Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three-dimensional numerical modeling of single geocell-reinforced sand

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarizes the development of a three-dimensional numerical model for analyzing single geocell-reinforced soil. In this model, the infill soil was modeled using the Duncan-Chang model, which can simulate non-linearity and stress-dependency of soil. Geocell was modeled using linearly elastic plate elements, which can carry both bending and membrane stresses. A linear interface stress-strain relationship with a Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion was adopted to model the interface friction between the geocell wall and the soil. By modeling the geocell and the soil separately, the interaction between the soil and the geocell can be accurately simulated. To verify this model, a plate load test was conducted in the laboratory, in which a 12-cm-thick sand layer reinforced by a single geocell was subjected to a vertical load from a circular steel plate. The load-displacement curves and the horizontal tensile strain of the geocell were recorded during the test. A numerical model was created according to the setup of the load test. The numerical results compared reasonably well with the test data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Webster S. Investigation of Beach Sand Trafficability Enhancement Using Sand-Grid Confinement and Membrane Reinforcement Concepts. Technical Report GL-79-20, 1979

  2. Dash S K, Krishnaswamy N R, Rajagopal K. Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2001, 19(4): 235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dash S K, Sireesh S, Sitharam T G. Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2003, 21(4): 197–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dash S K, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy N R. Performance of different geosynthetic reinforcement materials in sand foundations. Geosynthetics International, 2004, 11(1): 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thallak S G, Saride S, Dash S K. Performance of surface footing on geocell-reinforced soft clay beds. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2007, 25: 509–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen R H, Chiu Y M. Model tests of geocell retaining structures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2008, 26(1): 56–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pokharel S K, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons R L, Halahmi I. Behavior of geocell-reinforced granular bases under static and repeated loads. In: International Foundation Congress & Equipment Expo 2009- IFCEE’ 09. Orlando: Geotechnical Special Publication No. 187, 2009, 409–416

  8. Pokharel S K, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons R L, Halahmi I. Experimental evaluation of influence factors for single geocellreinforced sand. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting. Washington D C: Transportation Research Board, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sireesh S, Sitharam T G, Dash S K. Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell-sand mattress overlying clay bed with void. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(2): 89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cowland J W. Performance of a road embankment on soft clay supported on a geocell mattress fondation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1993, 12(8): 687–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Qadi I L, Hughes J J. Field evaluation of geocell use in flexible pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2000, 1709: 26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bathurst R J, Karpurapu R. Large-Scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1993, 16(3): 296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henkel D J, Gilbert G D. The effect of the rubber membrane on the measured triaxial compression strength of clay samples. Geotechnique, 1952, 3(1): 20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Madhavi Latha G. Investigations on the behaviour of geocell supported embankments. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Chenai: Indian Institute of Technology Madras, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duncan J M, Chang C Y. Non-linear analysis of the stress and strain in soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1970, 96(5): 1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  16. Madhavi Latha G, Rajagopal K. Parametric finite element analyses of geocell-supported embankment. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2007, 44(8): 917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Madhavi Latha G, Dash S K, Rajagopal K. Numerical simulation of the behavior of geocell reinforced sand in foundations. International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, 2009, 9(4): 143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han J, Yang X, Leshchinsky D, Parsons R L, Rosen A. Numerical analysis for mechanisms of a geocell-reinforced base under a vertical load. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics. Shanghai, 2008

  19. Han J, Yang X, Leshchinsky D, Parsons R L. Behavior of geocellreinforced sand under a vertical load. Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2008, n2045: 95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Duncan J M, Byrne P, Wong K S, Mabry P. Strength, stress-strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element analyses of stresses and movements in soil masses. UCB/GT/80-01, University of California, Berkeley CA

  21. Boscardin M D, Selig E T, Lin R S, Yang G R. Hyperbolic parameters for compacted soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1990, 116(1): 88–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ling H I, Cardany C P, Sun L X. Finite element study of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete-block facing. Geosynthetics International, 2000, 7(3): 163–188

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wesseloo J, Visser A T, Rust E. A mathematical model for the strain-rate dependent stress-strain response of HDPE geomembranes. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2004, 22(4): 273–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Itasca Consulting Group Inc. Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensional (Flac3D) Software Manual, 2006

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, the University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 55045, USA

    Xiaoming Yang, Jie Han & Robert L. Parsons

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19719, USA

    Dov Leshchinsky

Authors
  1. Xiaoming Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert L. Parsons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dov Leshchinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, X., Han, J., Parsons, R.L. et al. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of single geocell-reinforced sand. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 4, 233–240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0020-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0020-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation