Skip to main content
Log in

The Efficiency of Volcanic Tuff-Based Foamed Geopolymer for Heavy Metals Removal: A Parametric Study

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, natural volcanic tuff-based foamed geopolymer was synthesized, characterized, and evaluated for its efficiency to remove heavy metals (zinc and lead) from wastewater. Sodium hydroxide was used as an alkaline activator to dissolve the constituents and form geopolymeric binders. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used as a foaming agent at different levels (0%, 1%, and 2%). The effect of curing temperature (60, 80, and 100 °C) on the physical properties and the removal efficiency was evaluated with a pH ranging from 3 to 7 for lead removal and 5 to 7 for zinc removal. The physical properties include compressive strength, density, and microstructural characteristics. The results indicated that higher curing temperatures increase the compressive strength and removal efficiency of the geopolymer foam. Geopolymers that are prepared at a curing temperature of 100 °C exhibited the highest removal efficiency for both Pb2+ and Zn2+ ions. The addition of H2O2 refined the microstructural characteristics of the foamed geopolymer and increased the efficiency of the zinc removal process. Results revealed that as the pH increases, the removal efficiency also increases. This can be due to the competition between H+ and Pb2+ and Zn2+ ions on the available adsorption sites at low pH values. As the acidity of the solution decreases, this competition decreases and led to higher removal efficiency.

Article Highlights

  • Foam-based volcanic tuff geopolymer was synthesized and characterized.

  • The geopolymer efficiency for heavy metal removal was evaluated.

  • Increasing geopolymer curing temperature led to enhancing the removal efficiency.

  • Increasing the foaming agent dosage has enhanced the removal efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ababneh A, Matalkah F (2018) Potential use of Jordanian volcanic tuffs as supplementary cementitious materials. Case Stud Constr Mater 8:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdollahnejad Z et al (2015) Mix design, properties and cost analysis of fly ash-based geopolymer foam. Constr Build Mater 80:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah MMAB et al (2012) Fly ash-based geopolymer lightweight concrete using foaming agent. Int J Mol Sci 13(6):7186–7198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Bakria AM et al (2011) The effect of curing temperature on physical and chemical properties of geopolymers. Phys Procedia 22:286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi HSG (2019) Novel materials and processing routes using alkali-activated systems. Arizona State University, Tempe

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ghouti MA et al (2020) Application of geopolymers synthesized from incinerated municipal solid waste ashes for the removal of cationic dye from water. PLoS ONE 15(11):e0239095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zboon KK, Al-smadi BM, Al-Khawaldh S (2016a) Natural volcanic tuff-based geopolymer for Zn removal: adsorption isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic study. Water Air Soil Pollut 227(7):1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zboon KK et al (2016b) Natural volcanic tuff-based geopolymer for Zn removal: adsorption isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic study. Water Air Soil Pollut 227(7):1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4(4):361–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolong N et al (2009) A review of the effects of emerging contaminants in wastewater and options for their removal. Desalination 239(1–3):229–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng-Yong H et al (2017) Thermal resistance variations of fly ash geopolymers: foaming responses. Sci Rep 7(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng J et al (2015) Development of porous fly ash-based geopolymer with low thermal conductivity. Mater Des 65:529–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajimohammadi A et al (2017) Regulating the chemical foaming reaction to control the porosity of geopolymer foams. Mater Des 120:255–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassett JJ (1974) Capacity of selected Illinois soils to remove lead from aqueous solution. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 5(6):499–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henon J et al (2012) Porosity control of cold consolidated geomaterial foam: temperature effect. Ceram Int 38(1):77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamil NH et al (2020) Influences of SiO2, Al2O3 CaO and MgO in phase transformation of sintered kaolin-ground granulated blast furnace slag geopolymer. J Market Res 9(6):14922–14932

