Abstract
Bioorthogonal click chemistry has played a transformative role in many research fields, including chemistry, biology, and medicine. Click reactions are crucial to produce increasingly complex bioconjugates, to visualize and manipulate biomolecules in living systems and for various applications in bioengineering and drug delivery. As biological (model) systems grow more complex, researchers have an increasing need for using multiple orthogonal click reactions simultaneously. In this review, we will introduce the most common bioorthogonal reactions and discuss their orthogonal use on the basis of their mechanism and electronic or steric tuning. We provide an overview of strategies to create reaction orthogonality and show recent examples of mutual orthogonal chemistry used for simultaneous biomolecule labeling. We end by discussing some considerations for the type of chemistry needed for labeling biomolecules in a system of choice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
There is an eminent need for new methodologies that enable precise manipulation of biomolecules to better understand the complex biological processes. An important breakthrough occurred with the development of click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry, which is defined as a robust set of chemical reactions that can take place within a biological system without disrupting its native biochemical processes.
The term “click chemistry” was originally introduced by Sharpless and Meldal [1, 2]. In 2001, Sharpless published a landmark article entitled: “Click chemistry: diverse chemical functionality from a few good reactions,” summarizing the essential criteria for click-type reactions [1]. Click reactions must be modular and wide in scope, while giving very high yields in a stereospecific manner and generating inoffensive byproducts [1]. “Bioorthogonal click chemistry” adds the requirement for biocompatibility, ensuring that the reactions can occur within living systems without causing harm. Bertozzi’s research group pioneered in the use of bioorthogonal chemistry in the early 2000s [3, 4], after which it quickly integrated into various research areas in chemistry, biology, engineering, and medicine and provided new opportunities to study biomolecules in complex model systems. The reactions need to be fast and robust as the physiological conditions can prove challenging owing to the presence of water and oxygen, and the click reaction often occurs under dilute conditions. Bioorthogonal click chemistry on or within cells adds further challenges, such as the presence of reactive groups in biomolecules, metals, reactive oxygen species (ROS), high concentrations of glutathione, and the low pH of endosomes and lysosomes.
The bioorthogonal toolbox is versatile, though there is a growing demand for more sophisticated bioconjugates and methods to answer increasingly complex biological questions [5,6,7,8]. Therefore, the possibility to use multiple bioorthogonal reactions simultaneously, without the occurrence of cross-reactions, is highly desired. This concept is known as “mutual orthogonal bioorthogonal chemistry”, or simply “mutual bioorthogonal chemistry.”
Applying two or more bioorthogonal reactions simultaneously in mechanistically similar pathways is possible by fine-tuning the steric and electronic properties of the reactants. Introducing substituents that alter the steric or electronic properties on the reactive groups can increase or decrease the reaction kinetics by several orders of magnitude [9]. An additional layer of orthogonality can be installed by inducing proximity of slow-reacting reaction partners or by using an external trigger to initiate the reaction, such as light.
In this review, we will provide an overview of mutual orthogonal chemistry, focusing on its principles, applications, and recent advancements. We will first cover the most prevalent click reactions, examine the opportunities for mutual orthogonal chemistry and provide guidelines on how to apply these reactions in complex chemical systems as well as living systems. In this context, we discuss the tuning of the electronic properties by introducing electron-withdrawing (EWG) or electron-donating groups (EDG) and discuss the influence of steric substituents. We will then highlight the potential for activation using external light triggers and proximity enhanced click chemistry to capitalize on slower kinetic reactions under dilute conditions. Finally, we provide some examples of using multiple reactions in bioconjugation reactions and discuss some challenges in the field.
2 Types of Click Chemistry
Over the last two decades, many bioorthogonal reactions have been reported and tailored to the application and biological system used. In here, we will focus on five types of click reactions often used in bioconjugations as shown in Fig. 1 namely, (A) [3 + 2]-dipolar cycloadditions, (B) inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder reactions, (C) phosphine ligations, (D) [4 + 1] isonitrile cycloadditions, and (E) boronic ester condensations. We also discuss their potential for (sequential) orthogonal use in bioconjugations in vitro or within living cells.
2.1 [3 + 2] Dipolar Cycloadditions
2.1.1 Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloadditions (CuAAC)
The [3 + 2] dipolar cycloaddition involves the interaction between a 1,3-dipole and an alkyne or alkene dipolarophile, resulting in the formation of a five-membered heterocycle (Fig. 1A). While uncatalyzed reactions with non-strained alkynes proceed only at elevated temperatures, the regioselective copper (I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) occurs at ambient temperatures. Sharpless and Meldal were the first to independently report the use of this reaction in a biocompatible setting more than two decades ago [2, 10]. Alternative catalysts for the azide alkyne cycloadditions have also been reported. Ruthenium (II) complexes catalyze the cycloaddition, but compared with the CuAAC reaction that yields the 1,4-triazole isomer, the ruthenium-catalyzed AAC (RuAAC) is slower and yields the 1,5-isomer [11,12,13] Despite efforts to reduce the cellular toxicity of the metal species using stabilizing ligands [14], the use of the metal-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloadditions in living systems is not recommended.
2.1.2 Strain-Promoted Azide-Alkyne Cycloadditions (SPAAC)
In 2004, Bertozzi introduced the bioorthogonal strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC) as an alternative to CuAAC (Fig. 1A) [15]. The sp-hybridized alkynyl carbons cause high ring strain on the cyclic alkynes, bending the alkyne from its normal linear geometry. Since the release of ring strain drives the cycloaddition reaction, there is no copper catalyst required, making the SPAAC more suitable for use in living systems. Yet, compared to the CuAAC reaction, the SPAAC reaction holds a significant kinetic disadvantage in [3 + 2]-cycloadditions.
To increase the rates of the SPAAC reaction, researchers investigated modifications of the ring structure including size, conformation, electronic modifications, and inclusion of heteroatoms (Fig. 2A and C). For example, Bertozzi and colleagues showed that a gem-difluoro group on the propargylic position electronically activates the alkyne in their difluorinated cyclooctyne (DIFO) reagents [16]. Alternatively, increased ring strain is possible with fused rings, such as bicyclo[6.1.0]non-4-yne (BCN) or 4-dibenzocyclooctynol (DIBO) [17]. Inclusion of a sp2-like nitrogen center increases further enhances the reaction rate, such as biarylazacyclooctynones (BARAC) [18] and aza-dibenzocyclooctynes (DIBAC/DBCO) [19]. The additional aromatic rings present in diarylcyclooctynes, however, make the molecule bulky and less water soluble, which may be unfavorable for some applications.
The less bulky tetramethylthiacycloheptyne (TMTH), a seven-membered ring with an endocyclic sulfur atom, has faster kinetics than DIFO owing to increasing the strain energy [20]. The more reactive reactants, including BARAC and TMTH, are less stable and more likely to undergo side reactions [21]. For example, BARAC undergoes hydrolysis in phosphate buffered saline (t1/2 24h) and an intramolecular rearrangement may occur under acidic conditions [22]. In general, cyclooctynes are susceptible to nucleophilic addition with reactive cysteines or glutathione present in the intracellular environment [23]. Other side reactions, such as homotrimerization [24] and reactions with cysteine sulfenic acid, may also occur [25]. As TMTH lacks a convenient point for ligand attachment [26], a more stable TMTH-sulfoximine (TMTH-SI) variant was recently reported allowing for ligand conjugation. TMTH-SI additionally reacts somewhat faster with 1,3-dipoles compared with DBCO [27].
2.1.3 Alternative Cycloadditions Beyond Azides
Besides azides, other 1,3 dipoles have been extensively explored in reactions with strained alkynes. Most notably are the reactions with nitrones and mesoionic heterocycles.
The allyl-type nitrone dipole forms the stable N-alkylated isoxazoline product when reacted with a cytooctyne in the strain-promoted alkyne-nitrone cycloaddition (SPANC; Fig. 2B) [29,30,31]. Nitrones are biologically stable and show rapid cycloaddition kinetics. Contrary to azides, nitrones contain three sites for modification that allow for manipulation, making them highly tunable dipoles for bioorthogonal cycloadditions.
Diazo compounds can undergo [1 + 3] cycloaddition with strained alkynes [32]. Their reactivity depends on the conjugation of flanking groups, which can result in improved kinetics over azides [33]. Moreover, [1 + 3] cycloadditions between diazo and alkenyl compounds can occur selectively in the presence of an azide [34]. However, diazo compounds readily react with carboxylic acids, which is a major downside for applications in the bioorthogonal context [35].
Mesoionic heterocycles, such as sydnones act as 1,3 dipoles owing to their delocalized charge distribution. Identified in a high throughput screening campaign, Taran et al. reported on the biocompatible copper-catalyzed cycloaddition between sydnone and nonstrained alkynes [36]. The strain-promoted sydnone-alkyne cycloaddition (SPSAC) was reported soon after by Chin’s group and occurs via the [3 + 2]-cycloaddition, followed by a retro-Diels–Alder, forming a pyrazole and CO2 (Fig. 2B) [37, 38]. The SPSAC reaction rate is comparable to the SPAAC, but slower than the SPANC and CuAAC. Taran et al. introduced the strained-promoted iminosydnones cyclooctyne cycloaddition (SPICC), which involves iminosydnones and cycloalkynes and generates a pyrazole click product, releasing an isocyanate (Fig. 2B) [39, 40]. Although reaction rates are rather slow, this class of compounds allows the release of cargo upon cycloaddition reaction [39, 40]. The strain-promoted 1,3-dithiolium-4-olate/alkyne cycloaddition (SPDAC) requires the sulfur-based family of 1,3-dithiolium-4-olates (DTOs) mesoionics, and reacts in the same order of magnitude as SPSAC (Fig. 2B) [41]. Interestingly, owing to the rather bulky structure, DTOs react with BCN but do not react with the more bulky DBCO cyclooctyne.
