Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Stress Concentration Ratio on Shear Strength of Soft Soils Improved with Stone Columns

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have been performed on the behavior of stone columns subjected to vertical loads. However, little research has been focused on determining the shear strength and equivalent shear strength parameters of cohesive soils reinforced with stone columns. The performed research in this area mostly includes numerical analyses which do not consider the effect of stress concentration ratio, and the value of stress concentration ratio in such analyses is assumed to be 1. In this study, an experimental investigation has been carried out on stone columns subjected to vertical and shear loads, with the purpose of determining the actual value of stress concentration ratio. The experiments were performed in a large direct shear device. In this study, single, square and triangular arrangements of stone columns with three different area replacement ratios under three vertical loads were investigated. Soft clay was used as bed material, and stone column material was either crushed stone or fine-grained sand. Results showed that stress concentration ratio decreased with the increase in stone column diameter and vertical stress and the value of stress concentration ratio is highest for square arrangement and lowest for single stone columns. The equivalent shear parameters obtained from experiments and those predicted by analytical relationships were compared at stress concentration value of 1 and stress concentration values obtained from the experiments. Results also showed that the shear strength value and the equivalent shear strength parameters measured from experiments were higher than those predicted by analytical relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abusharar SW, Han J (2011) Two-dimensional deep-seated slope stability analysis of embankments over stone column-improved soft clay. Eng Geol 120(1–4):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamgir M, Miura N, Poorooshasb HB, Madhav MR (1996) Deformation analysis of soft ground columnar inclusions. Comput Geotech 18(4):261–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambily A, Gandhi SR (2006) Effect of sand pad thickness on load sharing in stone column. In: Proceedings Indian geotechnical conference, Chennai

  • Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone column, vol 1. FHWA/RD

  • Castro J (2017) Groups of encased stone columns: influence of column length and arrangement. Geotext Geomembr 45(2):68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JF, Li LY, Xue JF, Feng SZ (2015) Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils underembankment. Geotext Geomembr 43(5):424–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoulas ST, Giannaros CH, Tsiambaos G (1997) Stabilization of embankment foundations by using stone columns. Geotech Geol Eng 15(3):247–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Rose AN (1999) Stone column support for an embankment on deep alluvial soils. ICE Proc Geotech Eng 137(1):15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Samadhiya NK, Namdeo JB (2011) Laboratory model studies on unreinforced and geogrid-reinforced sand bed over stone column-improved soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 29(2):190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattah MY, Shlash KT, Al-Waily MJ (2010) Stress concentration ratio of model stone columns in soft clays. Geotech Test J 34(1):50–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox Z (2011) Critical state, “dilatancy and particle breakage of mine waste rock; Colorado State University”. Degree of Master of Science: Fort Collins, USA

  • Ghazavi M, Nazariafshar J (2013) Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr J 28:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gniel J, Bouazza A (2008) Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 27(3):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goughnour RR, Bayuk AA (1979) A field study of long term settlements of loads supported by stone columns in soft ground. In: Proceeding, international conference on soil reinforcement

  • Han J, Ye SL (2001) Simplified method of consolidation rate of stone column reinforced foundation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinpour I, Riccio M, Almeida MSS (2014) Numerical evolution of a granular column reinforced by geosynthetics using encasement and laminated disks. Geotext Geomembr 42:363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrannia N, Kalantary F, Ganjian N (2018) Experimental study on soil improvement with stone columns and granular blankets. J Cent South Univ 25(4):878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mestar P, Riou Y (2004) Validation des modeles numeriques de sol ameliore par colonnes. In: Proceedings international symposium on ground improvement, pp 229–243

  • Mohapatra SR, Rajagopal K, Sharma J (2016) Direct shear tests on geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Geotext Geomembr 44(3):396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2008) Shear load tests on granular columns with and without geosynthetic encasement. Geotech Test J 32(1):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2010) Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najjar S, Sadek S, Maakaroun T (2010) Effect of sand columns on the undrained load response of soft clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(9):1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak NV (1983) Recent advances in ground improvements by stone column. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, Madras, India

  • Nazariafshar J, Ghazavi M (2014) A simple analytical method for calculation of bearing capacity of stone column. Int J Civ Eng 12(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazariafshar J, Mehrannia N, Kalantary F (2017) Experimental investigation on the bearing capacity of stone columns with granular blankets. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazariafshar J, Mehrannia N, Kalantary F, Ganjian N (2019) Bearing capacity of group of stone columns with granular blankets. Int J Civ Eng 17(2):253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng KS (2014) Numerical study and design criteria of floating stone columns. National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Priebe H (1978) Abschatzung des Scherwiderstandes eines durgh Stopfverdichtung verbesserten Baugrundes. Die Bautechnik 55(9):281–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeber JN (2012) Effects of maximum particle size and sample scaling on the mechanical behavior of mine waste rock: a critical state approach. M.Sc. dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA

  • Vekli M, Aytekin M, İkizler B, Calik U (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of slope stabilization by stone columns. Nat Hazards 64(1):797–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhao M, Shi C, Zhao H (2013) Settlement calculation of composite foundation reinforced with stone columns. Int J Geomech 13(3):248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Javad Nazariafshar

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Lenjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

    Majid Aslani

Authors
  1. Javad Nazariafshar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Majid Aslani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javad Nazariafshar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nazariafshar, J., Aslani, M. Effect of Stress Concentration Ratio on Shear Strength of Soft Soils Improved with Stone Columns. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 45, 315–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00391-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00391-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation