Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Informed Consent, Confidentiality, and Practitioner Disclosure in Therapeutic Work with Youth: A Systematic Review of Practitioners’ Perspectives

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Adolescent Research Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mental health practitioners provide therapeutic interventions to youth on a daily basis, yet sparse research exists to inform ethical decision-making. It is commonly understood that therapeutic work with youth is ethically complex especially when considering informed consent and confidentiality, both of which have practical limitations. This review synthesized literature which reported practitioners’ perspectives (e.g., psychologists, social workers) on ethical decision-making about informed consent and confidentiality in therapeutic work with youth. Specifically, this review aimed to amalgamate relevant professional perspectives on work with youth who may be considered “Mature Minors” or “Gillick Competent,” indications of capacity to consent to intervention. Included studies (n = 25) largely originated in North America (40%), suggesting an underrepresentation of culturally diverse practitioners and help-seeking youth in available literature. Most studies concentrated on confidentiality (72%) and few considered decision-making related to informed consent. Adolescent risk-behavior and related potential for harm were prevalent factors in practitioners’ decision-making. This review demonstrates that practitioners endorse disparate decision-making factors and are limited in consensus to breach confidentiality. As such, practitioners demonstrate variance in approach to working with this developmentally vulnerable population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that some studies used two main measures.

References

An asterisk * denotes inclusion in the systematic review

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to acknowledge the assistance of the subject librarians at Monash University for their contribution to the search strategy in this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RT participated in conception of the study, developed its design, screened all articles and drafted the manuscript; ZM participated in the conception of the study, participated in the design, screened a percentage of articles, participated in interpretation of the data, and completed multiple reviews of the manuscript; NG participated in the conception of the study, the study design, and interpretation of results, and completed reviews of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachelle E. Thannhauser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Preregistration

The study design was preregistered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO, 2021) and can be accessed with the following link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=244815.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Search terms used in PsycInfo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thannhauser, R.E., Morris, Z.A. & Gamble, N. Informed Consent, Confidentiality, and Practitioner Disclosure in Therapeutic Work with Youth: A Systematic Review of Practitioners’ Perspectives. Adolescent Res Rev 7, 355–382 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00173-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00173-2

Keywords

Navigation