Abstract
The pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles produced in the asymmetric collision systems p+Al, p+Au and \(^3\)He+Au at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 200\) GeV are evaluated in the framework of a fireball model with Tsallis thermodynamics. The fireball model assumes that the experimentally measured particles are produced by fireballs following the Tsallis distribution and it can effectively describe the experimental data. Our results as well as previous results for d+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 200\) GeV and p+Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 5.02\) TeV validate that the fireball model based on Tsallis thermodynamics can provide a universal framework for pseudo-rapidity distribution of the charged particles produced in asymmetric collision systems. We predict the centrality dependence of the total charged particle multiplicity in the p+Al, p+Au and \(^3\)He+Au collisions. Additionally, the dependences of the fireball model parameters (\(y_{0a}\), \(y_{0A}\), \(\sigma _{a}\) and \(\sigma _{A}\)) on the centrality and system size are studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
High-energy heavy-ion collisions provide a unique way to understand the origin of the universe. However, their processes cannot be directly observed in experiments. We can only study the collision process indirectly by analyzing the properties of the final particles produced in the collisions. The pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles is one of the important experimental observables. The study of this observable could lead to a better understanding of the properties of the particles produced in the collisions, the particle production mechanism and so on. There have been numerous works in previous studies using different models, such as HIJING [1], AMPT [2,3,4], EPOS-LHC [5], a multi-source thermal model [6, 7], a new revised Landau hydrodynamics model [8], a 1 + 1-dimensional hydrodynamics model [9, 10], a dynamical initial state model coupled to (3 + 1)D viscous relativistic hydrodynamics [11] and so on, to analyze the existing experimental data of pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Although these models are based on different physical ideas, valuable physical information on the collision process has been extracted and learned.
Recently, a fireball model based on Tsallis thermodynamics was utilized to analyze the pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles measured in high-energy heavy-ion collisions [31,32,33]. In our previous works [32, 33], we used the fireball model to study the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles produced in p+p(\(\overline{\textrm{p}}\)) collisions for energies ranging from \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}\) = 23.6 GeV to 13 TeV and A+A collisions at the RHIC and LHC and extended the fireball model to the asymmetric collision systems, i.e., d+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 200\) GeV and p+Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 5.02\) TeV, by considering the asymmetric collision geometry configuration. In this paper, we utilize recently published data from the PHINEX Collaboration [30] at RHIC to systematically study the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles produced in asymmetric collision systems, including p+Al, p+Au and \(^3\)He+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 200\) GeV. We also predict the total multiplicities of the charged particles from the fireball model and study their centrality dependence. Further, we analyze the centrality and system size dependencies of the fireball model parameters obtained from the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, the fireball model with Tsallis thermodynamics is briefly introduced. In Sect. 3, the fitting results of the fireball model and the total charged particle multiplicities extracted from the fireball model are shown. The dependences of the model parameters on the centrality and size of the collision systems are also presented. A brief conclusion is drawn in Sect. 4.
2 Theoretical descriptions
In the self-consistent Tsallis thermodynamics, the Tsallis distribution is proposed as a generalization of the Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution [34]. To describe the transverse momentum spectrum of particles, the Tsallis distribution is written as [31,32,33]
where g is the particle state degeneracy, V is the volume, \(m_\text{T}=\sqrt{m^{2}_{0}+p_\text{T}^{2}}\) is the transverse mass and \(m_{0}\) is the particle rest mass, y is the rapidity, q is the entropic factor, which measures the non-additivity of the entropy [34, 35], \(\mu\) is the chemical potential and T is the temperature. The Boltzmann distribution is recovered when \(q=1\). We take \(\mu =0\) because the multiplicities of \(\pi ^+\) and \(\pi ^-\) are equal and they are the majority of particles produced in the collision systems considered. For the middle rapidity \(y\approx 0\), Eq. (1) can be rewritten as
The parameters q and T are extracted from the experimental transverse momentum spectrum of the particles.
In the fireball model with Tsallis thermodynamics [31,32,33], the particles measured in the experiment were produced by fireballs following Tsallis distribution Eq. (1). The density distribution of these fireballs in the rapidity space is \(\nu (y_\text{f})\), where \(y_\text{f}\) is the rapidity of the fireball. Therefore the transverse momentum spectrum of particles can be written as
where N is the total particle multiplicity and A is the normalization constant such that
Sometimes, the experimental data are measured in the pseudo-rapidity \(\eta\) space. To describe the experimental data \(\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}\eta }\), we substitute the relation between rapidity and pseudo-rapidity [36]
into Eq. (3) and integrate the transverse momentum in the equation to obtain [32, 33]
where
Because of the term of \(\sqrt{1-\frac{m_0^2}{m_\text{T}^2 \cosh ^2 y}}\), Eq. (6) cannot be analytically integrated over \(p_\text{T}\) and it is done numerically.
