gordon M, Cater JE, Soria J (2004) Investigation of the mean passive scalar field in zero-net-mass-flux jets in cross-flow using planar-laser-induced fluorescence. Phys Fluids (1994-present) 16(3):794–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhong S, Millet F, Wood N (2005) The behaviour of circular synthetic jets in a laminar boundary layer. Aeronaut J 109(1100):461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rathnasingham R, Breuer KS (2003) Active control of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 495:209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Liddle S, Wood N (2005) Investigation into clustering of synthetic jet actuators for flow separation control applications. Aeronaut J 109(1091):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. McCormick D (2000) Boundary layer separation control with directed synthetic jets. AIAA paper 519:2000

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang S, Zhong S (2010) Experimental investigation of flow separation control using an array of synthetic jets. AIAA J 48(3):611–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Van Buren T, Leong CM, Whalen E, Amitay M (2016) Impact of orifice orientation on a finite-span synthetic jet interaction with a crossflow. Phys Fluids 28(3):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  57. Van Buren T, Beyar M, Leong CM, Amitay M (2016) Three-dimensional interaction of a finite-span synthetic jet in a crossflow. Phys Fluids 28:18

    Google Scholar 

  58. Murugan T, Deyashi M, Dey S, Rana SC, Chatterjee PK (2016) Recent developments on synthetic jets. Def Sci J 66(5):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hong MH, Cheng SY, Zhong S (2020) Effect of geometric parameters on synthetic jet: a review. Phys Fluids 32:031301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bhapkar US, Mishra A, Yadav H, Agrawal A (2022) Effect of orifice shape on impinging synthetic jet. Phys Fluids 34:085111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pasa J, Panda S, Arumuru V (2022) Influence of Strouhal number and phase difference on the flow behavior of a synthetic jet array. Phys Fluids 34: 065118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Walimbe P, Agrawal A, Chaudhari M (2021) Flow characteristics and novel applications of synthetic jets: a review. J Heat Transfer 143:112301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Arshad A, Jabbal M, Yan Y (2020) Synthetic jet actuators for heat transfer enhancement–a critical review. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 146:118815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sharma P, Singh P, Sahu S, Yadav H (2022) A critical review on flow and heat transfer characteristics of synthetic jet. Trans Indian Natl Acad Eng 7:61–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Arik M, Utturkar YV (2015) A computational and experimental investigation of synthetic jets for cooling of electronics. ASME J Electron Packaging 137(2):021005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kanase MM, Mangate LD, Chaudhari MB (2018) Acoustic aspects of synthetic jet generated by acoustic actuator. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control 37(1):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348418757879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tang H, Zhong S (2015) Simulation and modeling of synthetic jets. In: New DTH, Yu SCM (eds) Vortex rings and jets, volume 111 of fluid mechanics and its applications. Springer Singapore, pp 93–144

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kral L, Donovan J, Cain A, Cary A (1997) Shear flow conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  69. Smith BL, Glezer A (1997) Vectoring and small-scale motions effected in free shear flows using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA paper 657:213–241

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rizzetta DP, Visbal MR, Stanek MJ (1999) Numerical investigation of synthetic-jet flowfields. AIAA J 37(8):919–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Mallinson SG, Hong G, Reizes JA (1999) Some characteristics of synthetic jets; AIAA 1999–3651. In: 30th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, USA, 28 June – 1 July 1999

  72. Mittal R, Rampunggoon R, Udaykumar HS (2001) Interaction of a synthetic jet with a flat plate boundary layer; AIAA 2001–2773. In: 31st Fluid Dynamics Conference & Exhibit, Anaheim, USA, 11–14 June 2001.

  73. Utturkar Y, Mittal R (2002) Sensitivity of synthetic jets to the design of the jet cavity. In: AIAA 2002–124, 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, USA, 14–17 January 2002

  74. Kim J, Moin P, Moser R (1987) Turbulent statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 177:133–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lee CY, Goldstein DB (2002) Two-dimensional synthetic jet simulation. AIAA J 40(3):510–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Crook A, Wood NJ (2000) A parametric investigation of a synthetic jet in quiescent conditions. In: 9th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Edinburgh, UK

