Abstract
The theoretical association of money supply and exchange rates with prices has been empirically established and shown to be dominant in explaining changes in price levels in India. However, post liberalisation, studies have shown price levels to be impacted by several other factors as also, weakened influence of the traditional factors established by theories. This study aims to find the determinants of price level for the period 1994–2008 using a Vector Autoregression model and test the predictive ability of the model. Our results show shorter and smaller impact of change in money supply and nominal effective exchange rate on price levels. Both money supply and nominal effective exchange rates are found to Granger-cause Consumer Price Index. But, impulse response functions show that the impact of shocks from money supply and nominal effective exchange rates on consumer prices peaks after two lags and is short-lived. Forecast error variance decomposition shows that these demand side factors contribute only 6 % of the forecast error variation in Consumer Price Index.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Books
Brooks, Chris. 2002. Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enders, Walter. 2004. Applied econometric time series. Singapore: Wiley.
Fisher, Irving. 1911. The purchasing power of money: its determination and relation to credit interest and crises. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Hamilton, James D. 1994. Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Research Papers
Biswas, Dipankar, and Sanjay Singhand Arti Sinha. 2010. Forecasting inflation and IIP growth: Bayesian vector autoregressive model, RBI Occasional Papers, 31(2). Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
Callen, Tim and Chang Dongkoo. September 1999. Modeling and Forecasting Inflation in India, IMF Working Paper WP/99/119, International Monetary Fund.
Cuvak, Ana, and Kalinauskas Zilvinas. 2009. Application of vector autoregression model for lithuanian inflation. EconomikaIrVadyba Econ Manag 14: 145–150.
Holod, Dymoto. 2000. The relationship between price level, money supply and exchange rate in Ukraine. Ukraine: National University of Kiev-MohylaAcademy.
John, Rijo M 2003. “Inflation in India: An analysis using Post-Liberalisation Data”, IGIDR Working Paper No.
Kapur, Muneesh 2012. Inflation forecasting: issues and challenges in India, RBI Working Paper Series (DEPR): 01 / 2012, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai.
Kenny, Geoff et al. 1998. Bayesian VAR models for forecasting Irish inflation, Technical Paper 4/RT/98, Central Bank of Ireland.
Kishor, N. Kundan. July 2009. “Modeling inflation in India: the role of money”, The Singapore Economic Review 57(4) (2012).
Kumar, Rakesh. 2013. A study of inflation dynamics in India: a cointegrated autoregressive approach. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 8(1): 65–72.
Lack, Ceasar. 2006. Forecasting Swiss inflation using VAR models, Swiss National Bank Economic Studies No. 2, Swiss National Bank.
Mehrotra, Aaron, and JoséR. Sánchez-Fung. 2008. Forecasting inflation in China, BOFIT Discussion Paper 2/2008, Bank of Finland.
Mishra, Ankita, and Vinod Mishra. 2010. A VAR model of monetary policy and hypothetical case of inflation targeting in India, Discussion paper 15/10, Monash University.
Patnaik, Anuradha. 2010. Study of inflation in India: a cointegrated vector autoregression approach. Journal of Quantitative Economics 8(1): 118–129.
Patra, M Debabrata, and Partha Ray. March 2010. Inflation expectations and monetary policy in India: An empirical exploration, IMF Working Paper WP/10/84, International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Pethe, Abhay, and G.P. Samant. 2001. Construction of a composite leading indicator for tracking inflation in India. Economic and Political Weekly 36(04): 311–316.
Ray, Partha, and Somnath Chatterjee. Nov 2001. The role of asset prices in Indian inflation in recent years: some conjectures, BIS Working Paper No. 8, Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
2014. Report of the expert committee to revise and strengthen the monetary policy framework. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
Robinson, Wayne. 1998. Forecasting Inflation using VAR Analysis. : Bank of Jamaica.
Sabade, Shubhada. 2014. Is money supply the cause of inflation in India? An alternative postulate to understand inflation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 133: 379–382.
Sims, C.A. 1980. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48(1): 1–48.
Sinha, Pankaj, Sushant Gupta, and Nakul Raundev. 2011. Modeling & forecasting of macro-economic variables of India: before, during & after recession. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences 6(1(15)/ Sp): 43–60.
