Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Artificial Ageing on the Defect Susceptibility of Tensile Properties to Porosity Variation in A356 Aluminium Alloys

  • Published:
International Journal of Metalcasting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to estimate the dependence of the tensile properties on microporosity variation in low-pressure die-cast A356 aluminium alloys with respect to various T6 treatment conditions and to investigate the relative contribution of the strain-hardening exponent and damage evolution of eutectic Si particles in terms of the defect susceptibility of the tensile properties to effective void area fraction. The solution treatment was performed for 3, 6 and 12 h at 540 °C, and the artificial ageing was conducted for 4, 16 and 48 h at 140–180 °C. The defect susceptibility of the tensile properties to microporosity variation depends practically upon the ageing time, whereas the solutionising time has a minor effect on the variability in the defect susceptibility. Additionally, the maximum value of the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) achievable in a defect-free condition remarkably increases with the ageing treatment, and it also slightly increases with the solutionising time. The maximum value of the tensile elongation for a defect-free condition depends practically upon the solutionising time, even though it generally decreases with ageing treatment. The main reason that the UTS and elongation exhibit different responses with regard to the solutionising and ageing treatments is the variation in the strain-hardening exponents associated with the T6 treatment. The frequency of the damage evolution of eutectic Si particles by the cracking mode is considerably decreased with the ageing treatment, and this transition under ageing treatment has additional contributions to the variation in the defect susceptibility of tensile properties to effective void area fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.H. Cáceres, Scr. Metall. 32, 1851–1855 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C.H. Cáceres, B.I. Selling, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 220, 109–116 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A.M. Gokhale, G.R. Patel, Mater. Charact. 54, 13–20 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.M. Gokhale, G.R. Patel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 392, 184–190 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.M. Gokhale, G.R. Patel, Scr. Mater. 52, 237–241 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.F. Horstemeyer, A.M. Gokhale, Int. J. solids struct. 36, 5029–5055 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.F. Horstemeyer, J. Lathrop, A.M. Gokhale, M.D. Dighe, Theor. appl. fract. mech. 33, 31–47 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M.D. Dighe, A.M. Gokhale, Scr. Mater. 37, 1435–1440 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.D. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 488, 296–302 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C.D. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527(3144), 3144–3150 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.P. Bandstra, D.A. Koss, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 319–321, 490–495 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Huber, Y. Brechet, T. Pardoen, Acta Mater. 53, 2739–2749 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Gammage, D. Wilkinson, Y. Brechet, D. Embury, Acta Mater. 52, 5255–5263 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T.I. So, W.C. Jung, C.D. Lee, K.S. Shin, Met. Mater. Int. 21, 842–849 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.E. Hatch, Aluminum—Properties and Physical Metallurgy (ASM, Ohio, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.K. Ghosh, Acta Metall. 25, 1413–1424 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C.D. Lee, K.S. Shin, Y.J. Kim, Eng Mater Frac. 175, 339–356 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. W.J. Poole, N. Charra, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 406, 300–308 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Weck, D.S. Wilkinson, Acta Mater. 56, 1774–1784 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Pardoen, J.W. Hutchinson, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48, 2467–2512 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Inha Technical College Research Grant (2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choong Do Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Do Lee, C. Effect of Artificial Ageing on the Defect Susceptibility of Tensile Properties to Porosity Variation in A356 Aluminium Alloys. Inter Metalcast 12, 321–330 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0168-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-017-0168-1

Keywords

Navigation