Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Potential of dolomite industrial waste as construction material: a review

  • State-of-the-art paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction industries consume a large part of the natural resources in the production of concrete. Utilization of the waste in concrete has gained interest due to the development in the construction structure and depletion of natural resources. This article reviews the utilization of dolomite industrial waste in sustainable concrete production. Dolomite industrial waste is a by-product of the dolomite industries generated during the production of dolomite mineral. This paper provides the effect of dolomite waste on various properties (fresh, mechanical, and durability) of concrete, analyzes the crucial findings of dolomite waste based on the partial replacement of cement and aggregate, and discusses its suitability as a construction material. Available research studies showed the dominant potential of dolomite quarry waste as cement and aggregate replacement. In the current article, a large number of research papers have been reviewed. The finding of the different studies showed that using the dolomite waste as cement and aggregate up to certain extent increases the mechanical properties of concrete and influences the durability properties, but simultaneously decreases the workability of concrete. This paper suggests using dolomite waste as partial substitute of cement and aggregate for cleaner production of concrete.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Jabri KS, Hisada M, Al-Saidy AH, Al-Oraimi SK (2009) Performance of high strength concrete made with copper slag as a fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater 23(6):2132–2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dabhade AN, Choudhari SR, Gajbhiye AR (2012) Performance evaluation of recycled aggregate used in concrete. Int J Eng Res Appl 2(4):1387–1391

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrew RM (2018) Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst Sci Data 10(1):195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Imbabi MS, Carrigan C, McKenna S (2012) Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int J Sustain Built Environ 1(2):194–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mo L, Panesar DK (2013) Accelerated carbonation–a potential approach to sequester CO2 in cement paste containing slag and reactive MgO. Cement Concr Compos 43:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oh DY, Noguchi T, Kitagaki R, Park WJ (2014) CO2 emission reduction by reuse of building material waste in the Japanese cement industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:796–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Häfliger IF, John V, Passer A, Lasvaux S, Hoxha E, Saade MRM, Habert G (2017) Buildings environmental impacts’ sensitivity related to lca modelling choices of construction materials. J Clean Prod 156:805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi C, Qian J (2000) High performance cementing materials from industrial slags—a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(3):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Agbede IO, Obam SO (2008) Compressive strength of rice husk ash-cement sandcrete blocks. Global J Eng Res 7(1):43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Long G, Gao Y, Xie Y (2015) Designing more sustainable and greener self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 84:301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hemalatha T, Mapa M, George N, Sasmal S (2016) Physico-chemical and mechanical characterization of highvolume fly ash incorporated and engineered cement system towards developing greener cement. J Clean Prod 125:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schöler A, Lothenbach B, Winnefeld F, Zajac M (2015) Hydration of quaternary Portland cement blends containing blast-furnace slag, siliceous fly ash and limestone powder. Cement Concr Compos 55:374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scrivener KL, John VM, Gartner EM (2018) Eco-efficient cements: potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem Concr Res 114:2–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Loganathan S, Srinath P, Kumaraswamy M, Kalidindi S, Varghese K (2017) Identifying and addressing critical issues in the Indian construction industry: perspectives of large building construction clients. J Constr Dev Ctries 22:121–144

    Google Scholar 

  15. Langer WH, Drew LJ, Sachs JS (2004) Aggregate and the environment. American Geological Institute. Silver Spring, MD

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shen W, Cao L, Li Q, Wen Z, Wang J, Liu Y, Chen R (2016) Is magnesia cement low carbon? Life cycle carbon footprint comparing with Portland cement. J Clean Prod 131:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tošić N, Marinković S, Pecić N, Ignjatović I, Dragaš J (2018) Long-term behaviour of reinforced beams made with natural or recycled aggregate concrete and high-volume fly ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 176:344–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oral HV, Saygin H (2019) Simulating the future energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of Turkish cement industry up to 2030 in a global context. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 24(8):1461–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dave N, Misra AK, Srivastava A, Sharma AK, Kaushik SK (2017) Study on quaternary concrete micro-structure, strength, durability considering the influence of multi-factors. Constr Build Mater 139:447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Juenger MC, Siddique R (2015) Recent advances in understanding the role of supplementary cementitious materials in concrete. Cem Concr Res 78:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hesami S, Modarres A, Soltaninejad M, Madani H (2016) Mechanical properties of roller compacted concrete pavement containing coal waste and limestone powder as partial replacements of cement. Constr Build Mater 111:625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Isa NF, Muhammad K, Yahya N, Ahmad MM, Manaf A, Hisyam MB, Naspu A (2016) Dolomite quarry waste as sand replacement in sand brick. Mater Sci Forum Trans Tech Publ Ltd 857(5):319–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta T, Siddique S, Sharma RK, Chaudhary S (2018) Lateral force microscopic examination of calcium silicate hydrate in rubber ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 179:461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Machner A, Zajac M, Haha MB, Kjellsen KO, Geiker MR, De Weerdt K (2018) Limitations of the hydrotalcite formation in Portland composite cement pastes containing dolomite and metakaolin. Cem Concr Res 105:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ashish DK (2019) Concrete made with waste marble powder and supplementary cementitious material for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 211:716–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta T, Kothari S, Siddique S, Sharma RK, Chaudhary S (2019) Influence of stone processing dust on mechanical, durability and sustainability of concrete. Constr Build Mater 223:918–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jain A, Siddique S, Gupta T, Sharma RK, Chaudhary S (2020) Utilization of shredded waste plastic bags to improve impact and abrasion resistance of concrete. Environ Dev Sustain 22(1):337–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pereira-de-Oliveira LA, Castro-Gomes JP, Santos PM (2012) The potential pozzolanic activity of glass and red-clay ceramic waste as cement mortars components. Constr Build Mater 31:197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Matos AM, Sousa-Coutinho J (2012) Durability of mortar using waste glass powder as cement replacement. Constr Build Mater 36:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aliabdo AA, Elmoaty AEMA, Auda EM (2014) Re-use of waste marble dust in the production of cement and concrete. Constr Build Mater 50:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chouhan DS, Agrawal Y, Gupta T, Sharma RK (2017) Utilization of granite slurry waste in concrete: a review. Indian J Sci Technol 10:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mashaly AO, Shalaby BN, Rashwan MA (2018) Performance of mortar and concrete incorporating granite sludge as cement replacement. Constr Build Mater 169:800–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Usman M, Khan AY, Farooq SH, Hanif A, Tang S, Khushnood RA, Rizwan SA (2018) Eco-friendly self-compacting cement pastes incorporating wood waste as cement replacement: a feasibility study. J Clean Prod 190:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muduli K, Govindan K, Barve A, Geng Y (2013) Barriers to green supply chain management in Indian mining industries: a graph theoretic approach. J Clean Prod 47:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lèbre É, Corder GD, Golev A (2017) Sustainable practices in the management of mining waste: a focus on the mineral resource. Miner Eng 107:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sheoran A (2017) Use of base metal tailings from mining industry in concrete: a review. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences 7(6):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  37. Duan H, Miller TR, Liu G, Tam VW (2019) Construction debris becomes growing concern of growing cities. Waste Manage 83:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma RK, Gupta T, Sharma S (2016) Assessment of mechanical properties of concrete containing granite slurry waste. Int J Eng 29(5):599–605

    Google Scholar 

  39. Srivastava V, Atul IA, Mehta PK, Satyendranath MK (2018) Supplementary cementitious materials in construction—an attempt to reduce CO2 emission. J Environ Nanotechnol 7(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gan GL, Spry PG, Cody RD, Cody AM (1996) Rim formation on Iowa highway concrete dolomite aggregate: the effects of dedolomitization reactions. Environ Eng Geosci 2(1):59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Haritonovs V, Tihonovs J, Smirnovs J (2016) High modulus asphalt concrete with dolomite aggregates. Transp Res Procedia 14:3485–3492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sadik C, Moudden O, El Bouari A, El Amrani IE (2016) Review on the elaboration and characterization of ceramics refractories based on magnesite and dolomite. J Asian Ceram Soc 4(3):219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Korjakins A, Shakhmenko G, Bajare D, Bumanis G (2010) Application a dolomite waste as filler in expanded clay lightweight concrete. Modern building materials, structures and techniques. Proc Int Conf 10:156–161

