Skip to main content
Log in

The Local Dependence of Bubble Breakup for Different Impeller Geometries in a Stirred Tank

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents an investigation into the effect of impeller geometry on the local bubble breakage behavior in a stirred tank. The relative breakage location and local number of produced daughter bubbles (fragments) were investigated using a high-speed imaging method. Three impeller geometries were used for a range of impeller Reynolds numbers (Re) (18380–40830). The impellor geometries used were: 4-flat blades, 4-twisted blades, and 2-flat blades. The results revealed that the number of breakages around the impeller is dependent on the impeller geometry and Re. At lower Re, most breakages occurred close to the tip of the blades in locations near the entry to the impellor region. For higher Re, the rotational motion of the fluid drives the mother and daughter bubbles into different regions around the impeller before breaking up. The highest number of daughter bubbles was observed to be generated close to the blade’s tips of 4-flat blades impeller (average of 8.3). The lowest number of daughter bubbles was observed to occur for the 4-twisted blades (average 2.7). The highest percentage of local bubble breakages and the highest number of resulting daughter bubbles were observed for the 4-flat bladed impeller for all Re (reached up to 90% for highest Re).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaszadeh M, Alishahi MM, Emdad H (2021) A new bubbly flow detection and quantification procedure based on optical laser-beam scattering behavior. Meas Sci Technol 32:025202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alabdly H, Majdi H, Hamad M, Hathal M, Hasan BO (2020) Effect of impeller geometry on bubble breakage and the contributions of different breakage mechanisms in a stirred tank. J. fluid dynamic research 52:065504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves SS, Maia CI, Vasconcelos JMT, Serralheiro AJ (2020) Bubble size in aerated stirred tanks. Chem Eng J 3990:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameur H (2020) Newly modified curved-bladed impellers for process intensification: energy saving in the agitation of Hershel-Bulkley fluids. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 154:108009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameur H (2020b) Christophe Vialb, Modified scaba 6SRGT impellers for process intensification: Cavern size and energy saving when stirring viscoplastic fluids. Chem Eng Process 148:107795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameur H (2019) Some modifications in the Scaba 6SRGT impeller to enhance the mixing characteristics of Hershel-Bulkley fluids. Food Bioprod Process 117:302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson R, Andersson B (2006) On the breakup of fluid particles in turbulent flows. AIChE J 52(6):2020–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi HZ, Naghashzadegan M, Shorkri V (2019) Comparison of numerical methods for two-fluid model for gas-liquid transient flow regime and its application in slug modeling initiation. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 3:663–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss A, Suleik A, Rugele K, Vanags J. CFD analysis of a stirred vessel bioreactor with double pitch blade and rushton type impellers. In: Proceedings of the 2017 COMSOL Conference in Rotterdam

  • Feng J, Cao J, Jiang J, Sun B, Cai Z, Gao Z (2019) Single bubble breakup in the flow field induced by a horizontal jet. Exp Res 17:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgia N, Hero EH, Jakobsen HA (2021) High-speed image processing of fluid particle breakage in turbulent flow. Chem Eng Sci X12:100117

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaile M, Merchuk JC (2007) operation policies for a gas-liquid stirred tank reactor. Chem Eng Commun 46:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriott SM (2001) Unit operations of chemical engineering, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill International, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann H, Derksen JJ, Montavon C, Pearson J, Hamill IS, van den Akker HEA (2004) Assessment of large eddy and RANS stirred tank simulations by means of LDA. Chem Eng Sci 59:2419–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan BO, Krakau F (2017) Experimental study on the bubble breakage in a stirred tank. Part 1. Mechanism and effect of operating parameters. Int J Multiph Flow 97:94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan BO (2018) Experimental study on the bubble breakage in a stirred tank, Part 2: Local dependence of breakage events. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 96:48–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan BO, Hamad MF, Majdi HS, Hathal MM (2021) Experimental characterization of dynamic behavior of single bubble breakage in an agitated tank. Eur J Mech B/Fluid 85:430–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan BO (2017) Breakage of drops and bubbles in a stirred tank: a review of experimental studies. Chin J Chem Eng 25:698–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hero EH, Lorgia N, Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA (2020) Single drop breakage in turbulent flow: statistical data analysis. Chem Eng Sci 8:100082

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze JO (1955) Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes. AIChE 1:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huchet F, Linea A, Morchaina J (2009) Evaluation of local kinetic energy dissipation rate in the impeller stream of a Rushton turbine by time-resolved PIV. Chem Eng Res Design 87:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kausley SB, Yadav MD, Dastane GG, Holkar CR, Pandit AB (2018) Process intensification opportunities in multiphase stirred tank reactors. Chem Ind Digest

  • Kumar S, Ganvir V, Satyanand C, Kumars R, Gandhi KS (1998) Alternative mechanisms of drop breakup in stirred vessels. Chem Eng Sci 53(18):3269–3280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalanne BO, Masbernat F (2019) Risso, A model for drop and bubble breakup frequency based on turbulence spectra. AIChE J 65:347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao Y, Lucas D (2009) A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. Chem Eng Sci 65(10):2851–2864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass S, Kraume M (2012) Determination of breakage rates using single drop experiments. Chem Eng Sci 70:146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass S, Eppinger T, Altwasser S, Rehm T, Kraume M (2011) Flow field analysis of stirred liquid-liquid systems in slim reactors. Chem Eng Technol 34(8):1215–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin M, Montes F, Galan M (2008) Influence of impeller type on the bubble breakup process in stirred tanks. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:6251–6263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa D, Brito-Parada PR (2020) Bubble size distribution in aerated stirred tanks: quantifying the effect of impeller-stator design. Chem Eng Res Design 160:356–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat RJ (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira M, Fitch AW, Ni X (2003) A study of bubble velocity and bubble residence time in a gassed oscillatory baffled column effect of oscillation frequency. Trans IChemE 81:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Tan Chao, Feng Dong MJD, Silva, (2020) Conductance sensors for multiphase flow measurement: a review. IEEE Sens J 21:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaiman QJM, Hasan BO, Mahmood H A (2008) Corrosion inhibition of carbon steel under two-phase flow (water-petroleum) simulated by turbulently agitated system. Can J Chem Eng 86(2):240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA (2015) Single air bubble breakup experiments in stirred water tank. Int J Chem React Eng 13:477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solsvik J, Maass S, Jakobsen H (2016) Definition of the single drop breakup event. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:2872–2882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamiri A, Chung JT (2018) Numerical evaluation of turbulent flow structures in a stirred tank with a Rushton turbine based on scale-adaptive simulation. Comput Fluids 170:236–248

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Yang G, Sayyar A, Wang T (2020) An improved bubble breakup model in turbulent flow. Chem Eng J 386:121484

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the contribution of alexander von Humboldt Foundation/Germany for providing experimental devices for performing this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basim O. Hasan.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamad, M.F., Hasan, B.O., Majdi, H.S. et al. The Local Dependence of Bubble Breakup for Different Impeller Geometries in a Stirred Tank. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 47, 469–479 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00547-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00547-4

Keywords

Navigation