Skip to main content
Log in

Development of an eco-friendly high-strength lightweight concrete using pre-treated coconut shell aggregate and ground-granulated blast furnace slag

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effective utilization of agricultural and industrial wastes in construction not only mitigates disposal issues but also preserves precious natural resources. The main aim of this research was to develop an eco-friendly high strength lightweight concrete (HSLWC) by using pre-treated (grout coating) crushed coconut shells and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS). Untreated coconut shell aggregate (CSA) concrete was considered a control mix. Then, cement was partially replaced with GGBFS at varying levels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight in the control mix, and the optimum percentage replacement was found to be 10%. Furthermore, untreated CSA was replaced with pre-treated CSA to study the effect of pre-treatment on the fresh and mechanical properties of concrete. Pre-treated CSA concrete mix with 10% GGBFS replacement (T/10) achieved a compressive strength of 41.55 MPa, which is 6.76% higher than the control mix. The properties of concrete such as tensile strength, flexural strength, and modulus of elasticity, were also improved by utilizing pre-treated CSA. The findings in this study prove that grout coating is an effective CSA pre-treatment method that can considerably improve the characteristics of CSA concrete. From the carbon footprint analysis, T/10 and conventional concrete emits 0.393 tCO2e/m3 and 0.410 tCO2e/m3respectively. An eco-friendly, HSLWC can be produced by incorporating GGBFS and pre-treated CSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ziefula UG, John CE, Bennett IE (2018) Properties of seashell aggregate concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 192:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shetty MS, Jain AK (2019) Concrete technology (theory and practice), 8th edn. S. Chand Publishing, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  3. FAOSTAT (2021) Food and agricultural data, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Coconut production, https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Accessed 17 Feb 2023

  4. Gunasekaran K, Kumar PS, Lakshmipathy M (2011) Mechanical and bond properties of coconut shell concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(1):92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sujatha A, Deepa BS (2021a) Properties of coconut shell aggregate concrete: a review. In: Singh RM, Sudheer KP, Kurian B (eds) Advances in civil engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 83. Springer, Singapore, pp 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5644-9_60

  6. Ramasubramani R, Gunasekaran K (2022) Study on plastic shrinkage of coconut shell concrete slab made with M-sand. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00614-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jayaprithika A, Sekar SK (2016) Stress-strain characteristics and flexural behaviour of reinforced eco-friendly coconut shell concrete. Constr Build Mater 117:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sujatha A, Deepa BS (2021b) Development of high strength lightweight coconut shell aggregate concrete. In: Thomas J, Jayalekshmi B, Nagarajan P (eds) Current trends in civil engineering, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 104. Springer, Singapore, pp 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8151-9_10.

  9. Pennarasi G, Soumya S, Gunasekaran K (2019) Study for the relevance of coconut shell aggregate concrete paver blocks. Mater Today Proc 14:368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.04.159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soumya S, Pennarasi G, Gunasekaran K (2019) Study on the reinforced manhole cover slab using coconut shell aggregate concrete. Mater Today Proc 14:386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.04.161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunasekaran K, Annadurai R, Chandar SP, Anandh S (2017) Study for the relevance of coconut shell aggregate concrete non-pressure pipe. Ain Shams Eng J 8(4):523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang KH, Jung YB, Cho MS, Tae SH (2015) Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on reduction of CO2 emissions from concrete. J Clean Prod 103:774–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alengaram JU, Hilmi M, Jumaat MZ (2011) Enhancement and prediction of modulus of elasticity of palm kernel shell concrete. Mater Des 32(4):2143–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafigh P, Jumaat MZ, Mahmud H (2011) Oil palm shell as a lightweight aggregate for production high strength lightweight concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(4):1848–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganesh P, Murthy AR (2019) Tensile behaviour and durability aspects of sustainable ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with GGBS as cementitious material. Constr Build Mater 197:667–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ni S, Liu H, Li Q, Quan H, Gheibi M, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Tian G (2022) Assessment of the engineering properties, carbon dioxide emission and economic of biomass recycled aggregate concrete: A novel approach for building green concretes. J Clean Prod 365:132780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mithun BM, Narasimhan MC (2016) Performance of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes incorporating copper slag as fine aggregate. J Clean Prod 112:837–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu F, Liu C, Zhang L, Lu Y, Ma Y (2018) Comparative study of carbonized peach shell and carbonized apricot shell to improve the performance of lightweight concrete. Constr Build Mater 188:758–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Zhang Z, Fan H, Wang J (2018) Wood carbonization as a protective treatment on resistance to wood destroying fungi. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 129:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.01.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yew MK, Yew MC, Beh JH, Saw LH, Lim SK (2021) Effects of pre-treated on dura shell and tenera shell for high strength lightweight concrete. J Build Eng 42:102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yew MK, Beh JH, Yew MC, Lee FW, Saw LH, Lim SK (2022) Performance of surface modification on bio-based aggregate for high strength lightweight concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e00910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. IS 12269 (2013) Ordinary Portland cement, 53 grade specification. Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  23. IS 383 (2016) Coarse and fine aggregate for concrete-specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thilagashanthi T, Gunasekaran K, Satyanarayanan KS (2023) Durability properties of treated coconut shell-used concrete for sustainability. Innov Infrastruct Solut 8(9):244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01211-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sujatha A, Deepa BS (2023) Properties of high strength lightweight concrete incorporating crushed coconut shells as coarse aggregate. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aziz W, Aslam M, Ejaz MF, Ali MJ, Ahmad R, Raza MWUH, Khan A (2022) Mechanical properties, drying shrinkage and structural performance of coconut shell lightweight concrete. In: Structures vol 35. Elsevier, pp 26–35

  27. IS 1199 (2018) Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  28. IS 516 (1959) Indian standard methods of tests for strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJ (2014) Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen B, Liu J (2008) Experimental application of mineral admixtures in lightweight concrete with high strength and workability. Constr Build Mater 22(6):1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lo TY, Tang WC, Cui HZ (2007) The effects of aggregate properties on lightweight concrete. Build Environ 42(8):3025–3029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.06.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mo KH, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ, Liu MYJ, Lim J (2016) Assessing some durability properties of sustainable lightweight oil palm shell concrete incorporating slag and manufactured sand. J Clean Prod 112:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shafigh P, Jumaat MZ, Mahmud HB, Alengaram UJ (2013) Oil palm shell lightweight concrete containing high volume ground granulated blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater 40:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Newman JB, Choo BS (2003) Advanced concrete technology: constituent materials. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hoff GC (2002) Guide for the use of low-density concrete in civil works projects

  36. Kumar VP, Gunasekaran K, Shyamala T (2019) Characterization study on coconut shell concrete with partial replacement of cement by GGBS. J Build Eng 26:100830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chidiac SE, Panesar DK (2008) Evolution of mechanical properties of concrete containing ground granulated blast furnace slag and effects on the scaling resistance test at 28 days. Cem Concr Compos 30(2):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.09.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shafigh P, Jumaat MZ, Mahmu HB, Hamid NA (2012) Lightweight concrete made from crushed oil palm shell: tensile strength and effect of initial curing on compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 27:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nihal A, Girgin ZC, Arιoglu E (2006) Evaluation of ratio between splitting tensile strength and compressive strength for concretes up to 120 MPa and its application in strength criterion. ACI Mater J 103(1):18–24

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shannag MJ (2011) Characteristics of lightweight concrete containing mineral admixtures. Constr Build Mater 25(2):658–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Erhan G, Gesoğlu M (2008) A study on durability properties of high-performance concretes incorporating high replacement levels of slag. Mater Struct 41:479–493. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9260-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thomas AH, Bremner TW (2000) State-of-the-art report on high-strength, high-durability structural low-density concrete for applications in severe marine environments.

  43. Islam MMU, Mo KH, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ (2016) Mechanical and fresh properties of sustainable oil palm shell lightweight concrete incorporating palm oil fuel ash. J Clean Prod 115:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu X, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Qiao H, Ye F, Lei Z (2023) Research on carbon emission reduction of manufactured sand concrete based on compressive strength. Constr Build Mater 403:133101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Praseeda KI, Reddy BV, Mani M (2015) Embodied energy assessment of building materials in India using process and input–output analysis. Energy Build 86:677–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sinkhonde D (2023) Modeling and experimental studies on energy consumption and properties of concrete containing waste brick powder and waste tire rubber for sustainable construction. Clean Eng Technol 13:100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100631

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Individual contribution of authors in the paper entitled ‘Development of an Eco-friendly High-Strength Lightweight Concrete using Pre-Treated Coconut Shell Aggregate and Ground-Granulated Blast Furnace Slag’. Sujatha A: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Preparation and Visualization. Deepa Balakrishnan S: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-Reviewing and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sujatha.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

Studies using human or animals are not included in the results presented.

Informed consent

Informed consent is obtained from all the individuals involved in the study.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sujatha, A., Balakrishnan, S.D. Development of an eco-friendly high-strength lightweight concrete using pre-treated coconut shell aggregate and ground-granulated blast furnace slag. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9, 191 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01510-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01510-9

Keywords

Navigation