Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How supply and demand shocks affect productivity and unemployment growth: evidence from OECD countries

  • Published:
Economia Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we highlight the joint dynamic behavior of three key variables in labor market. Precisely, by means of a structural VAR we employ labor productivity, real wage and unemployment to identify the structural shocks affecting their pattern, in the long and short-run. We will label them as technology, markup and aggregate demand shocks, respectively. The impulse responses of each variable to shocks provide the measure of their (relative) elasticity in explaining the behavior of labor market in six OECD countries, namely Italy, France, Spain, Germany, UK and USA. We find that: (1) the conditional correlations between productivity and real wage are positive for both supply and demand shocks, (2) the impulse responses show a persistent increase of both productivity and real wage to supply shocks, (3) the level of unemployment shows a persistent decrease when hit by a positive demand shock. The main result of our analysis is that Keynesian policies can have permanent effect on the labor market equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following the literature (i.e. in Fischer 1977; Blanchard and Quah 1989; Enders 2014; Calcagnini et al. 2016) we use a structural VAR in discrete time to test our theoretical model. This is a standard procedure. The empirical analysis in continuous time is left for future research (for example, Federici et al. 2012).

  2. Ball et al. (1999) shows that monetary and fiscal can have long-run effects on the level of unemployment.

References

  • Ball, L., Mankiw, N. G., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1999). Aggregate demand and long-run unemployment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1999, 189–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmaseda, M., Dolado, J. J., & López-Salido, J. D. (2000). The dynamic effects of shocks to labour markets: Evidence from OECD countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 52, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Galí, J. (2007). Real wage rigidities and the new Keynesian model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(s1), 35–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Giavazzi, F. (2003). Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 879–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J., & Johnson, D. R. (2013). Macroeconomics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J., Nordhaus, W. D., & Phelps, E. S. (1997). The medium run. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 89–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J., & Quah, D. (1989). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. The American Economic Review, 79, 655–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J., & Summers, L. H. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. In S. Fischer (Ed.), NBER macroeconomics annual 1986 (Vol. 1, pp. 15–90). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcagnini, G., Giombini, G., & Travaglini, G. (2016). Modelling energy intensity, pollution per capita and productivity in Italy: A structural VAR approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1482–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcagnini, G., Giombini, G., & Travaglini, G. (2017). A Schumpeterian model of investment and innovation with labor market regulation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcagnini, G., & Travaglini, G. (2014). A time series analysis of labor productivity. Italy versus the European countries and the US. Economic Modelling, 36, 622–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida, R., & Gali, J. (1994). Sources of real exchange-rate fluctuations: How important are nominal shocks? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 41, 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daveri, F., Jona-Lasinio, C., & Zollino, F. (2005). Italy’s decline: Getting the facts right. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 64, 365–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1992). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. NBER Technical Working Papers 0130, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W. (2014). Applied econometric time series (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, D., Saltari, E., Clifford, R. W., & Giannetti, M. (2012). Technological adoption with imperfect markets in the Italian economy. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 16(2), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. (1977). Long-term contracts, rational expectations, and the optimal money supply rule. Journal of Political Economy, 85(1), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1996). Introduction to statistical time series. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali, J. (1999). Technology, employment, and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations? American Economic Review, 89(1), 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamber, E. N., & Joutz, F. L. (1993). An application of estimating structural vector autoregression models with long-run restrictions. Journal of Macroeconomics, 15(4), 723–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetti, L., & Pistoresi, L. (2004). Policy matters. The long run effects of aggregate demand and markup shocks on the Italian unemployment rate. Empirical Economics, 29(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giersch, H. (1985). Eurosclerosis. No. 112. Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge.

  • Gordon, R. J. (1995). Is there a tradeoff between unemployment and productivity growth?. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lastrapes, W. D. (2002). Real wages and aggregate demand shocks: Contradictory evidence from VARs. Journal of Economics and Business, 54(4), 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, D. J., & Nucci, F. (2001). Unobserved factor utilization, technology shocks and business cycles. No. 392. Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

  • Saltari, E., & Travaglini, G. (2009). The productivity slowdown puzzle. Technological and non-technological shocks in the labor market. International Economic Journal, 23(4), 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltari, E., Travaglini, G., Wymer, C. R. (2010). Investment, productivity and employment in the Italian economy. The Economics of Imperfect Markets (Physica-Verlag HD), 7, 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Travaglini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Travaglini, G., Bellocchi, A. How supply and demand shocks affect productivity and unemployment growth: evidence from OECD countries. Econ Polit 35, 955–979 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-018-0127-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-018-0127-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation