Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impacts of Pollution for New High-Speed Railways: the Case of Noise in Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acoustics Australia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, high-speed train operations have been increasing, yet their environmental impact is still not well researched and understood. Evaluation of the impacts of Turkey’s new high-speed train lines from the perspectives of noise, vibration and socio-economic issues is important to secure sustainable development in the sector. National and international regulations are important to enable environmentally friendly railway systems to be secured. In this study, national and international regulations for the control of noise from conventional and high-speed train operations are reviewed and used to estimate distances which should not be exceeded for the Turkish high-speed train system. Calculated distances for EU and Turkish systems for noise threshold values of 87 dB (A) pass-by noise (LpAeq,Tp—measured 25 m distance from the centreline of the track and 3.5 m above the rail head), 65, 60 and 55 dB (A) (LpAeq, day; LpAeq, evening and LpAeq, night, the A-weighted average sound level for the specified time periods, at the most affected residential area, 4 ± 0.2 m above the ground) were 28, 160, 272 and 469 m from the centreline of the track, respectively. These threshold distances were defined as a buffer zone in a railway map of Turkey in ArcGIS v.10.2.1 and merged with the Turkey population map to determine the population numbers which would be subjected to exposure above the threshold limits. Calculations conducted for highly populated cities showed that 2325, 22,839 and 3184 people would be exposed to railway noise exceeding the EU 96/48/EC Directive threshold limit 87 dB (A) for Ankara, İstanbul and İzmir, respectively. When calculations were repeated for the Turkey regulation threshold limits 65, 60 and 55 dB (A), these numbers were 10,767, 19,298, 35,951 for Ankara; 125,033, 210,360, 357,041 for İstanbul and 17,340, 29,026, 49,318 for İzmir, respectively. The data indicate that some noise mitigation is required to protect human health in Turkey and potential mitigation strategies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guizhen, H., Arthur, P.J.M., Lei, Z., Yonglong, L.: Environmental risks of high-speed railway in China: Public participation, perception and trust. Environ. Dev. 14, 37–52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. International Union of Railways (UIC): UIC Railway Noise in Europe, A 2010 report on the state of the art. 16 rue Jean Ray, Paris, France. www.uic.org/download.php/516E.pdf (2010). Accessed 18 June 2015

  3. TCDD Annual Statistics 2010–2014: Turkish State Railways Research Planning and Coordination Department, Statistics Office. http://www.tcdd.gov.tr/files/istatistik/20102014yillik.pdf (2015). Accessed 12 July 2015

  4. International Union of Railways (UIC): UIC high speed rail. www.uic.org/download.php/publication/521E.pdf (2010). Accessed 18 June 2015

  5. International Union of Railways (UIC): UIC high speed rail. http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/2015_uic_highspeed_brochure_web.pdf (2015). Accessed 18 June 2015

  6. Xiaoan, G.: Railway environmental noise control in China. J. Sound Vib. 293, 1078–1085 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Givoni, M.: Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: a review. Transp. Rev. 26, 593–611 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640600589319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. High Speed Two (HS2): Noise, environment. HS2 Limited P2C29 noise. http://assets.hs2.org.uk/sites/default/files/consultation_library/pdf/P2C29_Noise.pdf (2013). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  9. EEA Report: Noise in Europe 2014. No: 10/2014. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/noise-in-europe-2014 (2014). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  10. Di, G., Zheng, Y.: Effects of high-speed railway noise on the synaptic ultrastructure and phosphorylated-CaMKII expression in the central nervous system of SD rats. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 35, 93–99 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2012.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frid, A., Leth, S., Hogstrom, C., Farm, J.: Noise control design of railway vehicles–Impact of new legislation. J. Sound Vib. 293, 910–920 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, H.H., Li, J.C.: Field acoustic measurements of high-speed train sound along BTIR. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 56–2, 474–482 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ban, Y., Miyamoto, T.: Noise control of high-speed railways. J. Sound Vib. 43(2), 273–280 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(75)90326-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raghunathan, R.S., Kim, H.D., Setoguchi, T.: Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38, 469–514 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00029-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Quiet City Transport Noise Map: EU Sixth Framework Programme. Noise maps after integrating action plan measures. http://www.qcity.org/downloads/SP1/D1-03_AKR_48M.pdf (2009). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  16. Oertli, J.: Cost benefit analysis in railway noise control. J. Sound Vib. 231, 505–509 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oertli, J.: Developing noise control strategies for entire railway networks. J. Sound Vib. 293, 1086–1090 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elmenhorst, E.M., Pennig, S., Rolny, V., Quehl, J., Mueller, U., Maaß, H., Basner, M.: Examining nocturnal railway noise and aircraft noise in the field: Sleep, psychomotor performance, and annoyance. Sci. Total Environ. 42, 48–56 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Havlick, D.G.: No Place Distant: Roads and Motorized Recreation on America’s Public Lands. Island Press, Washington D.C. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (WHO): Protection of the human environment occupational noise. environmental burden of disease series, No. 9 (2004)

  21. Existing directives relating to noise sources: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/sources.htm (2015). Accessed 25 June 2015

  22. Council Directive 96/48/EC.: Interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31996L0048 (1996). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  23. Council Directive 2002/732/EC.: Technical Specification for Interoperability (TSI) relating to high speed railway infrastructures. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:245:0143:0279:EN:PDF (2002). Accessed 12 December 2018

  24. Council Directive 2002/735/EC.: Technical Specification for Interoperability (TSI) relating to the rolling stock subsystem. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32002D0735 (2002). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  25. Council Directive 2008/232/EC.: Commission Decision of 21 February 2008 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling stock sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system (notified under document number C (2008) 648) (Text with EEA relevance) 4.2.6.5.1–4.2.6.5.4. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2008.084.01.0132.01.ENG (2008). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  26. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı: Çevresel Gürültünün Değerlendirilmesi ve Yönetimi Yönetmeliği. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2010/06/20100604-5.htm (2010). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  27. Parizet, E., Hamzaoui, N., Jacquemoud, J.: Noise assessment in a high-speed train. Appl. Acoust. 63, 1109–1124 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00017-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moritoh, Y., Zenda, Y., Nagakura, K.: Noise control of high speed Shinkansen. J. Sound Vib. 193(1), 319–334 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Quiet City Transport Noise Map: EU Sixth Framework Programme. Noise maps and analyses of existing situations for selected European cities. http://www.qcity.org/downloads/SP1/D1-01_ACL_12M.pdf (2006). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  30. Ju, S.H., Lin, H.T.: Experimentally investigating finite element accuracy for ground vibrations induced by high-speed trains. Eng. Struct. 30, 733–746 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rau, J., Wooten, D.: Environmental Impact Analysis Handbook. McGrawHill, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  32. TCDD CAF YHT Maintenance Manual: Chapter TBS 01-00 (General), 1. Ed. Turkey (2008)

  33. Turkey population and demography: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist (2014). Accessed 12 July 2017

  34. CIESIN: Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University; United Nations Food and Agriculture Programme (FAO); and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). 2005. Gridded Population of the World: Future Estimates (GPWFE). Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw (2005). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  35. Diva GIS: GIS files. http://www.diva-gis.org/gdata (2011). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  36. MapcruzinGIS: GIS files. http://www.mapcruzin.com/free-turkey-arcgis-maps-shapefiles.htm (1996). Accessed 12 Dec 2018

  37. Stairrs Final Technical Report: Strategies and tools to assess and implement noise reducing measures for railway systems. http://www.transport-research.info/Upload/Documents/201003/20100310_134523_78957_Final%20Report%20V10_2_.pdf (2002). Accessed 25 July 2015

  38. Oertli, J., Elbers, F. Stap, P. V. D.: The STAIRRS Project: A cost-benefit analysis of different measures to reduce railway noise on a European scale. The 2001 International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering (ICENCE). The Hague, Netherlands, 27–30 August. (2001)

  39. Maffei, L., Masullo, M., Aletta, F., Gabriele, M.D.: The influence of visual characteristics of barriers on railway noise perception. Sci. Total Environ. 445–446, 41–47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thompson, D.J., Jones, C.J.C., Waters, T.P., Farrington, D.: A tuned damping device for reducing noise from railway track. Appl. Acoust. 68, 43–57 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) because this work includes population data of Turkey provided by CIESIN.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, 06010, Kecioren, Ankara, Turkey

    Yasin Sarikavak

  2. Railway Research and Technology Centre, Turkish State Railways, 06105, Ankara, Turkey

    Yasin Sarikavak

  3. Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Heslington,York, YO105NG, UK

    Alistair Boxall

Authors
  1. Yasin Sarikavak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alistair Boxall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasin Sarikavak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarikavak, Y., Boxall, A. The Impacts of Pollution for New High-Speed Railways: the Case of Noise in Turkey. Acoust Aust 47, 141–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-019-00154-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-019-00154-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation