Skip to main content
Log in

Intention recognition of UAV swarm with data-driven methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

UAVs have been increasingly used in military and commercial applications. The theory of UAV swarm behavir has gradually matured and moved to the real application stage. Fast and accurate recognition of the intentions of UAV swarms become a key part of dealing with coming swarms. This paper proposes a data-driven approach to realize the recognition of the typical intentions of UAV swarm. The UAV swarm’s intention is divided into three basic categories: expansion, free movement, and contraction. The dubins model is introduced to depict and study the dynamic characteristics of the movement of the UAV swarm. Simulation experiments are performed through software to collect data and to verify and refine the proposed data-driven intention recognition approach. Moreover, real flight experiments are conducted to test the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed approach, from which key steps about the neural network building and training for intention recognition have been summarized, and satisfying results in intention recognition with high accuracy and stability during the entire movement of the UAV swarm have been achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prithviraj D (2006) Distributed automatic target recognition using multi-agent UAV swarms. In: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems

  2. Xirui X, Shucai H, Daozhi W (2022) Combined AGADESN with DBSCAN algorithm for cluster target motion intention recognition. Int J Aerosp Eng 2022

  3. Milanese M, Novara C (2004) Set membership identification of nonlinear systems. Automatica 40(6):957–975

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Geng ZY, Zhang JK (2008) Research on air target combat intention inference based on Bayesian network. Mod Defence Technol 36(06):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang HR, Lao SY, Bai L, Liu G (2012) Tactical air target intention recognition based on multi-entities bayesian network. Fire Control Command Control 37(10):133–138

    Google Scholar 

  6. Canale M, Fagiano L, Signorile MC (2014) Nonlinear model predictive control from data: a set membership approach. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 24(1):123–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen H, Ren QL, Hua Y, Qiu YN (2016) Fuzzy neural network based tactical intention recognition for sea targets. Syst Eng Electron 38(8):1847–1853

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu ZD (2020) Intelligent decision making of multi-UAV collaborative attack and defense based on intention prediction, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MA thesis

  9. Zhou WW, Yao PY, Zhang JY, Wang X, Wei S (2018) Combat intention recognition for aerial targets based on deep neural network. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 39(11):322468–322476

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed AA, Falah Mohammed M (2018) SAIRF: A similarity approach for attack intention recognition using fuzzy min-max neural network. J Comput Sci 25:467–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu JK (2021) Research on multi-dimensional data situational awareness technology for unmanned system cluster. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, MA thesis

  12. Yin X, Zhang M, Chen MQ (2018) Combat intention recognition of the target in the air based on discriminant analysis. J Project Rockets Missiles Guid 38(03):46–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu ZQ, Li DF (2010) A Model for aerial target attacking intention judgment based on reasoning and multi-attribute decision making. Electron Opt Control 17(05):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmad T, Michel B (2019) Recognition of drone formation intentions using supervised machine learning. In: 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), IEEE

  15. Jin ZY, Shen Q, Yong SZ (2019) Optimization-based approaches for affine abstraction and model discrimination of uncertain nonlinear systems. In: 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE

  16. Dubins LE (1957) On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature, and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Am J Math 79(3):497–516

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Andy G (2014) A comprehensive, step-by-step tutorial on computing dubin’s curves

  18. Janković R (2019) Machine learning models for cultural heritage image classification: comparison based on attribute selection. Information 11(1):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Xiaohui Zhang, Mr Zeyang Zhao and Mr Xiaoyun Sun from the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Shanghai Jiao Tong University for their technical support in our flight experiment.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 62103275.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Shen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Chen, J., Wang, J. et al. Intention recognition of UAV swarm with data-driven methods. AS 6, 703–714 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00238-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00238-1

Keywords

Navigation