Abstract
Discovering exoplanets and satellites in habitable zones within and beyond our solar system has sparked intrigue in planetary setting varieties that could support life. Based on our understanding of life on Earth, we can shed light on the origin, evolution, and future of Earth-like organisms in the galaxy and predict extinct or extant extraterrestrial life. Hence, extremophiles thriving in mimic outer space environments are particularly interesting as they exhibit traits that preponderate our comprehension regarding the possibility of life elsewhere and in situ life detection. Additionally, many extremophiles have been used for astrobiological research model organisms to unveil native alien life or possible life-produced metabolites outside Earth. Laboratory-based simulation chambers mimic this outer space condition, helping researchers study life beyond Earth in near identical conditions and understand molecular mechanisms for survival. This review summarizes relevant studies with isolated microorganisms from extreme analog Earth environments, harnessing them as promising astrobiological model candidates for pursuing life potentialities in other planetary bodies. We also highlight the necessity of environmental simulation chamber approaches for mimicking extraterrestrial habitats.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Can life originate, evolve, or survive in extraterrestrial environments? Such fundamental questions motivate scientists to search for life beyond Earth. Astrobiology is a relatively new branch of space-related science merging astronomy and biology.1 Searching for habitable environments is quintessential when investigating extraterrestrial life. Nowadays, nearly 200 planets and satellites in the solar system and more than 5000 exoplanets orbiting stars in the universe have been discovered, inspiring an exploration mission concerning planetary environment diversity that may host life. However, Earth remains the only known living planetary body that can guide us to these answers.2,3
Based on what we know, several planetary bodies exhibit extinct or extant life potential. Prokaryotic life dominates our planet’s evolutionary history, evolving to occupy every possible environmental habitat, including various extreme environments. Common Earth life forms have traditionally taught us about terrestrial boundaries and abilities. We now appreciate living organisms’ physiological and biochemical capabilities as it illuminates an extensive origin, evolution, and future for Earth-like beings in our solar system and beyond, primarily due to an ever-increasing awareness of extremophile varieties over the past 50 years.4,5,6
Extremophiles can survive in a myriad of planetary environments and present relevant characteristics advancing our understanding of potential life elsewhere and in situ life detection. Thus, extremophilic microbes, especially those thriving under multiple extremes (polyextremophiles), represent a vital research avenue for astrobiological and space exploration.7 Furthermore, many extremophiles are ideal astrobiology models, aiding in finding indigenous extraterrestrial life or potential life-produced metabolites outside Earth.8,9
Although space missions offer essential and distinctive planetary exploration knowledge, they are expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, to overcome in situ planetary exploration’s economic and technical limitations, laboratory simulations play a crucial role in achieving outer space conditions on Earth, establishing a critical link between the laboratory and life beyond Earth. Prominent factors for designing planetary simulation chambers include atmospheric composition, gas pressure, temperature, humidity, and UV radiation levels. Substantial model and instrumental design improvements of these simulation chambers over time enabled various simulated experiments related to Mars,10,11,12,13,14,15 the Moon,16 and asteroid/cometary/solar system small bodies,17 aiding mineral analysis,18 astrobiology,19,20 instrument calibration/materials testing,21 and planetary exploration studies.22,23
Herein, we review extremophilic microorganisms’ relevance and application in astrobiology and space-related studies, discussing their potential as astrobiological models. Additionally, we cover environmental simulation chamber development and use for simulating extraterrestrial habitats. Finally, we detail prospects concerning this emerging field and priorities for the upcoming decades.
2 Life Beyond Earth: Extremophiles as Models for Astrobiology
Astrobiology’s primary goal is to search for life on planetary bodies beyond Earth. Mars, Venus, and the icy moons Europa, Enceladus, and Titan offer numerous opportunities for investigating life’s chemical evolution and origin. In addition, their similar biochemistry features to those that support life on Earth make them targets for extensive research.24 To ascertain extraterrestrial life, we must first define boundary conditions where life can thrive. Outer space presents severely harsh and inhabitable environmental conditions deleterious for life growth, including high radiation doses, extreme temperatures, different gravity, pressure, pH, salinity, energy source, and nutrient scarcity.25 Nevertheless, as microbial life can flourish within broad physicochemical spectrums and extremely inhospitable habitats on Earth, they may be capable of surviving space’s harsh conditions.4 Thus, understanding living extremophiles’ molecular mechanisms and unique physiological characteristics is paramount for defining Earth’s boundary life limits and identifying conditions likely to originate or support life on other planetary bodies.4,26
2.1 (Poly)Extremophilic Microorganisms in the Planetary Context
Environmental parameters, such as extreme temperature, pH, salinity, water availability, pressure, radiation, and nutrients, can limit microbial life. Extremophiles are microorganisms that flourish in these intense conditions, whereas polyextremophiles optimally grow under multiple extreme stresses in the habitat simultaneously.27 Most extremophiles are affiliated with Archaea and Bacteria domains, while very few belong to Eukarya.28,29 Despite our progress in extremophile biology, (poly)extremophiles remain a novel microorganism group in different environments distributed around the biosphere, classified relative to the physicochemical conditions in which they grow: i) psychrophiles thrive in cold habitats, such as polar regions, deep-sea, and high mountain altitudes30; ii) thermophiles and hyperthermophiles flourish under high temperatures in volcanoes, desert hot springs, and hydrothermal vents31; iii) acidophiles localize in acid-mine drainage sites and acidic lakes as they require a pH less than 5.032; iv) alkaliphiles grow at high pH levels, such as in sodic lakes33; v) piezophiles prosper when highly pressurized deep inside the ocean34; vi) halophiles prefer the high salt concentrations of the sea, salars, saline lakes, and brine pools35; vii) xerophiles can thrive in the desert’s low water availability36; viii) oligotrophic microbes require low nutrient concentrations37; ix) radioresistant microbes can tolerate a high radiation incidence38,39,40,41; and x) metallophiles can prosper in high metals/heavy metals concentrations.42
Moreover, various environments on our planet’s surface—especially subsurfaces—exhibit extremes in one or more physical or chemical conditions. Mirroring Earth, other planetary bodies may have different environments with varying ranges for each condition. Even when natural terrestrial environments appear too strenuous and incompatible, such as volcanic and sulfuric hot springs, dry and hot deserts, deep-sea hydrothermal vents, acid-mine drainages, highly pressurized deep seas, cold and high UV irradiated polar environments, sub-surface caves, or supersaturated salt lakes, life still exists.8,43
These organisms endure selective pressure in such extremes by developing an extensive adaptation range for local survival, providing a unique perspective on fundamental biological process characteristics and exhibiting broad metabolic diversities and physiological capabilities.44,45 These adaptations include proteins and enzymes capable of functioning under extreme conditions, microbial membrane property modifications (proton permeability, lipid structure, and composition), and genomic modifications with horizontal gene transfer of mobile genetic elements (plasmids, integrons, and bacteriophages).46,47
Due to these unique and versatile characteristics to thrive in hostile conditions, isolated extremophiles are highly adapted and promising candidates for astrobiology study. Most ecological extremophile habitats on Earth resemble planetary bodies in outer space regarding biogeochemistry, nutrient composition, or topological similarities.48 Therefore, exploring modern living extremophiles on Earth is critical in understanding their adaptation mechanisms and helps identify novel biosignatures applicable in habitable zones beyond Earth.49 Furthermore, assessing potential extraterrestrial colonizers by investigating extreme microbiomes analogous to Earth could provide clues to whether (and how) life persists on other planetary bodies. Additionally, extremophiles can provide insight into how those microbes can support the terraformation of planets constantly facing extreme conditions.6,26 In this way, (poly)extremophiles are invaluable for predicting living organisms’ boundaries and deciphering mechanisms and strategies behind survival in extreme environments.
