Skip to main content
Log in

Ratcheting evaluation of additively manufactured 4043 aluminum samples through a combined isotropic–kinematic hardening framework

  • Full Research Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study evaluated the ratcheting behavior of additive manufactured 4043 aluminum alloy by coupling the Ahmadzadeh–Varvani (A–V) kinematic hardening rule with the isotropic hardening rule of Lee–Zaverl (L–Z). The L–Z description expanded the yield surface while the A–V model translated yield surface in deviatoric stress space. Materials coefficients Q and b in the L–Z model were, respectively, determined to address expansion of yield surface and its rate. Coefficients C and \({\gamma }_{1}\) in the A–V model were determined through consistency condition at which predicted hysteresis loops coincided with those experimentally obtained. The coefficient \({\gamma }_{2}\) was determined from the close agreement of the predicted and measured ratcheting strain data plotted over loading cycles. Increments of backstress were plotted versus stress cycles demonstrating a gradual decay as the number of stress cycles increased through the involvement of an internal variable \(\overline{{\varvec{b}} }\). Ratcheting curves and their corresponding hysteresis loops predicted based on the isotropic–kinematic framework were found in good agreements with those of experimental values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(s\) :

State of stress in deviatoric space

\(\sigma\) :

Applied stress

\(I\) :

Unit tensor

\(n\) :

Unit normal vector on the yield surface

\(d{\overline{\varepsilon }}^{p}\) :

Plastic strain increment

\({H}_{p}\) :

Plastic modulus function

\({\sigma }_{y}\) :

Actual yield stress

\({{\sigma }_{y}}^{0}\) :

Initial yield stress

\(R\) :

Internal variable of isotropic hardening

\(Q\) :

Saturated value of internal variable R

\(b\) :

Exponent defining evolution rate of R

\(p\) :

Accumulated plastic strain

\(C\), \({\gamma }_{1}\), \({\gamma }_{2}\), \(\delta\) :

Coefficients of the A–V model

\(\overline{a }\) :

Backstress tensor

\(\overline{b }\) :

Internal variable of the A–V model

\(E\) :

Elastic modulus

\(G\) :

Shear modulus

References

  1. Xia Z, Kujawski D, Ellyin F (1996) Effect of mean stress and ratcheting strain on fatigue life of steel. Int J Fatigue 18(5):335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(96)00088-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mishra SK, Dutta K, Ray KK (2015) Fatigue life estimation in presence of ratcheting phenomenon for AISI 304LN stainless steel tested under uniaxial cyclic loading. Int J Damage Mech 25(3):431–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789515598640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Varvani-Farahani A, Ahmadzadeh GR (2016) A kinematic hardening rule to investigate the impact of loading path and direction on ratcheting response of steel alloys. Mech Mater 101:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Varvani-Farahani A (2014) Fatigue–ratcheting damage assessment of steel samples under asymmetric multiaxial stress cycles. Theor Appl Fract Mech 73:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Paul SK (2019) A critical review of experimental aspects in ratcheting fatigue: microstructure to specimen to component. J Mater Res Technol 8(5):4894–4914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiong Y, Yu Y (2022) Ratcheting deformation and fatigue of surface treated ZK60 magnesium alloy. Int J Fatigue 156:106691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kong W, Wang Y, Chen Y, Liu X, Yuan C (2022) Investigation of uniaxial ratcheting fatigue behaviours and fracture mechanism of GH742 superalloy at 923 K. Mater Sci Eng A 831:142173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Varvani-Farahani A, Nayebi A (2018) Ratcheting in pressurized pipes and equipment: a review on affecting parameters, modelling, safety codes, and challenges. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41(3):503–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prager W (1955) A new method of analyzing stresses and strains in work‐hardening plastic solids. Division of Applied Mathematics Mathematics. BUDoA, Research USOoN, Ships USNDBo Brown University

  10. Armstrong PJ, Fredrick CO (1966) A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect. Central Electricity Generating Board [and] Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories. Research & Development Department, Berkeley, p 731

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bower A, Johnson K (1989) The influence of strain hardening on cumulative plastic deformation in rolling and sliding line contact. J Mech Phys Solids 37(4):471–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(89)90025-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohno N, Wang JD (1993) Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery, part I: formulation and basic features for ratchetting behavior. Int J Plast 9(3):375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(93)90042-O

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaboche JL (1991) On some modifications of kinematic hardening to improve the description of ratcheting effects. Int J Plast 7:661–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(91)90050-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Varvani-Farahani A, Ahmadzadeh GR (2013) Ratcheting assessment of materials based on the modified Armstrong-Frederick hardening rule at various uniaxial stress levels. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 36:1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Varvani-Farahani A (2017) A comparative study in descriptions of coupled kinematic hardening rules and ratcheting assessment over asymmetric stress cycles. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 40(6):882–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coffin L (1959) The cyclic straining and fatigue of metals. Trans Metall Soc AIME 215:794–806

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alameel GM (1985) Cyclic loading of inelastic materials: experiments and predictions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin

  18. Jiang Y, Kurath P (1997) Nonproportional cyclic deformation: critical experiments and analytical modeling. Int J Plast 13(8–9):743–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(97)00030-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang G, Liu Y, Li Z (2006) Experimental study on ratchetting-fatigue interaction of SS304 stainless steel in uniaxial cyclic stressing. Mater Sci Eng A 435:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McDowell D (1995) Stress state dependence of cyclic ratchetting behavior of two rail steels. Int J Plast 11(4):397–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(95)00005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Jiao R, Kim KS (2005) On the Ohno-Wang kinematic hardening rules for multiaxial ratcheting modeling of medium carbonsteel. Int J Plast 21(1):161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.005

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Karvan P, Varvani-Farahani A (2019) Isotropic-kinematic hardening framework to assess ratcheting response of steel samples undergoing asymmetric loading cycles. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 42(1):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karvan P, Varvani-Farahani A (2018) Ratcheting assessment of 304 steel samples by means of two kinematic hardening rules coupled with isotropic hardening descriptions. Int J Mech Sci 149:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mueller B (2012) Additive manufacturing technologies: rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Assem. https://doi.org/10.1108/aa.2012.03332baa.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McDonald K, Vartanian T (2016) Accelerating industrial adoption of metal additive manufacturing technology. JOM 68(3):806–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1794-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson LE, Murr WL (2017) 3D metal droplet printing development and advanced materials additive manufacturing. J Mater Res Technol 6(1):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2016.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Caffrey T, Wohlers T, Campbell I (2016) Executive summary of the Wohlers Report 2016

  28. Yap CY, Chua CK, Dong ZL, Liu ZH, Zhang DQ, Loh LE, Sing SL (2015) Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):041101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kotzem D, Höffgen A, Raveendran R, Stern F, Möhring K, Walther F (2022) Position-dependent mechanical characterization of the PBF-EB-manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. Prog Addit Manuf 7(2):249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00228-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Afrose MF, Masood SH, Iovenitti P, Nikzad M, Sbarski I (2016) Effects of part build orientations on fatigue behaviour of FDM-processed PLA material. Prog Addit Manuf 1(1):21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-015-0002-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Parast MSA, Bagheri A, Kami A, Azadi M, Asghari V (2022) Bending fatigue behavior of fused filament fabrication 3D-printed ABS and PLA joints with rotary friction welding. Prog Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00307-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stern F, Tenkamp J, Walther F (2020) Non-destructive characterization of process-induced defects and their effect on the fatigue behavior of austenitic steel 316L made by laser-powder bed fusion. Prog Addit Manuf 5(3):287–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00105-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Yang SL, Gu JX, Duan CF, Xiong Q (2019) Effect of ratcheting strain on mechanical properties of additive manufactured 4043 aluminum alloy. In Key Engineering Materials, vol 795. Trans Tech Publications Ltd., pp 43–48https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.795.43

  34. Dong B, Cai X, Lin S, Li X, Fan C, Yang C, Sun H (2020) Wire arc additive manufacturing of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy: microstructures and mechanical properties. Addit Manuf 36:101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y, Yang S, Xie C, Liu H, Zhang Q (2018) Microstructure and ratcheting behavior of additive manufactured 4043 aluminum alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 27(9):4582–4592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3563-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu MW, Chen JK, Lin BH, Chiang PH, Tsai MK (2020) Compressive fatigue properties of additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4V cellular material with different porosities. Mater Sci Eng A 790:139695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ghosh A, Sahu VK, Gurao NP (2022) Effect of heat treatment on the ratcheting behaviour of additively manufactured and thermo-mechanically treated Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 833:142345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Esmaeilizadeh R, Keshavarzkermania A, Bonakdar A, Jahed H, Toyserkani E (2021) On the effect of laser powder-bed fusion process parameters on quasi-static and fatigue behaviour of Hastelloy X: a microstructure/defect interaction study. Addit Manuf 38:101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang M, Sun CN, Zhang X, Wei J, Hardacre D, Li H (2019) High cycle fatigue and ratcheting interaction of laser powder bed fusion stainless steel 316L: fracture behaviour and stress-based modelling. Int J Fatigue 121:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Khan AS, Huang S (1995) Continuum theory of plasticity. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee D, Zaverl F (1978) A generalized strain rate dependent constitutive equation for anisotropic metals. Acta Metall 26(11):1771–1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(78)90088-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yu D, Chen G, Yu W, Li D, Chen X (2012) Visco-plastic constitutive modeling on Ohno-Wang kinematic hardening rule for uniaxial ratcheting behavior of Z2CND18.12N steel. Int J Plast 28(1):88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chaboche J (1986) Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity. Int J Plast 2:149–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(86)90010-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Gaudin C, Feaugas X (2004) Cyclic creep process in AISI316L stainless steel in terms of dislocation patterns and internal stresses. Acta Mater 52:3097–3110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support through Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through Dr. Varvani (RGPIN-2021-03047) and Dr. Hashemi (RGPIN-2017-06868). The first author wishes to thank Dr. Poorya Karvan (former PhD student) for training her to run the ratcheting program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Varvani-Farahani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Servatan, M., Hashemi, S.M. & Varvani-Farahani, A. Ratcheting evaluation of additively manufactured 4043 aluminum samples through a combined isotropic–kinematic hardening framework. Prog Addit Manuf 8, 667–678 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00355-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00355-x

Keywords

Navigation