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaya NA et al (2020) Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 247:118641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Z et al (2020) Porosity, mechanical strength and structure of waste-based geopolymer foams by different stabilizing agents. Constr Build Mater 258:119555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Z, Su L, Pei Y (2021) Characterization and adsorption performance of waste-based porous open-cell geopolymer with one-pot preparation. Ceram Int 47(9):12153–12162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kani EN et al (2012) Efflorescence control in geopolymer binders based on natural pozzolan. Cement Concr Compos 34(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattri S, Singh MK (2009) Removal of malachite green from dye wastewater using neem sawdust by adsorption. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):1089–1094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le VS, Louda P (2021) Research of curing time and temperature-dependent strengths and fire resistance of geopolymer foam coated on an aluminum plate. Coatings 11(1):87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen T et al (2017) Optimization of the metakaolin geopolymer preparation for maximized ammonium adsorption capacity. J Mater Sci 52(16):9363–9376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen T et al (2018) Removal of ammonium from municipal wastewater with powdered and granulated metakaolin geopolymer. Environ Technol 39(4):414–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JLV et al (2018) Preparation, characterization, and determination of mechanical and thermal stability of natural zeolite-based foamed geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 172:448–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masi G et al (2014) A comparison between different foaming methods for the synthesis of light weight geopolymers. Ceram Int 40(9):13891–13902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matalkah F, Aqel R, Ababneh A (2020) Enhancement of the mechanical properties of kaolin geopolymer using sodium hydroxide and calcium oxide. Procedia Manuf 44:164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroufel B et al (2013) Adsorptive removal of anionic dye from aqueous solutions by Algerian kaolin: characteristics, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Mater Environ Sci 4(3):482–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal A, Kurup L, Mittal J (2007) Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms and kinetics for the removal of Tartrazine from aqueous solutions using hen feathers. J Hazard Mater 146(1–2):243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad F et al (2018) Strength evaluation by using polycarboxylate superplasticizer and solidification efficiency of Cr6+, Pb2+ and Cd2+ in composite based geopolymer. J Clean Prod 188:807–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novais RM et al (2016) Novel porous fly-ash containing geopolymer monoliths for lead adsorption from wastewaters. J Hazard Mater 318:631–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papa E et al (2016) Porosity and insulating properties of silica-fume based foams. Energy Build 131:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petlitckaia S, Poulesquen A (2019) Design of lightweight metakaolin based geopolymer foamed with hydrogen peroxide. Ceram Int 45(1):1322–1330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasaki SA et al (2019) Geopolymer for use in heavy metals adsorption, and advanced oxidative processes: a critical review. J Clean Prod 213:42–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song D et al (2021) Feasibility exploration on the geopolymerization activation of volcanic tuff, parametrical optimization, and reaction mechanisms. J Market Res 11:618–632

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standard A (2008) ASTM C109-standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Taveri G (2019) Geopolymers incorporating wastes and composites processing. Brno University of Technology, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekin I (2016) Properties of NaOH activated geopolymer with marble, travertine and volcanic tuff wastes. Constr Build Mater 127:607–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temuujin J, Van Riessen A, Williams R (2009) Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes. J Hazard Mater 167(1–3):82–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Q, Sasaki K (2021) Structural characterizations of fly ash-based geopolymer after adsorption of various metal ions. Environ Technol 42(6):941–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trach Y et al (2021) Comparison the adsorption capacity of Ukrainian tuff and basalt with zeolite-manganese removal from water solution. J Ecol Eng 22(3):161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Jaarsveld J, Van Deventer JS, Lukey G (2002) The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash-and kaolinite-based geopolymers. Chem Eng J 89(1–3):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M et al (2012) Microstructure control in ceramic foams via mixed cationic/anionic surfactant. Mater Lett 88:97–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F et al (2018) Pore structure analysis and properties evaluations of fly ash-based geopolymer foams by chemical foaming method. Ceram Int 44(16):19989–19997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan S et al (2019) Green synthesis of high porosity waste gangue microsphere/geopolymer composite foams via hydrogen peroxide modification. J Clean Prod 227:483–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida T et al (2003) XPS study of Pb (II) adsorption on γ-Al2O3 surface at high pH conditions. J Nucl Sci Technol 40(9):672–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Deanship of Scientific Research and Graduate Studies at Yarmouk University under grant number 67/2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faris Matalkah.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matalkah, F., Khraisat, H. & Al-Momani, I. The Efficiency of Volcanic Tuff-Based Foamed Geopolymer for Heavy Metals Removal: A Parametric Study. Int J Environ Res 16, 67 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-022-00449-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-022-00449-y

Keywords

Navigation