2.1.4 Tuning Reactivity within [3 + 2] Dipolar Cycloadditions
The type of mechanism that drives the cycloaddition is dictated by the electronic properties of the reactants. Bicycle[6.1.0]nonyne (BCN), a cyclooctyne with a fused cyclopropane ring, is less bulky compared with DBCO [42]. Van Delft demonstrated that benzyl azides react faster with DBCO compared with BCN. The opposite is true for phenyl azides, that react faster with BCN [21]. DFT calculations revealed that BCN reacts with phenyl azides via an inverse-electron demand (IED) mechanism [21]. In here, the reaction is driven by the difference between HOMOBCN and LUMOazide, compared with most SPAAC reactions that follow interaction of HOMOazide and LUMOcyclooctyne. This observation found that the use of electron poor azides in reactions with BCN boost the reaction rate by at least one order of magnitude [21]. Van Delft further exploited this unique reactivity difference in a single pot orthogonal labeling of a BCN-labeled protein and a DBCO-modified fluorescent dye to a linker equipped with both an electron poor azide and an aliphatic azide (Fig. 3A).
Besides altering electronic properties, bulky reactants can alter the reactivity within the [3 + 2] cycloaddition. Mikula reported the chemoselective SPAAC reaction of BCN with tertiary azide in the presence of the sterically demanding DBCO with either a primary or secondary azide [43]. They applied the distortion/interaction model developed by Bickelhaupt and Houk, describing that steric hindrance increases distortion energy, thereby decreasing reactivity [44]. For example, DBCO reacts ~ 19-fold slower with tertiary azides compared with primary azides. The less bulky BCN reacts twofold slower with tertiary azides. Therefore, sequential orthogonal labeling is possible with DBCO reacting with the primary azide in the first step, and subsequently adding BCN that reacts with the tertiary azide (Fig. 3B). When the reagents are added simultaneously, the yield of the desired bifunctional labeled product is reduced to 72%, with the remaining 28% being double BCN labeled [43].
Similarly, owing to the bulky phenyl substituents, DTO preferentially reacts with less sterically demanding BCN compared with DBCO. In a double-click experiment, Taran and coworkers showed that SPDAC with DTO and BCN followed by SPAAC with an azide and DBCO could be performed orthogonally by preventing cross-reactivity owing to steric interference. (Fig. 3C) [41].
2.2 Inverse Electron Demand Diels–Alder Cycloaddition (IEDDA) Reactions
2.2.1 Dienes
The inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder (IEDDA) reaction between an electron-poor diene and electron-rich dienophile has grown to one of the most commonly used reactions for bioconjugations (Fig. 1B). This reaction forms a six membered ring in a π4s + π2s mechanism, where the 4π-electrons of the diene interact with the 2π-electrons of the dienophile [45]. Tetrazines are often used as diene, while the dienophiles are rather diverse and include cis or trans (strained) alkenes or alkynes. The reaction kinetics are commonly dictated by the energy gap between the LUMOdiene and HOMOdienophile. Consequently, substituting the tetrazine diene with electron deficient groups lowers the LUMO energy and thereby increases its reactivity [45].
Since its introduction by the Fox’s group in 2008, the IEDDA reaction has gained a lot of attention owing to its superior reaction kinetics, rendering it exceptionally suitable for in vivo applications [51]. Altering the electron density of the tetrazines by varying the substitutions at the C3 and C6 positions has led to a wide range of 1,2,4,5-tetrazine derivatives with diverse reactivities (Fig. 4). Electron-withdrawing substituents increases tetrazine reactivity, yet, they are also more susceptible to nucleophilic attack and, consequently, degradation in cell culture media [45, 48, 52, 53]. For example, the dipyridyl tetrazine reacts extremely fast with TCOs, but less than 1% is still intact after 24 h in cell growth medium [53]. Mikula et al. demonstrated that the high reactivity of 2-pyridyl substituted tetrazines was additionally attributed to the intramolecular repulsive N–N interaction rather than sole electron withdrawing properties of the tetrazine substituents. Conversely, more stable tetrazines were developed containing electron donating dihydro-2H-pyran (DHP) substituent that shows fast reaction rates owing to the distortion between the oxygen and nitrogen of the tetrazine [53].
1,2,4-Triazines are more stable in biological conditions compared with tetrazines. However, these reagents demonstrate several orders of magnitude slower reaction kinetics than tetrazines [54]. Other azabenzenes, including 1,3,5-triazines, 1,2-diazines, and 1,2,3-triazines, have been studied in IEDDA reactions but improved stability resulted in reduced reaction rates [55].
An interesting new class of compounds reported by the group of Vrabel are the N1-alkyl-1,2,4-triazinium salts that display orders of magnitude faster reaction rates with BCN compared with unsubstituted triazines [56]. The authors demonstrate good stability, solubility, and could be used for intracellular protein labeling. In addition, the triazonium salts do not react with DBCO making them orthogonal to the SPAAC reaction [56].
2.2.2 Dienophiles
In IEDDA reactions, the reactivity of the dienophiles depends on the strain as well as the electronic properties where: (1) strained dienophiles are more reactive than nonstrained counterparts, (2) electron-rich substituents improve reaction kinetics, and (3) an increase of steric hindrance lowers the reaction kinetics. Strained alkenes, especially trans-cyclooctenes (TCO), are the most commonly used dienophiles. The strain-promoted inverse electron demand Diels–Alder (SPIEDAC) between TCO and tetrazine is the fastest IEDDA reaction owing to the high ring strain introduced by the trans double bond [45].
Other dienophiles include cyclooctynes, such as BCN and DIFO, norbornenes, and methylcyclopropenes (MCps) [45, 46, 57]. More sterically hindered cyclooctynes, such as DBCO and TMTH, do not react with tetrazines [58,59,60]. A recent promising class of dienophiles are the S-, N-, and O-containing cyclooctenes (SNO-OCT). They benefit from their unique electronic tuning properties and a sulfonyl group, which increases their polarity and stability [61, 62]. SNO-OCTs react reasonably with dienes, azides, and diazo compounds and react slower with azides compared with BCN, providing the possibility for orthogonal use with the SPAAC reaction [61]. The reaction of SNO-OCT with azides, however, can be increased by two orders of magnitude by the introduction of electron withdrawing substituents on the SNO-OCTs [62]. Figure 5 outlines the relative kinetics of the IEDDA reactions and potential reactions with an azide. This also includes the vinylboronic acids (VBAs) [63] that uniquely react with high rates to tetrazines bearing a boron-coordinating substituent while no reactivity is observed to tetrazines with non-coordinating substituents, as additionally discussed in Sect. 3.4.2.
2.2.3 Tuning Reactivity in the Inverse Electron Demand Diels–Alder Cycloaddition (IEDDA) Reaction
The “distortion/interaction-activation strain model” helps to analyze how steric and electronic interactions influence the reactivity of dienophiles [44]. TCO derivatives have orders of magnitude decreased reactivity toward sterically encumbered tetrazines, whereas the much smaller 1,3-disubstituted cyclopropenes (Cps) are less sensitive to steric effects (Fig. 6) [57]. Within the Cps, the substituent pattern greatly affects reactivity toward tetrazines. Notably, the 1,3-disubstituted 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCp) reacts orthogonally with tetrazines in the presence of 3-methylcyclopropene (3-MCp) [57].
The low reactivity of triazines prevents reactions with less reactive alkenes, such as norbornene or Cps, providing mutual orthogonality with tetrazines (Fig. 5 and 7) [54]. Therefore, the triazine-TCO pair can be combined with norbornene or Cp and a tetrazine in a sequential orthogonal strategy. Here, the less reactive norbornene or Cp first reacts with the tetrazine, after which a TCO is added to react with the remaining triazine.
Bulky dienophiles, such as TMTH, are unreactive to 3,6-substituted tetrazines and -triazines owing to sterical hindrance from its methyl groups. They do react, however, with 5-substituted 1,2,4-triazines [60]. Sterically less hindered 1-MCp has a higher reactivity toward more electrophilic dienes and therefore reacts faster with tetrazine and slower with the 5-substituted triazine. Prescher demonstrated the orthogonal use of 1,2,4-triazine and 1-MCp for labeling of two biomolecules simultaneously. In this study, a nanoluciferase and GFP protein that were labeled with a 1,2,4-triazine and 1-MCp reacted with TMTH and dipyridyl tetrazine, respectively (Fig. 7) [60]. As already highlighted previously, the TMTH compound is unstable and not suited for conjugation to a ligand. To our knowledge, the improved TMTH-SI has not been tested on triazines.
2.3 Phosphine Ligations
The Staudinger-Bertozzi ligation (SBL) involves the reaction between an organic azide and a modified triaryl phosphine, and is one of the first bioorthogonal reactions used for labeling of biomolecules in vivo [66]. In the classic Staudinger reaction, an azide reacts with the phosphine into an iminophosphorane that hydrolyses to an amine and phosphine oxide in aqueous conditions. In the SBL an electrophilic methyl ester is present on one of the phosphine aryl ligands that serves as an internal trap for the imino group and results in the formation of a covalent amide linkage (Fig. 8) [67]. An alternative reaction variant is the traceless Staudinger ligation introduced by Raines et al. [68]. The reaction between phosphane and azide is “traceless” as the phosphine scaffold is absent and reagents are connected by a single unsubstituted amide linkage [69]. Alternative phosphines include the Staudinger-phosphite reaction [70] and the Staudinger phosphonate (Fig. 8) [71]. The drawbacks of these phosphine-based ligations are the slow reaction rates and the sensitivity of the phosphine toward oxidative environments [72]. The phosphite has a higher resistance to oxidation compared with the trialkyl phosphines, but can hydrolyze at acidic or even neutral pH, depending on their substituents [73]. Phosphinothiol show improved reaction kinetics, but the increased electron density also leads to higher susceptibility to oxidation [74]. Borane-protected phosphinothioesters were found to be more stable toward oxidation [74]. Recently, Poulou & Hackenberger summarized phosphine mediated ligations in an extensive review on the development and applications of the Staudinger ligation in labeling of biomolecules [75].
The use of cyclopropenones (CpOs), developed by Prescher’s group, proved a viable alternative to the azide in phosphine ligations [76]. In here, CpO reacts efficiently with triphenylphosphine via a Michael-type addition to form a ketene-ylide intermediate (Fig. 8E) [76]. Not all CpOs are stable in an intracellular environment, but adding steric bulk improves their stability. For example, introducing dialkyl-substitutions around the electrophilic carbonyl carbon prevents undesired competing nucleophilic thiol attacks [77]. In addition, altering heteroatoms can affect the reaction rates. For example, cyclopropenethione (CpS) react with substituted phosphines to provide thiocarbonyl adducts, sometimes 300-fold faster than CpO [78]. Cyclopropeniminium (CpN+) motifs, with NR2 instead of the oxygen of CpOs, have a unique reactivity pattern and allow for some orthogonality with CpOs in phosphine ligations [79].
2.4 [4 + 1] Cycloaddition with Isonitriles
Isonitriles react in a [4 + 1] cycloaddition with tetrazines or chlorooximes (Fig. 1) [80, 81]. The reaction is followed by a [4 + 2] cycloreversion that liberates nitrogen while concurrently generating a novel pyrazole ring [80]. The use of tertiary isonitriles provide stable products in the isonitrile-tetrazine ligation, while primary isonitriles form labile pyrazole products that are prone to hydrolysis [80]. For this reason, Franzini explored the use of primary isonitriles as caging group that can be selectively released using a chemical tetrazine trigger (Fig. 9) [82].
Isonitriles are able to uniquely react with sterically encumbered 3,6-bis-tert-butyl tetrazine (DTTz), while strained alkenes/alkynes are inreactive to DTTz owing to the steric bulk [83]. The stability-enhancing bulky tetrazine substituents are rate-enhancing and primary and tertiary isonitriles can react four- to fivefold faster with bulky tetrazines compared with less bulky tetrazines [83]. DTTz are stable reactants as the bulky groups prevent more hindered dienophiles and nucleophile from approaching. The use of a sterically hindered tetrazine thereby allows for orthogonal use of the IEDDA reaction and the isonitrile [4 + 1] cycloaddition for sequential orthogonal labeling of biomolecules. Both the isonitrile-tetrazine and isonitrile-chlorooxime ligations are additionally orthogonal to the SPAAC reaction [81, 84].
2.5 Condensation with Boronic Acids
Boronic acids are a distinctive class of compounds with unique electronic properties attributed to their vacant p-orbital [63]. The difference in electronegativity between boron and carbon causes an inductive effect. The main exploited strategy is boronic ester condensation and imino boronate formation between 2-acetyl/formyl-aryl boronic acids and hydrazine/hydroxylamine/semicarbazide derivatives and used for many bioorthogonal ligations [85, 86]. The acylboronic acid-hydrazine ligation is considered bioorthogonal with certain hydrazine derivatives and allows for the irreversible formation of a boron-nitrogen heterocycle (diazaborine) derivative. Bane et al. introduced the 2-formylphenylboronic acid (2fPBA)-α-amino-hydrazide reaction, which forms a stable 2,3,1-benzodiazoborine derivative. The reaction is highly chemoselective and, more importantly, mutually orthogonal to the SPAAC and IEDDA reaction [87].
2.6 Inducible Bioorthogonal Chemistry
The ability to obtain bioorthogonal reactants in an inducible and controlled manner using an external trigger allows for a high level of selectivity and extended spatial and temporal control in biological environments. In addition, the requirement of an external trigger adds an additional layer of reaction orthogonality. The development of (photo)chemically triggered click reactions has provided many new mutual orthogonal reaction partners to the most commonly used ones: CuAAC, SPAAC, and IEDDA.
2.6.1 Strain-Promoted Oxidation-Controlled Ortho-Quinone (SPOCQ) Cycloaddition
The strain-promoted oxidation-controlled cyclooctyne–1,2-quinone cycloaddition (SPOCQ) proceeds several orders of magnitude faster with strained alkynes and alkenes when compared with azides as explored by van Delft [88]. The 1,2-quinones are formed from catechols using mild oxidation conditions (e.g. sodium periodate) or from tyrosines using tyrosine peroxidase enzyme [89]. The quinones react uniquely fast with BCN when compared with TCO and TMTH(-SI) and showed very low reactivity to DBCO [90]. The preferred reaction of 1,2-quinones with BCN allowed the orthogonal labeling of a BCN-modified protein in the presence of azides [88].
2.6.2 Enzymatic Activation of Caged Tetrazines
Knittel et al. prepared a dihydrotetrazine conjugated with an enzyme cleavable group and several different self-immolative linkers [91]. Enzymatic cleavage leads to release of the dihydrotetrazine that spontaneously oxidizes to a functional tetrazine [91]. The authors generated caged tetrazines for enzymes that are overexpressed in certain cancer cells. Using this strategy, the authors could induce an iEDDA click-to-release reaction of a dienophile-caged doxorubicin drug in cells that express high levels of enzyme.
2.6.3 Photo-Click Cycloadditions
Photocaged compounds that become active after irradiation can also be used for sequential mutual orthogonal strategies [92, 93]. An interesting example is the photo-induced activation of CpO-caged cyclooctynes, which can be used for photo-SPAAC and photo-IEDDA to create mutual orthogonal reactions [94]. Here, Lang reported on a CpO-caged dibenzoannulated BCN derivative (photo-DMBO), a photo-activatable BCN-based probe. Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation at 365 nm decarbonylates the compound to DMBO (Fig. 10A) [95]. A site-specific incorporation of lysine-based methyl-substituted tetrazine of amino acids in Escherichia coli illustrates the mutual orthogonality of photo-DMBO labeling and IEDDA reactions with tetrazines. This strategy was also used with 3-N-substituted spirocyclopropenes, a photocaged Cp [96, 97]. The bulky N-protecting groups sterically prohibit reaction with tetrazines owing to steric repulsion. Upon exposure to light, the Cp is decaged, removing the steric block and allowing the reaction with the respective tetrazine (Fig. 10B).
The group of Fox developed a method to form tetrazines in situ from inactive dihydrotetrazine precursors using a suitable photocatalyst and light [98]. Incubation with silarhodamine or fluorescein dyes and irradiation at 660 nm or 470 nm, respectively, oxidizes the dihydrotetrazine into a functional tetrazine that can undergo IEDDA cycloaddition with strained dienophiles (Fig. 10C). This spatial addition of light allows tight spatial and temporal control of protein labeling in living cells [98]. Alternatively, Devaraj and coworkers modified the secondary amine in the dihydrotetrazine precursor with a photoprotecting group, which removes the need for a photocatalyst. Using a nitrophenyl deriverative as photocage, irradiation at 405 nm removed the photoprotecting group, leading to subsequent oxidation of the dihydrotetrazine into a functional tetrazine (Fig. 10D) [99].
Tetrazoles form reactive nitrile imines upon exposure of UV light. The Lin’s group developed tetrazole-ene photo-click chemistry (TPEC), where UV light triggers the generation of nitrile imines from 2,5-biaryl tetrazoles that subsequently react with alkenes (Fig. 11A) [100, 101]. Recently, Lin and coworkers introduced a new class of sterically shielded, sulfonated tetrazoles. The reagents react extremely fast and preferentially with BCN over strained alkenes and provide one of the fastest bioorthogonal ligations with BCN to date (Fig. 11B) [102].
The vinyl ether photo-cycloaddition (DVPC) reaction developed by Zhang et al. is a visible-light-induced [4 + 2] cycloaddition between 9,10-phenanthrenequinone (PQ) and vinyl ethers (VE) that occurs under biocompatible conditions (Fig. 11C) [103]. The reagents are unreactive toward strained alkynes, electron-deficient alkenes (such as monomethyl fumarate, MF), and other nucleophilic species. The authors observed some reactivity with TCO but at lower rates compared to VE. This allows mutual orthogonality with the azide-DBCO and UV-initiated tetrazole-ene photoclick reaction (Fig. 11D) [103].
2.6.4 Wavelength Selectivity and Photocaging for Orthogonality
Orthogonality in photoclick reactions can be achieved by using different wavelengths, in so-called λ-orthogonality or wavelength selectivity [105]. Kowollik et al. reported a light-induced reaction in a dual-chromophore setup where reactivity depended solely on the choice of wavelength and solvent. Here, the conversion of 2,5-diphenyl tetrazoles with N-ethylmaleimide at λmax = 285 nm yielded pyrazoline ligation products. Simultaneously, at λmax = 382 nm, o-methyl benzaldehyde reacted with N-ethylmaleimide via an o-quinodimethane intermediate while retaining the 2,5-diphenyl tetrazoles (Fig. 12) [106].
3 Tuning the Reaction Partners for Dual and Triple Orthogonal Bioorthogonal Labeling
3.1 Combining Mechanistically Different Bioorthogonal Reactions
Site-selective dual functionalization of proteins using mutual orthogonal chemistry reactions has been reported in various approaches. In this context, it is important to note that next to mutual orthogonal chemistry where all reagents are added simultaneously in a single pot, there are many strategies that require the sequential addition of reagents, leading to a sequential orthogonal labeling approach (Fig. 13). Weil et al. and Chen & Wu summarized the bioorthogonal chemistry combinations generally employed in literature for single or dual protein modification [107, 108]. The approaches included are (I) CuAAc + SPAAC (sequential orthogonal) [109], (II) IEDDA + IEDDA (sequential orthogonal) [110], (III) SPAAC + IEDDA (sequential or mutual orthogonal) [111], (IV) CuAAC + oxime ligation (mutual orthogonal) [112], and (V) CuAAC + IEDDA (mututal orthogonal) [113].
The tetrazine-TCO IEDDA and DBCO-azide SPAAC reactions are often used in combination for dual modification of biomolecules as they are mutual orthogonal and many variants of the reagents are commercially available. For example, Alabi’s group used the IEDDA and SPAAC combination for dual modification of an antibody to obtain bifunctional antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) [114]. In here, the authors chemically engineered the Her2-targeted antibody trastuzumab with a linker containing a methyltetrazine as well as an azide handle. The engineered antibodies were consequently functionalized with DM1 toxin as well as a hydrophylic PEG linker in a dual click reaction using TCO-DM1 and DBCO-PEG that react with the tetrazine and the azide, respectively.
The IEDDA and SPAAC reactions can be further expanded using other reactions that are mechanistically different, such as the bioorthogonal boronic acid condensation between 2fPBA and α-amino-hydrazide. For example, bone functionalized trastuzumab antibodies with either 2fPBA, azide, or TCO. Multi-bioorthogonal labeling with α-amino-hydrazide-RED, DBCO-TAMRA, and Tetrazine-BODIPY, respectively, resulted in the simultaneous triple antibody labeling on the basis of three distinct mechanisms (Fig. 14) [87].
Chatterjee et al. expanded the combination of SPAAC and IEDDA reactions with a chemoselective rapid azo-coupling reaction (CRACR) for site-specific bioconjugation and applied this for site-selective labeling in proteins. In here, 5-hydroxytryptophan (5HTP) residues are labeled chemoselectively with aromatic diazonium ions using the high electron-rich 5-hydroxy indole group. Using genetic code expansion, three non-canonical amino acids containing different bioorthogonal functional handles, e.g., 5-HTP, pAzF, and CpK (Fig. 15) were site selectively introduced into a protein [115]. The incorporated bioorthogonal groups were functionalized using CRACR-mediated labeling of 5-HTP with diazonium ion, SPAAC-labeling of pAzF with DBCO, and IEDDA labeling of CpK with a tetrazine, achieving protein labeling at three distinct sites [115]. This study shows that the CRACR is compatible with the SPAAC and IEDDA reactions for triple mutual orthogonal labeling [116].
3.2 Electronic Tuning of Reaction Partners
Mutual orthogonal click reactions within the same class of reactants can be achieved via electronic tuning of reagents. Raines’ and Schomaker’s groups showed that by tuning the electronic properties of SNO-OCTs, they could direct the preference for particular type I or III dipoles [62]. In this study, three proteins were individually functionalized with a diazoacetamide dipole (Cytoc-AcDz), a tetrazine dipole (RNase A-tet), and boronic-acid–aldehyde (RNase A-BA) and reacted with three fluorophores containing the respective complementary bioorthogonal handles: difuoro-substituted DF-SNO-OCT-Rho, parent P-SNO-OCT-C343, and alpha-amino-hydrazide-T (Fig. 16). Triple labeling was achieved simultaneously with SPAAC, IEDDA, and the boronic acid condensation, demonstrating the mutual orthogonality of the three reaction pairs [62].
3.3 Steric Tuning of Reaction Partners
Steric tuning of the reactants is an alternative strategy to obtain mutual orthogonal reaction pairs. For example, isonitriles uniquely react with bulky tetrazines, while strained alkynes/alkenes are unreactive and preferentially react with tetrazines containing small substituents. Building on this fact, Franzini’s group modified ovalbumin (OVA), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and lysozyme (LYSO) with an azide, a bulky 3,6-di-tert-butyl tetrazine (DTTz) and less hindered methyl phenyl tetrazine, respectively (Fig. 17) [83]. A selective reaction of DTTz with a tertiairy isonitrile-BODIPY green and methyl phenyl tetrazine with TCO-BODIPY-red was indeed feasible. The mechanistically different SPAAC reaction with DBCO-AF405 was used as the third mutual orthogonal reaction. Kele et al. used a similar approach to induce tetrazine orthogonality. In this dual labeling example, cells using genetically encoded nonnatural amino acids containing a BCN and a bulky isonitrille was used to react selectively with a methyl phenyl tetrazine instead and a bulky tetrazine, respectively [117].
Franzini and coworkers tested chemoselective IEDDA reactions on the basis of different dienes. They established that five-membered cyclic dienes (FMCDs) are inert to isonitriles but readily react with strained alkynes. Consistent with their previous findings that tetrazines with bulky substituents readily react with isonitriles, they performed a dual orthogonal protein-labeling experiment. Modifying two proteins with either a bulky DTTz or tetrachlorocyclopentadienone ethylene ketal (TCK) FMCD allowed selective protein modification using an isonitrile and a BCN, respectively (Fig. 18) [118]. In this example, the fluorophore was conjugated to the isonitrile. Tetrazines conjugated to fluorophore scaffolds allow for tunable “turn-on” fluorescent probes once reacted with a bulky isonitrile [119]. Alternatively, tert-butyl tetrazine caged fluorophores can be released upon reaction with a (bulky) isonitrile [120].
3.4 Inducing Reactant Proximity
3.4.1 Coordination Assisted Bioorthogonal Chemistry
While it is possible to use non-strained alkenes with tetrazines for bioconjugations, the reaction is extremely slow as the rate constants is orders of magnitude below 1 M−1 s−1 and requires long reaction times to complete. Bringing the reactants in close proximity can accelerate the reaction rates several orders of magnitude. An example here is the use of vinylboronic acids (VBAs) that react with tetrazines via the IEDDA mechanism [63]. Fast reaction rates are observed when reacting VBA with tetrazines containing substituent that can coordinate to the boron atom, such as a pyridyl or an o-phenol, while VBAs are unreactive to tetrazines lacking such substituent (Fig. 19A) [121]. This coordination-assisted ligation can increase the reaction rate by several orders of magnitude making VBA suitable for a sequential two-step orthogonal ligation approach. In here, the VBA reacts first with a tetrazine containing boron-coordinating substituent, after which a strained alkene is added to react with a non-coordinating tetrazine [121].
3.4.2 Enhanced Kinetics Induced by Biomolecular Interactions
Researchers have also benefited from slow bioorthogonal reaction rates and used proximity-enhanced click chemistry to profile specific biomolecular interactions. This concept, introduced by Robinson, induces a high local concentration of the reactants to overcome their kinetic barrier [122]. In this study, they metabolically labeled cells with azido-modified sialic acid (SiaNAz) in surface glycoproteins [122]. Subsequently, they added a DBCO-modified aptamer that recognized either protein tyrosine kinase-7 or the mu heavy chain of the B cell receptor, which are expressed on Jurkat and Ramos cells, respectively [122]. Each DBCO aptamer only reacted with the SiaNAz when combined with its corresponding target receptor owing to the close proximity, whereas no reaction was observed with a non-specific DBCO-aptamer (Fig. 19B) [122]. These experiments highlight the potential for proximity induced rate enhancement due to a high local concentration of the click reagents, and makes use of slow bioorthogonal reaction pairs a viable option [122].
In another study, Pan’s group explored the effect of enhanced cell–cell interactions in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell cytotoxicity. Here, the researchers prepared anti-CD19 CAR T cells that were metabolically labeled with an azido-modified galactose analog on the cell surface [123]. The CD19 expressing target cells were treated with a BCN-modified mannose analogue (Ac4ManNBCN). Once the anti-CD19 CAR T cell and CD19 expressing target cell recognize each other, the reactants are in close proximity, allowing the azide-BCN SPAAC reaction to proceed (Fig. 19C) [123]. These examples highlight that slow kinetics can also be favorable when investigating cellular processes and can be used as an additional dimension to induce an orthogonal reaction pair.
4 Considerations and Challenges in Mutual Bioorthogonal Chemistry
Bioorthogonal chemistry has made significant advancements over the last decades and many new reagents and reactions have been successfully explored for bioconjugations. In the context of mutually orthogonal bioorthogonal chemistry, the development of new reactions is continuously desired to improve and fine-tune reaction selectivity, reactant stability and ability to perform reactions in vivo.
Choosing the proper click chemistry pair highly depends on application, required conditions and (commercial) availability of the reagents. The most straightforward approach to achieve mutual orthogonality is by using two bioorthogonal reactions that proceed through different mechanistic pathways, such as the SPAAC and the IEDDA. Yet, within a mechanistic similar reaction pair it is possible to induce orthogonality by altering the steric and electronic properties of the reactants. Other strategies, such as activation triggers or to induce proximity of the reactants are possible to add another layer of control.
Additional desired features may also play a role. For example, the scope of click to release reactions is constantly expanding, with molecules that can release cargo or a quencher of their fluorescent moiety upon reaction completion [124]. So far, click to release has been reported from the Staudinger ligation [125], tetrazines [126], TCOs [127, 128], VBAs [129], iminosydnones [39, 40], and primary isonitriles [130]. Alternatively, there have been many examples for click to fluoresce, in which the click reaction yields a fluorescent dye or releases the quencher molecule to restore fluorescence [131,132,133,134,135]. This turn-on fluorescence is especially useful for imaging in living cells as no washing step due to excess fluorophore is needed.
4.1 Reaction Kinetics put in Perspective
When employing mutual orthogonal chemistry, the slowest pair will dictate the overall duration of the reaction. In general, a higher concentration or longer time for conversion is not as much a concern in making bioconjugates in situ as it is in live cell experiments. Using slow proceeding click reactions with rates < 1 M−1 s−1, in experimental settings that require low reactant concentrations, completion of the click reaction will not occur at a reasonable timeframe (Fig. 20). For example, a reaction with 100 µM of DBCO and azide, reacting with at k2 of 0.33 M−1 s−1, will take about 8.4 h to reach 50% conversion (t1/2), while at 5 µM it will take 7 days to achieve t1/2 [21]. However, any of these reactions can be performed in diluted conditions when the reactants are brought in close proximity to react with sufficient speed as described in Sect. 3.4.2.
4.2 Stability and Toxicity in Fixed and Living Systems
Achieving mutual orthogonal chemistry in vivo remains challenging despite the many successful examples in vitro. For effective in vivo application and potential clinical impact, the reactions need to proceed with high rates and the reactants must be nontoxic and stable under physiological conditions [136, 137]. Biological systems are complex as endogenous biomolecules, enzymes, and reactive species often interfere with bioorthogonal reactions. Strained alkynes, for example, are prone to thiol-ene addition and are less suitable for long intracellular labeling owing to the reductive environment and the presence of high concentrations of free thiols [138]. For labeling biomolecules in vivo, the tetrazine-TCO combination is very prominent owing to its extremely high reaction rates. However, TCOs are liable to isomerization to the inactive cis isomer via light, thermal energy, concentrated thiol solutions, and metalloproteins, such as transcuprein and serum albumin, that contain copper and zinc [139]. These instabilities make the application of strained alkynes and TCOs for intracellular labeling challenging, but not impossible [140]. Improved stability but slower kinetics can lead to higher efficacy, and thus be preferable in vivo, as was shown by Rossin et al. with several variants of TCO [141].
While most click reactions are suitable for use in living systems at low concentration, some catalysts, such as copper needed for CuAAC, are toxic [142]. Copper ligands, such as THPTA, both improve the kinetics and provide protection to oxidation of cell structures [143]. The BTTP and BTTAA-Cu(I) ligand-copper complexes have been used successfully in CuAAC inside E. coli without toxicity [144]. The low wavelength light used in photoclick chemistry can be cytotoxic. The most toxic conditions are in the UV range [145], although higher wavelengths may also induce photocytotoxicity [146]. The use of low wavelength light is further challenged by the poor skin penetration in vivo [147].
It is evident that using click chemistry in the intracellular environment of living systems is much more challenging compared with fixed cell material. This greatly restricts the use of certain chemistries, thereby limiting the use of multiple bioorthogonal reactions simultaneously. This underscores the need for a more diverse and rapid click reactions that are suitable for the biomolecule labeling in living cells.
5 Conclusions
Mutual orthogonal chemistry is a dynamic and transformative chemical and biological research field. It offers immense promise for the future of drug design, imaging techniques, biomaterial and tissue engineering, and precise drug delivery. Despite current limitations and challenges, such as the need for fine-tuned selectivity, adaptation to the complexities of biological environments, and the expansion of substrate scope, the field continues to evolve quickly. Recent advancements in achieving orthogonality through strategies, such as electronic and steric reactant tuning, yielding distinct reaction mechanisms, and induced click chemistry, have advanced mutual orthogonal chemistry to new grounds. The potential for this field to revolutionize drug discovery and expand the understanding of the complex chemical and biological world offers a bright future for its applications.
References
Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB (2001) Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed 40(11):2004–2021
Tornøe CW, Christensen C, Meldal M (2002) Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regiospecific copper(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J Org Chem 67(9):3057–3064
Hang HC, Yu C, Kato DL, Bertozzi CR (2003) A metabolic labeling approach toward proteomic analysis of mucin-type O-linked glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(25):14846–14851
Sletten EM, Bertozzi CR (2011) From mechanism to mouse: a tale of two bioorthogonal reactions. Acc Chem Res 44(9):666–676
Sletten EM, Bertozzi CR (2009) Bioorthogonal chemistry: fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew Chem Int Ed 48(38):6974–6998
Hu Y, Schomaker JM (2021) Recent developments and strategies for mutually orthogonal bioorthogonal reactions. ChemBioChem 22(23):3254–3262
Bird RE, Lemmel SA, Yu X, Zhou QA (2021) Bioorthogonal chemistry and its applications. Bioconjug Chem 32(12):2457–2479
Smeenk MLWJ, Agramunt J, Bonger KM (2021) Recent developments in bioorthogonal chemistry and the orthogonality within. Curr Opin Chem Biol 60:79–88
Deb T, Tu J, Franzini RM (2021) Mechanisms and Substituent effects of metal-free bioorthogonal reactions. Chem Rev 121(12):6850–6914
Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB (2002) A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 41(14):2596–2599
Zhang L, Chen X, Xue P, Sun HHY, Williams ID, Sharpless KB, Fokin VV, Jia G (2005) Ruthenium-catalyzed cycloaddition of alkynes and organic azides. J Am Chem Soc 127(46):15998–15999
Johansson JR, Beke-Somfai T, Said Stålsmeden A, Kann N (2016) Ruthenium-catalyzed azide alkyne cycloaddition reaction: scope, mechanism, and applications. Chem Rev 116(23):14726–14768
Li T, Dief EM, Kalužná Z, MacGregor M, Foroutan-Nejad C, Darwish N (2022) On-surface azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction: does it click with ruthenium catalysts? Langmuir 38(18):5532–5541
Chan TR, Hilgraf R, Sharpless KB, Fokin VV (2004) Polytriazoles as copper(I)-stabilizing ligands in catalysis. Org Lett 6(17):2853–2855
Agard NJ, Prescher JA, Bertozzi CR (2004) A strain-promoted [3 + 2] azide−alkyne cycloaddition for covalent modification of biomolecules in living systems. J Am Chem Soc 126(46):15046–15047
Codelli JA, Baskin JM, Agard NJ, Bertozzi CR (2008) Second-generation difluorinated cyclooctynes for copper-free click chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 130(34):11486–11493
Ning X, Guo J, Wolfert MA, Boons GJ (2008) Visualizing metabolically labeled glycoconjugates of living cells by copper-free and fast huisgen cycloadditions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 47(12):2253–2255
Jewett JC, Sletten EM, Bertozzi CR (2010) Rapid Cu-free click chemistry with readily synthesized biarylazacyclooctynones. J Am Chem Soc 132(11):3688–3690
Debets MF, van Berkel SS, Schoffelen S, Rutjes FP, van Hest JC, van Delft FL (2010) Aza-dibenzocyclooctynes for fast and efficient enzyme PEGylation via copper-free (3+2) cycloaddition. Chem Commun (Camb) 46(1):97–99
de Almeida G, Sletten EM, Nakamura H, Palaniappan KK, Bertozzi CR (2012) Thiacycloalkynes for copper-free click chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(10):2443–2447
Dommerholt J, van Rooijen O, Borrmann A, Guerra CF, Bickelhaupt FM, van Delft FL (2014) Highly accelerated inverse electron-demand cycloaddition of electron-deficient azides with aliphatic cyclooctynes. Nat Commun 5(1):5378
Chigrinova M, McKay CS, Beaulieu LP, Udachin KA, Beauchemin AM, Pezacki JP (2013) Rearrangements and addition reactions of biarylazacyclooctynones and the implications to copper-free click chemistry. Org Biomol Chem 11(21):3436–3441
Beatty KE, Fisk JD, Smart BP, Lu YY, Szychowski J, Hangauer MJ, Baskin JM, Bertozzi CR, Tirrell DA (2010) Live-cell imaging of cellular proteins by a strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition. ChemBioChem 11(15):2092–2095
Sletten EM, Nakamura H, Jewett JC, Bertozzi CR (2010) Difluorobenzocyclooctyne: synthesis, reactivity, and stabilization by beta-cyclodextrin. J Am Chem Soc 132(33):11799–11805
Poole TH, Reisz JA, Zhao W, Poole LB, Furdui CM, King SB (2014) Strained cycloalkynes as new protein sulfenic acid traps. J Am Chem Soc 136(17):6167–6170
King M, Baati R, Wagner A (2012) New tetramethylthiepinium (TMTI) for copper-free click chemistry. Chem Commun 48(74):9308–9309
Weterings J, Rijcken CJF, Veldhuis H, Meulemans T, Hadavi D, Timmers M, Honing M, Ippel H, Liskamp RMJ (2020) TMTHSI, a superior 7-membered ring alkyne containing reagent for strain-promoted azide–alkyne cycloaddition reactions. Chem Sci 11(33):9011–9016
Nguyen SS, Prescher JA (2020) Developing bioorthogonal probes to span a spectrum of reactivities. Nat Rev Chem 4(9):476–489
Ning X, Temming RP, Dommerholt J, Guo J, Ania DB, Debets MF, Wolfert MA, Boons G-J, van Delft FL (2010) Protein modification by strain-promoted alkyne-nitrone cycloaddition. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(17):3065–3068
Bilodeau DA, Margison KD, Serhan M, Pezacki JP (2021) Bioorthogonal reactions utilizing nitrones as versatile dipoles in cycloaddition reactions. Chem Rev 121(12):6699–6717
McKay CS, Moran J, Pezacki JP (2010) Nitrones as dipoles for rapid strain-promoted 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions with cyclooctynes. Chem Commun 46(6):931–933
Bernardim B, Dunsmore L, Li H, Hocking B, Nuñez-Franco R, Navo CD, Jiménez-Osés G, Burtoloso ACB, Bernardes GJL (2020) Precise installation of diazo-tagged side-chains on proteins to enable in vitro and in-cell site-specific labeling. Bioconjug Chem 31(6):1604–1610
McGrath NA, Raines RT (2012) Diazo compounds as highly tunable reactants in 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions with cycloalkynes. Chem Sci 3(11):3237–3240
Aronoff MR, Gold B, Raines RT (2016) 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of diazo compounds in the presence of azides. Org Lett 18(7):1538–1541
McGrath NA, Andersen KA, Davis AKF, Lomax JE, Raines RT (2015) Diazo compounds for the bioreversible esterification of proteins. Chem Sci 6(1):752–755
Kolodych S, Rasolofonjatovo E, Chaumontet M, Nevers M-C, Créminon C, Taran F (2013) Discovery of chemoselective and biocompatible reactions using a high-throughput immunoassay screening. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(46):12056–12060
Wallace S, Chin JW (2014) Strain-promoted sydnone bicyclo-[6.1.0]-nonyne cycloaddition. Chem Sci 5(5):1742–1744
Decuypère E, Plougastel L, Audisio D, Taran F (2017) Sydnone–alkyne cycloaddition: applications in synthesis and bioconjugation. Chem Commun 53(84):11515–11527
Bernard S, Audisio D, Riomet M, Bregant S, Sallustrau A, Plougastel L, Decuypere E, Gabillet S, Kumar RA, Elyian J et al. (2017) Bioorthogonal click and release reaction of iminosydnones with cycloalkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed 56(49):15612–15616
Ribéraud M, Porte K, Chevalier A, Madegard L, Rachet A, Delaunay-Moisan A, Vinchon F, Thuéry P, Chiappetta G, Champagne PA et al. (2023) Fast and bioorthogonal release of isocyanates in living cells from iminosydnones and cycloalkynes. J Am Chem Soc 145(4):2219–2229
Kumar RA, Pattanayak MR, Yen-Pon E, Eliyan J, Porte K, Bernard S, Riomet M, Thuéry P, Audisio D, Taran F (2019) Strain-promoted 1,3-dithiolium-4-olates–alkyne cycloaddition. Angew Chem Int Ed 58(41):14544–14548
Dommerholt J, Schmidt S, Temming R, Hendriks LJ, Rutjes FP, van Hest JC, Lefeber DJ, Friedl P, van Delft FL (2010) Readily accessible bicyclononynes for bioorthogonal labeling and three-dimensional imaging of living cells. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49(49):9422–9425
Svatunek D, Houszka N, Hamlin TA, Bickelhaupt FM, Mikula H (2019) Chemoselectivity of tertiary azides in strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloadditions. Chem Eur J 25(3):754–758
Bickelhaupt FM, Houk KN (2017) Analyzing reaction rates with the distortion/interaction-activation strain model. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 56(34):10070–10086
Oliveira BL, Guo Z, Bernardes GJL (2017) Inverse electron demand Diels–Alder reactions in chemical biology. Chem Soc Rev 46(16):4895–4950
Chen W, Wang D, Dai C, Hamelberg D, Wang B (2012) Clicking 1,2,4,5-tetrazine and cyclooctynes with tunable reaction rates. Chem Commun 48(12):1736–1738
Taylor MT, Blackman ML, Dmitrenko O, Fox JM (2011) Design and synthesis of highly reactive dienophiles for the tetrazine–trans-cyclooctene ligation. J Am Chem Soc 133(25):9646–9649
Karver MR, Weissleder R, Hilderbrand SA (2011) Synthesis and Evaluation of a series of 1,2,4,5-tetrazines for bioorthogonal conjugation. Bioconjug Chem 22(11):2263–2270
Lang K, Davis L, Torres-Kolbus J, Chou C, Deiters A, Chin JW (2012) Genetically encoded norbornene directs site-specific cellular protein labelling via a rapid bioorthogonal reaction. Nat Chem 4(4):298–304
Wang D, Chen W, Zheng Y, Dai C, Wang K, Ke B, Wang B (2014) 3,6-substituted-1,2,4,5-tetrazines: tuning reaction rates for staged labeling applications. Org Biomol Chem 12(23):3950–3955
Blackman ML, Royzen M, Fox JM (2008) Tetrazine ligation: fast bioconjugation based on inverse-electron-demand diels−alder reactivity. J Am Chem Soc 130(41):13518–13519
Tolshchina SG, Rusinov GL, Charushin VN (2013) 1,2,4,5-tetrazines and azolo[1,2,4,5]tetrazines: synthesis and reactions with nucleophiles. Chem Heterocycl Compd 49(1):66–91
Svatunek D, Wilkovitsch M, Hartmann L, Houk KN, Mikula H (2022) Uncovering the key role of distortion in bioorthogonal tetrazine tools that defy the reactivity/stability trade-off. J Am Chem Soc 144(18):8171–8177
Kamber DN, Liang Y, Blizzard RJ, Liu F, Mehl RA, Houk KN, Prescher JA (2015) 1,2,4-triazines are versatile bioorthogonal reagents. J Am Chem Soc 137(26):8388–8391
Levandowski BJ, Abularrage NS, Raines RT (2020) Differential effects of nitrogen substitution in 5- and 6-membered aromatic motifs. Chem Eur J 26(41):8862–8866
Šlachtová V, Bellová S, La-Venia A, Galeta J, Dračínský M, Chalupský K, Dvořáková A, Mertlíková-Kaiserová H, Rukovanský P, Dzijak R, Vrabel M (2023) Triazinium ligation: bioorthogonal reaction of N1-Alkyl 1,2,4-triazinium salts. Angew Chem Int Ed 62(36):e202306828
Kamber DN, Nazarova LA, Liang Y, Lopez SA, Patterson DM, Shih H-W, Houk KN, Prescher JA (2013) Isomeric cyclopropenes exhibit unique bioorthogonal reactivities. J Am Chem Soc 135(37):13680–13683
Karver MR, Weissleder R, Hilderbrand SA (2012) Bioorthogonal reaction pairs enable simultaneous, selective, multi-target imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(4):920–922
Knall A-C, Slugovc C (2013) Inverse electron demand Diels–Alder (iEDDA)-initiated conjugation: a (high) potential click chemistry scheme. Chem Soc Rev 42(12):5131–5142
Kamber DN, Nguyen SS, Liu F, Briggs JS, Shih H-W, Row RD, Long ZG, Houk KN, Liang Y, Prescher JA (2019) Isomeric triazines exhibit unique profiles of bioorthogonal reactivity. Chem Sci 10(39):9109–9114
Burke EG, Gold B, Hoang TT, Raines RT, Schomaker JM (2017) Fine-tuning strain and electronic activation of strain-promoted 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions with endocyclic sulfamates in SNO-OCTs. J Am Chem Soc 139(23):8029–8037
Hu Y, Roberts JM, Kilgore HR, Mat Lani AS, Raines RT, Schomaker JM (2020) Triple, mutually orthogonal bioorthogonal pairs through the design of electronically activated sulfamate-containing cycloalkynes. J Am Chem Soc 142(44):18826–18835
Eising S, Lelivelt F, Bonger KM (2016) Vinylboronic acids as fast reacting, synthetically accessible, and stable bioorthogonal reactants in the carboni-lindsey reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(40):12243–12247
Liu F, Liang Y, Houk KN (2017) Bioorthogonal cycloadditions: computational analysis with the distortion/interaction model and predictions of reactivities. Acc Chem Res 50(9):2297–2308
Ravasco JMJM, Monteiro CM, Trindade AF (2017) Cyclopropenes: a new tool for the study of biological systems. Org Chem Front 4(6):1167–1198
Saxon E, Bertozzi CR (2000) Cell surface engineering by a modified Staudinger reaction. Science 287(5460):2007–2010
Dorn RS, Prescher JA (2023) Bioorthogonal phosphines: then and now. Isr J Chem 63(1–2):e202200070
Nilsson BL, Kiessling LL, Raines RT (2000) Staudinger ligation: a peptide from a thioester and azide. Org Lett 2(13):1939–1941
Bednarek C, Wehl I, Jung N, Schepers U, Bräse S (2020) The Staudinger ligation. Chem Rev 120(10):4301–4354
Böhrsch V, Serwa R, Majkut P, Krause E, Hackenberger CPR (2010) Site-specific functionalisation of proteins by a Staudinger-type reaction using unsymmetrical phosphites. Chem Commun 46(18):3176–3178
Vallée MRJ, Majkut P, Wilkening I, Weise C, Müller G, Hackenberger CPR (2011) Staudinger-phosphonite reactions for the chemoselective transformation of azido-containing peptides and proteins. Org Lett 13(20):5440–5443
Vugts DJ, Vervoort A, Stigter-van Walsum M, Visser GWM, Robillard MS, Versteegen RM, Vulders RCM, Herscheid JDM, van Dongen GAMS (2011) Synthesis of phosphine and antibody-azide probes for in vivo Staudinger ligation in a pretargeted imaging and therapy approach. Bioconjugate Chem 22(10):2072–2081
Vallée MRJ, Majkut P, Krause D, Gerrits M, Hackenberger CPR (2015) Chemoselective bioconjugation of triazole phosphonites in aqueous media. Chem Eur J 21(3):970–974
Mühlberg M, Jaradat DSMM, Kleineweischede R, Papp I, Dechtrirat D, Muth S, Broncel M, Hackenberger CPR (2010) Acidic and basic deprotection strategies of borane-protected phosphinothioesters for the traceless Staudinger ligation. Bioorg Med Chem 18(11):3679–3686
Poulou E, Hackenberger CPR (2023) Staudinger ligation and reactions – from bioorthogonal labeling to next-generation biopharmaceuticals. Isr J Chem 63(1–2):e202200057
Row RD, Nguyen SS, Ferreira AJ, Prescher JA (2020) Chemically triggered crosslinking with bioorthogonal cyclopropenones. Chem Commun (Camb) 56(74):10883–10886
Row RD, Shih H-W, Alexander AT, Mehl RA, Prescher JA (2017) Cyclopropenones for metabolic targeting and sequential bioorthogonal labeling. J Am Chem Soc 139(21):7370–7375
Row RD, Prescher JA (2018) A cyclopropenethione-phosphine ligation for rapid biomolecule labeling. Org Lett 20(18):5614–5617
Heiss TK, Prescher JA (2019) Cyclopropeniminium Ions exhibit unique reactivity profiles with bioorthogonal phosphines. J Org Chem 84(11):7443–7448
Stöckmann H, Neves AA, Stairs S, Brindle KM, Leeper FJ (2011) Exploring isonitrile-based click chemistry for ligation with biomolecules. Org Biomol Chem 9(21):7303–7305
Schäfer RJB, Monaco MR, Li M, Tirla A, Rivera-Fuentes P, Wennemers H (2019) The bioorthogonal isonitrile-chlorooxime ligation. J Am Chem Soc 141(47):18644–18648
Tu J, Xu M, Parvez S, Peterson RT, Franzini RM (2018) Bioorthogonal removal of 3-isocyanopropyl groups enables the controlled release of fluorophores and drugs in vivo. J Am Chem Soc 140(27):8410–8414
Tu J, Svatunek D, Parvez S, Liu AC, Levandowski BJ, Eckvahl HJ, Peterson RT, Houk KN, Franzini RM (2019) Stable, reactive, and orthogonal tetrazines: dispersion forces promote the cycloaddition with isonitriles. Angew Chem Int Ed 58(27):9043–9048
Stairs S, Neves AA, Stöckmann H, Wainman YA, Ireland-Zecchini H, Brindle KM, Leeper FJ (2013) Metabolic glycan imaging by isonitrile-tetrazine click chemistry. ChemBioChem 14(9):1063–1067
António JPM, Russo R, Carvalho CP, Cal PMSD, Gois PMP (2019) Boronic acids as building blocks for the construction of therapeutically useful bioconjugates. Chem Soc Rev 48(13):3513–3536
Akgun B, Hall DG (2018) Boronic acids as bioorthogonal probes for site-selective labeling of proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed 57(40):13028–13044
Chio TI, Gu H, Mukherjee K, Tumey LN, Bane SL (2019) Site-specific bioconjugation and multi-bioorthogonal labeling via rapid formation of a boron-nitrogen heterocycle. Bioconjug Chem 30(5):1554–1564
Borrmann A, Fatunsin O, Dommerholt J, Jonker AM, Löwik DWPM, van Hest JCM, van Delft FL (2015) Strain-promoted oxidation-controlled cyclooctyne–1,2-quinone cycloaddition (SPOCQ) for fast and activatable protein conjugation. Bioconjug Chem 26(2):257–261
Bruins JJ, Westphal AH, Albada B, Wagner K, Bartels L, Spits H, van Berkel WJH, van Delft FL (2017) Inducible, site-specific protein labeling by tyrosine oxidation–strain-promoted (4 + 2) cycloaddition. Bioconjug Chem 28(4):1189–1193
Damen JAM, Escorihuela J, Zuilhof H, van Delft FL, Albada B (2023) High rates of quinone-alkyne cycloaddition reactions are dictated by entropic factors. Chem Eur J 29(39):e202300231
Knittel C, Chadwick S, Kuehling C, Devaraj N (2024) Enzymatic activation of caged tetrazines for cell-specific bioconjugation. ChemRxiv
Li J, Kong H, Zhu C, Zhang Y (2020) Photo-controllable bioorthogonal chemistry for spatiotemporal control of bio-targets in living systems. Chem Sci 11(13):3390–3396
Poloukhtine AA, Mbua NE, Wolfert MA, Boons G-J, Popik VV (2009) Selective labeling of living cells by a photo-triggered click reaction. J Am Chem Soc 131(43):15769–15776
Arumugam S, Orski SV, Mbua NE, McNitt C, Boons G-J, Locklin J, Popik VV (2013) Photo-click chemistry strategies for spatiotemporal control of metal-free ligation, labeling, and surface derivatization. Pure Appl Chem 85(7):1499–1513
Mayer SV, Murnauer A, von Wrisberg M-K, Jokisch M-L, Lang K (2019) Photo-induced and rapid labeling of tetrazine-bearing proteins via cyclopropenone-caged bicyclononynes. Angew Chem Int Ed 58(44):15876–15882
Jiang T, Kumar P, Huang W, Kao W-S, Thompson AO, Camarda FM, Laughlin ST (2019) Modular enzyme- and light-based activation of cyclopropene-tetrazine ligation. ChemBioChem 20(17):2222–2226
Kumar P, Jiang T, Li S, Zainul O, Laughlin ST (2018) Caged cyclopropenes for controlling bioorthogonal reactivity. Org Biomol Chem 16(22):4081–4085
Jemas A, Xie Y, Pigga JE, Caplan JL, Am Ende CW, Fox JM (2022) Catalytic activation of bioorthogonal chemistry with light (CABL) enables rapid, spatiotemporally controlled labeling and no-wash, subcellular 3D-patterning in live cells using long wavelength light. J Am Chem Soc 144(4):1647–1662
Liu L, Zhang D, Johnson M, Devaraj NK (2022) Light-activated tetrazines enable precision live-cell bioorthogonal chemistry. Nat Chem 14(9):1078–1085
Ramil CP, Lin Q (2014) Photoclick chemistry: a fluorogenic light-triggered in vivo ligation reaction. Curr Opin Chem Biol 21:89–95
Herner A, Lin Q (2016) Photo-triggered click chemistry for biological applications. Top Curr Chem (Cham) 374(1):1
Kumar GS, Racioppi S, Zurek E, Lin Q (2022) Superfast tetrazole–BCN cycloaddition reaction for bioorthogonal protein labeling on live cells. J Am Chem Soc 144(1):57–62
Li J, Kong H, Huang L, Cheng B, Qin K, Zheng M, Yan Z, Zhang Y (2018) Visible light-initiated bioorthogonal photoclick cycloaddition. J Am Chem Soc 140(44):14542–14546
Kumar GS, Lin Q (2021) Light-triggered click chemistry. Chem Rev 121(12):6991–7031
Hiltebrandt K, Pauloehrl T, Blinco JP, Linkert K, Börner HG, Barner-Kowollik C (2015) λ-orthogonal pericyclic macromolecular photoligation. Angew Chem Int Ed 54(9):2838–2843
Menzel JP, Feist F, Tuten B, Weil T, Blinco JP, Barner-Kowollik C (2019) Light-controlled orthogonal covalent bond formation at two different wavelengths. Angew Chem Int Ed 58(22):7470–7474
Xu L, Kuan SL, Weil T (2021) Contemporary approaches for site-selective dual functionalization of proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed 60(25):13757–13777
Chen X, Wu Y-W (2016) Selective chemical labeling of proteins. Org Biomol Chem 14(24):5417–5439
Maruani A, Smith MEB, Miranda E, Chester KA, Chudasama V, Caddick S (2015) A plug-and-play approach to antibody-based therapeutics via a chemoselective dual click strategy. Nat Commun 6(1):6645
Wang K, Sachdeva A, Cox DJ, Wilf NM, Lang K, Wallace S, Mehl RA, Chin JW (2014) Optimized orthogonal translation of unnatural amino acids enables spontaneous protein double-labelling and FRET. Nat Chem 6(5):393–403
Walker JA, Bohn JJ, Ledesma F, Sorkin MR, Kabaria SR, Thornlow DN, Alabi CA (2019) Substrate design enables heterobifunctional, dual “Click” antibody modification via microbial transglutaminase. Bioconjug Chem 30(9):2452–2457
Wu B, Wang Z, Huang Y, Liu WR (2012) Catalyst-free and site-specific one-pot dual-labeling of a protein directed by two genetically incorporated noncanonical amino acids. ChemBioChem 13(10):1405–1408
Sachdeva A, Wang K, Elliott T, Chin JW (2014) Concerted, rapid, quantitative, and site-specific dual labeling of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 136(22):7785–7788
Walker JA, Bohn JJ, Ledesma F, Sorkin MR, Kabaria SR, Thornlow DN, Alabi CA (2019) Substrate design enables heterobifunctional, dual “Click” antibody modification via microbial transglutaminase. Bioconjug Chem 30(9):2452–2457
Italia JS, Addy PS, Erickson SB, Peeler JC, Weerapana E, Chatterjee A (2019) Mutually orthogonal nonsense-suppression systems and conjugation chemistries for precise protein labeling at up to three distinct sites. J Am Chem Soc 141(15):6204–6212
Addy PS, Erickson SB, Italia JS, Chatterjee A (2017) A chemoselective rapid azo-coupling reaction (CRACR) for unclickable bioconjugation. J Am Chem Soc 139(34):11670–11673
Szatmári Á, Cserép GB, Molnár TÁ, Söveges B, Biró A, Várady G, Szabó E, Németh K, Kele P (2021) A genetically encoded isonitrile lysine for orthogonal bioorthogonal labeling schemes. Molecules 26(16):4988
Svatunek D, Chojnacki K, Deb T, Eckvahl H, Houk KN, Franzini RM (2023) Orthogonal inverse-electron-demand cycloaddition reactions controlled by frontier molecular orbital interactions. Org Lett 25(34):6340–6345
Deng Y, Shen T, Yu X, Li J, Zou P, Gong Q, Zheng Y, Sun H, Liu X, Wu H (2024) Tetrazine-isonitrile bioorthogonal fluorogenic reactions enable multiplex labeling and wash-free bioimaging of live cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 63(10):e202319853
Zhang X, Xu H, Li J, Su D, Mao W, Shen G, Li L, Wu H (2022) Isonitrile induced bioorthogonal activation of fluorophores and mutually orthogonal cleavage in live cells. Chem Commun 58(4):573–576
Eising S, Engwerda AHJ, Riedijk X, Bickelhaupt FM, Bonger KM (2018) Highly stable and selective tetrazines for the coordination-assisted bioorthogonal ligation with vinylboronic acids. Bioconjugate Chem 29(9):3054–3059
Robinson PV, de Almeida-Escobedo G, de Groot AE, McKechnie JL, Bertozzi CR (2015) Live-cell labeling of specific protein glycoforms by proximity-enhanced bioorthogonal ligation. J Am Chem Soc 137(33):10452–10455
Pan H, Li W, Chen Z, Luo Y, He W, Wang M, Tang X, He H, Liu L, Zheng M et al. (2021) Click CAR-T cell engineering for robustly boosting cell immunotherapy in blood and subcutaneous xenograft tumor. Bioact Mater 6(4):951–962
Fu Q, Shen S, Sun P, Gu Z, Bai Y, Wang X, Liu Z (2023) Bioorthogonal chemistry for prodrug activation in vivo. Chem Soc Rev 52(22):7737–7772
Azoulay M, Tuffin G, Sallem W, Florent JC (2006) A new drug-release method using the Staudinger ligation. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16(12):3147–3149
van Onzen AHAM, Versteegen RM, Hoeben FJM, Filot IAW, Rossin R, Zhu T, Wu J, Hudson PJ, Janssen HM, ten Hoeve W, Robillard MS (2020) Bioorthogonal tetrazine carbamate cleavage by highly reactive trans-cyclooctene. J Am Chem Soc 142(25):10955–10963
Versteegen RM, ten Hoeve W, Rossin R, de Geus MAR, Janssen HM, Robillard MS (2018) Click-to-release from trans-cyclooctenes: mechanistic insights and expansion of scope from established carbamate to remarkable ether cleavage. Angew Chem Int Ed 57(33):10494–10499
Sondag D, Maartense L, de Jong H, de Kleijne FFJ, Bonger KM, Löwik D, Boltje TJ, Dommerholt J, White PB, Blanco-Ania D, Rutjes F (2023) Readily accessible strained difunctionalized trans-cyclooctenes with fast click and release capabilities. Chemistry 29(6):e202203375
Lelieveldt LPWM, Eising S, Wijen A, Bonger KM (2019) Vinylboronic acid-caged prodrug activation using click-to-release tetrazine ligation. Org Biomol Chem 17(39):8816–8821
Tu J, Svatunek D, Parvez S, Eckvahl HJ, Xu M, Peterson RT, Houk KN, Franzini RM (2020) Isonitrile-responsive and bioorthogonally removable tetrazine protecting groups. Chem Sci 11(1):169–179
Li Q, Li G, Fan L, Yu Y, Liu J (2022) Click reaction triggered turn-on fluorescence strategy for highly sensitive and selective determination of steroid hormones in food samples. Food Chem 374:131565
Ko J, Oh J, Ahmed MS, Carlson JCT, Weissleder R (2020) Ultra-fast cycling for multiplexed cellular fluorescence imaging. Angew Chem Weinheim Bergstr Ger 132(17):6906–6913
Wieczorek A, Buckup T, Wombacher R (2014) Rigid tetrazine fluorophore conjugates with fluorogenic properties in the inverse electron demand Diels–Alder reaction. Org Biomol Chem 12(24):4177–4185
Werther P, Yserentant K, Braun F, Grußmayer K, Navikas V, Yu M, Zhang Z, Ziegler MJ, Mayer C, Gralak AJ et al. (2021) Bio-orthogonal red and far-red fluorogenic probes for wash-free live-cell and super-resolution microscopy. ACS Cent Sci 7(9):1561–1571
Devaraj NK, Hilderbrand S, Upadhyay R, Mazitschek R, Weissleder R (2010) Bioorthogonal turn-on probes for imaging small molecules inside living cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(16):2869–2872
Patterson DM, Prescher JA (2015) Orthogonal bioorthogonal chemistries. Curr Opin Chem Biol 28:141–149
Mitry MMA, Greco F, Osborn HMI (2023) In vivo applications of bioorthogonal reactions: chemistry and targeting mechanisms. Chem Eur J 29(20):e202203942
van Geel R, Pruijn GJM, van Delft FL, Boelens WC (2012) Preventing thiol-yne addition improves the specificity of strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Bioconjug Chem 23(3):392–398
Rossin R, van den Bosch SM, ten Hoeve W, Carvelli M, Versteegen RM, Lub J, Robillard MS (2013) Highly reactive trans-cyclooctene tags with improved stability for Diels–Alder chemistry in living systems. Bioconjug Chem 24(7):1210–1217
Ligthart NAM, de Geus MAR, van de Plassche MAT, Torres García D, Isendoorn MME, Reinalda L, Ofman D, van Leeuwen T, van Kasteren SI (2023) A lysosome-targeted tetrazine for organelle-specific click-to-release chemistry in antigen presenting cells. J Am Chem Soc 145(23):12630–12640
Rossin R, van Duijnhoven SMJ, Läppchen T, van den Bosch SM, Robillard MS (2014) Trans-cyclooctene tag with improved properties for tumor pretargeting with the Diels–Alder reaction. Mol Pharm 11(9):3090–3096
Kennedy DC, McKay CS, Legault MCB, Danielson DC, Blake JA, Pegoraro AF, Stolow A, Mester Z, Pezacki JP (2011) Cellular consequences of copper complexes used to catalyze bioorthogonal click reactions. J Am Chem Soc 133(44):17993–18001
Hong V, Steinmetz NF, Manchester M, Finn MG (2010) Labeling live cells by copper-catalyzed alkyne–azide click chemistry. Bioconjugate Chem 21(10):1912–1916
Yang M, Jalloh AS, Wei W, Zhao J, Wu P, Chen PR (2014) Biocompatible click chemistry enabled compartment-specific pH measurement inside E. coli. Nat Commun 5(1):4981
Masuma R, Kashima S, Kurasaki M, Okuno T (2013) Effects of UV wavelength on cell damages caused by UV irradiation in PC12 cells. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol 125:202–208
Klak M, Gomółka M, Dobrzański T, Tymicki G, Cywoniuk P, Kowalska P, Kosowska K, Bryniarski T, Berman A, Dobrzyń A et al. (2020) Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets. PLoS ONE 15(6):e0235052
Ash C, Dubec M, Donne K, Bashford T (2017) Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods. Lasers Med Sci 32(8):1909–1918
Acknowledgements
This work is part of a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 802940) and the NWO gravitation program “Institute for Chemical Immunology” (NWO-024.002.009).
Funding
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, NWO-024.002.009, NWO-024.002.009, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council, 802940.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.V., L.d.B, and K.B. wrote and edited the manuscript; K.V. and L.d.B prepared the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Venrooij, K.R., de Bondt, L. & Bonger, K.M. Mutually Orthogonal Bioorthogonal Reactions: Selective Chemistries for Labeling Multiple Biomolecules Simultaneously. Top Curr Chem (Z) 382, 24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-024-00467-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-024-00467-8