Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of 660-nm low-level and defocused 810-nm high-power laser for treatment of herpes labialis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Dental Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Laser therapy has been studied as a treatment for herpes labialis for some years. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 660-nm low-level laser to defocused 810-nm high-power laser for treatment of herpes labialis.

Methods

In this single-blinded clinical trial study, evaluated 32 patients with herpes labialis in prodromic and early vesicle phase (first 48 h) were divided into two same groups by inclusion-extrusion criteria consideration and ethic codes. For group A low-level 660-nm diode laser (6 J/cm2, 100 mW, 0 Hz, 60 s, near contact, focal point of laser unit was 1 cm2) and for group B high-power defocused 810-nm diode laser (2 W, CW, 300-µ fiber, at 0.5-cm distance, 60 s, screening method from the center toward outer for 1-cm2 area) were used. Pain score changes, time of pain relief, lesion size changes, time of clinical healing, recurrence rate within 6 months, and the recurrence interval were recorded. Data were analyzed using the t-test, Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney test, and ANOVA.

Results

The pain intensity significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.001) with no significant difference between them (P = 0.14). The time of pain relief was significantly shorter in group B (P = 0.003). The difference for the size of the lesion (P = 0.6) and time of clinical healing (P = 0.21) were not significant. The reduction in frequency of recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.55). The mean recurrence interval was significantly longer in group B (P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Two treatment methods had similar effects, but the defocused 810-nm high-power laser had better efficacy for shorter time of pain relief and longer recurrence interval in treatment of herpes labialis in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cernik C, Gallina K, Brodell RT (2008) The treatment of herpes simplex infections: an evidence-based review. Arch Intern Med 168:1137–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller CS, Redding SW (1992) Diagnosis and management of orofacial herpes simplex virus infections. Dent Clin North Am 36:879–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. George J, Galasso GJ, Whitley RJ, Merigan TC (2000) Antiviral agents and viral diseases of man. Raven Press, New York, pp 305–384

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramchandani M, Kong M, Tronstein E, Selke S, Mikhaylova A, Magaret A, Huang ML, Johnston C, Corey L, Wald A (2016) Herpes simplex virus type 1 shedding in tears, and nasal and oral mucosa of healthy adults. Sex Transm Dis 43:756–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Chi AC (2019) Color atlas of oral and maxillofacial diseases. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 142–147

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vinters HV, Wang R, Wiley CA (1993) Herpesviruses in chronic encephalitis associated with intractable childhood epilepsy. Hum Pathol 24:871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Winston DJ, Yeager AM, Chandrasekar PH, Snydman DR, Petersen FB, Territo MC (2003) Valacyclovir Cytomegalovirus Study Group. Randomized comparison of oral valacyclovir and intravenous ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 36:749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bond PA (1993) A role for herpes simplex virus in the aetiology of chronic fatigue syndrome and related disorders. Med Hypotheses 40:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedner E, Vahlne A, Kahnberg KE, Hirsch JM (1993) Reactivated herpes simplex virus infection as a possible cause of dry socket after tooth extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wat PJ, Strickler JG, Myers JL, Nordstrom MR (1994) Herpes simplex infection causing acute necrotizing tonsillitis. Mayo Clin Proc 69:269–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glick M (2015) Burket’s oral medicine. PMPH USA, pp 58–62

  12. Griffin K (2020) What is the best treatment for herpes labialis? Evidence-Based Practice 23:11–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Young TB, Rimm EB, D’alessio DJ (1988) Cross-sectional study of recurrent herpes labialis: prevalence and risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 127:612–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Paula Eduardo C, Aranha ACC, Simões A, Bello-Silva MS, Ramalho KM, Esteves-Oliveira M, de Freitas PM, Marotti J, Tunér J (2014) Laser treatment of recurrent herpes labialis: a literature review. Lasers Med Sci 29:1517–1529

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tunér J, Hode L (2014) The laser therapy handbook. Prima Books AB; Grängesberg, pp 150–153

  16. Dougal G, Lee SY (2013) Evaluation of the efficacy of low-level light therapy using 1072 nm infrared light for the treatment of herpes simplex labialis. Clin Exp Dermatol 38:713–718

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simunovic Z (2012) Herpes virus infection low level laser therapy (LLLT)-photobiostimulation applied as monotherapy in treatment of human pathogen Herpes virus. Laser Med 1:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sanchez PJM, Capote Femenías JL, Díaz Tejeda A, Tunér J (2012) The effect of 670-nm low laser therapy on herpes simplex type 1. Photomed Laser Surg 30:37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Carvalho RR, de Paula EF, Ramalho KM, Antunes JL, Bezinelli LM, de Magalhães MH, Pegoretti T, de Freitas PM, de Paula EC (2010) Effect of laser phototherapy on recurring herpes labialis prevention: an in vivo study. Lasers Med Sci 25:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marotti J, Sperandio FF, Fregnani ER, Aranha AC, de Freitas PM, de Paula EC (2010) High-intensity laser and photodynamic therapy as a treatment for recurrent herpes labialis. Photomed Laser Surg 28:439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bello-Silva MS, de Freitas PM, Aranha AC, Lage-Marques JL, Simoes A, de Paula EC (2010) Low-and high-intensity lasers in the treatment of herpes simplex virus 1 infection. Photomed Laser Surg 28:135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Donnarumma G, De Gregorio V, Fusco A, Farina E, Baroni A, Esposito V, Contaldo M, Petruzzi M, Pannone G, Serpico R (2010) Inhibition of HSV-1 replication by laser diode-irradiation: possible mechanism of action. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 23:1167–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schindl A, Neumann R (1999) Low-intensity laser therapy is an effective treatment for recurrent herpes simplex infection. Results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Invest Dermatol 113:221–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferreira DC, Reis HL, Cavalcante FS, Santos KR, Passos MR (2011) Recurrent herpes simplex infections: laser therapy as a potential tool for long-term successful treatment. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 44:397–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, Harkness EE, Harkness LE, Woodruff LD (2004) The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg 22:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Honarmand M, Farhadmollashahi L, Vosoughirahbar E (2017) Comparing the effect of diode laser against acyclovir cream for the treatment of herpes labialis. J Clin Exp Dent 9:e729-732

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hamed GY, Khudhur AS, Alshamaa ZA (2017) Effectiveness of low level diode laser (1064) and acyclovir in treatment of recurrent herpes labialis. (Comparative clinical study). Al-Rafidain Dental Journal 17:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Maweri SA, Kalakonda B, AlAizari NA, Al-Soneidar W (2018) Efficacy of low level laser therapy in management of recurrent herpes labialis: a systematic review. Laser Med Sci 33:1423–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradley P, Tuner J (2007) Laser phototherapy in dentistry. In: Gutknecht N et al (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop of Evidence Based Dentistry on Lasers in Dentistry. Quintessence, Surrey, UK, pp 156

  30. Chukuka ES, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, Harkness EE, Sanford LE, Woodruff LD (2004) The efficacy of low power laser in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg 22:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cotler HB, Chow RT, Hamblin MR, Carroll J (2015) The use of low level laser therapy (LLLT) for musculoskeletal pain. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol 2:00068

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chow R, Yan W, Armati P (2012) Electrophysiological effects of single point transcutaneous 650 and 808 nm laser irradiation of rat sciatic nerve: a study of relevance for low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture. Photomed Laser Surg 30:530–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Amir Mansour Shirani and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Mansour Shirani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by University (Research code was 23810201951020) by considering Ethic codes in Human Studies (1400–04-14–2-746).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Amir Mansour Shirani has a fellowship of laser dentistry from RWTH Aachen University.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi, M., Shirani, A.M., Farhad, S.Z. et al. Comparison of 660-nm low-level and defocused 810-nm high-power laser for treatment of herpes labialis. Laser Dent Sci 6, 211–218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-022-00164-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-022-00164-z

Keywords

Navigation