In this paper the asymmetric collision systems are studied, and the distribution \(\nu (y_\text{f})\) is assumed to be the sum of two asymmetric q-Gaussian functions [33],
where \(y_{0a(A)}\) and \(\sigma _{a(A)}\) are the centroid position and width of the fireball distribution in the direction of the light (heavy) nucleus beam, respectively. The normalization of Eq. (8) is handled by the normalization constant A in Eq. (3). x is the parameter to characterize the extent of asymmetry, which was first proposed in our previous work [33]. In this work, we take \(q'=q\) as in [31,32,33]. A representative figure of Eq. (8) is shown in Appendix 1 with the parameters obtained for the p+Al collisions at 0-5% centrality and \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV.
3 Results and discussion
Because the data of the transverse momentum spectra of the charged particles produced in p+Al, p+Au and \(^{3}\)He+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV have not been released yet, the data of the transverse momentum spectra of \(\pi ^0\) produced from these collisions are obtained from [37] in this study. Using Eq. (2) by taking \(g=1\) and V as a free parameter, the parameters T and q for the Tsallis distribution are extracted and listed in Table 2 in Appendix 2. A representative figure of the transverse momentum spectra of \(\pi ^0\) for p+Al collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\)GeV is shown in Appendix 3. It is worth noting that the transverse momentum spectrum of \(\pi ^0\) is very similar to that of \(\pi ^\pm\) at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV for a given collision centrality, and the temperature parameter T extracted from \(\pi ^0\) should reasonably characterize the property of the collision system. We take the parameters T and q from the closest centrality when the centrality of the particle transverse momentum spectrum and centrality of the charged particle pseudo-rapidity distribution are not the same. These two parameters and the fireball model with Tsallis thermodynamics, Eqs. (6) and (8), are then utilized to study the pseudo-rapidity distribution of the charged particles produced in the collisions. The corresponding values of x in Eq. (8) are also listed in Table 3 in Appendix 2.
In Figs. 1, 2 and 3, the results of the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles from the fireball model with Tsallis thermodynamics for different centrality bins in p+Al, p+Au and \(^3\)He+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV are shown. The fireball model effectively describes the experimental data within the errors. Notably, the data quality of the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles is not as good as that for the d+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV shown in [33], i.e., in terms of larger errors, a fewer number of data points as well as a lower pseudo-rapidity coverage, which leads to larger uncertainties to the fireball model parameters and affects our analyses of the fireball model parameters versus collision centrality and the collision system size to some extent later in the following. The pseudo-rapidity distribution of the charged particles for centrality 5–10% is lower than the case for centrality 10–20% in some pseudo-rapidity regions for the \(^3\)He+Au collisions, which is observed in Fig. 3. A larger x at centrality 5–10% compared with the others for the \(^3\)He+Au collisions is also observed in Table 3 in Appendix 2. We emphasize that the same fitting protocol is applied for all the pseudo-rapidity distribution data of the charged particles. Because the collision system is asymmetric, the pseudo-rapidity distribution of the charged particles has significant forward/backward asymmetry. Fewer particles are produced in the direction of the light nucleus (p, \(^3\)He) beam compared to the heavy nucleus (Al, Au) beam. As the d+Au collision system at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV and the p+Pb collision system at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=5.02\) TeV we studied in [33], the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles produced by these collision systems also become more symmetric from the central to peripheral collisions. This is because the peripheral collisions for asymmetric collision systems are more similar to the symmetric p+p collisions according to collision geometry.
We then evaluate the centrality dependence of the total multiplicities of the charged particles produced in these collision systems. Integrating Eq. (6) over the \(\eta \in [-10, 10]\) we obtain the total multiplicity of the charged particles for each centrality from the fireball model. Because the corresponding experimental data are not yet available, we only analyze the results extracted from the fireball model and treat them as predictions. Figure 4 shows the total multiplicities of the charged particles calculated from the fireball model versus the collision centrality c. \(c=0\) represents the most central collisions, and \(c=1\) represents the most peripheral collisions. It can be observed that the fitting function taken from [14] can effectively describe the centrality dependence of the total multiplicities of the charged particles. As the centrality changes from the central to peripheral collisions, fewer charged particles are produced.
We also analyze both the centrality and system size dependence of the parameters (\(y_{0a}\), \(y_{0A}\), \(\sigma _{a}\) and \(\sigma _{A}\)) of the fireball model. In Fig. 5 the dependence of the fireball model parameters on the collision centrality in the p+Al, p+Au and \(^3\)He+Au collisions at\(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV is shown. Inspired by the linear relation of the centrality dependence of the fireball model parameters for d+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 200\) GeV and p+Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}} = 5.02\) TeV shown in Fig. 12 of our previous work [33], the linear fittings are performed to guide the eyes in Fig. 5 and the fitting functions are listed in Table 1. The negative and positive slopes of the linear fittings for the fireball model parameters \((y_{0a}, y_{0A}\) and \(\sigma _A)\) versus centrality are similar to those of the d+Au and p+Pb collisions in [33]. In the following discussion, the results for d+Au and p+Pb are obtained from [33]. It can be observed that the slopes of the linear fittings for parameter \(y_{0a}\) versus centrality are positive and the corresponding slopes of the linear fittings for parameter \(y_{0A}\) versus centrality are negative for the p+Al, p+Au and d+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV. However, the slopes of the linear fittings for parameters \((y_{0a}, y_{0A})\) reverse the signs, respectively, for the \(^{3}\)He+Au collision at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV compared to the above-mentioned cases. The slopes of the linear fittings for parameters \((y_{0a}, y_{0A})\) are positive for p+Pb at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=5.02\) TeV. It can also be observed that there is a universal trend with increasing centrality for parameter \(\sigma _{a(A)}\) except the lightest collision system p+Al, i.e., \(\sigma _a\) increases with increasing centrality in the direction of the light nucleus beam and \(\sigma _A\) decreases with increasing centrality in the direction of the heavy nucleus beam. In the p+Al collision system, \(\sigma _a\) and \(\sigma _A\) have opposite trends with increasing centrality to their counterparts in the other collision systems. These different patterns indicate the complex dynamics in the asymmetric collisions relevant to the combinations of the projectile and target as well as the collision energy, which needs more investigations.
Figure 6 shows the collision system size dependence of the fireball model parameters at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV. For collision systems other than p+p, the parameters of the most central collisions are considered. In the p+p and Au+Au collisions, the parameters \(y_{0a}=y_{0A}=y_0\), \(\sigma _{a}=\sigma _{A}=\sigma\), where \(y_0\) and \(\sigma\) are the rapidity centroid and width of fireball distribution in the symmetric collision system, as detailed in [33]. It can be deduced that when the light nucleus is p, \(y_{0a}\) decreases as the size of the heavy nucleus increases, whereas \(y_{0A}\) shows the opposite trend. This indicates that a larger heavy nucleus has stronger stopping power for p. When the heavy nucleus is Au, \(y_{0a}\) increases as the size of the light nucleus increases, whereas \(y_{0A}\) shows the opposite trend. This means that a larger light nucleus is more difficult to stop by Au but has a stronger stopping power for Au. For parameters \(\sigma _a\) and \(\sigma _A\), no conclusive patterns are observed. We expect that more discussions can be added when the data quality of the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles is improved by experimentalists. These phenomena manifest the complex dynamics in the asymmetric collisions.
4 Summary
In this paper, we studied the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles produced in p + Al, p + Au and \(^3\)He + Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV using the fireball model with Tsallis thermodynamics. The model can well fit the experimental data from the asymmetric collisions. We also extracted the total multiplicities of the charged particles from the fireball model as predictions and analyzed their dependence on collision centrality. Notably, the data quality of the pseudo-rapidity distributions of the charged particles produced in the p + Al, p + Au and \(^3\)He + Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV affected our results to some extent. Combining our previous results of d+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV and p+Pb collision at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=5.02\) TeV, we analyzed the centrality and system size dependence of the fireball model parameters (\(y_{0a}\), \(y_{0A}\), \(\sigma _{a}\) and \(\sigma _{A}\)). Interesting patterns were revealed, which indicated the complex dynamics in the asymmetric collisions. Our results confirmed the conclusion made previously in [33] that the fireball model with Tsallis thermodynamics as a universal framework could also describe the pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles produced in asymmetric collision systems.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Science Data Bank at https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.j00186.00293 and https://cstr.cn/31253.11.sciencedb.j00186.00293.
References
X.N. Wang, M. Gyulassy, HIJING: a Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp, pA, and AA collisions. Phys. Rev. D 44, 3501 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3501
Z.W. Lin, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li et al., Multiphase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064901
H. Wang, J.H. Chen, Y.G. Ma et al., Charm hadron azimuthal angular correlations in Au + Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 200 GeV from parton scatterings. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 30, 185 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0706-z
Z.W. Lin, L. Zheng, Further developments of a multi-phase transport model for relativistic nuclear collisions. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 113 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00944-5
T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J.M. Katzy et al., EPOS LHC: test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN large hadron collider. Phys. Rev. C 92, 034906 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034906
X.J. Sun, C.X. Tian, E.Q. Wang et al., Dependence of charged particle pseudorapidity distributions on centrality in Pb–Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 2.76 TeV. Chinese Phys. Lett. 30, 022501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/30/2/022501
B.C. Li, Y.Z. Wang, F.H. Liu et al., Particle production in relativistic \(pp(\overline{p})\) and \(AA\) collisions at RHIC and LHC energies with Tsallis statistics using the two-cylindrical multisource thermal model. Phys. Rev. D 89, 054014 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.054014
L.N. Gao, F.H. Liu, On pseudorapidity distribution and speed of sound in high energy heavy ion collisions based on a new revised Landau hydrodynamic model. Adv. High Energy Phys. 184713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/184713https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/184713
Z.J. Jiang, D.F. Xu, Y. Huang, A description of pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles produced in Au+Au collisions at RHIC energies. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 1369098 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1369098
Z.J. Jiang, H.P. Deng, Y. Huang, A universal description of pseudorapidity distributions in both nucleus-nucleus and p-p collisions at currently available energies. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 5308084 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5308084
W.B. Zhao, S. Ryu, C. Shen et al., 3D structure of anisotropic flow in small collision systems at energies available at the BNL relativistic heavy ion collider. Phys. Rev. C 107, 014904 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014904
E. Abbas, B. Abelev, J. Adam et al., (ALICE Collaboration), Centrality dependence of the pseudorapidity density distribution for charged particles in Pb–Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 726, 610 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.022
J. Adam, D. Adamova, M.M. Aggarwal et al., (ALICE Collaboration), Centrality evolution of the charged-particle pseudorapidity density over a broad pseudorapidity range in Pb-Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 754, 373 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.082
J. Adam, D. Adamova, M.M. Aggarwal et al., (ALICE Collaboration), Centrality dependence of the pseudorapidity density distribution for charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 772, 567 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.017
S. Acharya, F. Torales-Acosta, D. Adamova et al., (ALICE Collaboration), Centrality and pseudorapidity dependence of the charged-particle multiplicity density in Xe-Xe collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 5.44 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 790, 35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.048
G. J. Alner, et al., (UA5 Collaboration), Scaling of pseudorapidity distributions at c.m. energies up to 0.9 TeV. Z. Phys. C 33, 1 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410446
B. Alver, B.B. Back, M.D. Baker et al., (PHOBOS Collaboration), Charged-particle multiplicity and pseudorapidity distributions measured with the PHOBOS detector in Au + Au, Cu + Cu, d + Au, and p + p collisions at ultrarelativistic energies. Phys. Rev. C 83, 024913 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.024913
K. Aamodt, et al., (ALICE Collaboration), Charged-particle multiplicity measurement in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}}\) = 0.9 and 2.36 TeV with ALICE at LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 68, 89 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1339-x
J. Adam, et al., (ALICE Collaboration), Charged-particle multiplicities in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}}\) = 0.9 to 8 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4571-1
J. Adam, D. Adamova, M.M. Aggarwal, (ALICE Collaboration) et al., Pseudorapidity and transverse-momentum distributions of charged particles in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 13 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 753, 319 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.030
F. Abe, D. Amidei, G. Apollinari et al., (CDF Collaboration), Pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles produced in \(\overline{p}p\) interactions as \(\sqrt{s}\) = 630 and 1800 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 41, 2330 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.41.2330
G. Arnison, G. Arnison, B. Aubert, (UA1 Collaboration) et al., Charged particle multiplicity distributions in proton-antiproton collisions at 540 GeV centre of mass energy. Phys. Lett. B 123, 108 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)90969-3
W. Thome, K. Eggert, K. Giboni, (Aachen-CERN-Heidelberg-Munich Collaboration) et al., Charged particle multiplicity distributions in pp collisions at ISR energies. Nucl. Phys. B 129, 365 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(77)90122-5
B.B. Back, M.D. Baker, D.S. Barton, (PHOBOS Collaboration) et al., Significance of the fragmentation region in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 052303 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.052303
B. Alver, B.B. Back, M.D. Baker, (PHOBOS Collaboration) et al., System size, energy, and centrality dependence of pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 142301 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.142301
B.B. Back, M.D. Baker, M. Ballintijn et al., (PHOBOS Collaboration), Charged-particle pseudorapidity distributions in Au+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}=62.4\) GeV. Phys. ReV. C 74, 021901(R) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.021901
B.B. Back, M.D. Baker, M. Ballintijn et al., (PHOBOS Collaboration), Scaling of charged particle production in d + Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}}\) = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 72, 031901(R) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.72.031901
G. Aad, et al., (ATALS Collaboration), Measurement of the centrality dependence of the charged-particle pseudorapidity distribution in proton-lead collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}}\) = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 199 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4002-3
V. Khachatryan, et al., (CMS Collaboration), Transverse-momentum and pseudorapidity distributions of charged hadrons in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}}\) = 0.9 and 2.36 TeV. J. High Energ. Phys. 2010, 41 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2010)041
A. Adare, C. Aidala, N.N. Ajitanand et al., Pseudorapidity dependence of particle production and elliptic flow in asymmetric nuclear collisions of p + Al, p + Au, and \(^3\)He + Au at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 222301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.222301
L. Marques, J. Cleymans, A. Deppman, Description of high-energy pp collisions using Tsallis thermodynamics: transverse momentum and rapidity distributions. Phys. Rev. D 91, 054025 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.054025
Y. Gao, H. Zheng, L.L. Zhu, A. Bonasera, Description of charged particle pseudorapidity distributions in Pb+Pb collisions with Tsallis thermodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 197 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12397-y
J.Q. Tao, M. Wang, H. Zheng et al., Pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles in pp(\(\overline{{\textbf{p} }}\)), p(d)A and AA collisions using Tsallis thermodynamics. J. Phys. G 48, 105102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac1393
C. Tsallis, Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429
G. Wilk, Z. Włodarczyk, Consequences of temperature fluctuations in observables measured in high-energy collisions. Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 161 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12161-y
C.Y. Wong, Introduction to High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994)
U.A. Acharya, A. Adare, C. Aidala, (PHENIX Collaboration) et al., Systematic study of nuclear effects in p + Al, p + Au, d + Au, and \(^3\)He + Au collision at \(\sqrt{s_{{\rm NN}}}\) = 200 GeV using \(\pi ^0\) production. Phys. Rev. C 105, 064902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064902
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Jun-Qi Tao, Hong-Bin He, Hua Zheng, Wen-Chao Zhang, Xing-Quan Liu, Li-Lin Zhu and Aldo Bonasera. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jun-Qi Tao and Hua Zheng, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11905120, 11947416), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (No. 2023NSFSC1322), the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (No. 2023-JC-YB-012), the United States Department of Energy (# DE-FG02-93ER40773) and the NNSA (No. DENA0003841 (CENTAUR)).
Appendices
Appendix 1: Fireball distribution of Eq. (8)
A representative figure of the fireball distribution of Eq. (8) using the parameters obtained for the p+Al collisions at 0–5% centrality and \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV is shown in Fig. 7.
Appendix 2: Parameters q, T and x
The parameters of q and T extracted by fitting the transverse momentum spectrum of particles [37] with Tsallis distribution Eq. (2) as well as parameter x in Eq. (8) are listed in Tables 2 and 3.
Appendix 3: The particle spectra fit
Using Eq. (2), the fitting figure of the transverse momentum spectra of \(\pi ^0\) produced in the p+Al collisions at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV is shown in Fig. 8. Similar results are obtained for the p+Au and \(^3\)He+Au collision systems at \(\sqrt{s_\text {NN}}=200\) GeV.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tao, JQ., He, HB., Zheng, H. et al. Pseudo-rapidity distributions of charged particles in asymmetric collisions using Tsallis thermodynamics. NUCL SCI TECH 34, 172 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01334-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01334-9