Skip to main content
Log in

Structural behavior of spliced deck beams with UHPC joints under monotonic load

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Splice beams are considered a solution for accelerated bridge construction and a method for repairing damaged beams. One of the most challenging aspects of this technique is avoiding bond failure between the spliced members. In this study, ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) was used to splice three beam segments. Seven specimens were tested under three bending point loads. The main variables were the depth of the joint, the presence of a shear key in the joint, type of longitudinal reinforcement (steel/carbon fiber), and the addition of dowels in the joint. The results concluded that the spliced specimens exhibited similar behavior to specimens without joints, and all the tested specimens failed due to flexural failure with the intact joint. The presence of CFRP bar in the specimen improved the ultimate load of the spliced beam by about 5% compared with the control specimen. The numerical analysis was performed by ABAQUS software with three-dimensional finite element method (FEM). The model was simulated and achieved good convergence when compared with experimental results, considering the load–deflection response and failure mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data availabe on the request.

References

  • Aaleti, S., & Sritharan, S. (2019). Quantifying bonding characteristics between UHPC and normal-strength concrete for Bridge deck application. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(6), 04019041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACI. (2019). 318M–19: Building Code requirements for concrete and commentary (p. 628). ACI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akeed, M. H., Qaidi, S., Ahmed, H. U., Emad, W., Faraj, R. H., Mohammed, A. S., Tayeh, B. A., & Azevedo, A. R. G. (2022). Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Part III: Fresh and hardened properties. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljanabi, A. Y., & Hassoon, A. H. (2020). Experimental behavior of continuous hybrid reinforced concrete spliced girders. IOP Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/871/1/012004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mamory, Z. K., & Al-Ahmed, A. H. A. (2022). Behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams with CFRP wrapped lap splice bars. Structures, 44(June), 1995–2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mamuree, A. H. (2008). Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Girders with Field Splices. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Baghdad.

  • Al-Quraishy, Q. A. (2012). Experimental and theoretical investigations for behavior of precast concrete girders with connections. Journal of Engineering, 18(05), 621–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tameemi, H. A. A. (2015). Analysis for behavior of spliced R . C. Girders Strengthened with ( CFRP ) laminates. Ph.D Thesis,University of Babylon.

  • Aoun, A. M. A. (2018). Comparative Study for Different Types of Reinforced Concrete Spliced Girders. M.Sc. thesis, Kerbala University.

  • Arafa, A., Farghaly, A. S., Ahmed, E. A., & Benmokrane, B. (2016). Laboratory testing of GFRP-RC panels with UHPFRC joints of the Nipigon river cable-stayed bridge in Northwest Ontario Canada. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 21(11), 05016006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C109/C109M-13A. (2023). C109C109M-13e1 standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens).pdf.

  • ASTM A955/A955M. (2015). Standard specification for deformed and plain stainless-steel bars for concrete. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/A0955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C469-11. (2008). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Manual on Hydrocarbon Analysis, I, 545.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C78M–15a. (2015). Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). In ACI Structural JournalIranian Journal of Polymer Science and Tchnology, 1, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Zhou, J., Gao, R., & Ma, Z. J. (2017). Flexural behavior of expansive concrete beams reinforced with hybrid CFRP enclosure and steel rebars. Construction and Building Materials, 150, 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chidambaram, S. R., & Agarwal, P. (2019). Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams with high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Journal of Central South University, 26, 2609–2622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-4198-0Flexural

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BS EN 12390–3. (2019). Testing hardened concrete - Part 3: Compressive of test specimens. 1–16.

  • Graybeal, B. A. (2007). Compressive behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 146, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybeal, B., Brühwiler, E., Kim, B.-S., Toutlemonde, F., Voo, Y. L., & Zaghi, A. (2020). International perspective on UHPC in bridge engineering. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 25(11), 04020094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graybeal, B., & Haber, Z. (2018). Ultra-High Performance Concrete for Bridge Deck Overlays (FHWA-HRT-17–097). April, 16.

  • Graybeal, B. A., & Russel, H. G. (2013). Ultra-high performance concrete: a state-of-the-art report for the bridge community. publication N.o FHWA-HRT-13–060. June, 176.

  • Hassoon, A., & Aljanabi, A. (2020). Improvement of flexural capacity of hybrid, reinforced concrete spliced girders using steel fiber concrete in splice region and near surface mounted carbon fiber-reinforced polymer bars: Experimental investigations. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00315-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadhim, M. M. A., Jawdhari, A., Nadir, W., & Majdi, A. (2023). Experimental study on RC beams strengthened in flexure with CFRP-Reinforced UHPC overlays. Engineering Structures, 285, 116066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadhim, M. M. A., Saleh, A. R., Cunningham, L. S., & Semendary, A. A. (2021). Numerical investigation of non-shear-reinforced UHPC hybrid flat slabs subject to punching shear. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A. (2013). Optimal Analysis of Structures by Concepts of Symmetry and Regularity. Springer Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1565-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Abadi, A. S. M. (2010). Cost optimization of a composite floor system using an improved harmony search algorithm. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(5), 664–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Bijary, Sh. (2014). Optimum cost design of reinforced concrete one-way ribbed slabs using CBO, PSO and Democratic PSO algorithms. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(6), 788–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Rahami, H., & Shojaei, I. (2020). Swift analysis of civil engineering structures using graph theory methods. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45549-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa, M. K., & Ali, A. Y. (2023a). Experimental investigation on the transform the simply supported girders to continuous girder by using the UHPC cast in place joint. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0775-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa, M. K., & Ali, A. Y. (2023b). Structural behavior of continuous hybrid reinforced concrete spliced girder under monotonic and cyclic load : Experimental investigation. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8(9), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00984-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa, M. K., Ali, A. Y., Salah, M. S., Hamad, M. A., & Nadir, W. (2023). Cyclic behavior of simply supported RC spliced deck girder with UHPC cast in place joint : An experimental and numerical study. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 8(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-023-00309-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadir, W., Harith, I. K., & Ali, A. Y. (2022). Optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete properties cured with ponding water. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 13(4), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20220033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadir, W., Kadhimi, M. M. A., Jawdhari, A., Fam, A., & Majdi, A. (2023). RC beams strengthened in shear with FRP-Reinforced UHPC overlay: An experimental and numerical study. Structures, 53, 693–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.04.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, K., & Yan, B. (2021). Experimental study of the flexural behaviour of ultra-high-performance concrete beam with wet joint. Magazine of Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.20.00078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, K., & Yan, B. (2022). Experimental study of the flexural behaviour of ultra-high-performance concrete beam with wet joint. Magazine of Concrete Research, 74(2), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.20.00078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, J., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Li, W., & Hu, Y. (2020). Flexural behavior of an innovative dovetail ultra-high performance concrete joint using steel wire mesh interface treatment in composite bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering, 23(6), 1142–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219891531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roufaiel, M., & Meyer, C. (1987). Analytical modeling of hysteretic behavior OF R/C Frames. Journal of the Structural Engineering, 113, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafieifar, M., Farzad, M., & Azizinamini, A. (2017). Experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC). Construction and Building Materials, 156, 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIMULIA. (2014). Abaqus theory manual. Abaqus 6.13 Documentation, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.

  • Siva Chidambaram, R., & Agarwal, P. (2015). Seismic behavior of hybrid fiber reinforced cementitious composite beam-column joints. Materials and Design, 86, 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villemure, I., & Ventura, E. (1995). Damage Indices for Reinforced Concrete Frames: Evaluation and Correlation. Department of Civil Engineering, Master, p. 196.

  • Wang, T., & Hsu, T. T. C. (2001). Nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete structures using new constitutive models. Computers and Structures, 79(32), 2781–2791. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00157-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams S.C. (2015). Behavior of the cast-in-place splice region of spliced I-girder bridges. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austen, American United States.

  • Zhang, Q., Feng, Y., Cheng, Z., Jiao, Y., & Cheng, H. (2022). Large-scale testing and numerical study on an innovative dovetail UHPC joint subjected to negative moment Large scale testing and numerical study on an innovative dovetail UHPC joint subjected to negative moment. Computing Concrete. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2022.30.3.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Meng, D., Zhang, Y., & Hussein, H. H. (2022). Long-term performance of a continuous box-girder bridge constructed using precast segments with wet ultra-high-performance concrete ( UHPC ) joints. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01285

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MKM: methodology, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, formal analysis, validation. AYA: methodology, supervision, leadership, reading, editing. MSS: writing—review and editing, testing. WN: testing, validation, resources, writing—review and editing. MWF: writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Kareem Moosa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moosa, M.K., Ali, A.Y., Salah, M.S. et al. Structural behavior of spliced deck beams with UHPC joints under monotonic load. Asian J Civ Eng 25, 3167–3181 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00970-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00970-1

Keywords

Navigation