Abstract
The acoustic propagation characteristics of the cavitating flow are essential for the noise suppression, but were not well studied. In the current paper, a new technique concerning the propagation path of the monopole acoustic energy is presented and two typical thermodynamic cavitation modes (the inertial and thermal modes) are selected to investigate the effect of the cavity shedding dynamics on the acoustic propagation path. In the inertial mode, the temporal variation and the spatial distributions of the monopole acoustic energy as well as the divergence of the monopole acoustic pressure are both more powerful and concentrated than that in the thermal mode. The acoustic propagation path in the thermal mode strictly satisfies the feature of the convective amplification, while there exists another propagation direction close to the normal direction of the foil surface in the inertial mode. Furthermore, the occurrence of the normal direction propagation will make the path deviate from the convective direction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kim S., Cheong C., Park W. G. Numerical investigation on cavitation flow of hydrofoil and its flow noise with emphasis on turbulence models [J]. AIP Advances, 2017, 7(6): 65114.
Ji B., Luo X. W., Arndt R. E. A. et al. Large Eddy Simulation and theoretical investigations of the transient cavitating vortical flow structure around a NACA66 hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2014, 68: 121–134.
Cheng H. Y., Ji B., Long X. P. et al. A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(2): 226–242.
Trummler T., Schmidt S. J., Adams N. A. Investigation of condensation shocks and re-entrant jet dynamics in a cavitating nozzle flow by Large-Eddy Simulation [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2020, 125: 103215.
Ghorbaniasl G., Carley M., Lacor C. Acoustic velocity formulation for sources in arbitrary motion [J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(3): 632–642.
Mao Y., Xu C., Qi D. Computation of instantaneous and time-averaged active acoustic intensity field around rotating source [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2015, 337: 95–115.
Xu C., Mao Y., Hu Z. et al. Vector aeroacoustics for a uniform mean flow: Acoustic intensity and acoustic power [J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7): 2794–2805.
Mao Y., Tang H., Xu C. Vector wave equation of aeroacoustics and acoustic velocity formulations for quadrupole source [J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(6): 1922–1931.
Chen T., Chen H., Liu W. et al. Unsteady characteristics of liquid nitrogen cavitating flows in different thermal cavitation mode [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 156: 63–76.
Chen T., Chen H., Huang B. et al. Thermal transition and its evaluation of liquid hydrogen cavitating flow in a wide range of free-stream conditions [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 127: 1277–1289.
Cervone A., Bramanti C., Rapposelli E. et al. Thermal cavitation experiments on a NACA 0015 hydrofoil [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2006, 128(2): 326–331.
Gustavsson J. P. R., Denning K. C., Segal C. et al. Incipient cavitation studied under strong thermodynamic effect [J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(3): 710–716.
Colombet D., Silva E G. D., Fortes-Patella R. On numerical simulation of cavitating flows under thermal regime [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 105: 411–428.
Chen T., Huang B., Wang G. et al. Numerical study of cavitating flows in a wide range of water temperatures with special emphasis on two typical cavitation dynamics [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 101: 886–900.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Projects supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51822903, 11772239).
Biography: Xin-cheng Wang (1998-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Xc., Bai, Xr., Cheng, Hy. et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics of monopole acoustic energy dominated by unsteady thermodynamic cavitating flow. J Hydrodyn 33, 867–871 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0059-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0059-z