Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of duration of Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching on dentin morphology: an in vitro study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Dental Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different durations of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on dentin morphology using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Materials and methods

Twenty-five extracted human-impacted permanent third molars were cut below the occlusal pit and fissure level, perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth. An occlusal area measuring 5 mm in length and 5 mm in width was prepared on each tooth for laser irradiation. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups for different durations of laser irradiation: T1, 5 s; T2, 10 s; T3, 20 s; T4, 40 s; T0, no laser irradiation. The effects of laser application on dentin surfaces were evaluated using SEM at × 80 and × 500 magnifications. Also, the presence/absence of smear layer was scored according to SEM findings. Score 0 indicated the absence and score 1 indicated the presence of smear layer.

Results

Forty seconds of irradiation resulted in an irregular dentin surface without smear layer, with open dentinal tubules and without enlargement.

Conclusion

Laser preparation of dentin creates a retentive surface for composite restoration, without the problems caused by smear layer after conventional preparation. Also, the disadvantages of acid etching can be avoided as such.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shahabi S, Chiniforoush N, Bahramian H, Monzavi A, Baghalian A, Kharazifard M (2012) Comparison of tensile bond strength of composite to dentin in conventional or laser-prepared cavities (Er;Cr:YSGG). J Oral Laser Appl 10:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hibst R (2002) Laser for caries removal and cavity preparation: state of the art and future directions. J Oral Laser Appl 2(4):202–212

    Google Scholar 

  3. Valian A, Salehi E (2013) Fundamentals of operative dentistry Summitt’s. In: Hilton T. pp 434–435

  4. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2011) State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27:1–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A (1967) A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol 12:1615–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fusayama T (1980) New concepts in operative dentistry. Quintessence, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eghbali F (2012) Craig’s restorative dental materials. In: Ronald A, John M. pp 332–333

  8. Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW (2010) A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater 26(2):e11–e16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perdigao J (2007) New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin N Am 51(2):333–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Tjäderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2011) Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res 90:953–968

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E (2008) Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 24:90–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Araújo E, Bruggmann T, Zucco J, Oliveira G (2011) Effect of dentin age and acid etching time on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 13:139–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ergücü Z, Çelik EU, Ünlü N, Türkün M, Özer F (2009) Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the microtensile bond strength of two different adhesives to the sound and caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 34(4):460–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beer F, Buchmair A, Körpert W, Marvastian L, Wernisch J, Moritz A (2012) Morphology of resin–dentin interfaces after Er,Cr:YSGG laser and acid etching preparation and application of different bonding systems. Lasers Med Sci 27:835–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee BS, Lin PY, Chen MH, Hsieh TT, Lin CP, Lai JY, Lan WH (2007) Tensile bond strength of Er, Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin–resin interface. Dent Mat 23:570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eghbali F (2009) Low level or theraputic lasers. In: Fekrazad R (ed) Applying low level laser therapy in dentistry. Tehran: Shayan Nemoodar 44–45:19–20

  17. Van As G (2004) Erbium lasers in dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 48:1017–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ekworapoj P, Sidhu SK, McCabe JF (2007) Effect of different power parameters of Er, Cr:YSGG laser on human dentine. Laser Med Sci 22:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benderli Y, Gökçe M, Kazak M, Gürsoy T (2013) SEM comparison of acid etching, ER,CR:YSGG laser and combined treatment on dentin surfaces. Balk J Stom 17:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramos ACB, Esteves-Oliveira M, Arana-Chavez VE, et al (2008) Adhesives bonded to erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser-irradiated dentin: transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and tensile bond strength analysis. J Lasers Med Sci 25:181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shahabi S, Chiniforoush N, Fekrazad R, Fatemi SM (2010) Comparison of tensile bond strength of composite to dentin in conventional or laser-prepared cavities (Er;Cr:YSGG). J Oral Laser Appl 10:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  22. Keller U, Hibst R (1989) Experimental studies of the application of Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 9(4):345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H (1998) Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 77:1404–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schoop U, Kluger W, Moritz A, Nedjelik N, Georgopoulos A, Sperr W (2004) Bacterial effect of different laser systems in deep layers of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 35(2):111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Niu W, Eto J, Kimura Y, Takeda FH, Matsumoto K (1998) A study of microleakage after resin filling of class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16(4):227–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tachibana A, Marques MM, Soler JMP, Matos AB (2008) Erbium, chromium:yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser for caries removal: influence on bonding of a self-etching adhesive system. Lasers Med Sci 23:435–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Akhoundan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article was done on extracted human third molars, and it does not include any human participant. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahdisiar, F., Mirzaei, A., Fallah, A. et al. Effect of duration of Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching on dentin morphology: an in vitro study. Laser Dent Sci 2, 213–219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-018-0038-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-018-0038-z

Keywords

Navigation