Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study for assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC methods applied to central Nile Delta, Egypt

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Energy and Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater (GW) is a significant source of freshwater supply because of the increasing the demand of for water for agriculture, industrial, rapid population growth and domestic consumption. In this paper, DRASTIC vulnerability model was implemented to assess vulnerability zones in the middle Delta, Gharbia Governorate (Egypt). DRASTIC maps are developed for modified pesticide DRASTIC, modified DRASTIC and pesticide DRASTIC. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to optimize the ratings and the weights of vulnerability DRASTIC model input parameters. Quantile classification approach was applied to classify the areas as follow: very high, high, moderate, low and very low vulnerable to groundwater contamination in all DRASTIC models. Based on all DRASTIC models, obtained results demonstrate that South of Zefta is classified as a very high vulnerable zone. Most of Qutur region is classified as moderate vulnerable zone based on all DRASTIC models, except AHP-pesticide DRASTIC and AHP-modified pesticide DRASTIC are classified as highly vulnerable zone. The majority of Samanod region as well as north of Al-Mahalla Al-Kubra region are categorized as a very low vulnerable zone. Single-parameter sensitivity analyses demonstrated that groundwater depth characteristic possesses the maximum influence on vulnerability assessment. The models are validated with measured nitrate concentration for water samples collected from 75 wells. Obtained results show accepted correlation between nitrate concentration and AHP pesticide modified DRASTIC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. This manuscript has not been published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All authors have approved of and have agreed to submit the manuscript to this journal.

References

  • Agossou, A., & Yang, J. S. (2021). Comparative study of groundwater vulnerability to contamination assessment methods applied to the southern coastal sedimentary basin of Benin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 35, 100803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, J. H., & Petty, R. J. (1985). A standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. R.S. Kerr, Envir. Res. Lab., EPA/600/2–85/018, Ada, Oklahoma.

  • Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, J. H., & Petty, R. J. (1987). A standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. R.S. Kerr, Envir. Res. Lab., EPA/600/2–87/035, US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma.

  • Armanuos, A. M., Negm, A, & Yoshimura, C. (2016). Application of wetspass model to estimate groundwater recharge variability in the nile delta aquifer application of wetspass model to estimate groundwater recharge variability in the nile delta aquifer, July

  • Armanuos, A. M., Allam, A., & Negm, A. M. (2019). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in western Nile Delta aquifer, Egypt, 2019. In Twenty-second international water technology conference, IWTC22, Ismailia, 12–13 September 2019.

  • Awawdeh, M., Al-Kharbsheh, N., Obeidat, M., & Awawdeh, M. (2020). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using modified SINTACS model in Wadi Shueib, Jordan. Annals of GIS, 26(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1773535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, I. S., Mohamed, M. A. A., Hiyama, T., & Kato, K. (2005). A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Science of the Total Environment, 345(1–3), 127–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bera, A., Mukhopadhyay, B. P., Chowdhury, P., Ghosh, A., & Biswas, S. (2021). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GIS-based DRASTIC model in Nangasai River Basin, India with special emphasis on agricultural contamination. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014, 112085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CAPMAS. (2012). Central agency for public mobilization and statistics, Egypt. http://www.capmas.gov.eg/.

  • Diab, M. S., Dahab, K. A., & El-Fakharany, M. A. (1997). Impact of the paleohydrogeological conditions on the groundwater quality in the northern part of the Nile Delta, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Geology, 41(2), 779–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducci, D., & Sellerino, M. (2022). A modified AVI model for groundwater vulnerability mapping: Case studies in Southern Italy. Water, 14(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-naqa, A., Hammouri, N., Al Kuisi, M. M., & Iron Oxide Crusts (2005) GIS-based evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in Russeifa Area, Jordan GIS-Based Evaluation of Groundwater Vulnerability in the Russeifa Area, Jordan (December)

  • FAO. (2006). World reference base for soil resources. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gad, M. I., El-Kammar, M. M., & Ismail, H. M. G. (2015). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using different overlay and index methods for quaternary aquifer of Wadi El-Tumilat, East Delta, Egypt. Asian Review of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghadimi, M., Zangenehtabar, S., Malekian, A., et al. (2022). Groundwater vulnerability assessment in a karst aquifer: A case study of western Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03956-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan, I., Al-Rawabdeh, A., & Al Hseinat, M. (2020). Groundwater vulnerability assessment for the Corridor Wellfield using DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC models: A case study of Eastern Jordan. Open Journal of Geology, 10, 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2020.1010046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakootian, M., & Nozari, M. (2019). Contribution of the sensitivity analysis in groundwater vulnerability assessing using the DRASTIC and composite DRASTIC indexes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-181

  • Masoud, A. A. (2015). Geotechnical evaluation of the alluvial soils for urban land management zonation in Gharbiya Governorate, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 101, 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.10.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MWRI. (2013). Zone, adaptation to climate change in the Nile Delta through integrated coastal management. Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, Giza.

  • Napolitano, P., & Fabbri, A. G. (1996). Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In K. Kovar & H. P. Nachtnebel (Eds.), HydrolGis application of geographic information systems in hydrology and waterresources management (Vol. 235, pp. 559–566). IAHS Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugraha, G. U., Gaol, K. L., Hartanto, P., & Bakti, H. (2020). Aquifer vulnerability: its protection and management—A case study in Pangkalpinang City, Indonesia. International Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8887914 Article ID 8887914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIGW. (1980). The groundwater in the Nile Delta. In: A.M. Negm (Ed.), Research Institute for Ground Water, Interior Report, Cairo, vol 1. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94283-4

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). Analytic heirarchy process. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics reference online. Chichester: Wiley

  • Salem, S. E., Sefelnasr, A. M., & Hasan, S. S. (2019). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability for pollution using DRASTIC Index, young alluvial plain, Western Nile Delta, Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, 727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4883-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secunda, S., Collin, M. L., & Melloul, A. J. (1998). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel’s Sharon Region. Journal of Environmental Management, 54(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şener, Ş, Şener, E., Nas, B., & Karagüzel, R. (2010). Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: A case study in the Lake Beyşehir Catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Management, 30(11), 2037–2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umar, M., Khan, S. N., Arshad, A., et al. (2022). A modified approach to quantify aquifer vulnerability to pollution towards sustainable groundwater management in Irrigated Indus Basin. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17882-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are gratefully thankful to research institute of groundwater of Egypt for availability of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Armanuos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 201 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Metwally, M.I., Armanuos, A.M. & Zeidan, B.A. Comparative study for assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC methods applied to central Nile Delta, Egypt. Int J Energ Water Res 7, 175–190 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-022-00198-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-022-00198-w

Keywords

Navigation