Abstract
This study, focused on Oman, has been motivated by the electrical power demand increase, global warming concerns, and technological advances in renewable energy production. The main objective of the study was to investigate the offshore wind potential and develop the wind atlas over the Oman Maritime Zone (OMZ). The study is based on wind data derived from the high-resolution numerical weather prediction (WRF) model. National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis global model data (0.5°) was used to derive a 9-km-resolution WRF model. This intermediate resolution was then further used to produce a high-resolution (3 km) WRF model. The model data were validated using ground measurement observations under different topographical conditions. Annual, seasonal, and monthly wind distribution over the OMZ are presented using the Geographical Information System environment from different heights above the mean sea level, namely 10 m, 20 m, 50 m, 80 m, and 100 m. In addition, the wind power density along the OMZ region was calculated as a postprocessing product of the model run. Finally, daily time series data are presented for selected points along the coastal areas of Oman. The study results show that the annual average wind speed over the southeastern region reached 8 m/s and peaked at above 10 m/s around the South Coast of Oman. Further, the wind speed during summer months (May–September) was much higher than in other months of the year.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AlSarmi S, Washington R (2011) Recent observed climate change over the Arabian Peninsula. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015459
Al-Yahyai S, Charabi Y, Gastli A (2010a) Review of the use of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Models for wind energy assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:3192–3198
Al-Yahyai S, Charabi Y, Gastli A, AL-Alawi S (2010b) Assessment of wind energy potential in Oman using data from existing weather stations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:1428–1436
Amirinia G, Mafi S, Mazaheri S (2017) Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS. Renew Energy 113:915–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.070
Audrius J, Saulius G, Alfonsas M, Mindaugas A, Inga K, Audrius B, Vidmantas T (2018) Challenges of integrating wind power plants into the electric power system: Lithuanian case. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94(C):468–475
Bilgili M, Yasar A, Simsek E (2011) Offshore wind power development in Europe and its comparison with onshore counterpart. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:905–915
Carvalho D, Rocha A, Gómez-Gesteira M, Santos CS (2014a) WRF wind simulation and wind energy production estimates forced by different reanalysis: comparison with observed data for Portugal. Appl Energy 117:116–126
Carvalho D, Rocha A, Gómez-Gesteira M, Santos CS (2014b) offshore wind energy resource simulation forced by different reanalysis: comparison with observed data in the Iberian Peninsula. Appl Energy 134:57–64
Chancham C, Waewsak J, Gagnon Y (2017) Offshore wind resource assessment and wind power plant optimization in the Gulf of Thailand. Energy 139:706–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.026
Charabi Y, Al-Yahyai S, Gastli A (2011) Evaluation of NWP performance for wind energy resource assessment in Oman. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1545–1555
Colmenar-Santos A, Perera-Perez J, Borge-Diez D, dePalacio-Rodríguez C (2016) Offshore wind energy: a review of the current status, challenges and future development in Spain. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:1–18
Doubrawa P, Barthelmie RJ, Pryor SC, Hasager CB, Badger M, Karagali L (2015) Satellite winds as a tool for offshore wind resource assessment: the Great Lakes Wind Atlas. Remote Sens Environ 168:349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.008
Dvorak MJ, Archer CL, Jacobson MZ (2009) California offshore wind energy potential. Renew Energy 35:1244–1254
EWEA (2017) http://www.ewea.org/. Accessed Mar 2017
Fang HF (2014) Wind energy potential assessment for the offshore areas of Taiwan west coast and Penghu Archipelago. Renew Energy 67:237–241
Furevik BR, Sempreviva AM, Cavaleri L, Lefèvre JM, Transerici C (2011) Eight years of wind measurements from scatter meter for wind resource mapping in the Mediterranean Sea. Wind Energy 14:355–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.425
Gadad S, Deka PC (2016) Offshore wind power resource assessment using Oceansat-2 scatter meter data at a regional scale. Appl Energy 176:157–170
GWEC (2016) http://www.gwec.net/. Accessed Dec 2016
Hasager CB, Barthelmie RJ, Christiansen MB, Nielsen M, Pryor SC (2006) Quantifying offshore wind resources from satellite wind maps: study area the North Sea. Wind Energy 9:63–74
Jakub J, Jerzy M, Magdalena K, Bartłomiej C, Mirosław J (2018) Integrating a wind- and solar-powered hybrid to the power system by coupling it with a hydroelectric power station with pumping installation. Energy 144(C):549–563
Jennie J, Paul D, Trieu M (2018) Analyzing storage for wind integration in a transmission-constrained power system. Appl Energy 228(C):122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.046
Kalogeri C, Galanis G, Spyrou C, Diamantis D, Baladima F, Koukoula M, Kallos G (2017) Assessing the European offshore wind and wave energy resource for combined exploitation. Renew Energy 101:244–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.010
Lima DKS, Leao RPS, dos Santos ACS, de Melo FDC, Couto VM, de Noronha AWT, Oliveira DS Jr (2015) Estimating the offshore wind resources of the State of Cear’a in Brazil. Renew Energy 83:203–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.025
Mattar C, Guzm’an-Ibarra MC (2017) A techno-economic assessment of offshore wind energy in Chile. Energy 133:P191–P205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.099
Membery DA (1983) Low-level wind profiles during the Gulf Shamal. Weather 38:18–24
NCAR (2017) http://weather.rap.ucar.edu/
NREL (2015) Cost of Wind Energy Review. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/66861.pdf. Accessed Dec 2015
Pimenta F, Kempton W, Garvine R (2008) Combining meteorological stations and satellite data to evaluate the offshore wind power resource of Southeastern Brazil. Renew Energy 33(11):2375–2387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.01.012
Quaschning V (2005) Understanding renewable energy systems. Earthscan, London
Ramachandra T, Subramanian D, Joshi N (1997) Wind energy potential assessment in Uttarannada district of Karnataka, India. Renew Energy 10:585–611
Rao PG, Al-Sulaiti M, Al-Mulla AH (2001) Winter shamals in Qatar, Arabian Gulf. Weather 56:444–451
Sajadi A, Strezoski L, Clark K, Prica M, Loparo KA (2018) Transmission system protection screening for integration of offshore wind power plants. Renew Energy 125(C):225–233
Sempreviva AM, Barthelmie RJ, Pryor SC (2008) Review of methodologies for offshore wind resource assessment in European seas. Surv Geophys 29:471–497
Soares P, Cardoso R, Miranda P, Medeiros J, Belo-Pereira M, Espirito-Santo F (2012) WRF high resolution dynamical downscaling of ERA-Interim for Portugal. Clim Dyn 39:2497–2522
Takeyama Y, Ohsawa T, Kozai K, Hasager CB, Badger M (2013) Comparison of geophysical model functions for SAR wind speed retrieval in Japanese coastal waters. Remote Sens 5:1956–1973. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041956
Ulazia A, Sáenz J, Ibarra-Berastegui G, González-Rojí SJ, Carreno-Madinabeitia S (2017) Using 3DVAR data assimilation to measure offshore wind energy potential at different turbine heights in the West Mediterranean. Appl Energy 208:1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.030
Zheng CW, Li CY, Pan J, Liu MY, Xia LL (2016) An overview of global ocean wind energy resource evaluations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:1240–1251
Acknowledgements
BP Oman (Research Grant BR/DVC/CESAR/18/01) supported this research. We thank our colleagues from Directorate General of Meteorology, who provided access to WRF model.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Charabi, Y., Al Hinai, A., Al-Yahyai, S. et al. Offshore wind potential and wind atlas over the Oman Maritime Zone. Energ. Ecol. Environ. 4, 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00108-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00108-7