Abstract
This article examines how theology and social science can contribute to the specific task of talking about God in management without compromising the integrity of the Triune God. To talk about God in management studies initially requires a discussion on the character of modernity and about whether modernity is absence or transformation of religious forms; to follow is an examination of the governing assumptions operating in social theory from a religious perspective. The conclusion is that without the correct hermeneutics, what management scholars mean by God cannot be more than an idea.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Blaise Pascal, “The Memorial” on the overwhelming mystical experience of the night of 23 November 1654.
Augustine, De Trinitate, V, 15. Cf., Letter 140, Ad Honoratum, ch. 4, n. 10, “we were indeed something before being sons of God, and we received the divine favor to become what we were not.”
I found the same idea exposed by Joseph Ratzinger in an essay of political theology originally published in Germany in 1970: “In Greco-Roman culture the unity of the world had its source in pantheism: the divine was itself a part of the world, and the world had divine status. Hence the unity of humanity could be converted directly into political reality” (Ratzinger 2015: 11).
References
Augustine. 2015. De Trinitate [Latin Edition] (Opera Omnia S. Augustini). Post Falls: Mediatrix Press.
Bible with Apocrypha. 2010.The new Oxford annotated revised standard version. Edited by Michael D. Croogan, et al. Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cafferky, M.E. 2013. On becoming a prophet. Faith in Business Quarterly 15 (4): 23–29.
Cafferky, M.E. 2015. Business ethics in biblical perspective: A comprehensive introduction. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.
De Lubac, H. 1998. The mystery of the supernatural. Translated by Rosémary Sheel, Introduction by David L. Schindler. New York: Crossroad.
Dyck, B. 2013. Management and the gospel. Luke’s radical message for the first and twenty-first centuries. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Fetcher, C.M. 2015. 24/7 Christian: The secular vocation of the Laity. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.
Ford, D.F. 1997. Introduction. In The modern theologians. An introduction to Christian theology in the twentieth century, ed. David F. Ford. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell.
Ha, K.-M. 2015. The role of religious beliefs and institutions in disaster management: A case study. Religions 6: 1314–1329.
Kerr, F. 1996. Milbank's Thesis in R. Gill (editor) Theology and sociology: A Reader, London: Cassell.
Long, S.D. 2000. Divine economy: Theology and the market. London: Routledge.
Milbank, J. 2000. Theology and Social Theory and its significance for community building: A conversation with John Milbank, Charlottesville, VA-December 16.
Milbank, J. 2006. Theology and social theory: beyond secular reason. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Pub 2nd and revised edition.
Milbank, J. 2013. Beyond secular order: The representation of being and the representation of the people. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Milbank, J. 2014. The suspended middle: Henri de Lubac and the renewed split in modern Catholic theology, Second edition. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Niebuhr, H.R. 1951. Christ and culture. New York: Harper and Row.
Ratzinger, J. 2015. The unity of nations: A vision of the church fathers, translate by Boniface Ramsey. Washington, D.C.: The CUA Press.
Schmitz, K.L. 1969. Postmodernism and the Catholic tradition. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73: 223–253.
Sison, A.J.G., and J. Fontrodona. 2012. The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2): 211–246.
Taylor, C. 1995. Two theories of modernity. Hastings Center Report Mar.-Apr.: 24–7.
Taylor, C. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Van Der Ven, J.A. 1998. Practical theology: An empirical approach. Belgium: Peeters Press First published in 1990 by Kok Pharos, Kanpen.
Veith, G.E., Jr. 2002. God at work: Your Christian vocation in all of life. Wheaton: Crossway.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The single author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
I am indebted to the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this paper for providing insightful comments and directions for additional work which has resulted in this improved version.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beltramini, E. God and Modernity in Management Studies. A Case of Theological Social Theory. Philosophy of Management 18, 331–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0090-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0090-5