2.2 Extremophiles as Great Candidates for Astrobiological Studies
Mars (with several ongoing missions, including Curiosity and Perseverance) and the icy moons, Enceladus and Europa, are the leading candidates for harboring microbial life in the past or extant.50,51,52 However, technological restrictions, distances between planets, and time make collecting and retrieving samples for study exceptionally difficult. Thus, this hypothesis of life as we know it beyond Earth remains mysterious, which has led astrobiologists to discuss possible forms of life and their characteristics under extreme environments in our solar system.
Earth harbors a myriad of analogous terrestrial environments that can be our foundation for understanding other planetary bodies’ potential habitability, including Antarctica’s dry valleys,53,54 the Atacama Desert,55 hydrothermal vents,56 and deactivated nuclear reactors.38,41 These microbial-colonized environments are potential organism models in this search for life. In astrobiology, model microorganisms can survive one or more extreme environmental conditions found on planets, moons, and asteroids which may be biochemically similar. All life domains (Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya) present these extremophilic models4 (Table 1). Prokaryotes are considered the oldest reported microorganisms on our planet and have survived all mass extinctions; therefore, prokaryotes are one of the most studied groups in astrobiology.
Among known extremophiles with considerable astrobiological model potential, halophilic archaea members are also promising models for space-related studies due to their evolutionarily ancient and physiologically versatile characteristics.57 They are frequently observed in brine pools, soda lakes, salt mines, and marine solar salterns in terrestrial environments. Haloarchaea constitute polyextremophilic microbes that can withstand salinity, anaerobic conditions, high ultraviolet and ionizing radiation levels, subzero temperatures, desiccation, and toxic ions.58 Halophilic archaea may survive in diverse planetary environments in outer space, including exposure to various extreme conditions found on Mars, such as desiccation, radiation, subzero temperatures, and perchlorate oxidizer exposure.5
Haloarchaea survived launches into Earth’s stratosphere and exposure to space conditions similar to those observed on Mars’ surface.59,60 Several studies have elucidated how these microbes function in high ionic strengths, perchlorate salts, and substantial negative temperatures. Haloarchaea also synthesizes red–orange isoprenoid carotenoids for protection and photo-repair processes against UV irradiation. Among Haloarchaea, two species are widely studied as astrobiology models: Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, a pigmented strain isolated from solar salterns in California (USA),59 and Halobacterium lacusprofundi, a more brightly pigmented and biofilm-forming strain isolated from a hypersaline lake in Antarctica.60
Bacteria are easily manipulated, preserve ancient ancestors from our planet’s origin, and contain various extensively studied extremophile specimens. Different studies demonstrated that Bacillus spores could survive arid conditions,61 high radiation levels,62,63 temperature fluctuations,64 outer space conditions,63,65,66 high perchlorate salt concentrations,65 and also regoliths that mimic the geochemical composition of Mars’ soil.67,68 For instance, Bacillus pumilus SAF-032 spores are a potential astrobiology model as they have repeatedly demonstrated an ability to survive numerous extreme conditions encountered in outer space, specifically heightened UV irradiation 63,65.
Deinococcus radiodurans is also known for its high radiation resistance; it is one of Earth's two most radiation-resistant organisms, surviving a dose of up to 10,000 Gy.69 Unlike other bacteria that produce specialized cellular structures (spores) or remain vegetative when exposed to stress, this microorganism remains metabolically active even at exceptionally high ultraviolet radiation levels. However, this ability necessitates a carbon source and a rich amino acid environment.70 For instance, Venkateswaran70 reported that D. radiodurans could grow on a rich nutrient medium in continuous radiation (6000 rads/h) without lethality. Contrarily, when in a nutrient-limiting condition, cells did not grow and were killed by continuous radiation. In addition, this study identified prominent nutritional constituents that restored D. radiodurans' growth in nutritionally limiting radioactive environments, such as nicotinic acid, amino acids, and some salts.
Furthermore, D. radiodurans can survive prolonged desiccation under very low relative humidity and even in an ultra-high vacuum.71 Araujo et al.72 demonstrated that this bacterium could survive irradiation with synchrotron ultraviolet light in its dry form. In recent International Space Station (ISS) experiments, D. radiodurans survived three years outside the space station (in a shielded compartment), establishing it as a relevant planetary protection and panspermia model.73 It is speculated that these forms of stress resistance are mainly associated with efficient DNA repair and antioxidant systems that protect cellular components from oxidative damage.74
Astrobiology also has a place for photosynthetic extremophilic organisms. Several astrobiological survival experiments have incorporated Chroococcidiopsidales members, which occupy diverse ecological niches in our planet’s most diverse and extreme habitats. For example, some Chroococcidiopsis strains can tolerate at least four years of air drying,75,76 up to 13 kJ m − 2 of UV-C radiation,75,76,77 15 kGy of X-rays,78 and 12 kGy of γ radiation.79 Although prokaryotes are common astrobiology and space-related study models, eukaryotes (yeast and mold) are promising astrobiology representatives. For instance, the fungi Cladosporium sphaerospermum and Cremonium murorum isolated from a Chernobyl nuclear reactor (Reactor 4 walls) extracted energy from the emitted ionizing radiation by the extensive radioactive material still present there.29 Some authors describe these microorganisms as a viable life model of space bodies due to the constant cosmic radiation exposure in these places.29,38
Another intriguing example is the halotolerant yeast Debaryomyces hansenii, considered the most perchlorate-tolerant microbe described thus far. Studies have shown that this microorganism can withstand 2.4 M of sodium perchlorate. This finding is particularly relevant for determining life potential on Mars due to the planet’s high concentration of this salt, which favors liquid water even at negative temperatures. In addition, species resistant to this chemical stress are pertinent for understanding possible life forms biochemistries that may be present in Mars’ perchlorate brines.80
Still, black yeasts stand out the most among fungi as eukaryotic astrobiology models,81,82 as their polyextremophilic nature allows these microorganisms to withstand various environmental stresses. Several studies have tested black yeast’s survival in space conditions through ground facility simulations and on space missions. Black yeasts isolated from Antarctica’s dry valleys (Cryomyces antarcticus and C. minteri) are the best-studied examples within this group. Onofri and collaborators83,84 indicated that the black yeast C. antarcticus maintained survival, DNA integrity, ultrastructural stability, and rapid metabolic activity recovery after 18 months of exposure to space and Mars-like conditions in various ISS experiments. Many studies still require further development to fully understand terrestrial life limits and how they are applicable for astrobiology purposes. Still, with the recent years’ increased extremophile research advancements, we can design new analog environments, plan new experiments, and lead the next steps in the search for life beyond Earth.
3 Extraterrestrial Environment Simulation
Numerous studies in modern astrobiology research use laboratory-based simulation facilities, demonstrating simulation chamber necessity and potential in space research. Although laboratory-based simulation chambers aid in various space research aspects, such as geology, astronomy, cosmo-chemistry, and planetology, these machines usually comprise an uncomplicated system that imitates a particular temperature and gas composition. Some sophisticated simulation chambers incorporate multiple techniques, including gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GCMS), quadrupole mass spectrometry (QMS), and infrared spectroscopy. For example, Andromeda121 is a planetary simulation chamber that simulates Martian conditions. At the same time, Exocam10 and SURFRESIDE122 help in studying physical–chemical interactions between Mars’ atmosphere, surface, and sub-surface and simulating interstellar and protostellar conditions, respectively.
In the late 2000s, a simulation chamber capable of reproducing most planetary objects’ atmospheric compositions and surface temperatures was constructed,123 achieving pressures and temperatures ranging from 5 to 5 × 10–9 mbar and 4 K to 325 K, respectively. This versatile simulation chamber can also study irradiation-induced chemical changes in controlled conditions. Furthermore, a planetary environment and analysis chamber (PEACh)18 uses in situ analytical techniques like laser Raman spectroscopy, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, near-IR reflectance spectroscopy, mid-IR attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy, and microscopic imaging for studying geological samples under relevant planetary environmental conditions. In addition, Sobrado et al.12 developed a Mars environmental simulation chamber incorporating a dust generation mechanism to study Martian dust deposition while controlling temperature and UV irradiation, the two essential planetary conditions.
A research group investigated the UV irradiation processing of biomarkers adsorbed on minerals (Mars soil analog) under Martian conditions using the planetary surface simulation facility (PALLAS).124 This study determined that these biomarkers degraded under Martian-like conditions at a substantially slower rate than terrestrial ambient conditions, indicating that current Martian conditions favor potential biomarker preservation embedded in Mars analog mineral matrices.125 In addition, UV radiation damages extremophilic yeast more in the stratospheric atmosphere than reduced atmospheric pressure, high desiccation, and low temperatures.81 Chroococcidiopsis biofilms with Martian mineral analog expressed enhanced biomarker protection when exposed to a Martian-simulated atmosphere combined with or without UV irradiation, signifying ground-based simulations’ importance for interpreting space experiment data..13,126
Bacillus and Paenibacillus species are cultivable microbial communities found in spacecraft assembly facilities (SAFs)63,65,127,128 with elevated UV irradiation and hydrogen peroxide treatment resistance due to the presence of several genes, gene orders, and proteins linked to providing extreme condition resistance.129,130,131 Another study examined simulated Martian solar UV radiation effects on bacteriophage T7 and isolated T7 DNA. The UV treatment decreased biological activity and lowered PCR product levels, indicating UV radiation damage.132,133 Recently, Li and colleagues134 administered simulation microbial community (represented by cyanobacterial crusts microbial communities) experiments and concluded that low stratospheric temperatures (similar to Martian conditions) alter microbial community structures by modifying their genomic and transcriptomic content.
4 Future Directions
A 2015 document, the NASA Astrobiology Strategy, addressed questions and defined goals and objectives to guide and inspire astrobiology research more effectively for the next decade.135 While a lot has improved since then, outstanding questions and challenges remain. Detecting unknown biological systems on unknown worlds is astrobiology’s biggest challenge. Scientists stress that to overcome this critical and complex hurdle, we need to understand how life on Earth functions because it is our only sample to examine. Despite current advances, we have only started to characterize extreme terrestrial microbiomes and understand their tolerance to multiple environmental extremes. Furthermore, more microbial diversity exists in unexpected and unexplored Earth ecosystems that will push the current boundary of life even further. Thus, continued analog environments and microbiome experiments will provide valuable insights regarding life limits on Earth and how extremophiles can support the terraformation of planets exhibiting extreme conditions.
Additionally, extremophilic microbes may assist in designing and developing future orbiters, lander missions, and planetary protection practices.136 Increasing the available microorganism culture collection isolated from astrobiology-relevant terrestrial environments is urgent; thus, novel microbial culture strategy customization, optimization, and development will be relevant. In addition, integrating omics-based approaches (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenetics) with customized microbial cultivation will permit us to understand adaptation mechanisms that enable extreme environment survival on Earth and in other habitats past our solar system (Fig. 1).
Astrovirology, or our understanding of viruses in astrobiology, is another avenue astrobiologists have been moving toward, yet very little is known.137 Viruses co-occurring with archaea and bacteria on Earth's biosphere express highly diverse structural and genomic sequences. These are vital in biogeochemical cycles in terrestrial ecosystems and evolution, mediating horizontal gene transfer and influencing microbial community dynamics. Overall, astrovirologists hypothesize that viruses are as vital in other planet ecosystems as they are paramount contributors on Earth.137,138 Furthermore, viral signatures may be pivotal in searching for life in other biospheres and understanding their evolutionary mechanics.138 Nowadays, two main field priorities are 1) viruses that inhabit extreme analog environments characterization and 2) virus-detection experiments in ancient oceans (Europa and Enceladus) using flight instruments to detect viral particles or sequences.137,138
Novel biological activity signature advances shed light on future frontiers for life detection missions. Since the Viking age, the astrobiology community has gained a palpable awareness about defining experimental protocols in the search for life on other worlds and the guiding principles needed to interpret generated data.139 In the coming years, several missions will be launched to answer fundamental astrobiology queries: how planets form, evolve, and support life. Current and planned planetary missions will examine extraterrestrial environments' physical and chemical characteristics. Furthermore, space agencies (NASA, ESA, CNSA) are expected to develop biosignature strategies for Mars, Europa, and Enceladus soon.
Mars, Titan, Europa, Enceladus, and Venus planetary missions will require specialized tools for distinguishing signs of life. As part of the ExoMars mission, ESA’s and ROSCOSMO's Rosalind Franklin rover will collect subsurface (up to 2 m) samples, where radiation shielding could preserve life, encouraging the possibility of active life on Mars.140 The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) instrument cluster is on board this rover,141 equipped with a gas chromatography system and mass spectrometry equipment. This portable laboratory will elucidate molecular species with complex chemical compositions. However, MOMA will face challenges, as the mass spectrometry system must measure complex organic molecules’ induced fragmentation, an approach never attempted outside Earth until now.142
The Dragonfly Mass Spectrometer (DraMS), another MOMA-like instrument NASA plans to launch in 2024, will explore an even more distant and bizarre world, Titan, Saturn’s largest and richly organic moon. Titan is an attractive astrobiology target because its surface contains abundant and complex carbon-rich chemistry and presents liquid (transient) water and hydrocarbons, possibly producing a primordial prebiotic soup.143 Other analytical instruments planned to be on board the spacecraft include the Dragonfly Gamma-Ray and Neutron Spectrometer, Dragonfly Geophysics and Meteorology Package, and the Dragonfly Camera Suite, a microscopic and panoramic camera suite for imaging Titan's terrain and exploring scientifically interesting landing sites.144
Jupiter's icy moons, such as Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, will welcome a new mass spectrometer aboard an ESA orbital mission scheduled for launch in 2022. The Jupiter Icy Moon Explorer will harbor neutral gas and ion mass spectrometry (NIM), making inaugural exosphere measurements for Jupiter's three icy moons.145,146 NIM can detect neutral and charged molecules from biosignatures in a molecular mass range, including lipids, small peptides, and some secondary metabolites. By examining their exospheres in detail, we could potentially gain insight into how life originates, necessary resources, and how these moons differ from each other and other planetary bodies in the Solar System.147
The strong evidence of liquid water under an icy crust denotes Europa as one of the most promising locations in our solar system for discovering currently habitable environments.148 Scientists hope to launch the Europa Clipper mission in the mid-2030s to determine if life exists beneath Europa’s surface. The spacecraft payload for this mission will include the Mass Spectrometer for Planetary Exploration/Europa instrument, a high-resolution TOF–MS for measuring trace organic compounds at parts-per-billion levels, and cameras to produce high-resolution images and compositional maps of Europa's surface and thin atmosphere.149 Included in the Europa Clipper mission, a solid-state UV laser source is integrated into the Ocean Debris and Life Signature Characterization instrument, a candidate instrument for the Europa Lander mission. The device can obtain 2D chemical images of Europa samples using an Orbitrap mass analyzer and active beam scanning.150 With these high-resolution instruments, it will be possible to determine if organic compounds originate from biological processes.151
We generally look for Earth-like life on Earth-like worlds. So, if life is rare or different from Earth’s, our current extraterrestrial life and biosignature detection approaches may fail. Expanded efforts are required to develop robust quantitative approaches to remotely detect biosignatures in stellar or planetary contexts.3 Whether or not other planetary bodies (Mars, Venus, Enceladus, Europa, or Titan) could or did support life, studying Earth’s life in extreme analog environments and their associated microbiomes will further space exploration and could shed light into the origination of life on and beyond Earth. Although simulating extraterrestrial environments in laboratory conditions is challenging, many research organizations have designed new technologies to interpret outer space data. Given the importance and booming interest in extraterrestrial environment study, new and improved simulation chambers are frequently constructed around the globe guaranteeing success in astrobiological studies.
5 Concluding Remarks
Microbial life has colonized most of Earth’s environments, even the most extreme and hostile. Microorganisms diversify their metabolisms and utilize available resources in habitats that may be extreme, and modify their cells’ components to function at life frontiers. Hence, extremophilic microorganisms are crucial for astrobiology studies since they thrive in various terrestrial analog environments, face extreme stresses, and are relevant for in situ life detection (cells, biomolecules, or biosignatures) of planetary bodies in the Solar System and exoplanets. Furthermore, studying life on Earth’s edge enables us to uncover extremophile potential and answer primary questions concerning how life originates and evolves in the universe. Lastly, these studies have provided an avenue for investigating microbe means and survival extents in extreme environmental conditions, broadening the scope of space biology.
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Stofan E (2009) Biology meets astronomy. Nat Geosci 2:237. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo482
Lissauer J, Dawson R, Tremaine S (2014) Advances in exoplanet science from Kepler. Nature 513:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13781
Walker SI, Bains W, Cronin L, DasSarma S, Danielache S, Domagal-Goldman S, Kacar B, Kiang NY, Lenardic A, Reinhard CT, Moore W, Schwieterman EW, Shkolnik EL, Smith HB (2018) Exoplanet biosignatures: Future directions. Astrobiology 18(6):779–824
Merino N, Aronson HS, Bojanova DP, Feyhl-Buska J, Wong ML, Zhang S, Giovannelli D (2019) Living at the extremes: extremophiles and the limits of life in a planetary context. Front Microbiol 10:780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00780.PMID:31037068;PMCID:PMC6476344
DasSarma P, Antunes A, Simões MF, DasSarma S (2020) Earth’s stratosphere and microbial life. Curr Issues Mol Biol 38(1):197–244. https://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.038.197
Coleine C, Delgado-Baquerizo M (2022) Unearthing terrestrial extreme microbiomes for searching terrestrial-like life in the Solar System. Trends Microbiol 30(11):1101–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2022.04.002. (Epub 2022 May 11 PMID: 35568658)
Billi D (2018) Desert cyanobacteria under space and planetary simulations: a tool for searching for life beyond Earth and supporting human space exploration. Int J Astrobiol Adv Online Publ. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147355041800037X
Abbott C, Pearce DA (2021) Extremophiles as astrobiological Models. In: Seckbach J, Stan-Lotter H (eds) Antarctic bacteria as astrobiological models. Wiley, Scrivener Publishing LLC, pp 137–159
Seyler L, Kujawinski EB, Azua-Bustos A, Lee MD, Marlow J, Perl SM, Cleaves Ii HJ (2020) Metabolomics as an emerging tool in the search for astrobiologically relevant biomarkers. Astrobiology 20(10):1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2019.2135
Rannou P, Chassefière E, Encrenaz T, Erard S, Génin JM, Ingrin J, Jambon A, Jolivet JP, Raulin F, Renault P et al (2001) Exocam: mars in a box to simulate soil-atmosphere interactions. Adv Space Res 27(2):189–193
Gómez F, Mateo-Martí E, Prieto-Ballesteros O, Martín-Gago J, Amils R (2010) Protection of chemolithoautotrophic bacteria exposed to simulated Mars environmental conditions. Icarus 209(2):482–487
Sobrado JM, Martín-Soler J, Martín-Gago JA (2014) Mimicking Mars: A vacuum simulation chamber for testing environmental instrumentation for Mars exploration. Rev Sci Instrum 85(3):035111
Baqué M, Verseux C, Böttger U, Rabbow E, de Vera JP, Billi D (2016) Preservation of biomarkers from cyanobacteria mixed with mars-like regolith under simulated martian atmosphere and UV flux. Orig Life Evol Biosph 46(2–3):289–310
Abbey WJ, Bhartia R, Beegle LW, DeFlores L, Paez V, Sijapati K, Sijapati S, Williford K, Tuite M, Hug W et al (2017) Deep UV Raman spectroscopy for planetary exploration: the search for in situ organics. Icarus 290:201–214
Wu Z, Ling Z, Zhang J, Fu X, Liu C, Xin Y, Li B, Qiao L (2021) A Mars environment chamber coupled with multiple in situ spectral sensors for mars exploration. Sensors 21(7):2519
Durga Prasad K, Murty SVS (2013) Performance of a small and low-cost chamber to simulate lunar surface environment. Acta Astronaut 89:149–153
Hanna KLD, C. M, Pieters, Patterson WR, Hiroi T, Moriarty DP, Wyatt MB, Thompson C 2012. Asteroid And Lunar Environment Chamber (Alec): Simulated Asteroid And Lunar Environments For Measuring Analog Materials.
Sobron P, Wang A (2012) A planetary environment and analysis chamber (PEACh) for coordinated Raman–LIBS–IR measurements under planetary surface environmental conditions. J Raman Spectrosc 43(2):212–227
Hintze PE, Buhler CR, Schuerger AC, Calle LM, Calle CI (2010) Alteration of five organic compounds by glow discharge plasma and UV light under simulated Mars conditions. Icarus 208(2):749–757
Mateo-Marti E (2014) Planetary atmosphere and surfaces chamber (PASC): a platform to address various challenges in astrobiology. Challenges 5(2):213–223
Manrique JA, Lopez-Reyes G, Cousin A, Rull F, Maurice S, Wiens RC, Madsen MB, Madariaga JM, Gasnault O, Aramendia J et al (2020) SuperCam calibration targets: design and development. Space Sci Rev 216(8):138
Kleiman J, Horodetsky S, Issoupov V 2013. A Planetary Environmental Simulator/Test Facility.In Kleiman J, Tagawa M, Kimoto Y. Protection of Materials and Structures From the Space Environment. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 355–370.
Vakkada Ramachandran A, Nazarious MI, Mathanlal T, Zorzano MP, Martín-Torres J. 2020. Space Environmental Chamber for Planetary Studies. Sensors (Basel) 20(14).
Taubner RS, Olsson-Francis K, Vance SD et al (2020) Experimental and simulation efforts in the astrobiological exploration of exooceans. Space Sci Rev 216:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-0635-5
Yamagishi A, Kawaguchi Y, Hashimoto H, Yano H, Imai E, Kodaira S et al (2018) Environmental data and survival data of Deinococcus aetherius from the exposure facility of the Japan experimental module of the international space station obtained by the tanpopo mission. Astrobiology 18:1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2017.1751
Lopez JV, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS (2019) Inevitable future: space colonization beyond earth with microbes first. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz127
Capece MC, Clark E, Saleh JK, Halford D, Heinl N, Hoskins S, Rothschild LJ (2013) Polyextremophiles and the constraints for terrestrial habitability. In: Seckbach J, Oren A, Stan-Latter H (eds) Polyextremophiles: life under multiple forms of stress. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp 3–60
Onofri S, De Vera JP, Zucconi L, Selbmann L, Scalzi G, Venkateswaran KJ, Rabbow E, De La Torre R, Horneck G (2015) Survival of antarctic cryptoendolithic fungi in simulated martian conditions on board the International Space Station. Astrobiology 15:1052–1059
Blachowicz A, Chiang AJ, Elsaesser A, Kalkum M, Ehrenfreund P, Stajich JE, Torok T, Wang CCC, Venkateswaran K (2019) Proteomic and metabolomic characteristics of extremophilic fungi under simulated Mars conditions. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2019.01013/FULL
Siddiqui KS (2015) Some like it hot, some like it cold: temperature dependent biotechnological applications and improvements in extremophilic enzymes. Biotechnol Adv 33(8):1912–1922
Madigan, M. T., Martinko, J. M., Stahl, D., Clark, D. P. Aquatic environments. Brock Biology of Microorganisms, 14th ed. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey, p. 683–697, 2016.
Johnson DB, Schippers A (2017) Editorial: recent advances in acidophile microbiology: fundamentals and applications. Front Microbiol 8:428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00428
Mamo G, Mattiason B (2016) Alkaliphilic microorganisms in biotechnology. In: Rampelotto PH (ed) Biotechnology of extremophiles: advances and challenges (grand challenges in biology and biotechnology). Springer, New York, NY, pp 243–272
Fang J, Zhang L, Bazylinski DA (2010) Deep-sea piezosphere and piezophiles: geomicrobiology and biogeochemistry. Trends Microbiol 18(9):413–422
Oren A (2010) Industrial and environmental applications of halophilic microorganisms. Environ Technol 31:825–834
Pitt, J. I., Hocking, A. D. Fungi and food spoilage. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2009.
Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1839
Belozerskaya T, Aslanidi K, Ivanova A, Gessler N, Egorova A, Karpenko Y, Olishevskaya S (2010) Characteristics of extremophylic fungi from chernobyl nuclear power plant. Curr Res Technol Educ Topics Appl Microbiol Microbial Biotechnol 1:88
Jaworowski Z (2010) Observations on the chernobyl disaster and LNT. Dose-Resp 8:148–171
Kessler, G., and Veser, A. (2014). "The Severe Reactor Accidents of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima," in The Risks of Nuclear Energy Technology. Springer), 173–198.
Lim S, Bijlani S, Blachowicz A, Chiang Y-M, Lee M-S, Torok T, Venkateswaran K, Wang CCC (2021) Identification of the pigment and its role in UV resistance in Paecilomyces variotii, a Chernobyl isolate, using genetic manipulation strategies. Fungal Genet Biol 152:103567
Zhang S, Yan L, Xing W, Chen P, Zhang Y, Wang W (2018) Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans and its potential application. Extremophiles 22:563–579
Carré L, Zaccai G, Delfosse X, Girard E, Franzetti B (2022) Relevance of earth-bound extremophiles in the search for extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology 22(3):322–367. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2021.0033. (Epub 2022 Feb 2 PMID: 35108099)
Canganella F, Wiegel J (2014) Anaerobic thermophiles. Life 4:77–104
Salwan R, Sharma V (2020) Molecular and biotechnological aspects of secondary metabolites in Actinobacteria. Microbiol Res 231:126374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.126374
Siliakus MF, van der Oost J, Kengen SWM (2017) Adaptations of archaeal and bacterial membranes to variations in temperature, pH and pressure. Extremophiles 21(4):651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-017-0939-x
Orellana R, Macaya C, Bravo G, Dorochesi F, Cumsille A, Valencia R, Rojas C, Seeger M (2018) Living at the frontiers of life: extremophiles in chile and their potential for bioremediation. Front Microbiol 30(9):2309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02309.PMID:30425685;PMCID:PMC6218600
Lammer H, Bredehöft JH, Coustenis A, Khodachenko ML, Kaltenegger L, Grasset O, Prieur D, Raulin F, Ehrenfreund P, Yamauchi M, Wahlund J-E, Grießmeier J-M, Stangl G, Cockell CS, Kulikov YN, Grenfell JL, Rauer H (2009) What makes a planet habitable? Astron Astrophys Rev 17:181–249
Jebbar M, Hickman-Lewis K, Cavalazzi B et al (2020) Microbial diversity and biosignatures: an icy moons perspective. Space Sci Rev 216:10
Fairén AG, Parro V, Schulze-Makuch D, Whyte L (2017) Searching for life on mars before it is too late. Astrobiology 17(10):962–970. https://doi.org/10.1089/AST.2017.1703
Howell SM, Pappalardo RT (2020) NASA’s Europa Clipper—a mission to a potentially habitable ocean world. Nat Commun 11(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15160-9
Neveu M, Anbar AD, Davila AF, Glavin DP, Mackenzie SM, Phillips-Lander CM, Sherwood B, Takano Y, Williams P, Yano H (2020) Returning samples from enceladus for life detection. Front Astron Space Sci 7:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSPAS.2020.00026/BIBTEX
Cockell C (2010) Astrobiology in antarctica. Trends Ecol Evol 25(12):683–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.006
Musilova M, Wright G, Ward JM, Dartnell LR (2015) Isolation of radiation-resistant bacteria from mars analog antarctic dry valleys by preselection, and the correlation between radiation and desiccation resistance. Astrobiology 15(12):1076. https://doi.org/10.1089/AST.2014.1278
Azua-Bustos A, González-Silva C, Fairén AG (2022) The Atacama Desert in Northern Chile as an analog model of Mars. Front Astron Space Sci 8:242. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSPAS.2021.810426/BIBTEX
Matsuno K, Imai E (2015) Hydrothermal vent origin of life models. Encycl Astrobiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44185-5_761
DasSarma S and DasSarma P (2017) Halophiles In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0000394.pub4.
Stan-Lotter H, Fendrihan S (2015) Halophilic archaea: life with desiccation, radiation and oligotrophy over geological times. Life 5(3):1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/LIFE5031487
Ng WV, Kennedy SP, Mahairas GG, Berquist B, Pan M, Shukla HD, Lasky SR, Baliga NS, Thorsson V, Sbrogna J, Swartzell S, Weir D, Hall J, Dahl TA, Welti R, Goo YA, Leithauser B, Keller K, Cruz R, Danson MJ, Hough DW, Maddocks DG, Jablonski PE, Krebs MP, Angevine CM, Dale H, Isenbarger TA, Peck RF, Pohlschroder M, Spudich JL, Jung KW, Alam M, Freitas T, Hou S, Daniels CJ, Dennis PP, Omer AD, Ebhardt H, Lowe TM, Liang P, Riley M, Hood L, DasSarma S (2000) Genome sequence of Halobacterium species NRC-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(22):12176–12181. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190337797.PMID:11016950;PMCID:PMC17314
DasSarma S, Berquist BR, Coker JA, DasSarma P and Müller JA (2006) Post-genomics of the model haloarchaeon Halobacterium sp. NRC-1. Saline Systems 2:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fajardo-Cavazos P, Link L, Melosh HJ, Nicholson WL (2005) Bacillus subtilis spores on artificial meteorites survive hypervelocity atmospheric entry: Implications for lithopanspermia. Astrobiology 5(6):726–736. https://doi.org/10.1089/AST.2005.5.726
Moeller R, Raguse M, Reitz G, Okayasu R, Li Z, Klein S, Setlow P, Nicholson WL (2014) Resistance of Bacillus subtilis spore DNA to lethal ionizing radiation damage relies primarily on spore core components and DNA repair, with minor effects of oxygen radical detoxification. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03136-13
Link L, Sawyer J, Venkateswaran K et al (2004) Extreme spore UV resistance of Bacillus pumilus isolates obtained from an ultraclean spacecraft assembly facility. Microb Ecol 47:159–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-1029-4
Chung S, Lim HM, Kim SD (2007) Formulation of stable Bacillus subtilis AH18 against temperature fluctuation with highly heat-resistant endospores and micropore inorganic carriers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76(1):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00253-007-0992-Y/TABLES/1
Vaishampayan PA, Rabbow E, Horneck G, Venkateswaran KJ (2012) Survival of Bacillus pumilus spores for a prolonged period of time in real space conditions. Astrobiology 12(5):487–497. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2011.0738. (PMID: 22680694)
Santomartino R, Waajen AC, de Wit W, Nicholson N, Parmitano L, Loudon CM, Moeller R, Rettberg P, Fuchs FM, van Houdt R, Finster K, Coninx I, Krause J, Koehler A, Caplin N, Zuijderduijn L, Zolesi V, Balsamo M, Mariani A, Cockell CS (2020) No effect of microgravity and simulated mars gravity on final bacterial cell concentrations on the international space station: applications to space bioproduction. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2020.579156
Nuding DL, Gough RV, Venkateswaran KJ, Spry JA, Tolbert MA (2017) Laboratory investigations on the survival of Bacillus subtilis spores in deliquescent salt mars analog environments. Astrobiology 17(10):997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1089/AST.2016.1545
Schuerger AC, Golden DC, Ming DW (2012) Biotoxicity of Mars soils: 1 Dry deposition of analog soils on microbial colonies and survival under Martian conditions. Planet Space Sci 72(1):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSS.2012.07.026
Daly MJ (2011) Deinococcus radiodurans: Revising the Molecular Basis for Radiation Effects on Cells. In: Horikoshi K (ed) Extremophiles Handbook. Springer, Tokyo, pp 1117–1133
Venkateswaran A, Mcfarlan SC, Ghosal D, Minton KW, Vasilenko A, Makarova K, Wackett LP, Daly MJ (2000) Physiologic determinants of radiation resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2620–2626
Bauermeister A, Moeller R, Reitz G et al (2011) Effect of relative humidity on deinococcus radiodurans’ resistance to prolonged desiccation, heat, ionizing, germicidal, and environmentally relevant UV radiation. Microb Ecol 61:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9785-4
de Araujo GG, Rodrigues F, Galante D (2020) Probing the response of Deinococcus radiodurans exposed to simulated space conditions. Int J Astrobiol 19(3):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550419000211
Kawaguchi Y, Yang Y, Kawashiri N, Shiraishi K, Takasu M, Narumi I, Satoh K, Hashimoto H, Nakagawa K, Tanigawa Y, Momoki Y, Tanabe M, Sugino T, Takahashi Y, Shimizu Y, Yoshida S, Kobayashi K, Yokobori S, Yamagishi A (2013) The possible interplanetary transfer of microbes: assessing the viability of Deinococcus spp. under the ISS environmental conditions for performing exposure experiments of microbes in the Tanpopo mission. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43:411–428
Slade D, Radman M (2011) Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75(1):133–191. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00015-10
Billi D (2009) Subcellular integrities in Chroococcidiopsis sp CCMEE 029 survivors after prolonged desiccation revealed by molecular probes and genome stability assays. Extremophiles 13(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-008-0196-0
Fagliarone C, Mosca C, Ubaldi I, Verseux C, Baqué M, Wilmotte A, Billi D (2017) Avoidance of protein oxidation correlates with the desiccation and radiation resistance of hot and cold desert strains of the cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis. Extremophiles 21(6):981–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-017-0957-8. (Epub 2017 Aug 30 PMID: 28856526)
Cockell CS, Schuerger AC, Billi D, Friedmann EI, Panitz C (2005) Effects of a simulated martian UV flux on the cyanobacterium, Chroococcidiopsis sp. 029. Astrobiology 5(2):127–140. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2005.5.127. (PMID: 15815164)
Billi D, Friedmann EI, Hofer KG, Caiola MG, Ocampo-Friedmann R (2000) Ionizing-radiation resistance in the desiccation-tolerant cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(4):1489–1492. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.4.1489-1492.2000
Verseux C et al (2017) Evaluation of the resistance of Chroococcidiopsis spp. to sparsely and densely ionizing irradiation. Astrobiology 17:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2015.1450
Heinz J, Krahn T, Schulze-Makuch D (2020) A new record for microbial perchlorate tolerance: fungal growth in NaClO4 Brines and its implications for putative Life on Mars. Life 10(5):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/LIFE10050053
Pulschen AA, Araujo GGd, Carvalho ACSRd, Cerini MF, Fonseca LdM, Galante D, Rodrigues F (2018) Survival of extremophilic yeasts in the stratospheric environment during balloon flights and in laboratory simulations. Appl Environ Microbiol 84(23):e01942-e11918
Dos Santos A, Rodrigues-Filho E, Homem M (2021) Analysis of microbial lipids deposited on Mars Global Simulant (MGS-1) by geomatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry. Int J Astrobiol 20(3):234–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550421000100
Onofri S, Fenice M, Cicalini AR, Tosi S, Magrino A, Pagano S, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Vishniac HS, Roseli Ocampo-Friedmann E, Friedmann I (2000) Ecology and biology of microfungi from Antarctic rocks and soils. Ital J Zool 67:163–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000009356372
Onofri S, Selbmann L, Pacelli C, de Vera JP, Horneck G, Hallsworth JE, Zucconi L (2018) Integrity of the DNA and cellular ultrastructure of cryptoendolithic fungi in space or mars conditions: a 1.5-Year Study at the International Space Station. Life 8(2):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/LIFE8020023
McCready S, Müller JA, Boubriak I et al (2005) UV irradiation induces homologous recombination genes in the model archaeon, Halobacterium sp. NRC-1. Aquat Biosyst. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-1-3
Coker JA, DasSarma P, Kumar J, Müller JA, DasSarma S (2007) Transcriptional profiling of the model Archaeon Halobacterium sp NRC-1: responses to changes in salinity and temperature. Saline Syst. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-3-6.PMID:17651475;PMCID:PMC1971269
Karan R, Capes MD, DasSarma P, DasSarma S (2013) Cloning, overexpression, purification, and characterization of a polyextremophilic β-galactosidase from the Antarctic haloarchaeon Halorubrum lacusprofundi. BMC Biotechnol 13:3
Mastascusa V, Romano I, Di Donato P et al (2014) Extremophiles survival to simulated space conditions: an astrobiology model study. Orig Life Evol Biosph 44:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-014-9397-y
Jolivet E, L’Haridon S, Corre E, Forterre P, Prieur D (2003) Thermococcus gammatolerans sp. nov, a hyperthermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent that resists ionizing radiation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53(3):847–851. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02503-0. (PMID: 12807211)
Dartnell LR, Hunter SJ, Lovell KV, Coates AJ, Ward JM (2010) Low-temperature ionizingradiation resistance of Deinococcus radiodurans and antarctic dry valley bacteria. Astrobiology 10(7):717–732
La Duc MT, Benardini JN, Kempf MJ, Newcombe DA, Lubarsky M, Venkateswaran K (2007) Microbial diversity of Indian Ocean hydrothermal vent plumes: microbes tolerant of desiccation, peroxide exposure, and ultraviolet and gamma-irradiation. Astrobiology 7(2):416–431. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2006.0060. (PMID: 17480169)
Di Donato P, Romano I, Mastascusa V, Poli A, Orlando P, Pugliese M et al (2018) Survival and adaptation of the thermophilic species Geobacillus thermantarcticus in simulated spatial conditions. Orig Life Evol Biosph 48:141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-017-9540-7
Romano I, De Angelis A, Poli A, Ragni P, Lilla L, Zito G, Nicolaus B, De Luca AC, Di Donato P (2018) Resistance and Raman spectroscopy analysis of Parageobacillus thermantarcticus spores after γ-ray exposure. Extremophiles 22(6):931–941
Finore I, Lama L, Di Donato P, Romano I, Tramice A, Leone L, Nicolaus B, Poli A (2019) Parageobacillus thermantarcticus, an Antarctic cell factory: From crop residue valorization by green chemistry to astrobiology studies. Diversity 11(8):128
Horneck G, Rettberg P, Reitz G, Wehner J, Eschweiler U, Strauch K, Panitz C, Starke V, Baumstark-Khan C (2001) Protection of bacterial spores in space, a contribution to the discussion on Panspermia. Orig Life Evol Biosph 31(6):527–547. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012746130771
