Abstract
This work presents an investigation into the effect of impeller geometry on the local bubble breakage behavior in a stirred tank. The relative breakage location and local number of produced daughter bubbles (fragments) were investigated using a high-speed imaging method. Three impeller geometries were used for a range of impeller Reynolds numbers (Re) (18380–40830). The impellor geometries used were: 4-flat blades, 4-twisted blades, and 2-flat blades. The results revealed that the number of breakages around the impeller is dependent on the impeller geometry and Re. At lower Re, most breakages occurred close to the tip of the blades in locations near the entry to the impellor region. For higher Re, the rotational motion of the fluid drives the mother and daughter bubbles into different regions around the impeller before breaking up. The highest number of daughter bubbles was observed to be generated close to the blade’s tips of 4-flat blades impeller (average of 8.3). The lowest number of daughter bubbles was observed to occur for the 4-twisted blades (average 2.7). The highest percentage of local bubble breakages and the highest number of resulting daughter bubbles were observed for the 4-flat bladed impeller for all Re (reached up to 90% for highest Re).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbaszadeh M, Alishahi MM, Emdad H (2021) A new bubbly flow detection and quantification procedure based on optical laser-beam scattering behavior. Meas Sci Technol 32:025202
Alabdly H, Majdi H, Hamad M, Hathal M, Hasan BO (2020) Effect of impeller geometry on bubble breakage and the contributions of different breakage mechanisms in a stirred tank. J. fluid dynamic research 52:065504
Alves SS, Maia CI, Vasconcelos JMT, Serralheiro AJ (2020) Bubble size in aerated stirred tanks. Chem Eng J 3990:1–9
Ameur H (2020) Newly modified curved-bladed impellers for process intensification: energy saving in the agitation of Hershel-Bulkley fluids. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 154:108009
Ameur H (2020b) Christophe Vialb, Modified scaba 6SRGT impellers for process intensification: Cavern size and energy saving when stirring viscoplastic fluids. Chem Eng Process 148:107795
Ameur H (2019) Some modifications in the Scaba 6SRGT impeller to enhance the mixing characteristics of Hershel-Bulkley fluids. Food Bioprod Process 117:302–309
Andersson R, Andersson B (2006) On the breakup of fluid particles in turbulent flows. AIChE J 52(6):2020–2030
Azizi HZ, Naghashzadegan M, Shorkri V (2019) Comparison of numerical methods for two-fluid model for gas-liquid transient flow regime and its application in slug modeling initiation. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 3:663–673
Buss A, Suleik A, Rugele K, Vanags J. CFD analysis of a stirred vessel bioreactor with double pitch blade and rushton type impellers. In: Proceedings of the 2017 COMSOL Conference in Rotterdam
Feng J, Cao J, Jiang J, Sun B, Cai Z, Gao Z (2019) Single bubble breakup in the flow field induced by a horizontal jet. Exp Res 17:1–10
Forgia N, Hero EH, Jakobsen HA (2021) High-speed image processing of fluid particle breakage in turbulent flow. Chem Eng Sci X12:100117
Hallaile M, Merchuk JC (2007) operation policies for a gas-liquid stirred tank reactor. Chem Eng Commun 46:179–196
Harriott SM (2001) Unit operations of chemical engineering, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill International, New York
Hartmann H, Derksen JJ, Montavon C, Pearson J, Hamill IS, van den Akker HEA (2004) Assessment of large eddy and RANS stirred tank simulations by means of LDA. Chem Eng Sci 59:2419–2432
Hasan BO, Krakau F (2017) Experimental study on the bubble breakage in a stirred tank. Part 1. Mechanism and effect of operating parameters. Int J Multiph Flow 97:94–108
Hasan BO (2018) Experimental study on the bubble breakage in a stirred tank, Part 2: Local dependence of breakage events. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 96:48–62
Hasan BO, Hamad MF, Majdi HS, Hathal MM (2021) Experimental characterization of dynamic behavior of single bubble breakage in an agitated tank. Eur J Mech B/Fluid 85:430–443
Hasan BO (2017) Breakage of drops and bubbles in a stirred tank: a review of experimental studies. Chin J Chem Eng 25:698–711
Hero EH, Lorgia N, Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA (2020) Single drop breakage in turbulent flow: statistical data analysis. Chem Eng Sci 8:100082
Hinze JO (1955) Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes. AIChE 1:289–295
Huchet F, Linea A, Morchaina J (2009) Evaluation of local kinetic energy dissipation rate in the impeller stream of a Rushton turbine by time-resolved PIV. Chem Eng Res Design 87:369–376
Kausley SB, Yadav MD, Dastane GG, Holkar CR, Pandit AB (2018) Process intensification opportunities in multiphase stirred tank reactors. Chem Ind Digest
Kumar S, Ganvir V, Satyanand C, Kumars R, Gandhi KS (1998) Alternative mechanisms of drop breakup in stirred vessels. Chem Eng Sci 53(18):3269–3280
Lalanne BO, Masbernat F (2019) Risso, A model for drop and bubble breakup frequency based on turbulence spectra. AIChE J 65:347–359
Liao Y, Lucas D (2009) A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. Chem Eng Sci 65(10):2851–2864
Maass S, Kraume M (2012) Determination of breakage rates using single drop experiments. Chem Eng Sci 70:146–164
Maass S, Eppinger T, Altwasser S, Rehm T, Kraume M (2011) Flow field analysis of stirred liquid-liquid systems in slim reactors. Chem Eng Technol 34(8):1215–1227
Martin M, Montes F, Galan M (2008) Influence of impeller type on the bubble breakup process in stirred tanks. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:6251–6263
Mesa D, Brito-Parada PR (2020) Bubble size distribution in aerated stirred tanks: quantifying the effect of impeller-stator design. Chem Eng Res Design 160:356–369
Moffat RJ (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1:3–17
Oliveira M, Fitch AW, Ni X (2003) A study of bubble velocity and bubble residence time in a gassed oscillatory baffled column effect of oscillation frequency. Trans IChemE 81:233–242
Shi X, Tan Chao, Feng Dong MJD, Silva, (2020) Conductance sensors for multiphase flow measurement: a review. IEEE Sens J 21:11
Slaiman QJM, Hasan BO, Mahmood H A (2008) Corrosion inhibition of carbon steel under two-phase flow (water-petroleum) simulated by turbulently agitated system. Can J Chem Eng 86(2):240–248
Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA (2015) Single air bubble breakup experiments in stirred water tank. Int J Chem React Eng 13:477–491
Solsvik J, Maass S, Jakobsen H (2016) Definition of the single drop breakup event. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:2872–2882
Zamiri A, Chung JT (2018) Numerical evaluation of turbulent flow structures in a stirred tank with a Rushton turbine based on scale-adaptive simulation. Comput Fluids 170:236–248
Zhang H, Yang G, Sayyar A, Wang T (2020) An improved bubble breakup model in turbulent flow. Chem Eng J 386:121484
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the contribution of alexander von Humboldt Foundation/Germany for providing experimental devices for performing this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hamad, M.F., Hasan, B.O., Majdi, H.S. et al. The Local Dependence of Bubble Breakup for Different Impeller Geometries in a Stirred Tank. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 47, 469–479 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00547-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00547-4