  77. Tang H, Zhong S (2005) 2d numerical study of circular synthetic jets in quiescent flows. Aeronaut J 109(1092):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Rathnasingham R, Breuer K (1997) Coupled fluid-structural characteristics of actuators for flow control. AIAA J 35(5):832–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Kotapati RB, Mittal R, Cattafesta LN III (2007) Numerical study of a transitional synthetic jet in quiescent external flow. J Fluid Mech 581:287–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Yao C, Chen FJ, Neuhart D (2006) Synthetic jet flowfield database for computational fluid dynamics validation. AIAA J 44(12):3153–3157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Jain M, Puranik B, Agrawal A (2011) A numerical investigation of effects of cavity and orifice parameters on the characteristics of a synthetic jet flow. Sens Actuators, A 165(2):351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Parmar MP, Kumar K (2018) Review paper on the behaviour of circular synthetic jet in quiescent air at low Reynolds number. Int J Sci Eng Dev Res 3(4):110–117

    Google Scholar 

  83. Yiran Lu, Wang J (2023) Numerical investigation of synthetic jets generated by various signals in quiescent ambient. Phys Fluids 35:015107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Raju R, Aram E, Mittal R, Cattafesta L (2009) Simple models of zeronet mass-flux jets for flow control simulations. Int J Flow Control 1(3):179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ravi B, Mittal R, Najjar F (2004) Study of three-dimensional synthetic jet flow fields using direct numerical simulation. AIAA Paper 51:61801

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zhou J, Zhong S (2009) Numerical simulation of the interaction of a circular synthetic jet with a boundary layer. Comput Fluids 38(2):393–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhou J, Zhong S (2010) Coherent structures produced by the interaction between synthetic jets and a laminar boundary layer and their surface shear stress patterns. Comput Fluids 39(8):1296–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Wu DKL, Leschziner MA (2009) Large-eddy simulations of circular synthetic jets in quiescent surroundings and in turbulent cross-flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 30:421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Wen X, Tang H (2014) On hairpin vortices induced by circular synthetic jets in laminar and turbulent boundary layers. Comput Fluids 95:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Cui J, Agarwal R (2005) 3-d cfd validation of an axisymmetric jet in cross-flow (Nasa Langley workshop validation: Case 2). In: AIAA Paper, 1112:2005

  91. Xia H, Qin N (2005) Detached-eddy simulation for synthetic jets with moving boundaries. Mod Phys Lett B 19(28n29):1429–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Dandois J, Garnier E, Sagaut P (2006) Unsteady simulation of synthetic jet in a crossflow. AIAA J 44(2):225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Biedron RT, Vatsa VN, Atkins HL (2005) Simulation of unsteady flows using an unstructured Navier-Stokes solver on moving and stationary grids. In: AIAA paper, 5093:2005

  94. Iaccarino G, Marongiu C, Catalano P, Amato M (2004) Rans modeling and simulations of synthetic jets. In: AIAA Paper, 2223

  95. Rumsey C, Schaeffler N, Milanovic I, Zaman K (2007) Time-accurate computations of isolated circular synthetic jets in crossflow. Comput Fluids 36(6):1092–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Rumsey CL (2004) Computation of a synthetic jet in a turbulent cross-flow boundary layer. In: NASA TM, 213273

  97. Rumsey C (2009) Successes and challenges for flow control simulations. Int J Flow Control 1(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Rumsey CL, Gatski T, Sellers W III, Vasta V, Viken S (2006) Summary of the 2004 computational fluid dynamics validation workshop on synthetic jets. AIAA J 44(2):194–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Dandois J, Garnier E, Sagaut P (2007) Numerical simulation of active separation control by a synthetic jet. J Fluid Mech 574:25–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Pamart P-Y, Dandois J, Garnier E, Sagaut P (2010) Large eddy simulation study of synthetic jet frequency and amplitude effects on a rounded step separated flow. In: proceedings of 6th Flow Control Conference, AIAA, volume 5086

  101. Ozawa T, Lesbros S, Hong G (2010) LES of synthetic jets in boundary layer with laminar separation caused by adverse pressure gradient. Comput Fluids 39(5):845–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. You D, Moin P (2008) Active control of flow separation over an airfoil using synthetic jets. J Fluids Struct 24(8):1349–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that they did not receive any funding to carry out the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302, India

    D. Sai Naga Bharghava & Mrinal Kaushik

  2. Department of Aerospace Engineering, B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bengaluru, 560019, India

    Tamal Jana

Authors
  1. D. Sai Naga Bharghava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamal Jana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mrinal Kaushik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DSNB performed the literature survey and wrote the first draft. TJ edited the manuscript. MK supervised the study and reviewed the final draft. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrinal Kaushik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bharghava, D.S.N., Jana, T. & Kaushik, M. A survey on synthetic jets as active flow control. AS (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-024-00301-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-024-00301-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation