Skip to main content
Log in

Water quality improvements from implementation of tailwater recovery systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impacts of nutrient loading from agricultural landscapes have gained widespread attention and led to the implementation of conservation practices aimed at mitigating nutrient loss to downstream systems. A relatively new conservation practice, tailwater recovery (TWR) systems, has been considered as a potential mitigation strategy. The objective of this study was to compare concentrations and loads between effluent of TWR systems (TE) and effluent of similar catchments without TWR systems (CE), under the same agronomic management. Tailwater recovery systems, CE, and paired differences between TE and CE were compared over seasons. Nutrient concentrations and hydrologic discharge were monitored at five TWR system outflow and control catchment outflow locations on a flow event basis. Results revealed that of all experimental analytes, including total suspended solids, total phosphorus, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate–nitrite, and ammonium, only total phosphorus concentrations were greater (F1,97 = 8.58, p < 0.005) at CE locations than TE locations. The difference between loads of TE and CE showed reduced loads per hectare leaving TWR systems. This included loads of total phosphorus, total nitrogen, organic nitrogen, total inorganic nitrogen, and nitrate–nitrite. Analyses revealed no differences across seasons for TE and paired differences between TE and CE. However, CE concentrations and loads were seasonally different, where ammonium was greater in the summer than in the winter and spring, but not different than fall. Additionally, only loads of total nitrogen were different across seasons, where winter was greater than spring, but not different than summer and fall. This study provides evidence that TWR systems are a positive contribution to reducing nutrient loads compared to control locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RB, Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Boyer EE, Nolan JV, Brakebill JW (2008) Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Environ Sci Technol 42(3):822–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker BH, Kröger R, Prevost JD, Pierce T, Ramirez-Avila JJ, Czarnecki JP, Faust D, Flora C (2016) A field-scale investigation of nutrient and sediment reduction efficiencies of a low-technology best management practice: low-grade weirs. Ecol Eng 91:240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barfuss SL, Tullis JP (1988) Friction factor tests on high density polyethylene pipe. Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57(1):289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodhaine GL (1982) Measurement of peak discharge at culverts by indirect methods, chapter A3. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner GW (2016) HEC-RAS, river analysis system hydraulic reference manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham MW, Davis DW (1990) Effects of data errors in computed steady-flow profiles. J Hydraul Eng 116:914–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8(3):559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter RW (1957) Computation of peak discharge at culverts. Circular No. 376. US Geological Survey

  • Chow VT (1959) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Baldassarre G, Claps P (2011) A hydraulic study on the applicability of flood rating curves. Hydrol Res 42(1):10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Baldassarre G, Montanari A (2009) Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(6):913–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagy JD, Boynton WR, Keefe CW, Wood KV (2004) Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow. Estuaries 27(4):634–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding LW, Gallegos CL, Perry ES, Miller WD, Adolf JE, Mallonee ME, Paerl HW (2016) Long-term trends of nutrients and phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries Coasts 39(3):664–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung RW, Reed LD (1990) Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 5(1):46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1-D and 2-D models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horritt MS, Di Baldassarre G, Bates PD, Brath A (2007) Comparing the performance of 2-D finite element and finite volume models of floodplain inundation using airborne SAR imagery. Hydrol Process 21:2745–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izuno FT, Rice RW, Garcia RM, Capone LT, Downey D (1998) Time versus flow composite water sampling for regulatory purposes in the Everglades Agricultural Area. Appl Eng Agric 14(3):257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarret RD (1987) Errors in slope-area computations of peak discharges in mountain streams. J Hydrol 96:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Frankenberger JR, Bowling LC, Sun Z (2014) Quantification of uncertainty in estimated nitrate–N loads in agricultural watersheds. J Hydrol 519:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killgore JK, Hoover JJ, Murphy CE, Johnson KD, Myers KF (2008) Restoration of delta streams: a case history and conceptual model. In: Ecosystem management and restoration research program technical notes collection. Engineering Research and Development Center and Coastal and Hydarualics Lab, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby WH (1987) Linear error analysis of slope-area discharge determinations. J Hydrol 96:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger R, Perez M, Walker S, Sharpley A (2012) Review of best management practice reduction efficiencies in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. J Soil Water Conserv 67(6):556–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn KA, Poganski BH, Kröger R, Ramirez-Avila JJ (2014) Effectiveness of low-grade weirs for nutrient removal in an agricultural landscape in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Agric Water Manag 131:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftis JC, MacDonald LH, Streett S, Iyer HK, Bunte K (2001) Detecting cumulative watershed effects: the statistical power of pairing. J Hydrol 251(1):49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (2015) Size of summer hypoxia. Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium. http://www.gulfhypoxia.net/Research/Shelfwide%20Cruises/. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • McCormick PV, Laing JA (2003) Effects of increased phosphorus loading on dissolved oxygen in a subtropical wetland, the Florida Everglades. Wetl Ecol Manag 11(3):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick PV, Newman S, Miao SL, Gawlik D, Marley D, Reddy KR, Fontaine TD (2001) Effects of anthropogenic phosphorus inputs on the Everglades. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) In: The Everglades, Florida Bay, and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys: an ecosystem sourcebook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 83–126

    Google Scholar 

  • MDEQ (Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality) (2008) Total maximum Datily load: total nitrogen and total phosphour for Harris Bayou, Yazoo River Basin Sunflower and Coahoma Counties, Mississippi. Final Report 2008. https://www.deq.state.ms.us/mdeq.nsf/0/ADFBDFC66470023B86257452006C2BE1/$file/YazooRBHarrisBayouNutrientsMay08.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • Moatar F, Meybeck M (2005) Compared performances of different algorithms for estimating annual nutrient loads discharged by the eutrophic River Loire. Hydrol Process 19(2):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omer AR (2017) Efficacy of tailwater recovery systems as an approach to water resource conservation. PhD Dissertation, Mississippi State University

  • Pennington KL (2004) Surface water quality in the delta of Mississippi. In: Nett MT, Locke MA, Pennington DA (eds) Water quality assessments in the Mississippi Delta: regional solutions, National Scope American Chemical Society Symposium Series 877. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 30–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce SC, Kröger R, Prevost JD, Pierce T (2012a) Field-scale monitoring of agricultural ditches as conduits of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediment in response to storm events and low-input drainage management: a case-study of the Tchula Lake Farm. In: Proceedings of the Mississippi Water Resources Conference, Jackson, MS, April 3–5. Mississippi Water Resources Research Institute, Starkville

  • Pierce SC, Kröger R, Pezeshki R (2012b) Managing artificially drained low-gradient agricultural headwaters for enhanced ecosystem functions. Biology 1(3):794–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabotyagov SS, Kling CL, Gassman PW, Rabalais NN, Turner RE (2012) The economics of dead zones: linking externalities from the land to their consequences in the sea. Iowa State University Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Working Papers. Paper 547. Iowa State University, Ames. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1553&context=card_workingpapers. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • Rao P, Hromadka IITV., Huxley C, Souders D, Jordan N, Yen CC, Bristow E, Biering C, Horton S, Espinosa B (2017) Assessment of computer modeling accuracy in floodplain hydraulics. Int J Model Simul 37(2):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanowicz R, Beven K (2003) Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps. Water Resour Res 39(3):1073–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2015) SAS/STAT user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade-Poole K, Möller G (2016) Impact and mitigation of nutrient pollution and overland water flow change on the Florida Everglades, USA. Sustainability 8(9):940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schall JD, Thompson PL, Zerges SM, Kilgore RT, Morris JL (2012) Hydraulic design of highway culverts. No. FHWA-HIF-12-026. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • Sharpley AN, Kleinman PJ, Jordan P, Bergström L, Allen AL (2009) Evaluating the success of phosphorus management from field to watershed. J Environ Qual 38(5):1981–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields FD Jr, Testa S, Cooper CM (2009) Nitrogen and phosphorus levels in the Yazoo River Basin, Mississippi. Ecohydrology 2(3):270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone KC, Hunt PG, Novak JM, Johnson MH, Watts DW (2000) Flow-proportional, time-composited, and grab sample estimation of nitrogen export from an eastern Coastal Plain watershed. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 43(2):281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:5995–6000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:20260–20264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullis JP, Watkins RK, Barfuss SL (1990) Innovative new drainage pipe. Pipeline Des Install ASCE 148–159

  • Turner RE, Rabalais NN (2003) Linking landscape and water quality in the Mississippi River Basin for 200 years. Bioscience 53(6):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA NRCS (USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service) (2014) Conservation practice standard irrigation reservoir code 447, February 2014. USDA NRCS, Washington. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1046883.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • USDA NRCS (USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service) (2016) Conservation practice standard irrigation reservoir code 436, February 2016. USDA NRCS, Washington. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1046883.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Guidance for quality assurance project plans. USEPA, Washington. http://www.epa.gov/QUALITY/qs-docs/g5-final.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2011) Great lakes. USEPA, Washington. https://www.epa.gov/nutrient-policy-data/great-lakes. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2016) National summary of impaired water and TMDL information. USEPA, Washington. https://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_nation_cy.control?p_report_type=T. Accessed 7 June 2018

  • Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology: lake and river ecosystems, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Brady DC, Boynton WR, Ball WP (2015) Long-term trends of nutrients and sediment from the Nontidal Chesapeake Watershed: an assessment of progress by river and season. J Am Water Resour Assoc 51(6):1534–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Delta Farmers Advocating Resource Management, Mississippi State’s Research and Education to Advance Conservation and Habitat program, and Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. The authors thank the producers and landowners who allowed TWR system access. The authors thank Paul Rodrigue (USDA NRCS, Grenada, MS) and Trinity Long (USDA NRCS, Indianola, MS) for their help and sharing their extensive knowledge of TWR systems. The authors thank Joby Prince Czarnecki (Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS) for her support in preparing this manuscript. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Austin R. Omer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omer, A.R., Baker, B.H. Water quality improvements from implementation of tailwater recovery systems. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 5, 703–713 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0249-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0249-1

Keywords

Navigation