Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of spatio-temporal variability of the seismic signal on the dynamic pressure behind retaining walls

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To obtain correctly, design of the structures under seismic loads, the methods of equivalent static and dynamic analyses are usually used. The assessment of the response of entire system soil-structure under seismic load is a fundamental step to anticipate losses and help to mitigate it. Some methods of the design of retaining walls under seismic loads require the knowledge of the maximum acceleration of seismic signal. The present work discusses these methods and a comparison with detailed analysis. Three configurations of a retaining wall at different heights were considered under seismic loading: 10 signals from the 2003 Boumerdes earthquake and the 1999 Ain-Témouchent earthquake (in Algeria). Then it was assessed the dynamic thrust forces given by the approximate methods for maximum acceleration of the considered earthquakes. The approximate methods used are the pseudo-static method, the method of Seed and Whitman, the approach given in the Algerian seismic code RPA99 and the Mononobe–Okabe method. The results show that the integration of time history of seismic loading to evaluate the dynamic active earth pressure behind retaining walls is very important and can transmit higher values than the seismic force calculated by the simplified methods. This demonstrates that an earthquake cannot be considered only by its maximum acceleration and to properly design the retaining structures, the developed energy during an earthquake must be taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bourdim SMA, Chekroun L, Benanane A, Bourdim A (2018) Treatment of a landslide by using piles system, case study of the East-West Highway of Algeria. In: Abdoun T, Elfass S (eds) Soil dynamics and soil-structure interaction for resilient infrastructure. Sustainable civil infrastructures. Springer, Cham, pp 16–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. AbbaszadehShahri A, Esfandiyari B, Hamzeloo H (2010) Evaluation of a nonlinear seismic geotechnical site response analysis method subjected to earthquake vibrations (case study: Kerman Province, Iran). Arab J Geosci 4:1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-009-0120-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aliazad S, Yasrobi S, Pak A (2008) Seismic active pressure distribution history behind rigid retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(5):365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ministry of Housing of Algeria (2003) "Règlement parasismique Algérien -RPA99- version 2003", DTR B C 2–48. (In French).

  5. Okabe S (1924) General theory on earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining walls and dams. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng 10(6):1277–1323

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mononobe N, Matsuo M (1932) Experimental investigation of lateral earth pressure during earthquakes. Earthquake Research Institute and Research Office of Public Works, pp 884–902

  7. Mononobe N, Matsuo O (1929) On the determination of earth pressure during earthquakes. In: Proceeding of the world engineering congress, Vol 9, Tokyo, pp 179–187

  8. Heyman J (1997) Coulomb’s memoir on statics: an essay in the history of civil engineering. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Saran S, Prakash S (1968) Dimensionless parameters for static and dynamic earth pressures behind retaining walls. Indian Geotech J 7(3):295–310

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saran S, Gupta RP (2003) Seismic earth pressures behind retaining walls. Indian Geotech J 33(3):195–213

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shukla SJ, Gupta SK, Sivakugan N (2009) Active earth pressure on retaining wall for c–φ soil backfill under seismic loading conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(5):690–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huntington WC (1957) Earth pressures and retaining walls. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iskander M, Chen Z, Omidvar M, Guzman I, Elsherif O (2013) Active static and seismic earth pressure for c–φ soils. Soils Found 53(5):639–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choudhury D, Nimbalkar S (2006) Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall. Geotech Geol Eng 24:1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-1134-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choudhury D, Subba Rao KS (2002) Seismic passive resistance in soils for negative wall friction. Can Geotech J 39(4):971–981. https://doi.org/10.1139/T02-023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Subba Rao KS, Nayak S, Choudhury D (2004) Determination of displacement-related passive earth pressure. Geotech Eng 35(2):79–85

    Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Homoud AS, Whitman RV (1994) Comparison between FE prediction and results from dynamic centrifuge tests on tilting gravity walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(323):259–268

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gazetas G, Sarropoulos PN, Anastasapoulos I, Gerolymos N (2004) Soil behavior of flexible retaining systems subjected to short-duration moderately strong excitation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:537–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Psarropoulos PN, Klonaris G, Gazetas G (2005) Seismic earth pressures on rigid and flexible earth retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:795–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Madabhushi SPG, Zeng X (2007) Simulating seismic response of cantilever retaining walls. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 133(5):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tiznado JC, Rodriguez-Roa F (2011) Seismic lateral movement prediction for gravity retaining walls on granular soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:391–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sitar N, Mikola R, Candia G (2012) Seismically induced lateral earth pressure on retaining structures and basement walls. In: Proceedings of GSP no. 226, pp 335–358

  23. Anderson DG, Martin GR, Lam IP, Wang JN (2008) Seismic design and analysis of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes and embankments. NCHRP Report 611. Transportation research board, National cooperative highway research program, Washington DC

  24. Iskander M, Omidvar M, Elsherif O (2012) Conjugate stress approach for Rankine seismic active earth pressure in cohesionless soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(7):1205–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Costet J, Sanglerat G (1969) Cours pratique de mécanique des sols. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robert WD (2002) Geotechnical earthquake engineering handbook. Mc-Graw Hill Book Company, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Choudhury D, Chatterjee S (2006) Dynamic active earth pressure on retaining structures. Sadhana 31:721–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cakir T (2017) Assessment of effect of material properties on seismic response of a cantilever wall. Geomech Eng 13(4):601–619

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brinkgereve RBJ, Vermeer PA (2003) PLAXIS Version 8, Scientific manual. Delft University of Technology, Pays-Bas, PLAXIS BV

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brinkgereve RBJ, Vermeer PA (2003) PLAXIS Version 8, Dynamics manual. Delft University of Technology, Pays-Bas, PLAXIS BV

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bourdim SMA, Boumechra N, Djedid A (2016) Numerical model calibration, case of dynamic behavior of a soil-retaining wall system. J Mater Environ Sci 7(3):1048–1055

    Google Scholar 

  32. Belghit A, Bourdim SMA, Benanane A, Bouhamou N (2020) Study of slope stability using piles pathological case in Mostaganem, Algeria. In: Pinto P, Ou CY, Shehata H (eds) Innovative solutions for deep foundations and retaining structures. GeoMEast 2019. Sustainable civil infrastructures. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  33. S.M.A. Bourdim and Y. Zelmate (2016) Earthquake analysis of an old minaret under real and synthetic accelerograms. Cinpar2016: XII International conference on structural repair and rehabilitation, 26–29 October 2016, Porto, Portugal

  34. Bourdim SMA, Hamdaoui K, Marcellini A (2013) Diagnosis and seismic analysis of the Mansourah minaret in Tlemcen, Algeria. Int J Civil Eng Res 4(2):153–175

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hamdaoui K, Benadla Z (2014) Dynamic analysis of a historical monument: retrofit using shape memory alloy wires. Smart Struct Syst 13(3):375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. EsmaeilAbadi R, AbasszadehShahri A, Behzadafshar K (2015) Frequency content analysis of the probable earthquake in Kopet Dagh region—Northeast of Iran. Arab J Geosci 8:3833–3844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1446-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Laouami N, Slimani A, Bouhadad Y, Chatelain J, Nour A (2006) Evidence for fault-related directionality and localized site effects from strong motion recordings of the 2003 Boumerdes (Algeria) earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(11):991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Esmaeilabadi R, AbbaszadehShahri A (2016) Prediction of site response spectrum under earthquake vibration using an optimized developed artificial neural network model. Adv Sci Technol Res J 10(30):76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Asheghi R, Abbas Hosseini S, Mojtaba S, AbbaszadehShahri A (2020) Updating the neural network sediment load models using different sensitivity analysis methods: a regional application. J Hydroinf 22(3):562–577. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Materials and Construction Processes, Civil Engineering Department, University Abdelhamid Ibn Badis of Mostaganem, Mostaganem, Algeria

    Sidi Mohammed El-Amine Bourdim

  2. EOLE Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University Abou Bekr Belkaid of Tlemcen, Tlemcen, Algeria

    Nadir Boumechra & Abdelkader Djedid

  3. RISCO, Civil Engineering Department, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Hugo Rodrigues

Authors
  1. Sidi Mohammed El-Amine Bourdim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadir Boumechra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdelkader Djedid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hugo Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sidi Mohammed El-Amine Bourdim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bourdim, S.M.EA., Boumechra, N., Djedid, A. et al. Effect of spatio-temporal variability of the seismic signal on the dynamic pressure behind retaining walls. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00626-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00626-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation