Abstract
This study sought to understand developmental heterogeneity in dual systems model imbalance. Furthermore, the study sought to examine relevance of imbalanced development for understanding behavioral outcomes. The Pathways to Desistance data were used in analyses. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to estimate heterogeneity in dual systems imbalance development. Mixed effects modeling was used to estimate the effects of imbalance on outcomes of interest. Findings indicated that a three-group developmental model of imbalance best fit the data. Assignment to the group characterized by consistently high sensation-seeking and consistently low impulse control was associated with increased risk for reporting engagement in all outcomes of interest (general offending, violent offending, heavy episodic drinking, marijuana use). Imbalance in dual systems development characterized by high levels of sensation-seeking and low impulse control predicts an increased risk for deviant behavioral outcomes. Problematic imbalanced development should be identified so as to mitigate the risk for behavioral issues during adolescence and emerging adulthood.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Only measures from waves 2–11 were used in analyses because sensation-seeking was only measured at these waves.
This impulse control measure was provided as-is by the Pathways to Desistance research team in the available data. While there were some concerns about this reverse-coding turning a measure of “impulsivity” into a non-analogous measure of “impulse control,” the original scoring guide and the Pathways to Desistance research team describe this measure as a measure of impulse control and the reverse coding only appears to have been done in order to facilitate scores corresponding with higher and lower impulse control in a logical manner.
Heavy episodic drinking was defined as having five or more drinks in a single sitting.
Because of the stability and apparently high negative correlation between sensation-seeking and impulse control that was apparent in the trajectory models and accompanying plots of mean trajectories of these outcomes, it was necessary to ensure that there was divergent validity for these variables. However, it was not possible to disentangle the individual items comprising these variables in order to conduct factor analysis due to data limitations. As such, correlation analyses were conducted to determine any potential conceptual overlap with these constructs. Obtained r correlation coefficients ranged from − .4806 to − .5749 for the 10 sets of measures used in analyses. So, correlation between the coefficients was moderate during each observation period, but not perfectly correlated. Correlation like this is to be expected considering the related nature of these constructs, but does not seem likely to explain the near perfect relationships observed in the trajectory models and accompanying figures.
Several other antisocial behavior were examined as outcomes in sensitivity analyses in order to ensure that effects were not limited to the four outcomes examined in the main analyses. Binary indicators for the following behaviors were examined as outcomes: ecstasy/MDMA use, cocaine/crack use, stimulant use, drunk/high driving, and opioid use. In all cases, results analogous to those observed in the main analyses were obtained. All four variables used in the main analyses were also examined as frequency variables in these sensitivity analyses modeled using mixed effects negative binomial regression (general offending and violent offending) and mixed effects ordered logistic regression (marijuana use and binge drinking). Again, results analogous to those from the main analyses were observed. Finally, variety measures for general offending, violent offending, and drug use were estimated using mixed effects negative binomial regression and results analogous to the main findings were observed. Results from these sensitivity analyses provide indication of the robustness of the main findings.
Baseline variables were used for gender, race, and SES since this was the only wave at which they were measured. Measures of age, proportion of time spent in secured facilities, and observation period length at the final wave of data were used in analyses because concurrent measurement with the outcome of interest was deemed to be most appropriate for these variables.
Code and data are available for the main and sensitivity analyses for all interested researchers. These files were uploaded to the Open Science Framework repository under the project name that is the same as the title of this manuscript or at the link available here: https://osf.io/k2xn8/.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association.
Andershed, H., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Levander, S. (2002). Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: A new assessment tool. In E. Blauuw & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Psychopaths: Current International Perspectives (pp. 131–158). Elsevier.
Armstrong, T. A., Boisvert, D., Wells, J., & Lewis, R. (2020). Extending Steinberg’s adolescent model of risk taking to the explanation of crime and delinquency: Are impulsivity and sensation seeking enough? Personality and Individual Differences, 165, 110133.
Baglivio, M. T., Epps, N., Swartz, K., Huq, M. S., Sheer, A., & Hardt, N. S. (2014). The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in the lives of juvenile offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(2), 1–17.
Barbas, H., & Zikopoulos, B. (2007). The prefrontal cortex and flexible behavior. The Neuroscientist, 13(5), 532–545.
Beardslee, J., Miltimore, S., Fine, A., Frick, P. J., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2019). Under the radar or under arrest: How is adolescent boys’ first contact with the juvenile justice system related to future offending and arrests? Law and Human Behavior, 43(4), 342.
Blumstein, A., & Nakamura, K. (2009). Redemption in the presence of widespread criminal background checks. Criminology, 47(2), 327–359.
Brady, S. S., & Donenberg, G. R. (2006). Mechanisms linking violence exposure to health risk behavior in adolescence: Motivation to cope and sensation seeking. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(6), 673–680.
Brewerton, T. D., Cotton, B. D., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2018). Sensation seeking, binge-type eating disorders, victimization, and PTSD in the National Women’s Study. Eating Behaviors, 30, 120–124.
Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28(1), 62–77.
Cihan, A., Sorensen, J., & Chism, K. A. (2017). Analyzing the offending activity of inmates: Trajectories of offense seriousness, escalation, and de-escalation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 50, 12–18.
Davis, J. P., Dumas, T. M., Berey, B. L., Merrin, G. J., Cimpian, J. R., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Effect of victimization on impulse control and binge drinking among serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(7), 1515–1532.
Dvorak, R. D., Simons, J. S., & Wray, T. B. (2011). Alcohol use and problem severity: Associations with dual systems of self-control. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(4), 678–684.
Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Kosterman, R. (2003). Comparing delinquency careers in court records and self-reports. Criminology, 41(3), 933–958.
Farrington, D. P., & Painter, K. A. (2004). Gender differences in offending: Implications for risk-focused prevention. Home Office.
Forrest, W., Hay, C., Widdowson, A. O., & Rocque, M. (2019). Development of impulsivity and risk-seeking: Implications for the dimensionality and stability of self-control. Criminology, 57(3), 512–543.
Fox, B. H., Perez, N., Cass, E., Baglivio, M. T., & Epps, N. (2015). Trauma changes everything: Examining the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders. Child Abuse & Neglect, 46, 163–173.
Gopnik, A. (2012). What’s wrong with the teenage mind? The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 28, 2012 from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970203806504577181351486558984
Hollingshead, A. B. (1957). Two factor index of social position. Mimeo. Yale University.
Holmes, A., & Wellman, C. L. (2009). Stress-induced prefrontal reorganization and executive dysfunction in rodents. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(6), 773–783.
Imas, A., Kuhn, M. A., & Mironova, V. (2018). Exposure to violence predicts impulsivity in time preference: Evidence from The Democratic Republic of Congo (pp. 1–19).
Kerig, P. K. (2017). Self-destructive behavior. In C. Schreck (Ed.), Encyclopedia of juvenile delinquency and justice (pp. 1–5). Wiley-Blackwell.
Kerig, P. K. (2019). Linking childhood trauma exposure to adolescent justice involvement: The concept of posttraumatic risk-seeking. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 26(3), e12280.
Luna, B., & Wright, C. (2016). Adolescent brain development: Implications for the juvenile criminal justice system. In K. Heilbrun, D. DeMatteo, & N. E. S. Goldstein (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 91–116). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14643-005
McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1), 33–44.
Meeus, W., Vollebergh, W., Branje, S., Crocetti, E., Ormel, J., van de Schoot, R., Crone, E. A., & Becht, A. (2021). On imbalance of impulse control and sensation seeking and adolescent risk: An intra-individual developmental test of the dual systems and maturational imbalance models. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(5), 827–840.
Meisel, S. N., Fosco, W. D., Hawk, L. W., & Colder, C. R. (2019). Mind the gap: A review and recommendations for statistically evaluating dual systems models of adolescent risk behavior. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 39, 100681.
Missikpode, C., Peek-Asa, C., McGehee, D. V., & Wallace, R. (2019). Classifying and predicting risky driving among novice drivers: A group-based trajectory approach. Journal of Safety Research, 68, 215–222.
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674.
Moody, R. L., Starks, T. J., Grov, C., & Parsons, J. T. (2018). Internalized homophobia and drug use in a national cohort of gay and bisexual men: Examining depression, sexual anxiety, and gay community attachment as mediating factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1133–1144.
Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, L., ... & Losoya, S. H. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 213–236.
Murray, A. L., Zhu, X., Mirman, J. H., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2021). An evaluation of dual systems theories of adolescent delinquency in a normative longitudinal cohort study of youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50, 1293–1307
Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press.
Nagin, D. S., & Odgers, C. L. (2010). Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 109–138.
Natsuaki, M. N., Ge, X., & Wenk, E. (2008). Continuity and changes in the developmental trajectories of criminal career: Examining the roles of timing of first arrest and high school graduation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(4), 431–444.
Nofziger, S., & Kurtz, D. (2005). Violent lives: A lifestyle model linking exposure to violence to juvenile violent offending. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(1), 3–26.
Noll, J. G., & Grych, J. H. (2011). Read-react-respond: An integrative model for understanding sexual revictimization. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023962
Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. Crime and Justice, 30, 359–506.
Piquero, A. R. (2015). Understanding race/ethnicity differences in offending across the life course: Gaps and opportunities. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(1), 21–32.
Pynoos, R. S., Steinberg, A. M., Layne, C. M., Briggs, E. C., Ostrowski, S. A., & Fairbank, J. A. (2009). DSM-V PTSD diagnostic criteria for children and adolescents: A developmental perspective and recommendations. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(5), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20450
Reitzel, J. D. (2019). Socioeconomic status and offending. In Bernat, F. P., Frailing, K., Gelsthorpe, L., Kethinini, S., & Pasko, L. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime (pp. 1–2).
Selner-Ohagan, M., Kindlon, D., Buka, S., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1998). Assessing exposure to violence in urban youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(2), 215–224.
Sharkey, P. T., Tirado-Strayer, N., Papachristos, A. V., & Raver, C. C. (2012). The effect of local violence on children’s attention and impulse control. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2287–2293.
Spencer-Smith, M., & Anderson, V. (2009). Healthy and abnormal development of the prefrontal cortex. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12(5), 279–297.
Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764.
Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216–224.
Sussman, T. J., Santaella-Tenorio, J., Duarte, C. S., Wall, M. M., Ramos-Olazagasti, M., Suglia, S. F., Canino, G., Bird, H., & Martins, S. S. (2022). Do trajectories of sensation seeking vary by sex and child maltreatment subtypes? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37, 5–6.
Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.
Vazsonyi, A. T., & Ksinan, A. J. (2017). Understanding deviance through the dual systems model: Converging evidence for criminology and developmental sciences. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 58–64.
Vohs, K. D., & Piquero, A. R. (2021). Self-control at 220 miles per hour: Steering and braking to achieve optimal outcomes during adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 351–357.
Walters, G. D. (2020). Hostility and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the violent victimization–violent offending relationship: Affect before cognition? Criminal Justice Studies, 33(4), 316–336.
Wasserman, A. M., Crockett, L. J., & Hoffman, L. (2017). Reward seeking and cognitive control: Using the dual systems model to predict adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(4), 907–913.
Weinberger, D. A., Feldman, S. S., Ford, M. E., & Chastain, R. L. (1987). Construct validity of the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory. Unpublished manuscript.
Weiss, J. (2002). Control-mastery theory. In M. Hersen & W. Sledge (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychotherapy (Vol. 1, pp. 545–549). Academic Press.
Wojciechowski, T. W. (2018). The development of deviant peer association across the life-course and its relevance for predicting offending in early adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(1), 73–91.
Wojciechowski, T. (2020a). Relevance of routine activities for understanding the impact of the dual systems model on binge drinking among college students. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 216, 108233.
Wojciechowski, T. (2020b). The relevance of the dual systems model of self-control for age-related deceleration in offending variety among juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 70, 101716.
Wojciechowski, T. (2021). Understanding how cumulative victimization predicts future victimization risk: Relevance of cognitive versus social mediation. Criminal Justice Review, 07340168211015725.
Wojciechowski, T. W. (2022a). The influence of deviant peer association on dual systems model development: The protective role of resistance to peer influence. Applied Developmental Science, 1–16.
Wojciechowski, T.W. (2022b). PTSD as a predictor of differential development of dual systems model constructs: A group-based trajectory modeling approach. Criminal Justice Review.
Wolfe, D. A., & Wekerle, C. (1997). Pathways to violence in teen dating relationships. In D. Cicchetti & S. L. Toth (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on trauma: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 315–342). University of Rochester Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wojciechowski, T. Understanding Differential Development of Imbalance as Predictive of Risk for Behavioral Outcomes Among Justice-Involved Youth. J Dev Life Course Criminology 9, 93–120 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-022-00217-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-022-00217-8