Singh, B. Karan. April 2012. An Assessment of Inflation Modelling in India, ICRIER Working Paper 259, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).
Srinivasan, Naveen, Vidya Mahambre, and M. Ramachandran. 2006. Modelling inflation in India: a critique of the structuralist approach. Journal of Quantitative Economics 4(2): 45–58.
Srinivasan, P., and M. Kalaivani. May 2013. “On the temporal causal relationship between macroeconomic variables: empirical evidence from India”.
Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. 2001. Vector autoregressions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 101–115.
Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. 1999. Forecasting Inflation, NBER Working Paper 7023, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Tanasie, Anca, et al. 2008. Forecasting inflation and its determinants. Revista Tinerior Economisti (The Young Economists Journal) 1(10): 110–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Cindrella Shah is an independent researcher and Nilesh Ghonasgi is Assistant Professor, Bhavan’s College, Mumbai. The paper is the authors’ independent work and does not represent any institution. The authors thank Dr. Anuradha Patnaik, Department of Economics, University of Mumbai for her guidance and support throughout and the anonymous referee for valuable comments as also helpful comments received during presentation of an earlier version of this paper at The Indian Econometric Society’s 51st Annual Conference. Any errors and/or omissions are solely of the authors. Emails: Cindrella Shah: cindrella.shah@gmail.com; Nilesh Ghonasgi: nileshghonasgi@gmail.com.
Appendices
Appendix
Seasonality in Index of Industrial Production (IIP)
The graph of Index of Industrial Production (IIP) below shows seasonality.
The seasonality is of the additive type and the seasonal movements are seen after nearly every 10–15 lags. The seasonal adjustment was done in R by decomposing the series into its trend, seasonal and random component and then subtracting the seasonal component from the series. The decomposition of the series can be seen in the below graph:
The series after seasonal adjustment is as below:
Results of VAR Estimation with Alternate Measures of CPI— Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW), Consumer Price Index for Agricultural Labourers (CPI-AL) and Consumer Price Index for Rural Labourers (CPI-RL)
The below tables show results of VAR models for other three indices of CPI (Tables 10, 11, 12). The period for which the model was fitted (based on the availability of data) was November 1995 to December 2010.
The results do not find the variables to be statistically significant. In cases where statistical significance of a variable is found, the value of the coefficient is very small. This is similar to the results we found with CPI-UNME.
CPI-IW
Optimal lag length | |||
AIC(n) | HQ(n) | SC(n) | FPE(n) |
9 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
CPI-AL
Optimal Lag length | |||
AIC(n) | HQ(n) | SC(n) | FPE(n) |
9 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
CPI-RL
AIC(n) | HQ(n) | SC(n) | FPE(n) |
9 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Results of the VAR estimation of CPI equation at three lags:
The result of the same is reported in the below table (Table 13).
The value of coefficients of past values of CPI lags is statistically significant at one and three lags. Also, statistical significance was found in coefficient values of M3 at two and three lags and for NEER at three lags. The coefficients of CPI and NEER have a value of 0.19 and 0.07, respectively. Small values of coefficients of M3 show that the lags of M3 have a negligible impact on the current value of CPI. This is an important result from point of view of policy making.
The A and B Coefficient Matrices of the VAR Model at One Lag are as Follows:
A matrix
B matrix
Data
The monthly series of the following data was collected from the Reserve Bank of India’s Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy, http://rbi.org.in/scripts/AnnualPublications.aspx?head=Handbook+of+Statistics+on+Indian+Economy. Accessed on 13 November 2013:
-
1.
Components of Money Stock
-
2.
Indices of real effective exchange rate (REER) and nominal effective exchange rate (NEER) of the Indian rupee (36-currency bilateral weights) (monthly average)
-
3.
Index Numbers of Industrial Production
-
4.
Monthly and annual averages of BSE sensitive index
Monthly series of Consumer Price Indices was accessed from International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) online data portal LABORSTA, http://laborsta.ilo.org/default.html. Accessed on 13 November 2013.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, C., Ghonasgi, N. Determinants and Forecast of Price Level in India: a VAR Framework. J. Quant. Econ. 14, 57–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-015-0019-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-015-0019-y