Wadsworth J, Cockell CS (2017) Perchlorates on Mars enhance the bacteriocidal effects of UV light. Sci Rep 7(1):4662. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04910-3.PMID:28684729;PMCID:PMC5500590
Cortesão M, Fuchs FM, Commichau FM, Eichenberger P, Schuerger AC, Nicholson WL, Setlow P, Moeller R (2019) Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to simulated mars surface conditions. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2019.00333/FULL
Blum JS, Han S, Lanoil B, Saltikov C, Witte B, Tabita FR, Langley S, Beveridge TJ, Jahnke L, Oremland RS (2009) Ecophysiology of Halarsenatibacter silvermanii strain SLAS-1T,gen. nov., sp. Nov., a facultative chemoautotrophic arsenate respirer from salt-saturated Searles Lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(7):1950–1960. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02614-08
Ronald S. Oremland - Chapter 5, Extremophiles as Astrobiological Models. Arsenic-and Light Hydrocarbon-Rich Hypersaline Soda Lakes and Their Resident Microbes as Possible Models for Extraterrestrial Biomes
Cosciotti B, Balbi A, Ceccarelli A, Fagliarone C, Mattei E, Lauro SE, Di Paolo F, Pettinelli E, Billi D (2019) Survivability of anhydrobiotic cyanobacteria in salty ice: implications for the habitability of Icy Worlds. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 9(4):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/life9040086
Billi D, Gallego Fernandez B, Fagliarone C, Chiavarini S, Rothschild LJ (2021) Exploiting a perchlorate-tolerant desert cyanobacterium to support bacterial growth for in situ resource utilization on Mars. Int J Astrobiol 20(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550420000300
Napoli A, Micheletti D, Pindo M, Larger S, Cestaro A, de Vera JP, Billi D (2022) Absence of increased genomic variants in the cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis exposed to Mars-like conditions outside the space station. Sci Rep 12(1):8437. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12631-5
Torre R, Sancho LG, Horneck G, Ríos A, Wierzchos J, Olsson-Francis K, Cockell CS, Rettberg P, Berger T, Vera JPP, Ott S, Frías JM, Melendi PG, Lucas MM, Reina M, Pintado A, Demets R (2010) Survival of lichens and bacteria exposed to outer space conditions – Results of the Lithopanspermia experiments. Icarus 208(2):735–748
Noetzel RT, Miller AZ, de la Rosa JM, Pacelli C, Onofri S, García Sancho L, Cubero B, Lorek A, Wolter D, de Vera JP (2018) Cellular responses of the Lichen circinaria gyrosa in mars-like conditions. Front Microbiol 9:308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00308
Hirooka S, Miyagishima SY (2016) 2022 Cultivation of acidophilic algae Galdieria sulphuraria and Pseudochlorella sp. YKT1 in media derived from acidic hot springs. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2016.02022/BIBTEX
Reeb V, Bhattacharya D (2010) The thermo-acidophilic cyanidiophyceae cyanidiales. In: Seckbach J, Chapman DJ (eds) Red algae in the genomic age. Springer, Cham, pp 409–426
Jayasinghe SA, Kennedy F, McMinn A, Martin A (2022) Bacterial utilisation of aliphatic organics: is the dwarf planet ceres habitable? Life 12(6):821. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060821
Taubner RS, Pappenreiter P, Zwicker J et al (2018) Biological methane production under putative Enceladus-like conditions. Nat Commun 9:748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02876-y
Schönheit P, Moll J, Thauer RK (1980) Growth parameters (Ks, μmax, Ys) of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Arch Microbiol 127:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414356.[CrossRef][GoogleScholar]
Mickol RL, Laird SK, Kral TA (2018) Non-Psychrophilic methanogens capable of growth following long-term extreme temperature changes, with application to Mars. Microorganisms 6(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms602003
Sinha N, Nepal S, Kral T, Kumar P (2021) Effects of temperatures and high pressures on the growth and survivability of methanogens and stable carbon isotope fractionation: Implications for deep subsurface life on Mars. Int J Astrobiol 20(3):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550418000216
Rettberg P, Antunes A, Brucato J, Cabezas P, Collins G, Haddaji A, Kminek G, Leuko S, McKenna-Lawlor S, Moissl-Eichinger C et al (2019) Biological contamination prevention for outer solar system moons of astrobiological interest: what do we need to know? Astrobiology 19(8):951–974
Baesman SM, Sutton JM, Fierst JL, Akob DM, Oremland RS (2019) Syntrophotalea acetylenivorans sp. Nov., a diazotrophic, acetylenotrophic anaerobe isolated from intertidal sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71(3):004698. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004698
Sakai HD, Kurosawa N (2018) Saccharolobus caldissimus gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultatively anaerobic iron-reducing hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from an acidic terrestrial hot spring, and reclassification of Sulfolobus solfataricus as Saccharolobus solfataricus comb. nov. and Sulfolobus shibatae as Saccharolobus shibatae comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68(4):1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002665
Nicholson WL, Munakata N, Horneck G, Melosh HJ, Setlow P (2000) Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64(3):548–572. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.64.3.548-572.2000.PMID:10974126;PMCID:PMC99004
Stepanov VG, Tirumalai MR, Montazari S, Checinska A, Venkateswaran K, Fox GE (2016) Bacillus pumilus SAFR-032 genome revisited: sequence update and re-annotation. PLoS ONE 11(6):e0157331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157331
Chivian D, Brodie EL, Alm EJ, Culley DE, Dehal PS, DeSantis TZ, Gihring TM, Lapidus A, Lin LH, Lowry SR, Moser DP, Richardson PM, Southam G, Wanger G, Pratt LM, Andersen GL, Hazen TC, Brockman FJ, Arkin AP, Onstott TC (2008) Environmental genomics reveals a single-species ecosystem deep within Earth. Science 322(5899):275–278. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155495. (PMID: 18845759)
Altair T, De Avellar MGB, Rodrigues F, Galante D (2018) Microbial habitability of Europa sustained by radioactive sources. Sci Rep 8:260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18470-z
Schink B (1985) Fermentation of acetylene by an obligate anaerobe, Pelobacter acetylenicus sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 142:295–301
Rabus R, Ruepp A, Frickey T, Rattei T, Fartmann B, Stark M, Bauer M, Zibat A, Lombardot T, Becker I, Amann J, Gellner K, Teeling H, Leuschner WD, Glöckner FO, Lupas AN, Amann R, Klenk HP (2004) The genome of Desulfotalea psychrophila, a sulfate-reducing bacterium from permanently cold Arctic sediments. Environ Microbiol 6(9):887–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00665.x. (PMID: 15305914)
Sears DWG, Benoit PH, McKeever SWS, Banerjee D, Kral T, Stites W, Roe L, Jansma P, Mattioli G (2002) Investigation of biological, chemical and physical processes on and in planetary surfaces by laboratory simulation. Planet Space Sci 50(9):821–828
Fraser HJ, van Dishoeck EF (2004) SURFRESIDE: a novel experiment to study surface chemistry under interstellar and protostellar conditions. Adv Space Res 33(1):14–22
Mateo-Martí E, Prieto-Ballesteros O, Sobrado JM, Gómez-Elvira J, Martín-Gago JA (2006) A chamber for studying planetary environments and its applications to astrobiology. Meas Sci Technol 17(8):2274
ten Kate IL, Reuver M (2016) PALLAS: planetary analogues laboratory for light, atmosphere, and surface simulations. Netherlands J Geosci Geol Mijnb 95(2):183–189
Fornaro T, Boosman A, Brucato JR, ten Kate IL, Siljeström S, Poggiali G, Steele A, Hazen RM (2018) UV irradiation of biomarkers adsorbed on minerals under Martian-like conditions: Hints for life detection on Mars. Icarus 313:38–60
Baqué M, Scalzi G, Rabbow E, Rettberg P, Billi D (2013) Biofilm and planktonic lifestyles differently support the resistance of the desert cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis under space and Martian simulations. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43(4–5):377–389
Satomi M, La Duc MT, Venkateswaran K (2006) Bacillus safensis sp. Nov., isolated from spacecraft and assembly-facility surfaces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56(8):1735–1740
Benardini JN, Vaishampayan PA, Schwendner P, Swanner E, Fukui Y, Osman S, Satomi M, Venkateswaran K (2011) Paenibacillus phoenicis sp. Nov., isolated from the Phoenix Lander assembly facility and a subsurface molybdenum mine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61(6):1338–1343
Newcombe DA, Schuerger AC, Benardini JN, Dickinson D, Tanner R, Venkateswaran K (2005) Survival of spacecraft-associated microorganisms under simulated martian UV irradiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8147–8156
Gioia J, Yerrapragada S, Qin X, Jiang H, Igboeli OC, Muzny D, Dugan-Rocha S, Ding Y, Hawes A, Liu W et al (2007) Paradoxical DNA repair and peroxide resistance gene conservation in Bacillus pumilus SAFR-032. PLoS ONE 2(9):e928
Moeller R, Schuerger AC, Reitz G, Nicholson WL (2011) Impact of two DNA repair pathways, homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, on bacterial spore inactivation under simulated martian environmental conditions. Icarus 215(1):204–210
Fekete A, Kovács G, Hegedüs M, Módos K, Lammer H (2008) Biological responses to the simulated Martian UV radiation of bacteriophages and isolated DNA. J Photochem Photobiol B 92(2):110–116
Fekete A, Rontó G, Hegedüs M, Módos K, Bérces A, Kovács G, Lammer H, Panitz C (2004) Simulation experiments of the effect of space environment on bacteriophage and DNA thin films. Adv Space Res 33(8):1306–1310
Li Q, Hu C, Yang H (2022) Responses of cyanobacterial crusts and microbial communities to extreme environments of the stratosphere. Microorganisms 10(6):1252
Hays, L., editor in chief. (2015) 2015 Astrobiology Strategy, NASA, Washington, DC
Fairén AG, Schulze-Makuch D, Whyte L, Parro V, Pavlov A, Gómez-Elvira J, Azua-Bustos A, Fink W, Baker V (2019) Planetary protection and the astrobiological exploration of Mars: proactive steps in moving forward. Adv Space Res 63(5):1491–1497
Berliner AJ, Mochizuki T, Stedman KM (2018) Astrovirology: viruses at large in the universe. Astrobiology 18(2):207–223. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2017.1649. (Epub 2018 Jan 10 PMID: 29319335)
Trubl G, Stedman K, Bywaters K, Boston PJ, Kaelber JT, Roux S, Rodríguez-Román E (2021) Astrovirology: expanding the search for life. Bull AAS. https://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.b072d157
Petković M, Lucas L, Levatić J et al (2022) Machine-learning ready data on the thermal power consumption of the Mars Express Spacecraft. Sci Data 9:229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01336-z
Vago JL, Westall F, Coates AJ, Jaumann R, Korablev O, Ciarletti V, Mitrofanov I, Josset JL, de Sanctis MC, Bibring JP, Rull F, Goesmann F, Steininger H, Goetz W, Brinckerhoff W, Szopa C, Raulin F, Edwards HGM, Whyte LG, Carreau C (2017) Habitability on Early Mars and the search for biosignatures with the exomars rover. Astrobiology 17(6):471–510. https://doi.org/10.1089/AST.2016.1533/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/FIGURE7.JPEG
Goesmann F, Brinckerhoff WB, Raulin F, Goetz W, Danell RM, Getty SA, Siljeström S, Mißbach H, Steininger H, Arevalo RD, Buch A, Freissinet C, Grubisic A, Meierhenrich UJ, Pinnick VT, Stalport F, Szopa C, Vago JL, Lindner R, van Amerom FHW (2017) The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) instrument: characterization of organic material in martian sediments. Astrobiology 17(6):655–685. https://doi.org/10.1089/AST.2016.1551/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/FIGURE15.JPEG
Marshall SM, Mathis C, Carrick E, Keenan G, Cooper GJT, Graham H, Craven M, Gromski PS, Moore DG, Walker SI, Cronin L (2021) Identifying molecules as biosignatures with assembly theory and mass spectrometry. Nature Commun 12(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23258-x
Grubisic A, Trainer MG, Li X, Brinckerhoff WB, van Amerom FH, Danell RM, Costa JT, Castillo M, Kaplan D, Zacny K (2021) Laser desorption mass spectrometry at Saturn’s moon Titan. Int J Mass Spectrom 470:116707. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMS.2021.116707
Lorenz RD, MacKenzie SM, Neish CD, le Gall A, Turtle EP, Barnes JW, Trainer MG, Werynski A, Hedgepeth J, Karkoschka E (2021) Selection and characteristics of the dragonfly landing site near Selk crater Titan. Planet Sci J 2(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ABD08F
Grasset O, Dougherty M, Coustenis A, Bunce E, Erd C, Titov D, Blanc M, Coates A, Drossart P, Fletcher L, Hussmann H, Jaumann R, Krupp N, Lebreton J-P, Prieto-Ballesteros O, Tortora P, Tosi F, Van Hoolst T (2013) Jupiter Icy moons explorer (JUICE): An ESA mission to orbit Ganymede and to characterise the Jupiter system. Planet Space Sci 78:1–21
Föhn M, Munz HP, Wurz P, Gerber M (2021) Description of the mass spectrometer for the Jupiter Icy Moons explorer mission. IEEE Aerosp Conf Big Sky MT. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero50100.2021.9438344
Chou L, Mahaffy P, Trainer M, Eigenbrode J, Arevalo R, Brinckerhoff W, Getty S, Grefenstette N, da Poian V, Fricke GM, Kempes CP, Marlow J, Sherwood Lollar B, Graham H, Johnson SS (2021) Planetary mass spectrometry for agnostic life detection in the solar system. Front Astron Space Sci 8:173. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSPAS.2021.755100/BIBTEX
Chela-Flores J (2021) Miniaturised instrumentation for the detection of biosignatures in Ocean Worlds of the Solar System. Front Space Technol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRSPT.2021.703809/FULL
Arevalo R, Selliez L, Briois C, Carrasco N, Thirkell L, Cherville B, Colin F, Gaubicher B, Farcy B, Li X, Makarov A (2018) An Orbitrap-based laser desorption/ablation mass spectrometer designed for spaceflight. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 32(21):1875–1886. https://doi.org/10.1002/RCM.8244
Willhite L, Ni Z, Arevalo R, Bardyn A, Gundersen C, Minasola N, Southard A, Briois C, Thirkell L, Colin F, Grubisic A, Fahey M, Yu A, Hernandez E, Ersahin A, Danell R, Makarov A (2021) CORALS: a laser desorption/ablation orbitrap mass spectrometer for in situ exploration of Europa. IEEE Aerosp Conf Proceed. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438221
Quick LC, Barnouin OS, Prockter LM, Patterson GW (2013) Constraints on the detection of cryovolcanic plumes on Europa. Planet Space Sci 86:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSS.2013.06.028
Funding
KAUST Baseline Grant financially supported this work; BAS/1/1096–01-01 (to Prof. A. S. Rosado). A.S. is grateful to CAPES for his Ph.D. scholarship (Grant numbers 88887.598052/2021–00 and 88881.682425/2022–01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JS and ASR devised the topic, supervised manuscript structure and data collection, conducted the literature search, created figures, and wrote the manuscript. AS conducted the literature search, created figures, and wrote the manuscript. NP conducted the literature search and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schultz, J., dos Santos, A., Patel, N. et al. Life on the Edge: Bioprospecting Extremophiles for Astrobiology. J Indian Inst Sci 103, 721–737 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-023-00382-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-023-00382-9