Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the mechanical properties of a filled polypropylene

  • Full Research Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few commodity semi-crystalline thermoplastics in neat form are used in fused deposition modeling (FDM) because they experience dimensional instability (warping) during printing. In this study, a commercially available polypropylene (PP) filament for FDM processing was used to print tensile and flexural test samples. Three printing parameters were investigated: (1) extrusion temperature (200, 250 °C), (2) printing speed (45, 90 mm/s) and (3) layer height (0.1, 0.3 mm). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that FDM printed PP samples had fewer α-crystals and more β-crystals than injection-molded (IM) PP samples. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) indicated that a higher extrusion temperature, slower printing speed and smaller layer height facilitated the molecular diffusion at the interfaces and created a smaller neck size within the printed parts. Density measurements showed that IM PP samples were denser than the FDM PP samples. No differences in density were found among the FDM PP samples. Compared to the IM PP, the mechanical properties decreased less for the PP printed at higher extrusion temperature (< 11.5%). The FDM PP parts had similar or even increased flexural modulus compared to the IM PP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wendel B, Rietzel D, Kühnlein F, Feulner R, Hülder G, Schmachtenberg E (2008) Additive processing of polymers. Macromol Mater Eng 293:799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaezi M, Chianrabutra S, Mellor B, Yang S (2013) Multiple material additive manufacturing –Part 1: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp 8:19–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Korpela J, Kokkari A, Korhonen H, Malin M, Närhi T, Seppälä J (2013) Biodegradable and bioactive porous scaffold structures prepared using fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 101:610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YH, Wool RP (1983) A theory of healing at a polymer-polymer interface. Macromolecules 16:1115–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drummer D, Cifuentes-Cuellar S, Rietzel D (2012) Suitability of PLA/TCP for fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 18:500–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosato DV, Rosato MG, Schott NR (2001) Plastics technology handbook, volume 1: introduction-properties-fabrication-processes. Momentum Press, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Harper CA (2000) Modern plastics handbook. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang L, Gramlich WM, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Tajvidi M (2018) Spray-dried cellulose nanofibril-reinforced polypropylene composites for extrusion-based additive manufacturing: nonisothermal crystallization kinetics and thermal expansion. J Compos Sci 2(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs2010007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carneiro OS, Silva AF, Gomes R (2015) Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Design 83:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stoof D, Pickering K (2018) Sustainable composite fused deposition modelling filament using recycled pre-consumer polypropylene. Compos Part B 135:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang L, Gardner DJ (2017) Effect of fused layer modeling (FLM) processing parameters on impact strength of cellular polypropylene. Polymer 113:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Milosevic M, Stoof D, Pickering KL (2017) Characterizing the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling natural fiber recycled polypropylene composites. J Compos Sci 1:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeong GY (2005) Fracture behaviour of wood plastic composite (WPC). Dissertation, Louisiana State University

  14. Tordjeman P, Robert C, Marin G, Gerard P (2001) The effect of α, β crystalline structure on the mechanical properties of polypropylene. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 4:459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bourbigot S, Garnier L, Revel B, Duquesne S (2013) Characterization of the morphology of iPP/sPP blends with various compositions. Express Polym Lett 7:224–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao W, Wu P, Feng J, Yao R (2009) Influence of a novel β-nucleating agent on the structure, morphology, and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 111:1076–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li JX, Cheung WL, Jia D (1999) A study on the heat of fusion of β-polypropylene. Polymer 40:1219–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Papageorgiou DG, Chrissafis K, Bikiaris DN (2015) β-Nucleated polypropylene: processing, properties and nanocomposites. Polym Rev 55(4):596–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Landel RF, Nielsen LE (1993) Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. Marcel Dekker, Inc, NY

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hodgkinson JM (2000) Mechanical testing of advanced fiber composites. CRC press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  22. Varga J (2002) β-modification of isotactic polypropylene: preparation, structure, processing, properties, and application. J Macromol Sci 41(4–6):1121–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J, Wei J, Wang S (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B-Eng 80:369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station (MAFES) project ME0-M-8-00527-13 and the USDA ARS Forest Products Research Agreement 58-0202-4-003. The authors thank Joshua Kovach for preparing the CAD drawings of the testing samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Sanders, J.E., Gardner, D.J. et al. Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the mechanical properties of a filled polypropylene. Prog Addit Manuf 3, 205–214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0053-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0053-3

Keywords

Navigation