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hakkou R, Benzaazoua M, Bussière B (2016) Valorization of phosphate waste rocks and sludge from the moroccan phosphate mines: challenges and perspectives. Procedia Eng 138:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Korjakins A, Šahmenko GS, Bajare D, Gaidukovs S, Pizele D (2009) Producing of concrete by using a dolomite waste as an alternative filler. Ěpitǒanyag-J Silicate Based Compos Mater 61(2):44–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Netinger I, Kesegic I, Guljas I (2011) The effect of high temperatures on the mechanical properties of concrete made with different types of aggregates. Fire Saf J 46(7):425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Verian KP, Panchmatia P, Olek J, Nantung T (2015) Pavement concrete with air-cooled blast furnace slag and dolomite as coarse aggregates: effects of deicers and freeze-thaw cycles. Transp Res Rec 2508(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou M K, Liu Z A, Chen X (2016) Frost durability and strength of concrete prepared with crushed sand of different characteristics. Adv Mater Sci Eng 1–9.

  49. Indira M, Reddy BU (2017) Study on replacement for cement and fine aggregates using eco sand. Int J Civ Eng Technol 8(4):846–854

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lingling X, Min D (2005) Dolomite used as raw material to produce MgO-based expansive agent. Cem Concr Res 35(8):1480–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Thorpe D, Zhuge Y (2010) Advantages and disadvantages in using permeable concrete pavement as a pavement construction material. In: Proceedings of 26th annual ARCOM conference, pp 1341–1350.

  52. Šernas O, Vorobjovas V, Šneideraitienė L, Vaitkus A (2016) Evaluation of asphalt mix with dolomite aggregates for wearing layer. Transp Res Procedia 14:732–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Selvan David A, SuntarRaajan VC (2016) An experimental study on autoclaved aerated concrete by replacing fine aggregate with dolomite. Icon (Integrating Concepts) 1(1):10

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhuge Y, Lian C (2009) Development of Environmentally friendly and structural enhanced permeable concrete pavement material. In: Proceedings of the 2009 southern engineering conference: infrastructure investment for a new economy. Engineers Australia, Queensland Division.

  55. Ruan S, Liu J, Yang EH, Unluer C (2017) Performance and microstructure of calcined dolomite and reactive magnesia-based concrete samples. J Mater Civ Eng 29(12):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang H, Shao Y (2015) Early carbonation behavior of high-volume dolomite powder-cement based materials. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mater Sci Ed 30(3):541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. El-Hawary M, Nouh K (2016) Sulfate resistance of filler cement mortars. MOJ Civil Eng 1(2):34–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Xu J, Chen J, Lu D, Xu Z, Hooton RD (2019) Effect of dolomite powder on the hydration and properties of calcium sulfoaluminate cements with different gypsum contents. Constr Build Mater 225:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nguyen HA (2019) Enhancement of engineering properties of slag-cement based self-compacting mortar with dolomite powder. J Build Eng 24:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nguyen HA, Chang TP, Shih JY, Djayaprabha HS (2018) Enhancement of low-cement self-compacting concrete with dolomite powder. Constr Build Mater 161:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kamal MM, Safan MA, Al-Gazzar MA (2013) Steel–concrete bond potentials in self-compacting concrete mixes incorporating dolomite powder. Adv Concr Const 1(4):273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Aral İF, Cihan MT (2019) Investigation of properties of mortars containing waste stone powder instead of sand under freezing-thawing effect. IOP Conf Ser: Earth and Environmental Science 362(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sargam Y, Wang K, Alleman JE (2020) Effects of modern concrete materials on thermal conductivity. J Mater Civ Eng 32(4):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Haritonovs V, Brencis G, Zaumanis M, Smirnovs J (2013) Use of unconventional aggregates in hot mix asphalt concrete. Const Sci 14(1):44–49

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ye H, Fu C, Yang G (2019) Influence of dolomite on the properties and microstructure of alkali-activated slag with and without pulverized fly ash. Cement Concr Compos 103:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Galı S, Ayora C, Alfonso P, Tauler E, Labrador M (2001) Kinetics of dolomite–portlandite reaction: application to Portland cement concrete. Cem Concr Res 31(6):933–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Garcı́a E, Alfonso P, Labrador M, Galı́ S, (2003) Dedolomitization in different alkaline media: application to Portland cement paste. Cem Concr Res 33(9):1443–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Makó É (2007) The effect of quartz content on the mechanical activation of dolomite. J Eur Ceram Soc 27(2):535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Marshdi QSR, Jasim AH, Obeed HA (2018) Effect of dolomite as expansive agent and shrinkage reducing admixture in self-compacting shrinkage–compensating concrete. J Univ Babylon Eng Sci 26(5):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  70. Cohen E, Peled A, Bar-Nes G (2019) Dolomite-based quarry-dust as a substitute for fly-ash geopolymers and cement pastes. J Clean Prod 235:910–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Donza H, Cabrera O, Irassar EF (2002) High-strength concrete with different fine aggregate. Cem Concr Res 32(11):1755–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Balakrishnan SD, Paulose KC (2013) Workability and strength characteristics of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash and dolomite powder. Am J Eng Res 24(4):43–47

    Google Scholar 

  73. Saranya P, Nagarajan P, Shashikala AP (2019) Development of ground-granulated blast-furnace slag-dolomite geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater J 116(6):235–243

    Google Scholar 

  74. Barbhuiya S (2011) Effects of fly ash and dolomite powder on the properties of self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(8):3301–3305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Abdel-Hay AS (2017) Properties of recycled concrete aggregate under different curing conditions. HBRC Journal 13(3):271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Heirman G, Vandewalle L (2003) The influence of fillers on the properties of self-compacting concrete in fresh and hardened state. In: Proc. of the 3rd int. symp. on self-compacting concrete (SCC2003) RILEM Publications SARL Bagneux 606–618

  77. Korjakins A, Gaidukovs S, Šahmenko G, Bajāre D, Pizele D (2008) Investigation of alternative dolomite filler properties and their application in concrete production. Sci Proc Riga Tech Univ Const Sci 2(9):64–71

    Google Scholar 

  78. JelčićRukavina M, Gabrijel I, Bjegović D (2015) Modifications of dolomite-based self-compacting concrete properties using mineral additives. Tehnički vjesnik 22(1):233–240

    Google Scholar 

  79. Poornima V, Ananthkumar M, Kumar SB, Ahamed KI (2019) Suitability of dolomite silica-sand in partial replacement with m-sand for cement mortar. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 577(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mikhailova O, Yakovlev G, Maeva I, Senkov S (2013) Effect of dolomite limestone powder on the compressive strength of concrete. Procedia Eng 57:775–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Shakhmenko G, Korjakins A, Bumanis G (2010) Concrete with microfiller obtained from recycled lamp glass. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference modern building materials, structures and techniques Vilnius Lithuania 280–284.

  82. Kumar JS, Palaniselvan G, Jayganesh D, Vijayaraghavan J (2016) Physical and chemical characteristics of dolomite for partial replacement of cement in M20 concrete. Eng Technol India 1(5):142–156

    Google Scholar 

  83. Sugathan A (2017) Experimental investigation on partial replacement of cement with dolomite powder. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol, pp 12748–12756

  84. Deepthi CG, Shindon B (2016) Study on compressive strength of concrete with dolomite powder and crushed tiles. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 5(9):16584–16590

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kumar LR, Kiran J, Rangarajan P (2017) Properties of concrete incorporating dolomite powder. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 14(2):78–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. El-Hawary M, Nouh K (2018) Properties and sustainability of concrete containing fillers. Aust J Civ Eng 16(2):96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Chen Z, Deng M, Liu P (2020) Application of light-burnt dolomite as a mineral addition in concrete. Adv Cem Res 32(10):435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Dhamne P, Nagarnaik D (2019) Experimental investigation on replacement of cement in concrete partially by using dolamite powder. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev 3(3):790–792

    Google Scholar 

  89. Preethi G, Prince G (2015) Effect of replacement of cement with dolomite powder on the mechanical properties of concrete. Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol 2(4):1083–1088

    Google Scholar 

  90. Azad A, Mousavi SF, Karami H, Farzin S (2018) Using waste vermiculite and dolomite as eco-friendly additives for improving the performance of porous concrete. Eng J 22(5):87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. An J, Kim SS, Nam BH, Durham SA (2017) Effect of aggregate mineralogy and concrete microstructure on thermal expansion and strength properties of concrete. Appl Sci 7(12):1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Sahmenko G, Korjakins A, Bajare D (2020) High-performance concrete using dolomite by-products. In: International RILEM workshop on concrete durability and service life planning (concrete life), Springer, Cham, 99–103.

  93. Gu K, Jin F, Al-Tabbaa A, Shi B, Tang C (2016) Evaluation of sulfate resistance of calcined dolomite activated ground granulated blast furnace slag. J Mater Civ Eng 28(2):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Saranya P, Nagarajan P, Shashikala A P (2020) Engineering and durability properties of slag–dolomite geopolymer mortars. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-construction materials, pp 1–12

  95. Nagendra CVS, Prasad CVSR, Florence KR (2019) An experimental investigation on properties of concrete by partial replacement of cement with dolomite and sand with crushed sea shell. Int J Sci Technol Res 8(10):1610–1614

    Google Scholar 

  96. Yan X, Li H, Wong YL (2007) Effect of aggregate on high-strength concrete in fire. Mag Concr Res 59(5):323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Abdelalim AMK, Abdel-Aziz GE, El-Mohr MAK, Salama GA (2009) Effect of aggregate type on the fire resistance of normal and self-compacting concretes. Eng Res J 122:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  98. Kamal MM, Safan MA, Al-Gazzar MA (2012) Experimental investigation on steel-concrete bond strength in self-compacting concrete. Eng Res J 35(2):149–158

    Google Scholar 

  99. Abo-El-Enein SA, El-Sayed HA, Ali AH, Mohammed YT, Khater HM, Ouda AS (2014) Physico-mechanical properties of high performance concrete using different aggregates in presence of silica fume. HBRC J 10(1):43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. El-Samrah MG, Abdel-Rahman MA, El Shazly RM (2018) Effect of heating on physical, mechanical, and nuclear radiation shielding properties of modified concrete mixes. Radiat Phys Chem 153:104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Jauffret G, Glasser FP (2016) Thermally activated dolomite as pozzolanic addition to Portland cement. Adv Cem Res 28(6):378–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Youssf O, Hassanli R, Mills JE (2017) Mechanical performance of FRP-confined and unconfined crumb rubber concrete containing high rubber content. J Build Eng 11:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Kamal MM, Safan MA, Bashandy AA, Khalil AM (2018) Experimental investigation on the behavior of normal strength and high strength self-curing self-compacting concrete. J Build Eng 16:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. AbdElaty MA, Ghazy MF (2016) Evaluation of consistency properties of freshly mixed concrete by cone penetration test. HBRC J 12(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Youssf O, Mills JE, Hassanli R (2016) Assessment of the mechanical performance of crumb rubber concrete. Constr Build Mater 125:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Ouda AS (2016) Estimation of radiation properties of high-performance concrete for use in nuclear installations. J Mater Civ Eng 28(11):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Bashandy AA, Soliman NM, Elrahman MH (2017) Recycled aggregate self-curing high-strength concrete. Civ Eng J 3:427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. El Samrah MG, Abdel Rahman MA, Kany AM (2018) Study characteristics of new concrete mixes and their mechanical, physical, and gamma radiation attenuation features. Z Anorg Allg Chem 644(2):92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, College of Technology and Engineering, MPUAT, Udaipur, India

    Yash Agrawal, Trilok Gupta & Ravi K. Sharma

  2. Division of Architecture and Urban Design, Institute of Urban Science, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea

    Salman Siddique

Authors
  1. Yash Agrawal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Trilok Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salman Siddique
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ravi K. Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trilok Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agrawal, Y., Gupta, T., Siddique, S. et al. Potential of dolomite industrial waste as construction material: a review. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00570-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00570-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation