Abstract
Purpose
Laser therapy has been studied as a treatment for herpes labialis for some years. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 660-nm low-level laser to defocused 810-nm high-power laser for treatment of herpes labialis.
Methods
In this single-blinded clinical trial study, evaluated 32 patients with herpes labialis in prodromic and early vesicle phase (first 48 h) were divided into two same groups by inclusion-extrusion criteria consideration and ethic codes. For group A low-level 660-nm diode laser (6 J/cm2, 100 mW, 0 Hz, 60 s, near contact, focal point of laser unit was 1 cm2) and for group B high-power defocused 810-nm diode laser (2 W, CW, 300-µ fiber, at 0.5-cm distance, 60 s, screening method from the center toward outer for 1-cm2 area) were used. Pain score changes, time of pain relief, lesion size changes, time of clinical healing, recurrence rate within 6 months, and the recurrence interval were recorded. Data were analyzed using the t-test, Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney test, and ANOVA.
Results
The pain intensity significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.001) with no significant difference between them (P = 0.14). The time of pain relief was significantly shorter in group B (P = 0.003). The difference for the size of the lesion (P = 0.6) and time of clinical healing (P = 0.21) were not significant. The reduction in frequency of recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.55). The mean recurrence interval was significantly longer in group B (P = 0.002).
Conclusion
Two treatment methods had similar effects, but the defocused 810-nm high-power laser had better efficacy for shorter time of pain relief and longer recurrence interval in treatment of herpes labialis in this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cernik C, Gallina K, Brodell RT (2008) The treatment of herpes simplex infections: an evidence-based review. Arch Intern Med 168:1137–1144
Miller CS, Redding SW (1992) Diagnosis and management of orofacial herpes simplex virus infections. Dent Clin North Am 36:879–895
George J, Galasso GJ, Whitley RJ, Merigan TC (2000) Antiviral agents and viral diseases of man. Raven Press, New York, pp 305–384
Ramchandani M, Kong M, Tronstein E, Selke S, Mikhaylova A, Magaret A, Huang ML, Johnston C, Corey L, Wald A (2016) Herpes simplex virus type 1 shedding in tears, and nasal and oral mucosa of healthy adults. Sex Transm Dis 43:756–760
Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Chi AC (2019) Color atlas of oral and maxillofacial diseases. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 142–147
Vinters HV, Wang R, Wiley CA (1993) Herpesviruses in chronic encephalitis associated with intractable childhood epilepsy. Hum Pathol 24:871–879
Winston DJ, Yeager AM, Chandrasekar PH, Snydman DR, Petersen FB, Territo MC (2003) Valacyclovir Cytomegalovirus Study Group. Randomized comparison of oral valacyclovir and intravenous ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 36:749–758
Bond PA (1993) A role for herpes simplex virus in the aetiology of chronic fatigue syndrome and related disorders. Med Hypotheses 40:301–308
Hedner E, Vahlne A, Kahnberg KE, Hirsch JM (1993) Reactivated herpes simplex virus infection as a possible cause of dry socket after tooth extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:370–376
Wat PJ, Strickler JG, Myers JL, Nordstrom MR (1994) Herpes simplex infection causing acute necrotizing tonsillitis. Mayo Clin Proc 69:269–271
Glick M (2015) Burket’s oral medicine. PMPH USA, pp 58–62
Griffin K (2020) What is the best treatment for herpes labialis? Evidence-Based Practice 23:11–12
Young TB, Rimm EB, D’alessio DJ (1988) Cross-sectional study of recurrent herpes labialis: prevalence and risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 127:612–625
de Paula Eduardo C, Aranha ACC, Simões A, Bello-Silva MS, Ramalho KM, Esteves-Oliveira M, de Freitas PM, Marotti J, Tunér J (2014) Laser treatment of recurrent herpes labialis: a literature review. Lasers Med Sci 29:1517–1529
Tunér J, Hode L (2014) The laser therapy handbook. Prima Books AB; Grängesberg, pp 150–153
Dougal G, Lee SY (2013) Evaluation of the efficacy of low-level light therapy using 1072 nm infrared light for the treatment of herpes simplex labialis. Clin Exp Dermatol 38:713–718
Simunovic Z (2012) Herpes virus infection low level laser therapy (LLLT)-photobiostimulation applied as monotherapy in treatment of human pathogen Herpes virus. Laser Med 1:1–2
Sanchez PJM, Capote Femenías JL, Díaz Tejeda A, Tunér J (2012) The effect of 670-nm low laser therapy on herpes simplex type 1. Photomed Laser Surg 30:37–40
de Carvalho RR, de Paula EF, Ramalho KM, Antunes JL, Bezinelli LM, de Magalhães MH, Pegoretti T, de Freitas PM, de Paula EC (2010) Effect of laser phototherapy on recurring herpes labialis prevention: an in vivo study. Lasers Med Sci 25:397–402
Marotti J, Sperandio FF, Fregnani ER, Aranha AC, de Freitas PM, de Paula EC (2010) High-intensity laser and photodynamic therapy as a treatment for recurrent herpes labialis. Photomed Laser Surg 28:439–444
Bello-Silva MS, de Freitas PM, Aranha AC, Lage-Marques JL, Simoes A, de Paula EC (2010) Low-and high-intensity lasers in the treatment of herpes simplex virus 1 infection. Photomed Laser Surg 28:135–139
Donnarumma G, De Gregorio V, Fusco A, Farina E, Baroni A, Esposito V, Contaldo M, Petruzzi M, Pannone G, Serpico R (2010) Inhibition of HSV-1 replication by laser diode-irradiation: possible mechanism of action. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 23:1167–1176
Schindl A, Neumann R (1999) Low-intensity laser therapy is an effective treatment for recurrent herpes simplex infection. Results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Invest Dermatol 113:221–223
Ferreira DC, Reis HL, Cavalcante FS, Santos KR, Passos MR (2011) Recurrent herpes simplex infections: laser therapy as a potential tool for long-term successful treatment. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 44:397–399
Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, Harkness EE, Harkness LE, Woodruff LD (2004) The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg 22:323–329
Honarmand M, Farhadmollashahi L, Vosoughirahbar E (2017) Comparing the effect of diode laser against acyclovir cream for the treatment of herpes labialis. J Clin Exp Dent 9:e729-732
Hamed GY, Khudhur AS, Alshamaa ZA (2017) Effectiveness of low level diode laser (1064) and acyclovir in treatment of recurrent herpes labialis. (Comparative clinical study). Al-Rafidain Dental Journal 17:23–31
Al-Maweri SA, Kalakonda B, AlAizari NA, Al-Soneidar W (2018) Efficacy of low level laser therapy in management of recurrent herpes labialis: a systematic review. Laser Med Sci 33:1423–1430
Bradley P, Tuner J (2007) Laser phototherapy in dentistry. In: Gutknecht N et al (eds) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop of Evidence Based Dentistry on Lasers in Dentistry. Quintessence, Surrey, UK, pp 156
Chukuka ES, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, Harkness EE, Sanford LE, Woodruff LD (2004) The efficacy of low power laser in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg 22:323–329
Cotler HB, Chow RT, Hamblin MR, Carroll J (2015) The use of low level laser therapy (LLLT) for musculoskeletal pain. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol 2:00068
Chow R, Yan W, Armati P (2012) Electrophysiological effects of single point transcutaneous 650 and 808 nm laser irradiation of rat sciatic nerve: a study of relevance for low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture. Photomed Laser Surg 30:530–535
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Amir Mansour Shirani and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was approved by University (Research code was 23810201951020) by considering Ethic codes in Human Studies (1400–04-14–2-746).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Amir Mansour Shirani has a fellowship of laser dentistry from RWTH Aachen University.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmadi, M., Shirani, A.M., Farhad, S.Z. et al. Comparison of 660-nm low-level and defocused 810-nm high-power laser for treatment of herpes labialis. Laser Dent Sci 6, 211–218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-022-00164-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-022-00164-z